URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Ancient World
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3688--------------------------------------------------
       Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: guest5 Date: January 26, 2021, 7:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9M5wyH4kNZE
       #Post#: 3695--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 26, 2021, 10:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OLD CONTENT
       Islamic Rennaissance?
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_Golden_Age
       ---
       Firstly, the term "Renaissance" etymologically implies revival
       after a lapse. The appearance of the Jamia (which has yet to
       occur) could be accurately called an Islamic Renaissance. The
       study of Greek classics in Islamic countries cannot accurately
       be termed an Islamic Renaissance.
       Secondly, even the term "Islamic Golden Age" is Eurocentric, and
       this article explains why:
       medium.com/the-maple-leaf-ummah/the-islamic-golden-age-the-bigge
       st-hoax-in-history-a2beaa8b10cc
       [quote]Isn’t it an inspiring story? Once upon a time, the
       magical world of flying carpets and Bangal tigers and bedouin
       was experiencing something similar (but inferior) to the acme of
       all human thought: the Enlightenment.
       Hard to imagine now, I know, but a long time ago the Arabs and
       Persians (and whatever else sort-of exists in those unknowable
       places) were acting almost civilized, almost European. So nearly
       European, in fact, that we can just go ahead and say they were
       fully European, and give them their own age.
       As long as they stay there.
       Yes, I’m talking about the Islamic Golden Age, that beautiful
       work of Orientalist fiction that is used to explain away the
       existence of a brief moment of civilization outside of the
       European sphere of influence.
       Why Do I have such disdain for this epithet, you ask? What is an
       epithet, you ask? Let me tell you.
       The Eye of the Beholder
       First off, an epithet is a name that someone gives something to
       describe it, and that is the key here. The ‘Golden Age’ of Islam
       was not a name given to this undefined period by Muslims, nor
       Arabs, nor Persians. It was a name bestowed upon those people by
       Europeans, and it refers to something painfully obvious and
       insulting to those people.
       The Golden Age of Islam is commonly understood to have started
       with the establishment of Baghdad, especially with the
       establishment of the House of Wisdom there, and/or various other
       universities around the same time. The Golden Age then continues
       until the destruction of Baghdad by the Mongols, or variously
       until some other event that a historian deems significant enough
       to condemn two whole continents back to barbarism.
       Most tellingly, the Golden Age can most easily be defined as the
       period of Islamic history that lead most directly to the
       European Renaissance.
       Furthermore, Golden Age Scholars like Avicenna are widely
       recognized as having contributed to the fields of science,
       whereas regular old philosophers such as Bukhari, Abu Hanifa or
       al-Qazwini are largely or completely ignored for no reason other
       than that their bodies of research were never appropriated by
       the ‘founders’ of everything good and correct in the world:
       European thought.
       ...
       So to sum things up: So long as the scholars were working toward
       a future prosperity in Europe, they were in the Golden Age. As
       soon as they stopped, they needed to be destroyed for their
       immorality.[/quote]
       I largely agree. Muslims themselves generally consider the best
       time in Islamic history (excluding when the Jamia will appear)
       to be the time when Mohammed himself was still alive, known as
       the Time of the Companions:
       en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Companions_of_the_Prophet
       If any time deserves to be called an "Islamic Golden Age", it
       should be that time, not the much later era chosen by
       Eurocentrists.
       #Post#: 3703--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: guest5 Date: January 27, 2021, 12:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Fascinating. Had not even thought of that.
       #Post#: 7789--------------------------------------------------
       Early Muslim Expansion - Arab Conquest of Iran and Egypt
       By: guest55 Date: July 30, 2021, 10:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Early Muslim Expansion - Arab Conquest of Iran and Egypt
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=baHT2nR5Wr4&list=TLPQMzEwNzIwMjG5xTTgkOalBQ&index=7
       #Post#: 18296--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: antihellenistic Date: March 7, 2023, 8:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ibn Rusyd, the Contributor to the Rise of Western Civilization
       and Horror of Aristotelianism, or Can be Called as Colonial Era
       [quote]According to Ibrahim Madkour, as quoted by Fuad Mahbub
       Siraj (2012: 91), there are several reasons that raise Western
       attention to Ibn Rushd's thoughts.
