DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 6936--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: June 5, 2021, 3:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Dazhbog link ---
>
> Are you implying that Hitler should have simply looked the
other way while Poland was slaughtering its German, Ukrainian,
Belarusian and Lithuanian minorities, as well as training
Zionist paramilitaries?
>
--- End Quote ---
I wasn't implying anything. I'm just saying that Hitler was
goaded into using military force against Poland as a result of
failed negotiations (which he was planning to do anyway) by the
Zionist cabal so they could have an excuse to wage war on him.
#Post#: 7819--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: Zea_mays
Date: July 31, 2021, 10:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
This is post-WWII, but you've probably heard about all kinds of
wacky Nazi plans to sink the entire Netherlands, or Himmler
trying to colonize the USSR with a bunch of Nordicist
neo-feudalist fiefdoms, or any other kinds of crazy things. I
think due to post-war propaganda, we'll never really know if
most of these things were always considered to be far too
impractical to ever leave the drawing board, or whether they
were actually semi-serious.
But here's a barbaric plan that was serious and quite frankly
dwarfs any 'evil plans' that WWII Germany allegedly had. During
the Korean war, General Douglas MacArthur (the highest-ranking
General in the US Army and commander of the US forces in the
Korean war) wanted to drop 30-50 atomic bombs on the border of
North Korea in order to stop Chinese reinforcements. Think about
that. 50 atomic bombs in the small Korean peninsula. By 1950,
the Soviets had their own nuclear weapons, and MacArthur was
also so antagonistic toward China that many believed he would
lead to a full-on WWIII with them. For these reasons, General
MacArthur was removed from his command in Korea.
How many times have we heard about the "audacity" of NS Germany
using scorched earth tactics on the Eastern front, on the
frontlines of a total war situation? Meanwhile, MacArthur wanted
to turn parts of China and Korea into nuclear wastelands which
would remain impenetrable for over an entire lifetime.
--- Quote ---
> At a press conference on 30 November 1950, Truman was asked
about the use of nuclear weapons:
>
> Q. Mr. President, I wonder if we could retrace that reference
to the atom bomb? Did we understand you clearly that the use of
the atomic bomb is under active consideration?
> Truman: Always has been. It is one of our weapons.
> Q. Does that mean, Mr. President, use against military
objectives, or civilian—
> Truman: It's a matter that the military people will have to
decide. I'm not a military authority that passes on those
things.
> Q. Mr. President, perhaps it would be better if we are allowed
to quote your remarks on that directly?
> Truman: I don't think—I don't think that is necessary.
> Q. Mr. President, you said this depends on United Nations
action. Does that mean that we wouldn't use the atomic bomb
except on a United Nations authorization?
> Truman: No, it doesn't mean that at all. The action against
Communist China depends on the action of the United Nations. The
military commander in the field will have charge of the use of
the weapons, as he always has.[88]
>
> The implication was that the authority to use atomic weapons
now rested in the hands of MacArthur.[89][90] Truman's White
House issued a clarification, noting that "only the President
can authorize the use of the atom bomb, and no such
authorization has been given," yet the comment still caused a
domestic and international stir.[88]
> [...]
> On 9 December 1950, MacArthur requested field commander's
discretion to employ nuclear weapons; he testified that such an
employment would only be used to prevent an ultimate fallback,
not to recover the situation in Korea.[92] On 24 December 1950,
MacArthur submitted a list of "retardation targets" in Korea,
Manchuria and other parts of China, for which 34 atomic bombs
would be required.[92][93][94][95] In June 1950, Louis Johnson
released a study on the potential uses of radioactive agents.
According to Major General Courtney Whitney, MacArthur
considered the possibility of using radioactive wastes to seal
off North Korea in December 1950, but he never submitted this to
the Joint Chiefs. After his dismissal, Senator Albert Gore Sr.
put a similar proposal to Truman.[96]
> [...]
> In early April 1951, the Joint Chiefs became alarmed by the
build up of Soviet forces in the Far East, particularly bombers
and submarines.[98] On 5 April 1951, they drafted orders for
MacArthur authorizing attacks on Manchuria and the Shantung
Peninsula if the Chinese launched airstrikes against his forces
originating from there.[99] The next day Truman met with the
chairman of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Gordon
Dean,[91] and arranged for the transfer of nine Mark 4 nuclear
bombs to military control.[100]
> [...]
