URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 3754--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: January 28, 2021, 4:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > I don't understand this logic? If the initiator of violence
       dies in a retaliatory strike does not the initiated violence end
       with that individuals death? By destroying the initiator how
       then can that individual ever initiate more violence?
       --- End Quote ---
       90sRF is talking about keeping the initiator in eternal hell,
       merely redirecting violence, not killing him. Killing isn't
       inherently violent; when it ends violence, it's nonviolent.
       90sRF doesn't think we can end initiated violence, because it's
       already been done, and I understand his logic, but that's normie
       defeatist logic, not heroic against-all-odds logic.
       And speaking of noble lions MIGHT I INTERJECT THAT JUNGLE
       EMPEROR LEO IS THE SINGLE GREATEST CARTOON EVER! He's literally
       a vegan lion enforcing veganism on his entire jungle (well, he
       settles for letting the carnivores eat grasshoppers, but he's
       doing his best, which is the true meaning of veganism) and
       generally being utterly noble and heroic. They even start
       growing crops. I recommend the original 60s version, plot and
       character wise (I'm watching the '93 redub though). The New
       Adventures has the best fight scenes though. The Lion King was
       such a ripoff and non-heroic.
       (and shoosh about anime not being cartoons)
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qw_-mA0AtdE
       #Post#: 3755--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: January 28, 2021, 6:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: 90sRetroFan link ---
       >
       > "If one is oblivious to the true nature of what they're doing.
       They aren't choosing to torture an animal. It's also possible a
       cat is coerced by its instincts. When I watch a predator I'm not
       sure it's 100% voluntary."
       >
       > You are in distinguished company:
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I'm not in the company of disingenuous pleas of insanity, if
       that's what you're insinuating. If I were to ever go up against
       the court for breaking a chicken farmer's neck I'd plead 100%
       sanity. But if someone poisons me with Salvia Divinorum which
       throws me into a deluded rage against a poor child whom I
       tragically mistake for a White Nationalist, of course I'm
       pleading insanity! What kind of monster punishes someone for
       something they have no control or knowledge of? What of the
       actual villain? I understand people can and do use this as an
       excuse but you'd think we'd try to discern the liars from the
       truthful and innocent.
       That being said, no one should have to plea insanity, everyone
       committing acts of violence should be presumed insane, and even
       more insane the more intentional and unrepentant their act,
       since they're all the more deluded and dangerous. Our current
       model means the most aggressive and clever offenders are classed
       as "sane" and merely punished (which only makes them more
       violent) and released after "serving time", whereas the most
       passive and flaky offenders are classed as "insane" and given
       effective treatment and not released until and unless their
       psychological condition is improved. This strikes me as a lazy
       and cowardly way to deal with the former; if you can't properly
       treat their criminality and redeem their life, then just kill
       them and put us all out of their misery. On that note, in
       accordance with universal compassion, the death penalty should
       be reconceived as euthanasia; and it should probably be used a
       lot more often.
       #Post#: 3759--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest5
       Date: January 28, 2021, 1:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > 90sRF is talking about keeping the initiator in eternal hell,
       merely redirecting violence, not killing him. Killing isn't
       inherently violent; when it ends violence, it's nonviolent.
       --- End Quote ---
       90sRF would torture the perpetrator first, kill the perp, and
       send the perp to hell early. Torture, death, and eternal
       suffering. You know nothing of 90sRF and you clearly have not
       read his writings.
       Some offender would need to die before they go to hell. Your
       logic still makes no sense to me.
       --- Quote ---
       > What kind of monster punishes someone for something they have
       no control or knowledge of?
       --- End Quote ---
       Nature punishes those who are often not aware of it's laws. So
       do Jews:
       --- Quote ---
       > According to some opinions, punishment is the same whether the
       individual transgresses with knowledge of the law or is ignorant
       of the law.
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah
       #Post#: 3765--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: January 28, 2021, 1:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Some offender would need to die before they go to hell. Your
       logic still makes no sense to me.
       --- End Quote ---
       If he's in hell he's still alive, just in a different state. You
       didn't really kill him. Define death how you like, I'm only
       interested in getting rid of my enemies once and for all, not
       acting like them.
       --- Quote ---
       > Nature punishes those who are often not aware of it's laws. So
       do Jews:
       --- End Quote ---
       Very true. We should not want to be like nature or Jews.
       #Post#: 3770--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest5
       Date: January 28, 2021, 6:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Define death how you like, I'm only interested in getting rid
       of my enemies once and for all, not acting like them.
       --- End Quote ---
       Any plans or solutions of how we get there, or, are you just
       interested in semantics and word jugglery? I like hearing my own
       voice too often, but I do it in private and I don't force it on
       other people. Unlike most fantasies, your fantasies do not seem
       to be based in reality at all.
