URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 21731--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 25, 2023, 8:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Cracker" is also inaccurate:
       [img]
  HTML https://preview.redd.it/love-a-giant-flatbread-and-captain-glenn-v0-jpkr08kwyoj81.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=47f80d827c94e0bc9a326c5ebed8624e9be0bfa7[/img]
       Related:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/psychological-decolonization/msg520/#msg520
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/psychological-decolonization/msg523/#msg523
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/psychological-decolonization/msg524/#msg524
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/face-shapes-and-preferences/msg10376/#msg10376
       #Post#: 21732--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: August 25, 2023, 8:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Cracker is not a reference to biscuits, but a reference to "Whip
       cracker", or the "cracking" sound the whip would make when a
       slavemaster would whip their slave.
       #Post#: 21733--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 25, 2023, 8:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Many False Leftists that I have encountered in the past think it
       is a reference to the biscuit and think it is an accurate
       comparison.
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cracker_(term)#Etymology
       [quote]Another possibility, which may be a modern folk
       etymology, supposes that the term derives from "soda cracker", a
       type of light wheat biscuit which dates in the Southern US to at
       least the Civil War.[23] The idea has possibly been influenced
       by "whitebread", a similar term for white people. "Soda cracker"
       and even "white soda cracker" have become extended versions of
       "cracker" as an epithet.[24][/quote]
       #Post#: 21734--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: August 25, 2023, 8:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yeah, I think the terminology has been somewhat misappropriated.
       In fact, i myself only imagine the biscuit when the term is
       used, not the slaveowner. I would recommend trying to reclaim
       the term rather than discard it altogether.
       #Post#: 22033--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: September 10, 2023, 1:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=BeerBelly link=topic=359.msg21656#msg21656
       date=1692733820]
       "Of course, this is obviously a non-Aryan trait, since the
       Neolithic revolution resulted in a steady supply of food and
       this would have no longer been advantageous."
       How sure are we that some neolithic people did not have a small
       beer belly?
       [quote]The quest for a kind of beer which could have appeared in
       the world before the first evidences of Neolithic culture
       (crops, domesticated animals, villages, pottery, ...) has much
       stimulated the imagination.
       Three conjectures sum up the various hypotheses according which
       this event could have happened between 30,000 and 10,000 BC, the
       latter date setting the oldest domestication of food plants and
       animals in the Near East and Asia :
       a) The accidental occurence of a fermented porridge during
       prehistory would have led humans to reproduce the phenomenon for
       their own benefit. Like higher primates, humans also developed
       an appetite for ethanol. This stimulus led them to reproduce and
       perfect the initial accidental fermentations. This is the
       assumption of the reproducible technical accident with
       prehistorical very rudimentary material means.
       b) Spiritual life in the Upper Paleolithic was sufficiently
       advanced for ceremonies to be the occasion for drinking
       fermented drinks. The prehistorical cave paintings testify to
       the richness of that collective mental life. The funeral
       practices of Neanderthal for example, one of the human branches
       coexisting in Europe with others like Homo Sapiens, are
       accompanied by rituals. The collective psychic life in the
       Paelolithic would have been a stronger dynamic than the
       development of material life. Hypothesis of the human spiritual
       quest as a driving force for human evolution.
       c) Simply gathering or picking up grain would have effortlessly
       provide enough starch to brew some primeval beers. These first
       grain surpluses would have been collected in ecosystems rich in
       wild grasses and a very low human population density. The
       surpluses of raw material (grains, tubers) generates major
       social changes, including new drinking behaviors. This third
       assumption is based on economics...[/quote]
  HTML https://beer-studies.com/en/world-history/Birth-of-brewing
       [quote]With around seven calories per gram, alcohol contains
       almost as many calories as pure fat. In addition, many alcoholic
       drinks are also high in sugar meaning you could be consuming
       lots of empty calories, which could lead to weight gain -
       including a beer belly - and put your long-term health at
       risk...[/quote]
  HTML https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/health-effects-of-alcohol/appearance/how-can-i-beat-my-beer-belly
       How Can Ectomorphs Lose Belly Fat? [Easier Than You Think]
       [quote]Having belly fat is one of the most common struggles that
       the majority of skinny people have. And just because you’re an
       Ectomorph, that doesn’t mean that you can’t develop it. You can
       always carry body fat even if you’re skinny. This usually occurs
       when you’re too inactive. The basic advice that you’ll see all
       over the internet is that you need to eat less. I know exactly
       what you’re thinking. That doesn’t make any sense for
       Ectomorphs, right? Not only will that make you feel lighter and
       more tired but If you read the majority of articles about
       gaining weight as an Ectomorph, most of them (Including mine)
       recommend that you always have a calorie surplus. That means you
       should always be eating more. So how can Ectomorphs lose belly
       fat?[/quote]
  HTML https://ectomorphing.com/how-can-ectomorphs-lose-belly-fat/
       I imagine that in neolithic societies the winter months did not
       involve much physical labor and a lot of celebrating the prior
       years bountiful harvest? Neolithic belly fat was more than
       likely not part of a survival mechanism as it would have been in
       paleolithic tribes, but it could have still existed, no?
       [/quote]
       Pre-Neolithic people in warm climates were ectomorphs, so there
       is no contradiction between ectomorphy and the non-Aryan trait I
       mentioned. If I have said otherwise, then I misspoke.