> In interview with Jim G. Lucas and Bob Considine on 25 January
1954, posthumously published in 1964, MacArthur said,
>
> Of all the campaigns of my life, 20 major ones to be exact,
[Korea was] the one I felt most sure of was the one I was
deprived of waging. I could have won the war in Korea in a
maximum of 10 days.... I would have dropped between 30 and 50
atomic bombs on his air bases and other depots strung across the
neck of Manchuria.... It was my plan as our amphibious forces
moved south to spread behind us—from the Sea of Japan to the
Yellow Sea—a belt of radioactive cobalt. It could have been
spread from wagons, carts, trucks and planes.... For at least 60
years there could have been no land invasion of Korea from the
north. The enemy could not have marched across that radiated
belt."[110]
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relief_of_Douglas_MacArthur#Nuclear_weapons
Oh, and another thing:
--- Quote ---
> There were numerous atrocities and massacres of civilians
throughout the Korean War committed by both sides, starting in
the war's first days. On 28 June, North Korean troops committed
the Seoul National University Hospital massacre.[393] On the
same day, South Korean President Syngman Rhee ordered the Bodo
League massacre,[150][394][395] beginning mass killings of
suspected leftist sympathizers and their families by South
Korean officials and right-wing groups.[396][397] Estimates of
those killed during the Bodo League massacre range from at least
60,000–110,000 (Kim Dong-choon) to 200,000 (Park
Myung-lim).[398] The British protested to their allies about
later South Korean mass executions and saved some
citizens.[396][397]
>
> In 2005–2010, a South Korean Truth and Reconciliation
Commission investigated atrocities and other human rights
violations through much of the 20th century, from the Japanese
colonial period through the Korean War and beyond. It excavated
some mass graves from the Bodo League massacres and confirmed
the general outlines of those political executions. Of the
Korean War-era massacres the commission was petitioned to
investigate, 82% were perpetrated by South Korean forces, with
18% perpetrated by North Korean forces.[399][400][398]
> [...]
> In the most notorious U.S. massacre, investigated separately,
not by the commission, American troops killed an estimated
250–300 refugees, mostly women and children, at No Gun Ri in
central South Korea (26–29 July 1950).[401][402] U.S.
commanders, fearing enemy infiltrators among refugee columns,
had adopted a policy of stopping civilian groups approaching
U.S. lines, including by gunfire.[403] After years of rejecting
survivors’ accounts, the U.S. Army investigated and in 2001
acknowledged the No Gun Ri killings, but claimed they were not
ordered and "not a deliberate killing".[404]:x South Korean
officials, after a parallel investigation, said they believed
there were orders to shoot. The survivors’ representatives
denounced what they described as a U.S. "whitewash".[405][406]
> [...]
> In December 1950, the South Korean National Defense Corps was
founded; the soldiers were 406,000 drafted citizens.[436] In the
winter of 1951, 50,000[437][438] to 90,000[439][440] South
Korean National Defense Corps soldiers starved to death while
marching southward under the PVA offensive when their commanding
officers embezzled funds earmarked for their
food.[437][439][441][442] This event is called the National
Defense Corps Incident.[437][439] There is no evidence that
Syngman Rhee was personally involved in or benefited from the
corruption.[443]
> [...]
> Throughout the Korean War, "comfort stations" were operated by
South Korean officials for UN soldiers.[445]
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War#War_crimes
If you changed the names to make it seem like it happened at the
hands of Germany or Japan in WWII, no one would have batted an
eye. But since it happened by a different nation in a different
war, it's never in regular history books. If the point of the
history books was to simply teach certain actions and principles
were bad in a sincere and unbiased manner, there wouldn't be
such an extreme double standard focusing on the (alleged)
actions of a single regime during a single time period, while
ignoring all the comparable (and often worse) things that
happened at the hands of other regimes (in more recent time
periods!).
#Post#: 7822--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: Zea_mays
Date: July 31, 2021, 11:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The present-day historiography of the capital-h 'Holocaust' as a
sacred thing everyone needed to talk about seems to have started
in the late 1970s:
HTML https://images.newrepublic.com/f4f636791aa06ac92655e25b31892047d96073bc.png
This image is from the Google Ngram Viewer, which analyzes how
frequently words have been used in digitized books, etc., and
was produced for the article below.
