DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs Right
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28821--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: November 30, 2024, 12:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I recall you mentioning on one of the Aryanism.net pages that
the battle lines will no longer be between Aryans, Jews, and
Gentiles, but simply between Aryans and non Aryans. I see this
becoming truer each day, as now it is not even worth the effort
to distinguish between Jews and Gentiles.
#Post#: 28847--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: December 3, 2024, 12:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Another BS "documentary" from BS Gentile Stew Peters:
HTML https://twitter.com/realstewpeters/status/1861952893068427508
#Post#: 28848--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: December 3, 2024, 2:36 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The following tweet demonstrates the mentality of the
documentary maker:
HTML https://x.com/Onetimeoff1837/status/1861972915924689095?t=k81z-hHQuLj7omoUkw20GA&s=19
[Quote]
There is a difference between caring about your own very much
and hating others. Hitler may have been racist against
non-Germans. That doesn't mean he hated them. His hatred appears
to be reserved for a very specific group and that group only.
[/Quote]
This is an annoying POV that is beginning to take hold in WN
circles. That Hitler was "racist" but still cared about "non
Whites". Now that information about Jesse Owens and Hitler's
collaboration with the "third world" is coming out, they will
attempt to reconcile their racism with "pro Hitler" sentiments
by doing the old "self determination for all peoples" meme
("Hitler supported "non Whites" in their own countries!". Even
David Duke was doing this). This what I believe VK Clark was
promoting, and what JAM based his ideology on.
I would prefer they abandon this and acknowledge (as many of the
more literate identitarians are doing) that Hitler was an anti
racist, and that it is in their interest to support Zionism/the
Allied Powers. Of course this approach will also end up
strengthening Identitarianism as it will give them a more
coherent ideology, and I don't want that either. What are your
thoughts on how to deal with this?
#Post#: 28849--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 3, 2024, 5:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"doing the old "self determination for all peoples""
This is just a sugarcoated way of saying "whites" get to
categorize everyone and decide where each category gets to live.
In other words, "whites" actually rule the whole world and run
it like a zoo.
""Hitler supported "non Whites" in their own countries!""
Which countries are their own countries?
Firstly, it is known that Hitler supported Amerindians taking
back America from "white" rule, so Hitler did not consider
America to belong to "whites". This can logically be extended to
all lands stolen by "whites" during the colonial era, contrary
to the WN position that "whites" get to keep all their stolen
lands.
Secondly, it is known that Hitler opposed discrimination against
"non-white" Germans in Germany. Thus he considered "non-white"
Germans (ancestrally from former German colonies) in Germany to
be in their own country. This can logically be extended to all
origin countries of all the Western colonial powers, contrary to
the WN position that these should be "white".
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/hitler-the-face-of-anti-tribalism/msg27892/#msg27892
Thirdly, there exist "white" countries which did not have
colonies, such as Poland (which is not to say that it did not
try to get some:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colonization_attempts_by_Poland
).
Hitler directly invaded Poland. Had the Third Reich won WWII,
"non-white" Reich citizens would have been among those able to
live in Poland afterwards if they wanted to, whereas they had
been unable to do so before. Thus Hitler had no interest in
keeping Poland "white", contrary to the WN position.
Finally, if Hitler did not support "non-whites" being in
"Europe", then why did he prefer Charles Martel to lose, and why
did he praise Andalus and disparage the Reconquista?
"what JAM based his ideology on"
During OWNP and Monarchist Party times, JAM officially declared
that America should be multiethnic, and in private discussions
expressed that "non-whites" from former British colonies
deserved to live in Britain. I do not know what he believes now.
"I would prefer they abandon this and acknowledge (as many of
the more literate identitarians are doing) that Hitler was an
anti racist, and that it is in their interest to support
Zionism/the Allied Powers. "
I agree.
"Of course this approach will also end up strengthening
Identitarianism as it will give them a more coherent ideology,
and I don't want that either."
