DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28019--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: September 27, 2024, 3:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Queen Elizabeth (1900 - 2002) and King George VI (1895 - 1952)
inspect the bomb damage at Buckingham Palace in London, after an
air raid during the Blitz, 10th September 1940. (Image: (Photo
by Fox Photos/Hulton Archive/Getty Images))
HTML https://i2-prod.mylondon.news/incoming/article23452963.ece/ALTERNATES/s810/1_GettyImages-101687160.jpg
Source :
Royal Family: Incredible forgotten photos of Buckingham Palace
hit by a bomb with the Queen's mum and dad staring into a huge
crater
HTML https://www.mylondon.news/news/nostalgia/gallery/royal-family-incredible-forgotten-photos-23452915
#Post#: 28435--------------------------------------------------
Re: True Left breakthrough: anti-democracy
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 29, 2024, 7:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> "The recognition of the plurality of autonomous life would,
however, immediately lead back to a disastrous pluralism tearing
the German people apart into discrete classes and religious,
ethnic, social, and interest groups if it were not for a strong
state which guarantees a totality of political unity
transcending all diversity."
--- End Quote ---
Carl Schmitt, The Legal Basis of the Total State (1933)
--- Quote ---
> “Every actual democracy rests on the principle that not only
are equals equal, but unequals will not be treated equally.
Democracy requires, therefore, first homogeneity and second – if
the need arises – elimination or eradication of heterogeneity.”
--- End Quote ---
— Carl Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy
#Post#: 28464--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: November 1, 2024, 5:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: antihellenistic link ---
>
> Was Hitler Really Wanted Peace with Britain?
>
> The answer was Hitler not really wanted peace with Britain. He
wanted to invade her but the British airpowers defeated his both
airpowers and naval powers which made long time recover. British
used radar-technology to made her warplanes easily found the
Hitler's warplanes and shot them down. And their fighterplanes
attacked back with bombed the Hitler's ports, ships, and
headquarters which used for preparation to invade Britain on
French-occupied territory. And also Hitler's naval powers not
yet to match the Britain's naval power during that time which
made invasion of Britain harder during 1940. See this
information :
>
> Source : "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich: A History of
Nazi Germany, Arrow books 1991." by William L. Shirer
>
> Book can be read on this link/URL :
HTML https://archive.org/details/B-001-014-606/page/780/mode/2up
>
> Read only the sentences which given bold if you don't have
time to read all the quoted contents
>
> [quote]...fortunately for posterity and the truth, the
mountainous secret German military files leave no doubt that
Hitler’s plan to invade Britain in the early fall of 1940 was
deadly serious and that, though given to many hesitations,
the Nazi dictator seriously intended to carry it out if there
were any reasonable chance of success. Its ultimate fate was
settled not by any lack of determination or effort but by the
fortunes of war, which now, for the first time, began to turn
against him.
--- End Quote ---
(Page 762)
--- Quote ---
> ...the Naval War Staff had estimated that to fulfill the
demands of the Army for landing 100,000 men with equipment and
supplies in the first wave, along a 200-mile front from amsgate
to Lyme Bay, would necessitate rounding up 1,722 barges, 1,161
motorboats, 471 tugs and 155 transports. Even if it were
possible to assemble such a vast amount of shipping, Raeder told
Hitler on July 25, it would wreck the German economy, since
taking away so many barges and tugs would destroy the whole
inland-waterway transportation system, on which the economic
life of the country largely depended.16 At any rate, Raeder
made it clear, the protection of such an armada trying to supply
such a broad front against the certain attacks of the British
Navy and Air Force was beyond the powers of the German naval
forces.
--- End Quote ---
(page 766)
--- Quote ---
> British light naval forces bombarded the chief Channel
invasion ports, Ostend,Calais, Boulogne and Cherbourg, while the
R.A.F. sank eighty barges in Ostend Harbor. In Berlin that day
Hitler conferred with his service chiefs at lunch. He thought
the air war was going very well and declared that he had no
intention of running the risk of invasion.24 In fact, Jodl got
the impression from the Fuehrer’s remarks that he had
“apparently decided to abandon Sea Lion completely,” an
impression which was accurate for that day, as Hitler confirmed
the following day — when, however, he again changed his mind.