       1. Frederick II as a lover of science and philosophy, as well as
       the founder of the University of Naples, was very interested in
       Ibn Rushd's comments on Aristotle. He asked Ibn Rushd's comments
       on Aristotle's thoughts to be translated into Latin, which were
       then widely spread in Europe.
       2. The Jews, adherents of Ibn Rushd's philosophy, attempted to
       translate Ibn Rushd's works into Hebrew and Latin. Then they
       acted as intermediaries between Ibn Rushd philosophy and Western
       (Christian) philosophy
       3. Some philosophical researchers think that to understand
       Aristotle's philosophy, it is best to read the works of Ibn
       Rushd. Therefore, retranslating Ibn Rushd's works in the 16th is
       aimed at understanding Aristotle better than Ibn Rushd himself.
       Ibn Rushd has a very large contribution to the development of
       philosophy and medicine in Europe. Some experts have even dubbed
       Ibn Rushd as the most superior representative of Arabic
       philosophy and the prince of science, because of his enormous
       influence on Europe in the Middle Ages and succeeded in planting
       the seeds of revival in Europe. Ibn Rushd's rational thoughts
       entered Europe via Spain which was seen as a bridge crossing
       Arab-Islamic culture to the West. His works were translated from
       Arabic into Hebrew by Jacob Anatoli, and from Hebrew into Latin
       by Jacob Mantino and Abraham de Balmes. Other works were
       translated directly from Arabic into Latin by Michael Scott
       (Fuad Mahbub Siraj, 2012: 92).
       Ernest Renan, Isrel Welfens, and Oliver Leaman noted that Ibn
       Rushd's philosophy was influential among the Jews through the
       role of a Jewish philosopher named Moses Maimonides (Musa bin
       Maimun). For medieval Jewish scholars, Ibn Rushd was almost
       equal to Aristotle, because without Ibn Rushd, the best
       commentator on Aristotle, the Jews would not have known
       Aristotle.[/quote]
       History of Islamic and Western World Thought by Ajat Sudrajat
       page 238
       #Post#: 18297--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 7, 2023, 8:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/debate-with-the-liberals/msg15024/#msg15024
       [quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristotle#On_medieval_Judaism
       [quote]Moses Maimonides (considered to be the foremost
       intellectual figure of medieval Judaism)[178] adopted
       Aristotelianism from the Islamic scholars and based his Guide
       for the Perplexed on it and that became the basis of Jewish
       scholastic philosophy. Maimonides also considered Aristotle to
       be the greatest philosopher that ever lived, and styled him as
       the "chief of the philosophers".[179][180][181] Also, in his
       letter to Samuel ibn Tibbon, Maimonides observes that there is
       no need for Samuel to study the writings of philosophers who
       preceded Aristotle because the works of the latter are
       "sufficient by themselves and [superior] to all that were
       written before them. His intellect, Aristotle's is the extreme
       limit of human intellect, apart from him upon whom the divine
       emanation has flowed forth to such an extent that they reach the
       level of prophecy, there being no level
       higher".[182][/quote][/quote]
       #Post#: 18348--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: antihellenistic Date: March 10, 2023, 3:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Famous Islamic Scholars and Philosophers during Caliphate
       Era were close to Westerners ideologically, not Islamic
       [quote]... this philosophical thought began to be seen clearly,
       especially during the reign of the Abbasids. Interest in Greek
       thought began with the desire of Muslims at that time to study
       medicine or the Greek model of medicine, from that encounter it
       was then continued in other sciences, including philosophy.
       Attention to philosophy increased during the reign of Caliph
       Al-Makmun (813-833 AD), son of Harun al-Rashid. In his time,
       many scientists were sent to the Byzantine Empire to look for
       manuscripts which were then brought to Baghdad to be translated
       into Arabic. For the purposes of translation, al-Makmun founded
       Bait al-Hikmah in Baghdad. This institution was led by a
       Christian from Hirah named Hunain ibn Ishaq. He had been to
       Greece and studied Greek. Apart from mastering Arabic and Greek,
       Hunain also mastered Siriak (Siryani), which at that time was
       one of the scientific languages. The works translated into
       Arabic are Aristotle, [color=black]Plato, and books on
       neo-Platonism.[/color][/quote]
       History of Islamic and Western World Thought by Ajat Sudrajat
       page 55 and 56
       [quote]Among the Muslim philosophers who have big names include:
       1. Al-Kindi (801-866 AD)
       The name Al-Kindi is the nisbat for the tribe from which he
       originated, namely Banu Indah. Banu Kindah is a tribe of Kindah
       descent which has long occupied the southern region of the
       Arabian Peninsula. Al-Kindi's full name is Abu Yusuf Ya'qub ibn
       Ishaq Ash-Shabbah ibn 'Imran ibn Ismail ibn Al-Asy'ats ibn Qays
       Al-Kindi. He was born in Kufa in 185 AH (801 AD). His father,
       Ishaq Ash-Shabbah, was governor of Kufa during the reign of
       Al-Mahdi and Harun al-Rashid from Bani Abbas. His father died a
       few years after Al-Kindi was born. Because he was the only
       Muslim philosopher of Arab descent, Al-Kindi was known as
       Failasuf Al-'Arab.