--- Quote ---
> In the course of reporting "A Liberator, But Never Free,"
about the recent discovery of the late Dr. David Wilsey’s
letters home from the liberation of the Dachau concentration
camp, one intriguing semantic anomaly transfixed every expert
consulted: the Spokane anesthesiologist’s persistent use of the
word “holocaust” to describe the horrors all around him.
> [...]
> Yet for decades after the war, the genocide lacked any formal
title in English except, perhaps, “The Final Solution,” the term
the Nazis used. In Hebrew, the calamity quickly became known as
“Shoah,” which means “the catastrophe.” But it wasn’t until the
1960s that scholars and writers began using the term
“Holocaust,” and it took the 1978 TV film Holocaust, starring
Meryl Streep, to push it into widespread use.
> [...]
> Allied governments, Donahue said, downplayed the extent of the
peril to Jews in their rally-the-homefront propaganda materials,
for fear that many non-Jews wouldn’t be willing to fight and die
for what was still a marginalized religious minority regarded
suspiciously even in the U.S. Wilsey himself reflected those
attitudes in a letter on April 4, 1945, in which he complains
about a Jewish anesthesiologist he was forced to bunk with. “
Dear, medicine is so full of them, so usurped by them, so
progressively becoming ruled by them — that we white men just
must not do all we can to help them.” A paragraph later, in
fact, he blames his Jewish colleague’s “Prussianism”—his Eastern
European background—for “exactly what has caused 3 holocaustic
wars.”
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://newrepublic.com/article/121807/when-holocaust-became-holocaust
Lol, the person who first used the term "holocaust" to describe
the events of WWII blamed Jewish attitudes for causing WWII!
That tidbit will certainly not be printed in history textbooks.
Nor will things such as the diary entries of people like General
Patton (who complained about the attitudes of Jewish journalists
who were covering the US military occupation in Germany).
There's countless famous quotations claiming victors write
history. But the real power is the fact that the victors are the
ones who get to teach history and shape the "official" narrative
of what we accept as reality. Even if they don't outright make
anything up, they pick and choose which pieces of information to
include and which to selectively exclude, to shape what we think
is important and what we will remain ignorant to. When it comes
to facts of dubious accuracy, well, the vast majority of people
don't care about facts and rational argumentation (and, even if
they did, there is too much information in existence for every
person to possibly process). The vast majority don't care about
history either--it's just a subject they are forced to take in
school and don't pay any attention to. They only care about the
peer pressure to adhere to "accepted" narratives and the taboo
against acknowledging unpopular narratives as potentially
legitimate.
However, what narratives are "accepted" can rapidly change, yet
we are rarely aware of these changes in paradigm. We often just
think what we had been taught is how the narrative has always
been taught. Again, this is much more powerful than simply
writing down history after it happens. What has been written
will always be there--the truth, the lies, and the half
truths--but which pieces are ignored and which are included in
the narrative of history can always change. Who knows, 100 years
from now the manner in which WWII is taught could completely
change, and no one alive then would even realize how the war is
taught today!
To give another example of changing narratives of history, over
the past few decades there's been a lot of revisionism trying to
rehabilitate the legacy of Genghis Khan, apparently in a
misguided (or intentionally misleading) attempt to be "woke".
--- Quote ---
> Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World (2004) is a
history book written by Jack Weatherford, Dewitt Wallace
Professor of Anthropology at Macalester College. It is a
narrative of the rise and influence of Genghis Khan and his
successors, and their influence on European civilization.
Weatherford provides a different slant on Genghis Khan than has
been typical in most Western accounts, attributing positive
cultural effects to his rule.
>
> In the last section, he reviews the historiography of Genghis
Khan in the West and argues that the leader's early portrayal in
writings as an "excellent, noble king" changed to that of a
brutal pagan during the Age of Enlightenment.
> [...]
> The book suggests that the western depiction of the Mongols as
savages who destroyed civilization was due to the Mongols'
approach to dealing with the competing leadership classes. The
Mongols practiced killing the ruling classes in order to subdue
the general population, a technique used by other cultures as
well. Survivors of the upper classes wrote the histories and
expressed resentment of Mongol brutality toward them.
Weatherford explores the Mongol treatment of the general
population (peasants, tradesmen, merchants) under Mongol rule.
He suggests their rule was less burdensome than that of European
nobility due to lighter taxes, tolerance of local customs and
religions, more rational administration, and universal education
for boys.
