URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 7277--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 24, 2021, 12:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemies are also discussing sports, which they believe
       should be about (wait for it) sexual dimoprhism:
  HTML https://vdare.com/posts/why-bankers-can-t-stop-running
       [quote]Golf is a fine sport for coed participation, but far
       fewer heterosexual women than heterosexual men see the point of
       it. (I suspect that golf is a white collar suburbanized version
       of the traditional blood sports that appeal more to hunters than
       to gatherers.)[/quote]
       I hate golf.
       [quote]As I’ve been pointing out since 2012, I would not be
       surprised if type of exercise done isn’t just a matter of
       self-selection based on individual Nature but also has a
       measurable Nurture effect on other aspects, such as political
       attitudes. For example, actors who lift weights intensively tend
       to be to the right of actors who run obsessively. I’ve used the
       comparison of two TV stars: Mark Harmon (football star to jogger
       and anti-gun activist) versus Gary Sinise (theater kid to lifter
       and support-the-troops Republican activist).[/quote]
       Harmon's face:
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/originals/65/5e/4b/655e4b0b75c5aabb03468c26d2e4dedd.jpg
       Sinise's face:
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/236x/65/4d/fc/654dfc6f0d376ec183de27a72152b2a0--gary-sinise-criminal-minds.jpg
       #Post#: 7335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 29, 2021, 3:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemies are still talking about golf:
       [quote]This model of how the world works mostly comes up with
       findings that are already common stereotypes (football players
       are highly masculine on average), But the Occam’s Razor approach
       has generated one unexpected finding: that the appeal of golf, a
       non-violent non-contact sport, was a lot more masculine than you
       might think from seeing it on TV, which is why lesbians are
       common among the top ranks of women golfers but gay men are
       quite rare on the male side.[/quote]
       Non-violent?!
  HTML https://www.shipsticks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/what-your-golf-divot-tells-you-about-swing-facebook.jpg
       [img]
  HTML https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/golf-ball-strike-picture-id153016681[/img]
  HTML https://golfdigest.sports.sndimg.com/content/dam/images/golfdigest/fullset/2016/07/07/577ecee8d42cbe9b4bfb9621_IMG_2698.JPG.rend.hgtvcom.1280.640.suffix/1573403898365.jpeg
       The degree of Westerners' utter insensitivity to the violence
       they constantly initiate never fails to amaze me.....
       And don't get me started on:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golf_course#Environmental_impact
       [quote]Environmental concerns over the use of land for golf
       courses have grown since the 1960s. Specific issues include the
       amount of water required for irrigation and the use of chemical
       pesticides and fertilizers in maintenance, as well as the
       destruction of wetlands and other environmentally important
       areas during construction. The United Nations estimates that,
       worldwide, golf courses consume about 2.5 billion gallons/9.5
       billion litres of water per day. [/quote]
       #Post#: 18247--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: March 3, 2023, 5:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Junito18 link=topic=359.msg3078#msg3078
       date=1609604520]
       Another thing - I was arguing with this guy and he brought up
       the Khoi-San as examples of ectomorphic hunters. I said they
       were ectomorphic because they lived in a very hot climate, and
       that people living in hot climates are more ectomorphic than
       people in cold climates and farmers are more ectomorphic than
       hunters. What do you think of non-farmer ectomorphs such as the
       Khoi-San and the Maasai? Are they just ectomorphs due to climate
       rather than subsistence style? He also said that ectomorphic
       body types are absent in the areas of Africa into which the
       Bantu expanded, and I said the people living in those areas
       aren't pure farmers because the Bantu bred with the people
       already living there, and showed him this map.
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ad/World_in_1000_BCE.png<br
       />Is this the correct response? What about the areas the Bantu
       originally came from - in West Africa? I think people in those
       areas do tend to be quite Mesomorphic.
       [/quote]
       I find that many ectomorphs are quite robust despite their
       somatotype. For example, the Khoi San:
  HTML https://sb-cafetalk.s3.amazonaws.com/user-uploaded-files/cafetalk-optimized-5f2162a545d56-928604000-1596023461.jpg
       Look at the thickness of their wrists. In fact, I find that many
       "White" ectomorph incels are quite robust, their bones are a lot
       thicker compared to someone like me. Additionally, I have
       observed that these ectomorphs do not have Aryan metabolism
       either, which leads to a "skinny fat" physique.