--- End Quote ---
(page 770)
...
--- Quote ---
> ...two hundred German bombers, escorted by three times
as many fighters, appeared over the Channel about midday,
headed for London. Fighter Command had watched the assembling of
the attackers on its radar screens and was ready. The Germans
were intercepted before they approached the capital, and
though some planes got through, many were dispersed and others
shot down before they could deliver their bomb load. Two hours
later an even stronger German formation returned and was routed.
Though the British claimed to have shot down 185
Luftwaffeplanes, the actual figure, as learned after the war
from the Berlin archives, was much lower — fifty-six, but
thirty-four of these were bombers. The R.A.F. lost only
twenty-six aircraft.
>
> ...
>
> The German Navy, crippled by the losses off Norway in the
early spring, was unable, as its chiefs admitted all along, to
provide the sea power for an invasion of Britain. Without this,
and without air supremacy, the German Army was helpless to move
across the narrow Channel waters. For the first time in the war
Hitler had been stopped, his plans of further conquest
frustrated, and just at the moment, as we have seen, when he was
certain that final victory had been achieved He had never
conceived — nor had anyone else up to that time — that a
decisive battle could be decided in the air. Nor perhaps did he
yet realize as the dark winter settled over Europe that a
handful of British fighter pilots, by thwarting his invasion,
had preserved England as a great base for the possible
reconquest of the Continent from the west at a later date. His
thoughts were perforce turning elsewhere; in fact, as we shall
see,had already turned
--- End Quote ---
(page 781 - 782)
What if Hitler's soldiers successfully invade Britain? See this
information below.
--- Quote ---
> The Nazi German occupation of Britain would not have
been a gentle affair. The captured German papers leave no
doubt of that. On September 9 Brauchitsch, the Commander
in Chief of the Army, signed a directive providing that
“the able-bodied male population between the ages of
seventeen and forty-five [in Britain] will, unless the
local situation calls for an exceptional ruling, be
interned and dispatched to the Continent.” Orders to this
effect were sent out a few days later by the
Quartermaster General, in OKH, to the Ninth and Sixteenth
armies, which were assembled for the invasion. In no
other conquered country, not even in Poland, had the
Germans begun with such a drastic step. Brauchitsch’s
instructions were headed “Orders Concerning the
Organization and Function of Military Government in
England” and went into considerable detail. They seem
designed to ensure the systematic plunder of the island
and the terrorization of its inhabitants. A special
“Military Economic Staff England” was set up on July 27
to achieve the first aim. Everything but normal household
stocks was to be confiscated at once. Hostages would be
taken. Anybody posting a placard the Germans didn’t like
would be liable to immediate execution, and a similar
penalty was provided for those who failed to turn in
firearms or radio sets within twenty four hours.
>
> Actually, already in August Heydrich had organized six
[color=red]Einsatzkommando for Britain which were to
operate from headquarters in London, Bristol, Birmingham,
Liverpool, Manchester and Edinburgh — or in Glasgow, if
the Forth Bridge was found blown up. They were to
carry out Nazi terror;[/color] to begin with, they were
to arrest all those on the “Special Search List, G.B.
[Great Britain],” which in May had been hurriedly and
care- lessly compiled by Walter Schellenberg, another one
of Himmler’s bright young university graduates, who was
then chief of Amt (Bureau) IV E— Counterespionage — of
R.S.H.A. Or so Schellenberg later claimed, though at this
time he was mainly occupied in Lisbon, Portugal, on a
bizarre mission to kidnap the Duke of Windsor.
--- End Quote ---
(Page 783)
...
--- Quote ---
> This Nazi Black Book actually formed a supplement to a
supposedly highly secret handbook called Informationsheft,
which Schellenberg also claims to have written, and whose
purpose seems to have been to aid the conquerors in
looting Britain and stamping out anti-German institutions
there. It is even more amusing than the Search List.
Among the dangerous institutions, besides the Masonic
lodges and Jewish organizations, which deserved “special
attention” by R.S.H.A., were the “public schools” (in
England, the private schools), the Church of England,
which was described as “a powerful tool of British
imperial politics,” and the Boy Scouts, which was put
down as “an excellent source of information for the
British Intelligence Service.” Its revered leader and
founder, Lord Baden Powell, was to be immediately
arrested.