An incoherent ideology is more dangerous in that, even after
defeating it, the narrative of what was actually being defeated
can be distorted again. Last time, Himmler and other racists in
the NSDAP was what allowed the Allies to portray Jews as victims
of racism, leading to all the subsequent confusion that we have
had to deal with ever since. Do we want to go through all this
again?
#Post#: 28851--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: December 3, 2024, 6:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"During OWNP and Monarchist Party times, JAM officially declared
that America should be multiethnic, and in private discussions
expressed that "non-whites" from former British colonies
deserved to live in Britain. I do not know what he believes now"
I suppose then that it was VK Clark's view, not necessarily
JAM's.
#Post#: 28852--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: December 3, 2024, 6:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Which countries are their own countries?"
They would probably do the "White separatist" meme in countries
like the US, where Amerindians/"Black" descendants of the
original slaves are allowed to stay (but still segregated")
while other "non Whites" should be deported, whereas for Europe,
they would say that all "non Whites" should be deported. Of
course, these positions are thoroughly anti Hitlerist as you
demonstrated above.
#Post#: 28891--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: rp Date: December 6, 2024, 9:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/jakeshieldsajj/status/1799317976942104992?t=f9jqmYOZaDkenkvBxCNSVw&s=19
[quote]
the difference America admitted our evils and gave natives
monthly money
Israel still lies and denies its crimes and is currently
committing them
[Quote]
Don’t forget….
[Img]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GPX7VWWaUAAyr_h?format=jpg&name=small[/img]
[/Quote]
[/Quote]
Did it give them their land back? Shields is another
ethnocentrist bigot who wants you to think that Jews are the
only group capable of ethnotribalism, and that Gentile tribes
are not as bad as Jews.
#Post#: 29835--------------------------------------------------
Re: Exposing people with the Western Darwinian Worldview
By: antizion Date: April 6, 2025, 1:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=antihellenistic link=topic=348.msg23329#msg23329
date=1698904163]
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/22a12e78ab649c1be08bdb7878387f9a/3d1cac69c48f9586-ae/s1280x1920/cdf911da2386795794b871b42350405b6c27e660.jpg
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/dc316943829548aea3fd2d29d3f1e305/df26cb2ccc575b18-86/s1280x1920/478b7f19f62cd5bf473160a323aac8716121d9e5.jpg
[/quote]
The replies on twitter are interesting. Expected, but
interesting.
The_Hellenist genuinely believes that IQ test scores is
importantly, and hence also holds prejudice towards "whites"
with low IQ test scores.
Yet his followers replying to him, rather than agreeing with
him, tries to defend "whites" with low IQ tests scores.
If IQ test scores were so important, then it shouldn't matter
where it comes from?
This exposes that racists identitarians only talk about IQ test
scores is because it makes their ethnicities look good (except
when it makes Jews look good).
Just like the topic of Ideology vs Pseudoideology in the main
site:
HTML https://aryanism.net/philosophy/ideology-vs-pseudoideology/
> “Whatever quality in which I excel over others is a good
quality. Whatever quality in which others excel over me is a bad
quality.”
#Post#: 30484--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists feeling the need for True Leftism
By: Not At Home Date: June 23, 2025, 6:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Child: Mom! Let's go get some Anti-Zionism!
Mother: But we have anti-zionism at home!
anti-zionism at home:
<iframe width="560" height="315"
src="
HTML https://www.youtube.com/embed/357OUblBYgQ?si=ULQdmA9tmFD5sJt4"<br
/>title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0"
allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write;
encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share"
referrerpolicy="strict-origin-when-cross-origin"
allowfullscreen></iframe>
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=357OUblBYgQ
#Post#: 30485--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Boromir Syndrome
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 23, 2025, 5:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
According to his narrative, Britain had good rulers until the
1800s. In reality:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Empire#Origins_(1497%E2%80%931583)
[quote]In 1562, Elizabeth I encouraged the privateers John
Hawkins and Francis Drake to engage in slave-raiding attacks
against Spanish and Portuguese ships off the coast of West
Africa[14] with the aim of establishing an Atlantic slave trade.