>
> These benefits were enjoyed only by populations who
surrendered immediately to the Mongol invaders. Those
populations that resisted could be massacred as a warning to
other towns/cities. These massacres were a method of
psychological warfare to alert those populations not yet
conquered. The resulting terror helped color the historical
portrayal of the Mongols.
> [...]
> Weatherford explores Genghis Khan's legacy and influence; he
attributes many aspects of the Renaissance, such as the spread
of paper and printing, the compass, gunpowder and musical
instruments such as the violin, to the influence of trade
enabled by Genghis Khan and the Mongol Empire. Weatherford
suggests that the European Renaissance was a rebirth, not of
Greece or Rome, but of concepts from the Mongol Empire. He notes
the following:
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan_and_the_Making_of_the_Modern_World
Yet:
--- Quote ---
> One estimate is that about 11% of the world's population was
killed either during or immediately after the Mongol invasions
(around 37.75 - 60 million people in Eurasia).[1] If the
calculations are accurate, the events would be the deadliest
acts of mass killings in human history.
>
> Oliver Chancellor conducted research and found that the Mongol
invasions induced population displacement "on a scale never seen
before", particularly in Central Asia and Eastern Europe, and
that "the impending arrival of the Mongol hordes spread terror
and panic".[2]
> [...]
> The reputation of guaranteed genocide on those who fought them
allowed the Mongols to hold vast territories long after their
main force had moved on. Even if the tumens (tyumens) were
hundreds or thousands of miles away, the conquered people would
usually not dare to interfere with the token Mongol occupying
force since they feared a likely Mongol return.
> [...]
> As Mongol conquests spread, that form of psychological warfare
proved effective at suppressing resistance to Mongol rule. There
were tales of lone Mongol soldiers riding into surrendered
villages and executing peasants at random as a test of loyalty.
It was widely known that a single act of resistance would bring
the entire Mongol army onto a town to obliterate its occupants.
> [...]
> Genghis Khan was largely tolerant of multiple religions, but
there are many cases of him and other Mongols engaging in
religious war even if the populations were obedient. He passed a
decree charging all Taoist followers to pay more taxes. All
campaigns involved deliberately destroying places of worship.[6]
>
> Ancient sources described Genghis Khan's conquests as
wholesale destruction on an unprecedented scale in certain
geographical regions, causing great demographic changes in Asia.
According to the works of the Iranian historian Rashid al-Din
(1247–1318), the Mongols killed more than 700,000 people in Merv
and more than 1,000,000 in Nishapur. The total population of
Persia may have dropped from 2,500,000 to 250,000 as a result of
mass extermination and famine. Population exchanges also
sometimes occurred.[7]
> [...]
> The Mongols practised biological warfare by catapulting
diseased cadavers into the cities they besieged. It is believed
that fleas remaining on the bodies of the cadavers may have
acted as vectors to spread the Black Death.
> [...]
> For example, there is a noticeable lack of Chinese literature
from the Jin dynasty, predating the Mongol conquest, and in the
Siege of Baghdad (1258), libraries, books, literature, and
hospitals were burned: some of the books were thrown into the
river in quantities sufficient to turn the Tigris black with ink
for several months".[17][18] [19][20]; as well as "In one week,
libraries and their treasures that had been accumulated over
hundreds of years were burned or otherwise destroyed. So many
books were thrown into the Tigris River, according to one
writer, that they formed a bridge that would support a man on
horseback" [21]
>
> The Mongols' destruction of the irrigation systems of Iran and
Iraq turned back millennia of effort in building irrigation and
drainage infrastructure in these regions. The loss of available
food as a result may have led to the death of more people from
starvation in this area than the actual battle did.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire
How many times have you seen people repeat the narrative about
Genghis Khan actually being "progressive" for his time and not
that bad? (Even a series as "woke" as Assassin's Creed pushes
this narrative of Genghis Khan!) Simply reading a few paragraphs
of the Wikipedia article above could have corrected their
beliefs. But they didn't bother, since narratives (i.e.
propaganda) are more powerful and compelling than facts alone.
And, of course, don't get us started on discussing communist
apologists who don't even try to downplay the carnage and
oppression of communist regimes, and are still able to embrace
communism and cling on to the tiniest examples of how communism
is supposedly positive! But it is somehow too taboo to examine
any of the positives of the National Socialist regime, solely
because they allegedly killed....tens of millions fewer people
than the Soviets or Mongols...? I guess it's because the
communists and Weatherford's narrative of Genghis Khan don't
fundamentally challenge Western Civilization, and therefore such
narratives are allowed to exist within the Overton Window.
