DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 33045--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 15, 2026, 9:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Ok, , does my aunt (father's side) who never reproduced (due to
schizophrenia) with her now deceased vegetarian husband count?"
Sure!
"N = 2.5
M = 1.66"
In other words, the inferior are more fertile in absence of
state intervention, which is what we would expect. Again it
confirms the need for National Socialism.
#Post#: 33047--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 15, 2026, 11:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ok. On a side note, if meat eaters are not sadistic as hunters,
what about gatherers (women with paleo blood) who reproduce, but
who are vegetarian? And what about their offspring, who seem to
take pleasure in humiliating/berating other people?
#Post#: 33048--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 16, 2026, 1:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"if meat eaters are not sadistic as hunters"
Some non-hunting meat eaters can be as sadistic as (or even more
sadistic than) hunters, such as those who are too physically
lazy to go outside, but nevertheless enjoy watching videos of
cruelty to animals. But at the other extreme are those who
cannot bear to watch slaughterhouse videos in person, but who
eat meat anyway even though they know some animal went through
exactly what was in the videos in order for the meat to be
produced.
"what about gatherers (women with paleo blood) who reproduce,
but who are vegetarian?"
If you are referring to Gentile women, I doubt they would be
heritably inclined towards vegetarianism, since in Paleolithic
times even if they themselves did not hunt they would have eaten
meat hunted by men. But indeed it would be easier for them to
evolve non-sadism than Gentile men, since this would not have
made it harder for them to survive. On the other hand, if they
had really evolved enough empathy to not eat meat, they should
also have had enough empathy to not voluntarily reproduce with
meat-eating men. So was their reproduction involuntary? In many
cases this might have been the case.
"And what about their offspring, who seem to take pleasure in
humiliating/berating other people?"
How do you know they were doing this in Paleolithic times? Or
are you talking about someone alive today?
#Post#: 33051--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: Murkadin
Date: August 16, 2026, 7:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"And what about their offspring, who seem to take pleasure in
humiliating/berating other people?"
Found this interesting: (Gemini)
--- Quote ---
> Yes, people in Paleolithic tribes almost certainly insulted
and mocked each other. While ancient spoken words did not
fossilize, studies of modern egalitarian hunter-gatherer
societies show that verbal teasing, sarcasm, and insults are
universal tools used to maintain social harmony, check ego, and
resolve disputes.
>
> Why Anthropologists Believe They Insulted Each Other
>
> Egalitarian enforcement: Small bands relied on cooperation for
survival, meaning arrogant or bossy individuals posed a threat
to group unity.
>
> Modern foraging analogs: Studies of groups like the Ju/'hoan
San reveal a formal practice called "insulting the meat," where
successful hunters are actively teased and told their big kills
are scrawny or worthless to prevent pride.
>
> Universal human behavior: Teasing, gossip, and verbal friction
appear in every known human culture as a low-level way to police
behavior without resorting to lethal physical violence.
>
> Forms of Prehistoric Conflict and Tension
>
> Shaming and mockery: Used informally to deflate individual ego
or punish laziness.
>
> Fierce arguments: Heated verbal quarrels over social norms,
mating dynamics, or sharing resources.
>
> Severe verbal rejection or temporary exclusion from the group
when teasing failed to correct bad behavior.
--- End Quote ---
Compared to Neolithic tribes: (Gemini)
--- Quote ---
> Yes, people in Neolithic tribes almost certainly insulted and
mocked each other. While spoken words from 10,000 years ago do
not fossilize, human psychological makeup, humor, and
interpersonal friction were the same then as they are now.
>
> Why We Know They Insulted Each Other:
>
> Universal human nature: Every known human culture across
history uses verbal teasing, gossip, sarcasm, and insults to
express anger or enforce social rules.
>
> Egalitarian pressure: Small-scale Neolithic and
hunter-gatherer societies often used teasing and ridicule to
stop individuals from acting selfishly or trying to act superior
[??] to others.
>
> Inter-group conflict: Archaeology shows evidence of tension,
competition, and warfare between neighboring Neolithic groups,
making hostile name-calling or teasing very likely during
disputes.
