DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 3913--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
DIR By: guest27
Date: February 2, 2021, 5:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> all you have to say is cliches like "reclaiming innocence".
--- End Quote ---
In this thread I've given a brief overview of the concrete,
worldly methods I advocate (twice, to my recall), but in case
you don't remember, this thread was specifically about the
ultimate spiritual and moral implications of our
ideology/actions; an important topic in itself.
--- Quote ---
> You're being inconsistent, you started out by saying that
natural methods are completely incompatible with your moral
compass but ended up agreeing that killing to end violence is
acceptable, but still don't want to hold individuals who
initiate violence accountable because of their biology.
--- End Quote ---
Natural methods were considered violent and contrasted with
"ideal", non-violent methods, in the original site. Killing can
either be violent or non-violent, I only advocate the latter
form as I don't find violence consistent with ideal/non-violent
goals.
Yet 90sRF revealed he has *violent* goals, despite Aryanism.net
apparently preaching *ideal* goals, but maybe I missed something
despite rereading the articles many times over. In any case, his
ideology seems inconsistent through and through, making hell
bedfellows with heaven, cruelty with compassion, defeatism with
heroism, non-violence with retaliatory violence, and so on.
I hold everyone accountable in stopping violence, the heroes and
so-called villains alike; he who hasn't hurt a fly or he who
eats meat, in my ideology everyone is expected to uphold heroic
duty and honour their Original Nobility. I guess what you're
talking about is "blame", where the only one held truly
accountable is simultaneously bereft of honour - he's the only
one who could've prevented violence but he's evil through and
through, so all we can do is poke him with a pitchfork and maybe
we feel marginally better.
--- Quote ---
> Who should get killed then? Certainly not your own cruel cat?
--- End Quote ---
My cat is not cruel, I know her as she truly is, and I already
killed her, she was severely ill and her future looked grim, but
what really cemented my decision was my compassion for her prey
- not because I blame her, but because friends don't let friends
hurt friends. I question my own survival constantly.
--- Quote ---
> In my opinion, not believing in eternal punishment proves that
you lack sense of justice.
--- End Quote ---
Eternal punishment saves no one, and 2 wrongs don't make a
right, which surely anyone with an intact sense of justice could
understand. I'm broadly in favour of the methods and ideas on
Aryanism.net or this forum, just no gratuitous torture, and any
actions from hugging to killing must be 100%
non-violent/anti-violent (anti-violence specifically referring
to intervention, not "retaliatory violence")
#Post#: 3914--------------------------------------------------
Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
DIR By: guest27
Date: February 2, 2021, 5:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> "Do you find this acceptable?"
>
> It may be or it may not be, depending on who it is.
--- End Quote ---
Oh and ^ 90sRF, this just makes you a selective psychopath. Well
done.
*****************************************************
Page 9 of 9
DIR Previous Page