--------
And, just for fun, if you like to read deeply into things:
From the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica:
--- Quote ---
> HOLOCAUST (Gr.
ὁλοκαυστον,
or ὁλόκαυτον,
wholly burnt), strictly a sacrifice wholly destroyed by fire,
such as the sacrifices of the Jews, described in the Pentateuch
as “whole burnt offerings”
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.gutenberg.org/files/39232/39232-h/39232-h.htm#ar175
From Webster's Dictionary, 1913:
--- Quote ---
> HOLOCAUST
> 1. A burnt sacrifice; an offering, the whole of which was
consumed by fire, among the Jews and some pagan nations. Milton.
>
> 2. Sacrifice or loss of many lives, as by the burning of a
theater or a ship.
>
> Note: [An extended use not authorized by careful writers.]
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> SCAPEGOAT
> 1. (Jewish Antiq.)
>
> Defn: A goat upon whose head were symbolically placed the sins
of the people, after which he was suffered to escape into the
wilderness. Lev. xvi. 10.
>
> 2. Hence, a person or thing that is made to bear blame for
others. Tennyson.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/29765
So Zionist historians/propagandists scapegoated the Jews as the
biggest victims of WWII, who were then capital-H holocausted...
And Yahweh certainly rewarded them for their offering.
#Post#: 7824--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 31, 2021, 11:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I actually find this narrative somewhat plausible:
--- Quote ---
> Weatherford explores Genghis Khan's legacy and influence; he
attributes many aspects of the Renaissance, such as the spread
of paper and printing, the compass, gunpowder and musical
instruments such as the violin, to the influence of trade
enabled by Genghis Khan and the Mongol Empire. Weatherford
suggests that the European Renaissance was a rebirth, not of
Greece or Rome, but of concepts from the Mongol Empire. He notes
the following:
--- End Quote ---
I merely happen to consider the Renaissance to be the worst
event in all of history, therefore acknowledging Genghis Khan's
role in it just makes him an even more evil villain in my mind.
The problem with False Leftists is that (being progressives)
they think the Renaissance was a positive event to begin with.
True Leftists can work with anyone who hates the Renaissance, no
matter whom they blame for it. True Leftists cannot work with
anyone who likes the Renaissance, no matter whom they credit for
it.
#Post#: 7986--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 10, 2021, 1:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If you ask neo-Nazis about what Hitler disliked about Poland,
they will claim basically that Hitler considered Poland too
ghetto. Of course they do not have a clue what they are talking
about. Here are some videos of pre-WWII Poland:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biBCosaZ_0w
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0hlKsZdnhI
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7o0SP4zK4
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjps5GHWEgE
What you see in these videos is what Hitler actually disliked
about Poland. As a matter of fact, it was only after Hitler got
the Luftwaffe to bomb the above into dust:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi_crimes_against_the_Polish_nation#1939_September_Campaign
--- Quote ---
> Over 100,000 Poles died in the Luftwaffe's terror bombing
operations, like those at Wieluń.[27] Massive air raids
were conducted on towns which had no military
infrastructure.[28] The town of Frampol, near Lublin, was
heavily bombed on 13 September as a test subject for Luftwaffe
bombing technique; chosen because of its grid street plan and an
easily recognisable central town-hall. Frampol was hit by 70
tonnes of munitions,[29] which destroyed up to 90% of buildings
and killed half of its inhabitants.[30] Columns of fleeing
refugees were systematically attacked by the German fighter and
dive-bomber aircraft.[31]
>
>
HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/18/Frampol_bombing.jpg
>
> Amongst the Polish cities and towns bombed at the beginning of
war were: Brodnica,[32] Bydgoszcz,[32] Chełm,[32]
Ciechanów,[32] Częstochowa,[33][34] Grodno,[34]
Grudziądz,[34] Gdynia,[32] Janów,[32] Jasło,[32]
Katowice,[34] Kielce,[34] Kowel,[34] Kraków,[32][33] Kutno,[32]
Lublin,[32] Lwów,[34] Olkusz,[32] Piotrków,[35] Płock,[32]
Płońsk,[34] Poznań,[33][34] Puck,[34] Radom,[32]
Radomsko,[34] Sulejów,[35] Warsaw,[33][34] Wieluń,[32]
Wilno, and Zamość.[32] Over 156 towns and villages
were attacked by the Luftwaffe.[36] Warsaw suffered particularly
severely with a combination of aerial bombardment and artillery
fire reducing large parts of the historic centre to rubble,[37]
with more than 60,000 casualties.[24]
--- End Quote ---
that infrastructure was rebuilt post-WWII in the
Brutalist-influenced styles that neo-Nazis complain about as
being "ghetto".