>
--- End Quote ---
Acting superior and actually being superior are not the same.
Example: Trump has always behaved as if he were superior, but in
action anyone with real discernment understands Trump is
inferior to anyone with a grain of nobility to say the least.
#Post#: 33052--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 16, 2026, 9:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"If you are referring to Gentile women, I doubt they would be
heritably inclined towards vegetarianism, since in Paleolithic
times even if they themselves did not hunt they would have eaten
meat hunted by men. But indeed it would be easier for them to
evolve non-sadism than Gentile men, since this would not have
made it harder for them to survive. On the other hand, if they
had really evolved enough empathy to not eat meat, they should
also have had enough empathy to not voluntarily reproduce with
meat-eating men. So was their reproduction involuntary? In many
cases this might have been the case."
Perhaps you are right. The siblings of the hunter I mentioned,
all are vegetarian (their mother raised them to not eat meat,
even though the father would bring it home and feed it to the
kids). One is married to and reproduced with a vegetarian, one
is married to a vegetarian turned non vegetarian turned
vegetarian again. One is married to and reproduced with a
fisherman as I mentioned earlier, but I think this marriage was
based on misinformation similar to her mother's marriage (she
was originally going to marry another guy (vegetarian) who she
was seeing, but marriage got cancelled due to some superstitious
BS)....
"How do you know they were doing this in Paleolithic times? Or
are you talking about someone alive today?"
In the present day. So I think here again the context matters.
The offspring of the sister who married and reproduced with a
vegetarian, I mentioned her kids earlier her kids are all
vegetarian (though they prefer food that replicates meat). The
son is kind of a show off when it comes to physical strength
(I.e. "mogging"), but I haven't seen him directly initiate
violence by eating meat or physically bullying anyone. The
daughter also one time made a snarky comment of my brother
stature, but again I haven't seen her try to directly bully him
or eat meat. She has also taken up some service work with peace
corps. I'm pretty sure both of them have no intention of
reproducing any time soon.
I'm pretty sure I recall the offspring of the fisherman couple
(son) was bullying an autistic child older than him. I suppose
it's early to tell (maybe I recall the incident wrong), but I
guarantee this kid will grow up to be a monster. Already he
participates in fishing trips with his father (not sure if he
does this as he forced to or if he really likes it). There's
also the fact that his older sister (daughter) nearly choked him
to death one time. She also participates in fishing trips, so
there's that. Again, it's too early to tell, maybe they just got
into a physical altercation that went too far, and maybe she is
only fishing because she is forced to by her father (who I
mentioned uses terror tactics to control his children).
Similarly, I have seen offspring of some semi vegetarian couples
(where marriage was most likely based on misinformation, and
where husband was a serial liar with archetypal non aryan
treacherous phenotype) who gladly eat meat. When they were
young, the excuse was that the father was corrupting them (even
though they themselves relished it), but their mother was able
to raise them vegetarian to a certain extent. So the kids would
come to our house and my mom would feed them vegetarian food. I
also did my best to not directly criticize them and tried to
engage and play with them, as I viewed them as victims of
initiated violence, even though it was obvious their temperament
was different, and they were obviously sucking up my time and
energy that I could otherwise use to bond with my younger
siblings instead. For example, they were high in sexual
dimorphism at the age of 9 itself, and they were obviously
reproductive Eurocentrists. I felt as though they were bringing
the bad sh*t from school that I tried to get away from. It also
naturally led to some weird dynamics where I couldn't ignore her
since she was in my house (even though I wanted to), but trying
to engage her resulted in obvious sexual tension (which she
liked, but which I didn't, but I nevertheless played along with
since there was no option). Moreover, as I mentioned, it also
resulted in younger siblings being socially excluded, but again,
this was more of an unintentional consequence of their
temperament, rather than an active effort by the girl. So I
would do my best to include them and the girl would also not
protest.
As they got older though, it was clear through their body
language, etc. when they were in my house they were trying to
physically intimidate and socially exclude my younger siblings.
