DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 33058--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 3:12 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Did they tell you this?"
Ok, maybe not explicit reproductive Eurocentrists, but I did see
them lusting after "White" men.
"Social exclusion was not considered bullying during the
Counterculture era. Everyone can choose whom to socialize with
and whom not to socialize with. Just because you are unpopular
does not mean you are being bullied, so long as even those who
socially exclude you respect your boundaries"
Ok, fine, perhaps you are right. But you also have to consider
the fact that the girl is in the house and occupying space, in
effect draining up resources (time) from the other siblings, do
I viewed it as betraying my duty and turning my back on them, as
she would always talk down to them in condescending manner since
they were younger when they join the group. But I suppose this
is a different phenomenon than social exclusion... And btw this
did lead into real bullying as I did see her physically
intimidate is using her sexual dimorphism when she got older,
kind of like saying with her body language (there's something
wrong with you, not me, when the truth is the inverse). She also
took my brother pictures without his consent.
Conversely, (this when she was younger) when it was time to
exclude her from our group, after some cousins visited and she
had to leave, she started crying. LOL
#Post#: 33059--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 3:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"You should promote anti-"whiteness" to both, so that at least
they exert their tendencies in a better direction."
I originally thought of turning them against their father, but
this won't work, since ultimately the father is providing for
them. Of course, this, coupled with their already inferior
blood, will ultimately make them follow in their father's
footsteps. Sure, this might be generic determinism, but it is
what it is. The best as you said we can hope for is for them to
take out "Whites".
#Post#: 33060--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 4:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"But indeed it would be easier for them to evolve non-sadism
than Gentile men, since this would not have made it harder for
them to survive. On the other hand, if they had really evolved
enough empathy to not eat meat, they should also have had enough
empathy to not voluntarily reproduce with meat-eating men. So
was their reproduction involuntary? In many cases this might
have been the case."
But wait a minute, I recall you mentioning that vegan Gentile
women are sexually attracted to Gentile men who hunt? Or perhaps
they are attracted to them, but not enough to reproduce? I'm
confused now...
I guess perhaps there is a spectrum...
#Post#: 33061--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 17, 2026, 5:54 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I recall you mentioning that vegan Gentile women are sexually
attracted to Gentile men who hunt?"
But they rarely enjoy watching those men hunt. It's the same
inconsistency that I am trying to point out.
This also applies in other fields. For example, many women
strongly prefer men who can drive a car compared to men who
cannot, but at the same time can't stand men talking about cars.
If you just looked at the second point, you would logically
think that such a woman would prefer a non-driving man (who
would thus be less likely to talk about cars), but no.....
#Post#: 33062--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 7:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"But they rarely enjoy watching those men hunt. It's the same
inconsistency that I am trying to point out."
I guess the ones that did, who were unable to join the hunt,
would be the ones that would eat meat and wouldn't give it up.
On the other hand, those that did not enjoy hunting would be the
ones who could give up meat, but still would occasionally like
the taste, since the cohabitating partners were all hunting men,
and they would have to have reproduced them for the lineage to
not go extinct. I place the cousin who reproduced with a
fisherman in this camp. His phenotype itself should have been a
red flag; that she was attracted enough to marry him itself says
something about her inferior blood.
Then there are those vegetarians since birth who reproduce with
non fisherman/non hunting meat eaters (for example, the daughter
of the other semi vegetarian couple). This group doesn't like
the taste of meat at all (perhaps it is due to the fact that in
this case the father was "noble" enough to not feed it to the
child, and he himself had quit at this point). But it is still
in their blood to be sexually attracted to meat eating men, or
at least not be repulsed enough by them to not reproduce with
them (low standards). I would place her in the general camp of
mixed blood offspring (Aryan/non Aryan). This is the vast
majority of the Indian population.
I hope my analysis is correct.
Also, out of curiosity, where would you place the Aunts that
reproduced with the meat eaters out of misinformation? Paleo or
Aryan leaning vegetarianism? When conversing with them, I do get
a different feeling than conversing with their daughters (who
are vegetarian also). Their temperament is different I would
say..
#Post#: 33063--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 17, 2026, 5:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"This is the vast majority of the Indian population."
This would imply that vegetarianism among Indians is more common
for females than for males. (I would also suspect this to be the
case on account of the Turanian Vedic invasion alone.) And
indeed:
HTML https://www.vrg.org/blog/2020/08/19/how-many-people-are-vegetarian-in-india/
--- Quote ---
> about 30% of women and about 20% of men may fall under the
lacto-vegetarian category
--- End Quote ---
"I hope my analysis is correct."
It seems to work out.
"His phenotype itself should have been a red flag"
How about the physiognomy of your cousins themselves? Does it
line up with their behaviour?