#Post#: 8281--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: guest55
Date: August 24, 2021, 12:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hitler's Jewish Soldiers
--- Quote ---
> Many men who were partly of Jewish ancestry served in the
German armed forces during WW2 - find out how and why they ended
up in Hitler's army.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RRfCwrI--is
In other words, many people of Jewish blood wanted to be Germans
more than they wanted to be Jews. Many Germans rejected their
Jewish identity altogether.
Reminder:
Remarkable tale of Hitler's young Jewish friend
HTML https://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/976/cpsprodpb/BC0E/production/_104324184_207359e2-26ac-4e1b-b47b-400e4b1623ed.jpg
--- Quote ---
> At first glance, the picture of the man hugging the beaming
young girl appears to show a scene of great happiness.
--- End Quote ---
(Uhhhh, maybe because it does? LOL! WTF!?!?)
--- Quote ---
> But a closer look reveals a far darker tale: this is Adolf
Hitler, the man behind the murder of six million Jews, and the
little girl is Jewish.
> (Do Western historians really not realize how retarded
sentences like this read?)
>
> Despite this, Hitler would go on to build a friendship with
Rosa Bernile Nienau, which only ended when top Nazi officials
intervened five years later.
>
> And now this rare, signed image from 1933 is going up for
auction in the US.
>
> Alexander Historical Auctions, in Maryland, estimates the
picture, taken by photographer Heinrich Hoffmann, could fetch as
much as $10,000 (Ł7,500) when it goes on sale on Tuesday.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-46192941
A Westerner can tell you exactly how many Jews died during WWII,
but can they tell you how many Germans died? How many Russians
died? How many French died? etc.? But they absolutely positively
know how many Jews died right? Why is that? This fact alone
should make a normal person want to vomit.
#Post#: 10390--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: January 2, 2022, 10:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
New blog post:
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/white-supremacism-defeated-hitler/
#Post#: 10929--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: guest55
Date: January 31, 2022, 12:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
What the World Rejected: Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1939
--- Quote ---
> "Germany will be perfectly ready to disband her entire
military establishment and destroy the small amount of arms
remaining to her, if the neighboring countries will do the same
thing with equal thoroughness.
>
> ... Germany is entirely ready to renounce aggressive weapons
of every sort if the armed nations, on their part, will destroy
their aggressive weapons within a specified period, and if their
use is forbidden by an international convention.
>
> ... Germany is at all times prepared to renounce offensive
weapons if the rest of the world does the same. Germany is
prepared to agree to any solemn pact of non-aggression because
she does not think of attacking anybody but only of acquiring
security." — Adolf Hitler, May 17th, 1933
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/nothanks/wwr00.html
[img]
HTML https://fft-keymilitary.b-cdn.net/sites/militarykey/files/styles/article_body/public/imported/2020-03-24/img_105-2_10.jpg?itok=IWiT85Zz[/img]
HTML https://static.toiimg.com/imagenext/toiblogs/photo/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/article-2.jpg
#Post#: 10988--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: February 2, 2022, 2:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Where do we direct the people who claim Hitler hated 'black'
people and use quotes from Mein Kampf and his 1.18.27 speech in
Thuriginia?
#Post#: 10992--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: guest55
Date: February 2, 2022, 3:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: christianbethel link ---
>
> Where do we direct the people who claim Hitler hated 'black'
people and use quotes from Mein Kampf and his 1.18.27 speech in
Thuriginia?
--- End Quote ---
Would be a good place to start I suspect:
HTML https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/41D1asjyHdL._SX316_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
HTML https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1347770829l/11059697.jpg
HTML https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51cWcAb-eVL.jpg
HTML https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1408932416l/18794291.jpg
--- Quote ---
> Why is the Black Nazis book and thesis so controversial to so
many? Why have extremists on both the left and right attacked
the author's premise with such indignant ferocity? This concise
interview conducted by Ernest Young of Germany's Zuerst!
magazine of author Veronica Kuzniar answers these questions.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/18794291-the-controversy-of-black-nazis-ii
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 15
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page