DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 33083--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 18, 2026, 10:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
On a side note, classify this lactose tolerant lacto vegetarian:
[Img]
HTML https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D5603AQFHrfDFgqwQYw/profile-displayphoto-shrink_200_200/profile-displayphoto-shrink_200_200/0/1728144232574?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=Zksk030S9vADoMJDgZXz4PGMkbQobEOtFkS4CF9IxXg[/img]
He has said on the record according to scriptures, it is ok for
him to consume meat if he hunts it and offers to "God" (though
he does not do this himself). He also is much taller than me/my
siblings, though not an ectomorph in the slightest. Due to his
height, he often talks condescendingly to those shorter than
him. He has extremely conservative/traditionalist/patriarchal
views on women.
I view this "religious" kid as no different than the
grandchildren in the previous post. Both obviously have non
Aryan blood, but both abstain from meat for ethical reasons
(although grandchildren like food that replicates meat). Since
neither group has reproduced, we cannot say one is better than
the other. But according to the traditionalist view this kid is
better than the grandchildren because he is religious and they
are not.
Which goes back to your point about how religiousness is not
necessarily Aryan. In fact, I would say this kid is worse as he
is doing PhD level research in a STEM field, and often brags
about his IQ, and how there are less women in STEM.
#Post#: 33084--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2026, 3:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"What if the "taste of meat" was proven to correlate highly with
sodium content and texture? Could we not then argue that the way
to a 'better world' is by eliminating those you enjoy
high-sodium products"
The opposite. From Aryanism.net:
--- Quote ---
> There is more salt in animal tissues, such as meat, blood, and
milk, than in plant tissues. Nomads who subsist on their flocks
and herds do not eat salt with their food, but agriculturalists,
feeding mainly on cereals and vegetable matter, need to
supplement their diet with salt. With the spread of
civilization, salt became one of the world's main trading
commodities.
>
> Agricultural labour itself leads to increased salt loss via
increased perspiration, hence another reason behind the need for
salt intake. Are you ”worth your salt”?
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 33085--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2026, 4:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"The daughters are all also obese. As is the daughter of the
other aunt."
You can watch to see if they become diabetic later.
"The latter even said ("I am too fat, no one will marry me, so I
chose to marry a meat eater since he accepted me, explicitly
supporting my theory of low standards")."
Are you sure the "" are in the correct position?
"The obesity/low heat tolerance could indicate Turanian blood,
since the steppe was a temperate climate."
Obesity should not have been an advantage for Turanians since it
makes horseriding less efficient, but I imagine that if they ate
a Turanian diet they might not be obese in the first place.
"On a side note, classify this lactose tolerant lacto
vegetarian:"
He definitely looks like his own personality.
"Due to his height, he often talks condescendingly to those
shorter than him."
How does he feel towards "whites" (who on average are taller
than "non-whites")?
"abstain from meat for ethical reasons"
But he does not appear to properly understand the ethical
reasons if he is able to say:
--- Quote ---
> it is ok for him to consume meat if he hunts it and offers to
"God"
--- End Quote ---
Besides, how can he be both patriarchist and (supposedly)
ethical vegetarian, given that not only are more women
vegetarian than men, but also among vegetarians more women are
vegetarian for ethical reasons?
HTML https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/animals-and-us/202411/why-do-more-women-than-men-choose-to-become-vegetarians
--- Quote ---
> The women were more likely than men to have become vegetarians
primarily out of ethical concerns (46 percent versus 30
percent).
> ...
> gender differences in concern for animals seem to be
culturally widespread, if not universal. In a 2021
cross-cultural study of university students, women in every one
of 22 countries scored higher than men on scales measuring
concern for other species. In a paper in Scientific Reports,
Christopher Hopwood and his colleagues reported that men
consumed more meat than women in 20 of 23 nations. (The
exceptions were China, Indonesia, and India).
--- End Quote ---
"Since neither group has reproduced, we cannot say one is better
than the other."
We can compare them on other issues. For example, are the
grandchildren less patriarchist than he is?
"there are less women in STEM."
So he considers STEM more important than vegetarianism?
(And don't even get me started on the many ways in which
progress in STEM itself has worsened the lives of countless
animals. A hypothetical world where all humans were women is
likely to have avoided most of this.)
#Post#: 33088--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 18, 2026, 6:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Are you sure the "" are in the correct position?"
Should be after "me"
"How does he feel towards "whites" (who on average are taller
than "non-whites")?"
He is nominally "anti White", but for all the wrong reasons
("Whites" are "low IQ", bad at STEM, etc. kind of like the Vivek
Ramaswamy argument). But one thing is he does condemn "Whites"
for their carnism (albeit in a somewhat speciesist way (I've
only heard him condemn them for beef eating). It's kind of a
toss up; he wants to be himself (vegetarian, Hindu) and have a
society where vegetarians/Hindus are respected but at the same
time wants to do STEM, so he has to criticize "Whites" but for
all the wrong reasons.
"We can compare them on other issues. For example, are the
grandchildren less patriarchist than he is?"