"where would you place the Aunts that reproduced with the meat
eaters out of misinformation? Paleo or Aryan leaning
vegetarianism?"
It's hard to say. My understanding based on what you have told
me above (correct me if I am mistaken) is that they have never
eaten meat in their lives, but because of this we do not
actually know if they would like the taste if they did try it.
What do their husbands look like, and how do they compare to
what your aunts prefer men to look like (e.g. celebrities they
are fans of)?
"When conversing with them, I do get a different feeling than
conversing with their daughters (who are vegetarian also). Their
temperament is different I would say."
But any heritable difference could be caused by the daughters'
patrilineal blood, therefore does not say anything about the
blood of your aunts which is what you are asking me about.
#Post#: 33066--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 6:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"This would imply that vegetarianism among Indians is more
common for females than for males. (I would also suspect this to
be the case on account of the Turanian Vedic invasion alone.)
And indeed:"
So you are implying an Aryan matrilineal + Turanian patrilineal
combo I guess? This would make sense, heritably vegetarian but
sexually having low standards.
"It's hard to say. My understanding based on what you have told
me above (correct me if I am mistaken) is that they have never
eaten meat in their lives, but because of this we do not
actually know if they would like the taste if they did try it.
What do their husbands look like, and how do they compare to
what your aunts prefer men to look like (e.g. celebrities they
are fans of)?"
You are correct. I mentioned earlier how the Aunts criticize
their husbands behavior, but my mother and father both remarked
how they are both still a little materialistic minded (which
they share with their daughters), or bossy (the mother of the
hunter was a school headmistress- her daughter takes after this
behavior a little), and just kind of "go with the flow" of what
their husbands do (aside from trying to get them to quit meat),
and in fact enjoyed many of the material benefits that heir
husbands offered. Perhaps it is because there is not really any
choice since they have reproduced, but again this goes back to
the lack of standards. My mother kind of hinted at this by
saying how they are not really pious in the sense that my mother
and father are. Sure, you don't really have control of many
things, but in this case the best course of option is to
surrender to God ferociously. That they did not do this despite
coming from religious background and themselves being religious
illustrated the lack of standards. i also mentioned earlier how
they fought with my mother at the wedding about not wearing
silk. Also to note is that they both still drink milk coffee.
This might also supplement the Turanian patrilineal/Aryan
matrilineal hybrid hypothesis. But I should note they may have
inherited this combo from their mother (my grandmother). My
grandfather on my father's side was a soft spoken down to earth
gentleman who worked as a veterinarian treating sick animals. On
the other hand my grandmother always looks unhappy in the photos
where they are pictured together. But I will note she is
extremely religious.
"But any heritable difference could be caused by the daughters'
patrilineal blood, therefore does not say anything about the
blood of your aunts which is what you are asking me about."
I was thinking daughter temperament = non Aryan blood
(obviously) so a different temperament = Aryan blood. For
example, in the case of the hunter's mother, the daughter is a
staunch atheist, whereas the mother is religious. Sure even
here, the religious belief is somewhat superstitious, which the
daughter criticizes her for, but it is still something. It is
hard for me to explain, but you would have to interact with them
to see what I am talking about. Going to the daughters house
feels extremely Westernized/soulless (no religious iconography
at all, it's like you have fully entered the realm of Judeo
Americanism). Whereas at least the mother does some prayers.
In the case of the other aunt, the temperament is much more
similar with her daughter. Also, I should note, even though they
are both a little materialistic, they are not as bossy. The only
difference is that the daughter seems less religious/more ok
with cohabitating with meat eating men than her mother (due to
patrilineal blood). This relates to a broader point about how
perhaps in this case, the father was a meat eater but not as
avid as the other husband (who ate till his death and fed it to
the kids). I would place this husband in the category of
Turanian patrilineal + Aryan matrilineal male offspring (unlike
the other husband who had clear Gentile blood as evidenced by
his sons hunting). This group might have had enough Aryan blood
to convert to vegetarianism out of religious reasons but never
eliminated the taste for meat. This is exemplified by the
husband's father, who was a notorious male chauvinist who would
criticize my aunt for every little thing but would make excuses
for his son. I mentioned one time how my father's brother
complained to the father in law about the son's meat eating, but
the father in law became upset at the brother for complaining
rather than his own son for eating meat! Add insult to injury
was that the father in law claimed to be a supposedly devout
religious person!
Also to note is that both aunts are overweight and suffer from
diabetes....
#Post#: 33067--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 6:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"How about the physiognomy of your cousins themselves? Does it
line up with their behaviour?'"
I am told that both the cousin who married the fisherman and the
cousin who hunts share a remarkable semblance to their father.