They also started consuming meat by their own will this time
around.
Which brings me to another point: Bullying/sadism need not be
directly physical right? Sometimes through people's body
language, coupled with their physical structure (high sexual
dimorphism), leads to social exclusion/physical intimidation
naturally. Though there is a difference here between those who
do this actively (the girl) vs those who don't do it actively
(the son in the first paragraph, or even the girl herself when
she was younger). This is a broader point about genetic
determinism I guess, but then why talk about good vs bad when
everyone is just acting as per their biological imperative?
Isn't this just fatalism? These questions are driving me insane.
Doesn't this open up a can of worms where even the victims of
bullying don't deserve sympathy then, since they are genetically
wired to accept bullying?
Lastly, where do you put those test on animals (including non
Whites) Aren't they sadists?
Sorry if I went off on bit of a tangent. These things have been
on my mind and I had to get it off my chest
#Post#: 33053--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 16, 2026, 7:37 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Some non-hunting meat eaters can be as sadistic as (or even
more sadistic than) hunters, such as those who are too
physically lazy to go outside, but nevertheless enjoy watching
videos of cruelty to animals. But at the other extreme are those
who cannot bear to watch slaughterhouse videos in person, but
who eat meat anyway even though they know some animal went
through exactly what was in the videos in order for the meat to
be produced"
Wait, so are you saying the second group is less or more
sadistic?
#Post#: 33054--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: Murkadin
Date: August 16, 2026, 10:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I've been jumped from behind three times on three different
occasions, once by two people. Not sure if any of them were meat
eaters? I heard much later about some of the people involved.
Apparently, one of them was known for torturing cats by swinging
them around by their tails. He later also became a repeat
criminal and started smoking crack...
#Post#: 33055--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 17, 2026, 2:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I guarantee this kid will grow up to be a monster."
"his older sister (daughter) nearly choked him to death one
time."
You should promote anti-"whiteness" to both, so that at least
they exert their tendencies in a better direction.
"they were obviously reproductive Eurocentrists"
Did they tell you this?
"trying to engage her resulted in obvious sexual tension (which
she liked"
So for non-reproductive sex she doesn't mind "non-whites"?
"Bullying/sadism need not be directly physical right?"
True, but I often receive an impression that people from your
generation and younger use the term "bullying" differently from
my generation and older. I will elaborate below.
"social exclusion"
Social exclusion was not considered bullying during the
Counterculture era. Everyone can choose whom to socialize with
and whom not to socialize with. Just because you are unpopular
does not mean you are being bullied, so long as even those who
socially exclude you respect your boundaries.
For example, if I sit at a lunch table and everyone else already
sitting at that table moves to a different table, I am not being
bullied. In contrast, if I sit at a lunch table and those
already sitting at that table steal my chair/spit in my
food/etc., I am being bullied. However, these days I have seen
even the former labelled as "bullying".
"why talk about good vs bad when everyone is just acting as per
their biological imperative?"
Because there is good blood and bad blood, and good blood should
be trying to eliminate bad blood.
"Doesn't this open up a can of worms where even the victims of
bullying don't deserve sympathy then, since they are genetically
wired to accept bullying?"
If two people are being bullied and one accepts it while the
other does not, I will definitely help the latter if I am only
allowed to help one. But if I am allowed to help both I will, if
only to prevent the bullies from victory.
"Lastly, where do you put those test on animals (including non
Whites) Aren't they sadists?"
Please rephrase your question. In its current form it is
incomprehensible.
"Wait, so are you saying the second group is less or more
sadistic?"
Less. They are horrified by the process, but are addicted to the
product. This is not sadism. Sadism is enjoying the process.
#Post#: 33056--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: rp
Date: August 17, 2026, 2:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Please rephrase your question. In its current form it is
incomprehensible."
Would you consider those (including non Whites) who test on
animals to be sadists?
#Post#: 33057--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mental Health
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 17, 2026, 3:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Would you consider those (including non Whites) who test on
animals to be sadists?"
If they enjoy the process, yes. If they solely seek the product
(empirical knowledge), no.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page