--- End Quote ---
(Page 784)
Another information about how the British people will got
treated if Hitler succeed on invade Britain. See this
information below.
--- Quote ---
> The Nazis also had plans for the deportation and enslavement
of 50% of Britain's adult male population in the event of a
successful invasion.[26]
--- End Quote ---
Source :
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forced_labour_under_German_rule_during_World_War_II
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/8586d73bcb769f014964151c5c5ba7a8/865ca80cede2d0aa-eb/s1280x1920/c8435b856164cd78d183d89e431a3d2258c4b970.jpg
[/quote]
Authentic source on Hitler's Plan to Conquer Britain
Translated from German into English Language by Google Translate
--- Quote ---
> Working guidelines for the military administration in England.
>
> 1.) The use of all the country's resources for the purposes of
the fighting troops and for the needs of the German war economy
is the main task of the military administration.
>
> 2.) The provision of the country's auxiliary forces
presupposes that security and order prevail. Their maintenance
must therefore be ensured. Administrative measures should not
violate military law unless the enemy has given cause for
reprisals.
>
> 3.) Irregulars of both sexes must be dealt with in a legal
manner. If the population begins fighting after the town has
been completely conquered or in towns behind the fighting front,
the residents found in Kaspb are considered to be irregulars.
>
> Persons in whom the active enemy has a keen interest should be
taken as hostages.
>
> 4.) The military-age population between the ages of 17 and 45
is to be interned and deported to the mainland as soon as
possible, unless the local authorities deem an exception
necessary.
>
> 5.) The collection of taxes and other monetary charges is
prohibited for the commanders as well as for the troop leaders.
The right to take decisive measures is reserved for the
Commander-in-Chief of the Army and the departments expressly
authorized by him.
>
> 6.) The state laws that came into force before the occupation
continue to apply, provided they do not contradict the purpose
of the occupation.
>
> The state authorities may continue to work if they behave
loyally.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Unterlagen des Generalquartiermeisters im Generalstab des Heeres
beim OKH: Sammelmappe „Militärverwaltung England" - Befehle und
Weisungen über die Organisation und den Einsatz der
Militärverwaltung in England (1) (9. September 1940)
HTML https://wwii.germandocsinrussia.org/de/nodes/7336#page/1/mode/grid/zoom/1
#Post#: 28873--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: rp
Date: December 4, 2024, 11:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Its incredible that Rudolf Hess was the only authentic
(Hitlerist) NSDAP member that lived well into the late 20th
century:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9lM-aaCHJU
The Zionists knew this, and that he would potentially reveal
their lies about the Reich, which is why they locked him up and
probably had him killed.
#Post#: 28987--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: rp
Date: December 19, 2024, 8:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As the "Holocaust" narrative increasingly falls out of fashion
(which the Jews have anticipated), we will increasingly see a
more honest ZC narrative of WW2, that Hitler was still bad
because he was anti Western civilization and Jews are part of
Western civilization.
I even saw the "comedian" Owen Benjamin (Jew) say that the
"Holocaust" was fake but that there was indeed persecution of
Jews.
And yet some idiots in the Aryanism.net comments think talking
about Third Reich revisionism is still getting us somewhere...
#Post#: 29290--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: February 2, 2025, 8:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: guest78 link ---
>
> What the World Rejected: Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940
Paperback – Illustrated, October 26, 2016
> [quote]Written by Germany’s foremost diplomatic historian of
the early twentieth century, this work maps out all the numerous
times that Adolf Hitler made unconditional offers of peace to
all the nations of Europe—and how the major anti-German
belligerents, France and Britain, turned down these offers each
and every time.
>
> The author lists all of Hitler’s offers in detail, complete
with quotes, starting with his first offer of May 17, 1933, his
second offer of December 18, 1933, his third offer of May 21,
1935, his fourth offer of March 31, 1936, his fifth offer of
September 30, 1938, his sixth offer of December 6, 1938, his
seventh offer of late 1939 to Poland to settle the Danzig
Corridor issue peacefully, and finally, his offer of world peace
on October 6, 1939, just over a month after Britain and France
had declared war on Germany for invading Poland on September 1
(but not on the Soviet Union, which also invaded Poland on
September 17).