       Al-Kindi's name rose after living in the palace during the reign
       of Al-Mu'tashim who replaced Al-Makmun in 218 H. (833 AD),
       because he was trusted to be the personal teacher of
       Al-Mu'tashim's son, namely Ahmad ibn Al -Mu'tasim. It was at
       this time that Al-Kindi had the opportunity to write his works,
       after during Al-Ma'mun's time he had translated Greek books into
       Arabic. As a philosopher who pioneered the meeting of Greek
       religion and philosophy, Al-Kindi received many challenges from
       religious experts. He was accused of belittling and fooling
       scholars who did not know Greek philosophy. Many slanders were
       accused of Al-Kindi, especially during the reign of
       Al-Mutawakkil. Finally Al-Kindi stepped aside from the palace's
       political turmoil and died in 292 H (866 AD) (Azhar Basyir,
       1993:80-81)
       ...
       2. Al-Farabi (872-950 AD)
       Another great philosopher in Islam is Abu Nasr Muhammad ibn
       Muhammad ibn Tarkhan ibn Uzlagh al-Farabi. Al-Farabi was the son
       of a warlord from the Samani Dynasty (874-999 AD) who ruled in
       Transoxania and Persia. The name al-Farabi comes from the name
       of the place where he was born, namely Farab, Transaxonia ; was
       born in 872 AD, and is of Turkic descent.
       As a youth he went to Baghdad, the center of science and
       philosophy, and he studied philosophy, logic, mathematics,
       metaphysics, ethics, political science, music, and other things.
       Al-Farabi had been a student of Bisyr ibn Yunus, one of the
       translators who assisted Hunain ibn Ishaq at Bait al-Hikmah.
       From Baghdad then he moved to Aleppo and lived in the Palace of
       Saif Al-Daulah of the Hamdani dynasty that ruled Syria. It was
       in this palace that he developed a lot of his thoughts, because
       this palace was a place for scientists to gather and meet. Among
       Muslim philosophers, al-Farabi is known as al-Mu'alim al-Tsani
       (Second Teacher); while the First Teacher (al-Mu'alim
       al-al-Awwal) was Aristotle.[/quote]
       History of Islamic and Western World Thought by Ajat Sudrajat
       page 60
       How can the Islamic scholars in the past consider Greek western
       worldview as "philosophy" while not considering Mohammad's
       teachings philosophy too? Even they consider Aristotle were
       their main teacher?
       #Post#: 18414--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: antihellenistic Date: March 14, 2023, 10:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ibnu Khaldun Reviving Western's Capitalism, Aristotelian's
       Empiricism and Climate-Racialism. He also Pave the Way to the
       Rise of Communist Ideology
       [quote]Ibn Khaldun, a [s]Muslim[/s] philosopher in the 14th
       century, stated that by nature humans need something to eat.
       This is needed to equip himself in all circumstances and stages
       of his life from the first period of his growth to his old age.
       This statement is complemented by quotations from a number of
       verses contained in the Qur'an, including in surah al-Jatsiyah
       (45): 13 which states: "And He has subjected to you all that is
       in the heavens and on earth, (as a mercy) from Him” (Ibn
       Khaldun, 1986: 447).