       #Post#: 18249--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 3, 2023, 6:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I find that many "White" ectomorph incels are quite robust"
       Incels themselves keep complaining that they have insufficient
       "frame" compared to Chads. This shows that they value
       robustness, but do not have as much of it as they would like to
       have.
       "these ectomorphs do not have Aryan metabolism either, which
       leads to a "skinny fat" physique."
       In what way are they ectomorphs, then? Ectomorphy is a direct
       description of metabolism.
       #Post#: 18253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: March 3, 2023, 11:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "In what way are they ectomorphs, then? Ectomorphy is a direct
       description of metabolism."
       Limb length and shoulder-hip ratio. Also, their metabolism may
       only be fast for meat, as opposed to carbs.
       #Post#: 21633--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: August 21, 2023, 7:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here is an incel post discussing "White" blood in "Blacks":
  HTML https://incels.is/threads/blackcels-how-true-according-to-you-is-bbc-halo.408045/
       [quote]As a professor, today I teach my students about Black
       history.&#8203;
       (Any ADHD copers too lazy to read, you better gtfo rn than just
       comment **** and leave)
       Life of Blacks back 2 centuries ago was absolutely BRUTAL in the
       west. They were slaved because Cumskins saw them as less
       developed than they are back then. But since 21st century
       Tyrones and high tier black tallfags have ascended. BBC and
       bragging rap culture is lifefuel for numerous blacks out there
       in the west.
       BUT, THIS AIN‘T IT. Let me explain. Whenever the western media
       or people say the word ‘black man’ the image is of a black man
       born and raised in a English speaking country with black
       ancestry. Mental Image of people is either of some shitload
       retarded low iq mumble rapper or some 7 foot tall 12inch girthed
       BBC silicon injected Pornstar since that’s what mainstream out
       there.
       But in reality only 1 in 20 black men is a westerner. The rest
       95% are true Africans. Light skin blacks didn’t just pop out
       from the air. They are light skin because of CUMSKIN ANCESTRY.
       That’s why true blacks are most of the time really dark (Take
       Khaby lame whose hometown is Senegal for eg)
       Do you really think an average blackcel from some ’oonga boonga’
       tribe from some deathnic shithole withou[/quote]
       This is Khaby Lame, BTW:
       [img]
  HTML https://static01.nyt.com/images/2021/06/06/fashion/02KHABY-1/02KHABY-1-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale[/img]
       Note the ectomorphy. This ectomorphy seems to be more common in
       "African" countries than in India. Indians have a lower BMI*
       than "Whites", but they are also prone to developing more
       abdominal fat than "Whites", resulting in "normal weight
       obesity" (high body fat percentage but normal BMI), resulting in
       "skinny fat". This is due to evolutionarily adapting for famine,
       since a deposit of fat could be used as energy during periods
       where food supply was scarce. Of course, this is obviously a
       non-Aryan trait, since the Neolithic revolution resulted in a
       steady supply of food and this would have no longer been
       advantageous. In "African" countries, however, this trait does
       not seem to be that prominent, hence why ectomorphy is more
       prominent. Perhaps this was due to the abundance of wild fruits
       which would provide a steady supply of flood, even among
       pre-farming populations.
       *I should also note that muscular "Whites" also have a high BMI,
       but are not considered overweight for some reason... (Why not??)
       #Post#: 21634--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 21, 2023, 8:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Firstly, anyone who uses the term:
       [quote]Cumskins[/quote]
       should not be taken seriously.
       [img]
  HTML https://wildflowersex.com/cdn/shop/articles/guideToSemen_14172286-721f-4258-aa3c-560ed056f86b_1024x1024.jpg?v=1616086978[/img]
       Is the hand skin more similar in colour to the semen or to the
       background?
       [quote]Light skin blacks didn’t just pop out from the air. They
       are light skin because of CUMSKIN ANCESTRY.[/quote]
       According to this idiot, these guys':
       [img]
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b2/InitialExpansionMitogenome.PNG[/img]
       skin colour:
       [img]
  HTML https://scontent.fhkg4-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/44177315_746611822350755_8149305569161773056_n.jpg?_nc_cat=110&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=8bfeb9&_nc_ohc=hqY10Rs4zCYAX--T9AV&_nc_ht=scontent.fhkg4-1.fna&oh=00_AfCWQoNvbRfZhbMEkhjTklZK_T8ztFou_X2oUr3_PmY76g&oe=650B88A3[/img]
       is because of:
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cb/55/04/cb5504196418f213f680d4fbed9558a3.jpg
       Who writes this ****?