>
> This edition benefits from four new sections which did not
appear in the original publication. These are:
>
> – The full text of Hitler’s “Appeal for Peace and Sanity”
speech, made before the Reichstag on July 19, 1940, following
the fall of France. Although nearly half the British cabinet
wanted to take up his offer, Churchill’s warmongering put an end
to this final offer of peace;
>
> – Hitler’s Political Testament, dictated just hours before his
death on April 29, 1945, wherein he spelled out once again how
he had tried to avoid the war, and blamed Jewish agitators for
the refusal of other nations to accept his peace offers;
>
> – Hermann Göring’s final letter—from this death cell in
Nuremberg—to Winston Churchill, in which he blamed the latter’s
warmongering on behalf of “Jewish Bolsheviks” for the conflict;
and
>
> – An extract from The Forrestal Diaries, in which the US
Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal quotes British Prime
Minister Neville Chamberlain as complaining that “the world
Jews” have forced England into the war.
>
> Fully reset and illustrated throughout with 22 rare
photographs.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.amazon.com/What-World-Rejected-Hitlers-1933-1940/dp/1684186102
HTML https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71o71q2sUuL.jpg
Are many Western powers still anti-German?:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/brexit/
[/quote]
HTML https://z-lib.gs/book/5011468/df6365
Fixed that for you.
#Post#: 29294--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: christianbethel
Date: February 3, 2025, 2:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: rp link ---
>
> As the "Holocaust" narrative increasingly falls out of fashion
(which the Jews have anticipated), we will increasingly see a
more honest ZC narrative of WW2, that Hitler was still bad
because he was anti Western civilization and Jews are part of
Western civilization.
>
> I even saw the "comedian" Owen Benjamin (Jew) say that the
"Holocaust" was fake but that there was indeed persecution of
Jews.
>
> And yet some idiots in the Aryanism.net comments think talking
about Third Reich revisionism is still getting us somewhere...
>
--- End Quote ---
Hey man, don't look at me. JJ was the one who made the thread
about Western revisionism of the world wars. I support him in
that endeavor, but I realize we should be focusing on activism
and ideological discussion. Problem is, every time we get into a
discussion we're just branded as 'Nazis' and kicked out of
wherever we try to perform activism (at least in my personal
experience).
#Post#: 29297--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: February 4, 2025, 2:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: christianbethel link ---
>
> [quote author=guest78 link=topic=40.msg14069#msg14069
date=1655232466]
> What the World Rejected: Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940
Paperback – Illustrated, October 26, 2016
> [quote]Written by Germany’s foremost diplomatic historian of
the early twentieth century, this work maps out all the numerous
times that Adolf Hitler made unconditional offers of peace to
all the nations of Europe—and how the major anti-German
belligerents, France and Britain, turned down these offers each
and every time.
>
> The author lists all of Hitler’s offers in detail, complete
with quotes, starting with his first offer of May 17, 1933, his
second offer of December 18, 1933, his third offer of May 21,
1935, his fourth offer of March 31, 1936, his fifth offer of
September 30, 1938, his sixth offer of December 6, 1938, his
seventh offer of late 1939 to Poland to settle the Danzig
Corridor issue peacefully, and finally, his offer of world peace
on October 6, 1939, just over a month after Britain and France
had declared war on Germany for invading Poland on September 1
(but not on the Soviet Union, which also invaded Poland on
September 17).
>
> This edition benefits from four new sections which did not
appear in the original publication. These are:
>
> – The full text of Hitler’s “Appeal for Peace and Sanity”
speech, made before the Reichstag on July 19, 1940, following
the fall of France. Although nearly half the British cabinet
wanted to take up his offer, Churchill’s warmongering put an end
to this final offer of peace;
>
> – Hitler’s Political Testament, dictated just hours before his
death on April 29, 1945, wherein he spelled out once again how
he had tried to avoid the war, and blamed Jewish agitators for
the refusal of other nations to accept his peace offers;
>
> – Hermann Göring’s final letter—from this death cell in
Nuremberg—to Winston Churchill, in which he blamed the latter’s
warmongering on behalf of “Jewish Bolsheviks” for the conflict;
and
>
> – An extract from The Forrestal Diaries, in which the US
Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal quotes British Prime
Minister Neville Chamberlain as complaining that “the world
Jews” have forced England into the war.