       Departing from the verse he quoted above, Ibn Khaldun argues
       that humans are given the power by God to exploit everything
       that exists on earth and this sky. Humans have a part of
       everything that exists in this world. Furthermore, emphasized by
       Ibn Khaldun, once someone has owned an item, then other people
       cannot take that item but he must give something of equal value
       in return. Therefore, when people have earned income, then to
       obtain other needs and interests of life can be done by
       exchanging, in economic language it is called bartering or
       buying and selling (Ibn Khaldun, 1986: 448)[/quote]
       The problem is, if the trade based on equal power all the time,
       there will be no socialism. That's capitalistic way of economy
       by nature
       History of Islamic and Western World Thought by Ajat Sudrajat
       page 197 to 198
       [quote]Ibn Khaldun's intellectual contribution to the
       development of Western thought traditions is also very
       significant. Through the monumental work Muqaddimah, Ibn Khaldun
       has contributed scientific methodology in the form of empirical
       theoretical studies in the field of social sciences. It is this
       [s]Muslim[/s] scholar who should be recognized as the pioneer of
       empirical sociological studies, not Augustus Comte. In his
       methodology, Ibn Khaldun places great emphasis on empirical
       data, theoretical verification, hypothesis testing, and
       observational methods, all of which are basic principles in
       Western scientific research and the world in general.
       According to Graundy, Ibn Khaldun has shown the influence of
       climate, geography and economic conditions on the lives of
       nations. Studying the structure and function of society starts
       from the division of labor, the role of social solidarity
       (ashobiyah) in the formation of the state and the destruction of
       power and proves that differences in the way of seeking life
       will affect the customs and thoughts of nations. Ibn Khaldun has
       also provided a theoretical formulation regarding the
       understanding of historical materialism that has been developed
       by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels.[/quote]
       History of Islamic and Western World Thought by Ajat Sudrajat
       page 240 to 241
       This case on Ibn Khaldun's contribution above is
       self-explanatory
       Islamic [s]Golden Age[/s] Eurocentrism and Self-Destruction
       #Post#: 18434--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 15, 2023, 2:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "That's capitalistic way of economy by nature"
       No, capitalism is about making money from the money you already
       have.
       [quote]once someone has owned an item, then other people cannot
       take that item but he must give something of equal value in
       return. Therefore, when people have earned income, then to
       obtain other needs and interests of life can be done by
       exchanging, in economic language it is called bartering or
       buying and selling[/quote]
       It would only be capitalism if "earned income" includes income
       from capital investments. So long as "earned income" is all
       income from labour, it is not capitalism, as no one will become
       richer than their total quantity of labour.
       #Post#: 18636--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islamic Golden Age - Philosophy and Humanities
       By: IbnHaytham Date: March 28, 2023, 3:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Dark Origins of the Scientific Method
       [quote]500 years before the Scientific Revolution, the
       mathematician Al-Hassan Ibn al-Haytham spent hours in a dark
       room studying the light that filtered in. Not only did he
       revolutionize how we literally see the world, he pioneered the
       scientific method that is now the backbone of modern
       science.[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5cPzNmtoZDU
       Comments:
       [quote]Ibn haytham famous quote "The duty of the man who
       investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth
       is his goal, is to make himself an enemy of all that he reads,
       and ... attack it from every side. He should also suspect
       himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that
       he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency."[/quote]
       [quote]I learned all of this back in 5th and 6th grade science
       class. Except change the scientist from Al-Haytham to the more
       Anglo, Newton. Thank you US education![/quote]
       [quote]I've been spreading that peice of knowledge for years and
       little did scientists know of or acknowledge it. Very pleased
       with this video, keep up the good work 👌[/quote]
       [quote]Excellent video! All those people deserve recognition and
       credit. Something to think about...the scientific method is
       actually "built in" to nature. Without the ability to
       detect/observe, make and remember a choice, and then later learn
       from a bad choice or repeat a good or better choice, nothing
       could propagate itself. Plants, animals  and early humans have
       been doing these things since they started to exist (and yes,
       plants do "behave" by avoiding things that are harmful to them
       and being attracted to things that are good for their survival,
       like growing towards sunlight). The earliest humans had to
       observe what they were hunting, test different techniques,
       abandon those that didn't work and perfect those that did.
       [s]Same thing a pack of wolves had to do to survive.[/s] Nature
       is "running experiments" all the time. In that sense, the
       "scientific method" is as old as nature itself. Thanks for the
       great video![/quote]
       Wolves are scavengers. Both plants and wolves teach human-beings
       that you do not need to murder other beings in-order to survive
       nature's "running experiment"...
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page