       If you truly wanted to get rid of all enemies once and for all
       you would be advocating for a stop to all reproduction. I do not
       see you doing this either? Infact, rather than actually fighting
       any enemies you seem more concerned with staying in this thread
       than actually helping us fight anyone. Interesting to say the
       least....
       Stop wasting our time moron!
       #Post#: 3794--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: January 29, 2021, 3:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > If you truly wanted to get rid of all enemies once and for all
       you would be advocating for a stop to all reproduction. I do not
       see you doing this either? Infact, rather than actually fighting
       any enemies you seem more concerned with staying in this thread
       than actually helping us fight anyone. Interesting to say the
       least....
       --- End Quote ---
       I advocate Aryanization, veganism and antinatalism, among other
       things. I'm definitely fighting enemies by arguing in this
       thread. It's crucial our intentions are clear and honourable and
       our ideology is palatable and coherent. You Aryanists seem to
       have an awful lot of potential and Aryanism.net helped me
       immensely on the spiritual and ideological front; maybe I can
       return the favour. I thought Aryanism was perfect, but finally
       talking to self-proclaimed Aryanists has been brutally
       disappointing, there's something SERIOUSLY wrong here, but if
       there's a slim shot at redemption I'll take it, otherwise I
       promise to get out of your hair. I don't enjoy this in fact it's
       stressful and scary but I appreciate the way you've carried
       yourselves.
       It's unethical to violently torture people no matter what and
       it's a waste of time. Eternal hell is also an absurd, unethical
       and impossible fantasy. If we focus on weeding out the root of
       evil we'll surely defeat it. Fighting violence on the material
       plane by freeing people of oppressive genetics, beliefs, and
       situations and giving them the necessary tools of nonviolence
       such as empathy, courage and Aryan metabolism. If we can't
       ultimately achieve a perfect world we must destroy it for good,
       ceasing reproduction and extincting life. Hell would perpetuate
       imperfect material existence, whereas Heaven/Nirvana could see
       it never spontaneously returning since the soul is permanently
       detached.
       #Post#: 3860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: January 31, 2021, 3:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > are you just interested in semantics and word jugglery? I like
       hearing my own voice too often, but I do it in private and I
       don't force it on other people.
       --- End Quote ---
       Also, what a pathetic argument ^
       IT ISN'T "JUST SEMANTICS" WHEN THE WORLD IS AT STAKE
       [img width=500
       height=500]
  HTML https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/51f0a40ae4b00c4da7609cb0/1435936180769-1L80U6TMYOACG051CC4P/image-asset.png?format=1500w&content-type=image%2Fpng[/img]
       #Post#: 3879--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: Ganbaru
       Date: January 31, 2021, 8:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > are you just interested in semantics and word jugglery?
       --- End Quote ---
       my thoughts exactly.
       #Post#: 3892--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: guest27
       Date: February 1, 2021, 2:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Ganbaru link ---
       >
       > [quote]are you just interested in semantics and word jugglery?
       --- End Quote ---
       my thoughts exactly.
       [/quote]
       When was this ever even an argument about semantics? When has
       this been about mere words? Do you people not take the concepts
       we're debating here seriously? I wouldn't be surprised...
       Edit: Alright, the fact you guys see this as "just
       semantics/word jugglery" proves to me how little you actually
       care about the concepts we're discussing.
       I won't take any more of your time. I'm done with your
       disgusting farce; your mockery of justice and heroism.
       #Post#: 3910--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ideal Methods > Natural Methods
   DIR By: Ganbaru
       Date: February 2, 2021, 12:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "When was this ever even an argument about semantics? When has
       this been about mere words? Do you people not take the concepts
       we're debating here seriously? I wouldn't be surprised..."
       You're not proposing anything concrete, only ranting about how
       our ideology doesn't suit your worldview. We have a very precise
       plan to end violence but when inquired about yours all you have
       to say is cliches like "reclaiming innocence".
       "Alright, the fact you guys see this as "just semantics/word
       jugglery" proves to me how little you actually care about the
       concepts we're discussing."
       You're being inconsistent, you started out by saying that
       natural methods are completely incompatible with your moral
       compass but ended up agreeing that killing to end violence is
       acceptable, but still don't want to hold individuals who
       initiate violence accountable because of their biology. Who
       should get killed then? Certainly not your own cruel cat? I
       first became hostile because of your post rejecting natural
       methods (and its implications for victims of initiated violence
       like children, victims of rape by serial rapists, etc.), but now
       I'm not even sure what I'm reading.
       "I won't take any more of your time. I'm done with your
       disgusting farce; your mockery of justice and heroism."
       In my opinion, not believing in eternal punishment proves that
       you lack sense of justice. Feel free to outline your plan and/or
       prove its effectiveness in practice though.
       *****************************************************
       Page 8 of 9
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page