       #Post#: 21635--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: August 21, 2023, 8:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You're right that light skin is not necessarily a product of
       "White" blood, but I do suspect the high sexual dimorphism is.
       #Post#: 21656--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: BeerBelly Date: August 22, 2023, 2:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Of course, this is obviously a non-Aryan trait, since the
       Neolithic revolution resulted in a steady supply of food and
       this would have no longer been advantageous."
       How sure are we that some neolithic people did not have a small
       beer belly?
       [quote]The quest for a kind of beer which could have appeared in
       the world before the first evidences of Neolithic culture
       (crops, domesticated animals, villages, pottery, ...) has much
       stimulated the imagination.
       Three conjectures sum up the various hypotheses according which
       this event could have happened between 30,000 and 10,000 BC, the
       latter date setting the oldest domestication of food plants and
       animals in the Near East and Asia :
       a) The accidental occurence of a fermented porridge during
       prehistory would have led humans to reproduce the phenomenon for
       their own benefit. Like higher primates, humans also developed
       an appetite for ethanol. This stimulus led them to reproduce and
       perfect the initial accidental fermentations. This is the
       assumption of the reproducible technical accident with
       prehistorical very rudimentary material means.
       b) Spiritual life in the Upper Paleolithic was sufficiently
       advanced for ceremonies to be the occasion for drinking
       fermented drinks. The prehistorical cave paintings testify to
       the richness of that collective mental life. The funeral
       practices of Neanderthal for example, one of the human branches
       coexisting in Europe with others like Homo Sapiens, are
       accompanied by rituals. The collective psychic life in the
       Paelolithic would have been a stronger dynamic than the
       development of material life. Hypothesis of the human spiritual
       quest as a driving force for human evolution.
       c) Simply gathering or picking up grain would have effortlessly
       provide enough starch to brew some primeval beers. These first
       grain surpluses would have been collected in ecosystems rich in
       wild grasses and a very low human population density. The
       surpluses of raw material (grains, tubers) generates major
       social changes, including new drinking behaviors. This third
       assumption is based on economics...[/quote]
  HTML https://beer-studies.com/en/world-history/Birth-of-brewing
       [quote]With around seven calories per gram, alcohol contains
       almost as many calories as pure fat. In addition, many alcoholic
       drinks are also high in sugar meaning you could be consuming
       lots of empty calories, which could lead to weight gain -
       including a beer belly - and put your long-term health at
       risk...[/quote]
  HTML https://www.drinkaware.co.uk/facts/health-effects-of-alcohol/appearance/how-can-i-beat-my-beer-belly
       How Can Ectomorphs Lose Belly Fat? [Easier Than You Think]
       [quote]Having belly fat is one of the most common struggles that
       the majority of skinny people have. And just because you’re an
       Ectomorph, that doesn’t mean that you can’t develop it. You can
       always carry body fat even if you’re skinny. This usually occurs
       when you’re too inactive. The basic advice that you’ll see all
       over the internet is that you need to eat less. I know exactly
       what you’re thinking. That doesn’t make any sense for
       Ectomorphs, right? Not only will that make you feel lighter and
       more tired but If you read the majority of articles about
       gaining weight as an Ectomorph, most of them (Including mine)
       recommend that you always have a calorie surplus. That means you
       should always be eating more. So how can Ectomorphs lose belly
       fat?[/quote]
  HTML https://ectomorphing.com/how-can-ectomorphs-lose-belly-fat/
       I imagine that in neolithic societies the winter months did not
       involve much physical labor and a lot of celebrating the prior
       years bountiful harvest? Neolithic belly fat was more than
       likely not part of a survival mechanism as it would have been in
       paleolithic tribes, but it could have still existed, no?
       #Post#: 21729--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Misinformation about Racial Origins
       By: rp Date: August 25, 2023, 8:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Cumskin"
       False Leftists who call "Whites"  "mayos" are just as stupid
       tbh:
       [img]
  HTML https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-0adb4eafb0e2704ef0a48a1b4a89d046-lq[/img]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page