This effort was rebuffed and later, as the Anglo-Spanish Wars
intensified, Elizabeth I gave her blessing to further
privateering raids against Spanish ports in the Americas and
shipping that was returning across the Atlantic, laden with
treasure from the New World.[15] At the same time, influential
writers such as Richard Hakluyt and John Dee (who was the first
to use the term "British Empire")[16] were beginning to press
for the establishment of England's own empire.
...
The British Empire began to take shape during the early 17th
century, with the English settlement of North America and the
smaller islands of the Caribbean, and the establishment of
joint-stock companies, most notably the East India Company, to
administer colonies and overseas trade.
...
rising costs soon led English traders to embrace the use of
imported African slaves.[35] The enormous wealth generated by
slave-produced sugar made Barbados the most successful colony in
the Americas,[36] and one of the most densely populated places
in the world.[34] This boom led to the spread of sugar
cultivation across the Caribbean, financed the development of
non-plantation colonies in North America, and accelerated the
growth of the Atlantic slave trade, particularly the triangular
trade of slaves, sugar and provisions between Africa, the West
Indies and Europe.[37]
...
In 1655, England annexed the island of Jamaica from the Spanish,
and in 1666 succeeded in colonising the Bahamas.[39] In 1670,
Charles II incorporated by royal charter the Hudson's Bay
Company (HBC), granting it a monopoly on the fur trade in the
area known as Rupert's Land, which would later form a large
proportion of the Dominion of Canada.
...
Two years later, the Royal African Company was granted a
monopoly on the supply of slaves to the British colonies in the
Caribbean.[41] The company would transport more slaves across
the Atlantic than any other, and significantly grew England's
share of the trade, from 33 per cent in 1673 to 74 per cent in
1683.[42] The removal of this monopoly between 1688 and 1712
allowed independent British slave traders to thrive, leading to
a rapid escalation in the number of slaves transported.[43]
British ships carried a third of all slaves shipped across the
Atlantic—approximately 3.5 million Africans[44]
...
To facilitate the shipment of slaves, forts were established on
the coast of West Africa, such as James Island, Accra and Bunce
Island. In the British Caribbean, the percentage of the
population of African descent rose from 25 per cent in 1650 to
around 80 per cent in 1780, and in the Thirteen Colonies from 10
per cent to 40 per cent over the same period (the majority in
the southern colonies).[46] The transatlantic slave trade played
a pervasive role in British economic life, and became a major
economic mainstay for western port cities.[47] Ships registered
in Bristol, Liverpool and London were responsible for the bulk
of British slave trading.[48] For the transported, harsh and
unhygienic conditions on the slaving ships and poor diets meant
that the average mortality rate during the Middle Passage was
one in seven.[49]
...
In 1778, Joseph Banks, Cook's botanist on the voyage, presented
evidence to the government on the suitability of Botany Bay for
the establishment of a penal settlement, and in 1787 the first
shipment of convicts set sail, arriving in 1788.[83] Unusually,
Australia was claimed through proclamation. Indigenous
Australians were considered too uncivilised to require
treaties,[84] and colonisation brought disease and violence that
together with the deliberate dispossession of land and culture
were devastating to these peoples.[85]
...
The East India Company fought a series of Anglo-Mysore wars in
Southern India with the Sultanate of Mysore under Hyder Ali and
then Tipu Sultan. Defeats in the First Anglo-Mysore war and
stalemate in the Second were followed by victories in the Third
and the Fourth.[92] Following Tipu Sultan's death in the fourth
war in the Siege of Seringapatam (1799), the kingdom became a
protectorate of the company.[92]
The East India Company fought three Anglo-Maratha Wars with the
Maratha Confederacy. The First Anglo-Maratha War ended in 1782
with a restoration of the pre-war status quo.[93] The Second and
Third Anglo-Maratha wars resulted in British victories.[94]
After the surrender of Peshwa Bajirao II in 1818, the East India
Company acquired control of a large majority of the Indian
subcontinent.[95][/quote]
HTML https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81GyYavXL4L._AC_UF894,1000_QL80_.jpg
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page