>
> Fully reset and illustrated throughout with 22 rare
photographs.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.amazon.com/What-World-Rejected-Hitlers-1933-1940/dp/1684186102
HTML https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/71o71q2sUuL.jpg
Are many Western powers still anti-German?:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/brexit/
[/quote]
HTML https://z-lib.gs/book/5011468/df6365
Fixed that for you.
[/quote]
Hitler wanted the war, and he intended to expand his territory,
there's nothing wrong with it, as long it resulting the defeat
of Western Civilization and it's cultural influences
#Post#: 29300--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 4, 2025, 4:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Hitler wanted the war, and he intended to expand his territory"
Yes, but his intention was to expand eastwards first:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drang_nach_Osten#Lebensraum_concept_of_Nazi_Germany
--- Quote ---
> Adolf Hitler, dictator of Nazi Germany from 1933–1945,
advocated for a Drang nach Osten to acquire territory for German
colonists at the expense of central and eastern European nations
(Lebensraum). The term, by then, had gained enough currency to
appear in foreign newspapers without explanation.[19] Nazi
propaganda depicted Eastern Europe as historically Germanic
territories, promoting the myth that these regions were stolen
from Aryan races by Hunnic and Avar tribes.[20] Hitler viewed
Slavs as primitive subhumans and for this reason detested the
German empire's alliance with Austria-Hungary during World War
I. In his works such as Mein Kampf and Zweites Buch, Hitler
viewed the Slavs as lacking the capability to form a state.[21]
>
> Anti-Slavism was also a core doctrine of Nazi ideology, which
considered Slavs to be racially inferior Untermensch.
--- End Quote ---
Thus it made strategic sense for him to want to avoid war on the
western front in addition to war on the eastern front. This
accounts for his peace offers with Britain etc.. It also made
strategic sense for Churchill to reject his offers. Had Britain
accepted the offers, National Socialist Germany could have
defeated Russia and then, being both no longer threatened by
Russian invasion and in possession of Russian resources, would
have been in a much stronger position from which to threaten
Britain. Churchill already knew that Hitler wanted independence
for British colonies, thus his priority was to ensure that
Hitler was incapable of effectively pressuring Britain to
surrender its colonies.
#Post#: 30033--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
DIR By: YouAreFucked!
Date: April 27, 2025, 2:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Western "whites" wish Hitler spoke this disputed "white" western
nonsense:
--- Quote ---
> I don't see much future for the Americans... it's a decayed
country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of
social inequalities... It goes without saying that we have no
affinities with the Japanese. (UMMM, NS Germany was allied with
Japan "white" western racist moron!). They’re too foreign to us,
by their way of living, by their culture. (Both Japan and
Germany have militaristic culture and ways of living?). But my
feelings against Americanism are feelings of hatred and deep
repugnance. I feel myself more akin to any European country, no
matter which. (NS Germany waged war against all of "white"
western Europe, duh!?). Everything about the behavior of
American society reveals that it’s half Judaised, and the other
half negrified. How can one expect a State like that to hold
together—a State where 80 percent of the revenue is drained away
for the public purse—a country where everything is built on the
dollar? From this point of view, I consider the British State
very much superior. - Adolf Hitler, 7 January 1942, evening
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Hitler
What was most likely said by Hitler:
--- Quote ---
> “I don't see much future for the Americans ... it's a decayed
country. And they have their racial problem, and the problem of
social inequalities ... my feelings against Americanism are
feelings of hatred and deep repugnance ... everything about the
behavior of American society reveals that it's half Judaised,
and the other half negrified. How can one expect a State like
that to hold together?” - Adolf Hitler, Remarks recorded by
Martin Bormann, published in Hitler's Table Talk (1953).
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://enroll.nationalww2museum.org/learn/education/for-students/ww2-history/quotations/axis-leaders.html
I completely agree. The only thing that could save the AMERICA
at this point is the negro. Russia knows this too, I'm sure...
*****************************************************
Page 12 of 15
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page