Son:
[Img]
HTML https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/v2/D4E03AQFNX_DrWJKW_g/profile-displayphoto-shrink_800_800/profile-displayphoto-shrink_800_800/0/1718231291849?e=1788393600&v=beta&t=hdxtYjCw3sGmndl1bF5ucGcepe3UU6ylAfbofN9r9Eo[/img]
Can't find picture of daughter.
#Post#: 33068--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 17, 2026, 8:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"how they fought with my mother at the wedding about not wearing
silk."
This is even harder to understand. Obviously they do not
ethically care about the silkworms, but if they like silk as a
symbol of affluence, and your mother does not wear silk whereas
they do, doesn't this make themselves look better by their own
standards? Or do you mean at your parents' wedding everyone was
prohibited from wearing silk? If the latter, then their
complaint (that the wedding as a whole lacked affluence) would
actually make more sense.
"in the case of the hunter's mother, the daughter is a staunch
atheist, whereas the mother is religious."
I do not think this is a reliable indicator. There are also
atheist ethical vegans.
"Westernized/soulless (no religious iconography at all"
You are using the term "Westernized" incorrectly. Recall:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/
"I would place this husband in the category of Turanian
patrilineal + Aryan matrilineal male offspring (unlike the other
husband who had clear Gentile blood as evidenced by his sons
hunting)."
Turanians also hunted recreationally.
"This is exemplified by the husband's father, who was a
notorious male chauvinist who would criticize my aunt for every
little thing but would make excuses for his son."
Is this male chauvanism or in-law blaming (close-quarter
nepotism)? If he also has a daughter (does he?), but sides with
his daughter's husband over his daughter, only then can we
safely conclude it is the former.
"I mentioned one time how my father's brother complained to the
father in law about the son's meat eating, but the father in law
became upset at the brother for complaining rather than his own
son for eating meat!"
This also suggests in-law blaming (only males involved here, but
the in-law gets the blame).
"Also to note is that both aunts are overweight and suffer from
diabetes...."
Either obesity or diabetes in conjunction with vegetarian diet
could indicate non-Aryan blood. Both at the same time is almost
a smoking gun! (To be absolutely sure we would have to put them
on meat diets and see if their health improves, not that I am
advising this to be done!)
#Post#: 33069--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 9:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"This is even harder to understand. Obviously they do not
ethically care about the silkworms, but if they like silk as a
symbol of affluence, and your mother does not wear silk whereas
they do, doesn't this make themselves look better by their own
standards?"
I guess I should clarify. It wasn't about wearing silk. In Hindu
wedding tradition, the bride has to give some sarees as gifts to
the groom's family. These sarees were cotton at my father's
request (initially he wanted to accept no gifts at all on
principle, but agreed since this was a religious custom). The
sister in laws complained about these, that they were cotton and
not silk.
"Either obesity or diabetes in conjunction with vegetarian diet
could indicate non-Aryan blood."
I agree it indicates non aryan blood, but the question here more
is if the vegetarianism itself is a product of non Aryan blood,
specifically if they like the taste of meat. Recall we talked
about Aryan phenotypes but non Aryan body type. Similarly, they
can have somewhat Aryan temperament, but non Aryan bodies (of
course whether the bodies influence temperament is also a valid
question, as evidenced by their bossiness/materialism, and also
a separate incident where my aunt was complaining about it being
too hot). At the end of the day, I agree though non Aryan blood
is non Aryan blood. And it definitely influenced their
reproductive standards.
"I do not think this is a reliable indicator. There are also
atheist ethical vegans."
Yes, they are ethical vegetarians, no argument there. My
question more was if their ethical vegetarianism (paleolithic
leaning, see next paragraph) differs from the mother's ethical
vegetarianism (I suspected Aryan based).
"You are using the term "Westernized" incorrectly. Recall:"
Ok, I agree. But these aren't just atheists; they are **** anti
religionists. They have fully assimilated into the "American"
culture of sportsball, consumerism, etc. Without religion, it
seems as though they have blended in to the progressivist
secularism of the day and age. They regularly celebrate
thanksgiving with Tofu turkey and such (I mentioned the
daughter/grandchildren like the taste of meat). Typical
"American" "suburban soccer mom" type family where all the
energy is invested into pushing the kids into sports and such.
The granddaughter did learn Indian classical music but it was
decoupled from its religious roots (which is virtually
impossible) so she didn't really get into it that much. My aunt
hence likes being with us more than them (since we also take her
to temples and stuff which her daughter's family never goes to).
"Turanians also hunted recreationally"
Fine. But can we say that the father of the sun who hunted has
more non Aryan blood? I guess since the other husband didn't
have a son we won't know. But I will say the daughters of the
two aunts have different temperaments.
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page