       As for neolithic societies, the evidence that belly fat would
       have been selected against is deduced from the simple fact that
       extra body weight would require extra energy to move, thus
       making farming more energy intensive. However, given that
       farming itself is a labor intensive task, it is possible that
       those with this trait would have never gained fat in the first
       place. So it is also possible that this trait was not selected
       against. In the latter case, we could say that skinny fat/belly
       fat is a trait of non-Aryan origin (similar to blonde hair and
       mate choice copying) but not a non-Aryan trait in and of itself
       (meaning Aryans could also carry it). What do you guys think?
       #Post#: 22034--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 10, 2023, 6:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Surely belly fat would also make heat dispersal more difficult?
       I do not understand even the claim in the linked article that
       ectomorphs can have belly fat, or more precisely, that someone
       with belly fat can still be classified as an ectomorph. Aren't
       ectomorphs supposed to have fast metabolism, which would thus
       burn off excess fat automatically even without physical
       activity?
       #Post#: 22035--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: September 10, 2023, 7:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Surely belly fat would also make heat dispersal more difficult"
       Again, this would not be a problem if one did not accumulate
       belly fat in the first place, by burning off excess caloric
       intake through strenuous physical labour.
       However, you are correct that this would have caused a problem
       among the pre-Neolithic populations who did not engage in as
       much strenuous labor, but
       who nevertheless lived in a warm climate. But the flip side is
       that, as I previously mentioned, this would have also been
       advantageous to them as it would have helped them during times
       of food scarcity and famine, both of which are likely in absence
       of a steady food supply that was made possible by the Neolithic
       revolution.
       "I do not understand even the claim in the linked article that
       ectomorphs can have belly fat, or more precisely, that someone
       with belly fat can still be classified as an ectomorph."
       It is possible that the article is referring to ectomorphs whose
       metabolism has slowed down due to aging. I have seen many
       ectomorphs gain a potbelly as they age.
       "Aren't ectomorphs supposed to have fast metabolism, which would
       thus burn off excess fat automatically even without physical
       activity?"
       That is the Aryanist definition of ectomorphy. However, I noted
       that it is possible to have other ectomorphic traits (such as
       long limbs, narrow shoulders, both of which increase surface
       area/volume ratio and thus heat dispersal) while having a rather
       slow metabolism (that specifically increases propensity to
       accumulate abdominal fat but not necessarily increase in overall
       BMI). This is a broader definition of ectomorphy would include
       the aforementioned individuals as well.
       If not, then what is the explanation behind the skinny fat
       physique we see in middle class Indians who have a low BMI but
       excess abdominal fat, even though we have established that
       ectomorphy is a warm climate adaptation?
       #Post#: 22038--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 10, 2023, 7:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "If not, then what is the explanation behind the skinny fat
       physique we see in middle class Indians who have a low BMI but
       excess abdominal fat, even though we have established that
       ectomorphy is a warm climate adaptation?"
       Sexual selection, perhaps?
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/aryan-metabolism/msg21582/#msg21582
       You yourself mentioned being attracted to skinny fat women!!
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/face-shapes-and-preferences/msg18181/#msg18181
       #Post#: 22040--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: September 10, 2023, 8:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "You yourself mentioned being attracted to skinny fat women!!"
       If you are referring to:
       [quote], I like the Aryan face + gracile body + endomorphic
       somatotype as well[/quote]
       I did not mention it explicitly, as gracile bodies and
       endomorphic somatotypes do not necessarily produce a skinny fat
       physique.
       However, I concede that at the beginning of the sentence:
       [quote]Note the thin forearm, but also note the hourglass figure
       and body fat in her upper arms.[/quote]
       I did implicitly allude to her skinny-fat physique, as the fat
       distribution is mainly concentrated in her upper arms and
       hips/buttocks, giving her an outwardly thin appearance in some
       photos. But what could be the reason behind this sexual
       selection? I can see why those women with Gentile blood memory
       would sexually select for mesomorphic men despite mesomorphy
       being evolutionarily disadvantageous in warm climates, as
       mesomorphy would make one a better hunter. But why would those
       men with non-Aryan blood memory sexually select for endomorphic
       skinny-fat women? In my case, it was a certain matriarchal
       impulse that made me attracted to them, the feeling that a woman
       like Kaur would be able to provide me with "love" and "warmth"
       of a "caring mother/older sister". In fact, I suspect that this
       impulse is what makes young pre-teen boys attracted to somewhat
       sexually mature teenage/adult women (see the Japanese "straight
       shota" Hentai genre for this example).
       However, given that this trait would not be disadvantageous so
       long as there is enough strenuous physical labor to burn the
       excess caloric intake (which I theorized in the case of farming
       there was as the fat accumulation is primarily
       minimal/concentrated toward certain parts of the body in
       contrast to cold climates), do you agree that it was not
       naturally selected against? Perhaps it was sexually selected
       against by the farmers (again, why?)?
       #Post#: 22041--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 10, 2023, 8:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "why would those men with non-Aryan blood memory sexually select
       for endomorphic skinny-fat women?"
       I'm not certain it is men with non-Aryan blood memory. It could
       be men with Aryan blood memory prioritizing face over body.
       Surely (I hope) you wouldn't be attracted to a skinny fat woman
       without an Aryan face?  :o
       "In my case, it was a certain matriarchal impulse that made me
       attracted to them, the feeling that a woman like Kaur would be
       able to provide me with "love" and "warmth" of a "caring
       mother/older sister"."
       But are you saying that a truly ectomorphic woman (even if
       facially at least as beautiful as Kaur) is less able to give you
       this feeling?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page