I am not sure, but I do know they are a little more
"Whitewashed" when it comes to personality, their friend circle,
etc (which we can attribute to their inferior blood). Whereas
this person tries to socialize with vegetarians more than meat
eaters. But even here only vegetarian men. He does somewhat hold
the view that vegetarians > non vegetarians, and stressed the
importance of not being embarrassed of celebrating religious
festivals in Western countries, etc. But even here it is
somewhat Identitarian ("hold on to my identity")
"He definitely looks like his own personality."
I used to think he was good due to his religiosity, and . Not
after seeing his posts on X. Which brings me to another point
about how this type of male chauvinist behavior is rampant on
his patrilineal side of the family. Also relates to a point
about how supposed religiosity is meaningless if you are not a
good person.
His father's brother (my mother's sister's husband) also
displays some of this behavior but in his case at least he
genuinely tries to be a better person. For example, although he
has reproduced, he is less genetically selfish (only one child)
and does not have a mindset of my children vs other children
double standards, and offers equal support, and likewise
(sometimes undeserved) criticism. But unfortunately he does have
a short temper, and sometimes is emotionally a rock when it
comes to his wife. However he does defend his wife from the
extreme toxic side of his family (his brothers/even sisters).
One time he held our hand and started crying saying don't feel
bad I am criticizing you, just care for you, etc. He is also
less materialistic/Westernized, no interest in STEM research,
content with fairly simple life. His behavior is partly due to
genetics but also due to environment (grew up in post war
poverty but with lot of siblings, had to support his siblings).
In fact, we were remarking how he didn't want to even really
have kids of his own, due to these conditions, which is why he
stopped with one. He is the most truthful/non selfish of our non
blood relatives we can count on, a (somewhat) genuine well
wisher. But his other siblings (for example, another brother)
are not the same way.
#Post#: 33089--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 18, 2026, 6:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"So he considers STEM more important than vegetarianism?"
This part is where I think the coin could land either way. In
theory, if he was really religious/traditionalist, then he would
be anti STEM. But since religion/traditionalism is a way to
exert male dominance, perhaps he likes STEM for his ability to
do that.
#Post#: 33090--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 18, 2026, 6:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Video to get better idea of face shape
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h8joBRWrMhw
#Post#: 33091--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2026, 8:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
""Whites" are "low IQ", bad at STEM"
HTML https://ageofthegeek.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/charles-murray-copy.jpg
"He does somewhat hold the view that vegetarians > non
vegetarians"
Which should imply women > men on average, yet he ignores this.
"stressed the importance of not being embarrassed of celebrating
religious festivals in Western countries, etc. But even here it
is somewhat Identitarian ("hold on to my identity")"
Does he support non-Hindu non-Westerners (e.g. Muslims)
celebrating their religious festivals in Western countries?
"his posts on X"
Can you post examples?
"Which brings me to another point about how this type of male
chauvinist behavior is rampant on his patrilineal side of the
family."
He defends it using female STEM underrpresentation, but do the
others also? And if not, how do they defend it?
"if he was really religious/traditionalist"
He has not yet reproduced so we have not seen how he would treat
his offspring. Has he advocated traditionalism when it comes to
how other parents should treat their offspring? If not, we
cannot call him traditionalist.
#Post#: 33092--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 18, 2026, 8:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Does he support non-Hindu non-Westerners (e.g. Muslims)
celebrating their religious festivals in Western countries?"
Yes. He retweeting posts celebrating operation gadaffi, saying
Europe deserves this.
"He defends it using female STEM underrpresentation, but do the
others also? And if not, how do they defend it"
They do not. Rather, they defend it using kind of paternalistic
arguments, that men know what's "best" for women, similar to how
paternalists claim they know what's best for children.
"Can you post examples"
They are no longer visible unfortunately. He locked his account.
Will post it once he makes it visible again.
Also, would like to get your analysis of his face shape after
watching the video.
#Post#: 33094--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2026, 9:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Yes. He retweeting posts celebrating operation gadaffi, saying
Europe deserves this."
Then I would not call him identitarian.
"men know what's "best" for women, similar to how paternalists
claim they know what's best for children."
The latter argues that current children will thank the adult
supremacists in future after they become adults themselves. But
women do not become men in future unless they bring in
reincarnation, and their theory would have to be that women who
accept patriarchy will reincarnate as men, whereas women who
reject patriarchy will continue to reincarnate as women. But
anti-patriarchists could just argue that it is other way round.
So there is no possible correspondence with the adult-child
dynamic.
"your analysis of his face shape"
Terrible of course, especially the facial hair area (goes down
to his neck FFS!).
#Post#: 33106--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 19, 2026, 9:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Here is the picture of the fisherman son in law:
[Img]
HTML https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4E03AQGM7RI6Okw2gA/profile-displayphoto-crop_800_800/B4EZubqfu.KkAI-/0/1767843167558?e=1788998400&v=beta&t=zHKEyJZRe-t4XPW1QqQhcdhLdLbzBut3YvA-1UKoqvI[/img]
Btw, would you advocate ahimsa against him? How about my hunter
cousin?
It is unfortunate and an embarrassment that I have the
misfortune of being related to either of them..
*****************************************************
Page 7 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page