URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 28118--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: JAM Date: October 4, 2024, 10:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pitUprbdfSw
       This is him reviewing adult toys. In his videos he goes on about
       various topics including details of how much he hates n*ggers,
       his suicide attempts, and occasionally talks of Hebrew
       literature. He is also homeless
  HTML https://johnalanmartinson.com/2024/10/03/why-am-i-homeless/
       Further, he sells an adult themed shirt displaying a
       urine-sipping giraffe on this site.
       Is this the power of aryan comradeship?
       #Post#: 28119--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: JAM Date: October 4, 2024, 11:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V83EJfq77qc
       Here he is going on about his sexual thoughts regarding Veronica
       Clark. He also mentions his suicide attempt involving
       diphenhydramine, an OTC allergy drug
       #Post#: 28120--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 5, 2024, 12:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       He still understands our enemies better than most:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g4vS1m3ulg
       Of course I disagree with his optimism regarding WNs' chances of
       success (which he estimates to be low but I estimate to be
       higher). Honestly, I would prefer to be wrong.
       #Post#: 28132--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: WavesOfWhiteness Date: October 6, 2024, 2:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=323.msg28120#msg28120
       date=1728107568]
       He still understands our enemies better than most:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g4vS1m3ulg
       Of course I disagree with his optimism regarding WNs' chances of
       success (which he estimates to be low but I estimate to be
       higher). Honestly, I would prefer to be wrong.
       [/quote]
       [quote]Did the Russians really charge German positions in mass
       numbers, without firearms, during World War II? In movies
       depicting the Eastern front, the Soviets thrust their soldiers
       at German positions. Was this truly a common tactic for Soviet
       forces?
       No, the Soviets were brutal and callous with the lives of their
       soldiers, but they weren’t actively trying to lose the war.
       Enemy at the Gates is one of the worst depictions of the Eastern
       Front, but for some reason comprises the majority of people’s
       ‘knowledge’ about that theater. The Soviets never really lacked
       for small arms, although they did often lack heavier weapons.
       Because of heavy losses in 1941 and the occupation of many
       densely populated regions, the Soviets actually suffered from
       manpower shortages which required them to not zerg rush the
       Germans as depicted in Enemy at the Gates...[/quote]
       Entire response:
  HTML https://www.quora.com/Did-the-Russians-really-charge-German-positions-in-mass-numbers-without-firearms-during-World-War-II-In-movies-depicting-the-Eastern-front-the-Soviets-thrust-their-soldiers-at-German-positions-Was-this-truly-a-common-tactic-for-Soviet-forces
       [img width=1280
       height=875]
  HTML https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/oQYAAOSwr2Zi9rIx/s-l1600.webp[/img]
       Are you really ready for the wrath of "whiteness", or do you
       still think it's a joke?
       "Whites" = rape of the non-"whites" the "whites" told you are
       non-"whites". "Whites" are the superior colonizers of this world
       par-excellence, you must always respect them for this
       "accomplishment".
  HTML https://p1-tt.byteimg.com/origin/pgc-image/b4d98143e2d64ea68266ba0da9a3dd13.jpg
  HTML https://rarehistoricalphotos.com/soviet-soldiers-harass-german-woman-1945/
       I would have problem sleeping after mowing down mass waves of
       invading "whites" with an MG-42. The rest of this (non-"white")
       world clearly never learns from any of it's mistakes...
       #Post#: 28133--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: WavesOfWhiteness Date: October 6, 2024, 2:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I would have NO problem sleeping*
       #Post#: 28139--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: rp Date: October 6, 2024, 12:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=323.msg28120#msg28120
       date=1728107568]
       He still understands our enemies better than most:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5g4vS1m3ulg
       Of course I disagree with his optimism regarding WNs' chances of
       success (which he estimates to be low but I estimate to be
       higher). Honestly, I would prefer to be wrong.
       [/quote]
       I am also optimistic about Identitarisnism's low chance of
       success in the US, mainly due to its multiethnic nature, which
       is what JAM is basing his optimism on. There is still the danger
       of reproductive Eurocentrism/neocon assimilationism/progressive
       Yahwism, but I think that explicit "White" identitarianism will
       die out in the U.S. We just need to abolish the electoral
       college to prevent rightists from gaining power. The main
       identitarian threats IMO are V4 and Israel.
       Do you not agree with this?
       #Post#: 28144--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 6, 2024, 6:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Indeed I disagree. They still have the secession strategy. The
       Supreme Court will also be on their side. Unless we are willing
       to militarily invade their seceded territories at once*, they
       will just wait until the chance arises to do what Israel did to
       go from 1946 to 1948:
       [img width=1280
       height=774]
  HTML https://www.palestineportal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Maps_1897-Present.jpg[/img]
       and from there proceed as Israel subsequently did.
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/orania/
       I am not even convinced that South Africa is safe for
       "non-whites", and you think I would consider the US safe for
       "non-whites"?
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-we-lose/
       #Post#: 28156--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 7, 2024, 2:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Never mind, JAM is our enemy now:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sZ1N9unfGg
       For the record, JAM was never a fan of Islam even during the old
       days, and totally downplayed Hitler's well-documented positive
       opinions of Islam in his interpretation of Hitlerism. When he
       commissioned me to write the monarchist calendar to promote his
       Monarchist Party, I initially proposed including Mohammed as one
       of the 12 examples of historically significant monarchists, but
       he rejected my idea. So perhaps I should have seen this turn
       coming.
       Warner has always been our enemy:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Warner_(writer)
       [quote]The Council on American–Islamic Relations has described
       the CSPI as Islamophobic, listing it as part of the" U.S.-based
       Islamophobia network’s inner core".[15][/quote]
       #Post#: 28427--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: rp Date: October 28, 2024, 9:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=323.msg28144#msg28144
       date=1728255635]
       Indeed I disagree. They still have the secession strategy. The
       Supreme Court will also be on their side. Unless we are willing
       to militarily invade their seceded territories at once*, they
       will just wait until the chance arises to do what Israel did to
       go from 1946 to 1948:
       [img width=1280
       height=774]
  HTML https://www.palestineportal.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Maps_1897-Present.jpg[/img]
       and from there proceed as Israel subsequently did.
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/orania/
       I am not even convinced that South Africa is safe for
       "non-whites", and you think I would consider the US safe for
       "non-whites"?
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-we-lose/
       [/quote]
       Thinking about this is just horrifying. I simply don't have the
       stomach for modern war.
       I would much rather retreat to a monastery and live the life of
       an ascetic, quitting politics altogether.
       But I realize that it is desertion.
       #Post#: 28525--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JAM
       By: rp Date: November 7, 2024, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=323.msg28156#msg28156
       date=1728286236]
       Never mind, JAM is our enemy now:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5sZ1N9unfGg
       For the record, JAM was never a fan of Islam even during the old
       days, and totally downplayed Hitler's well-documented positive
       opinions of Islam in his interpretation of Hitlerism. When he
       commissioned me to write the monarchist calendar to promote his
       Monarchist Party, I initially proposed including Mohammed as one
       of the 12 examples of historically significant monarchists, but
       he rejected my idea. So perhaps I should have seen this turn
       coming.
       Warner has always been our enemy:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Warner_(writer)
       [quote]The Council on American–Islamic Relations has described
       the CSPI as Islamophobic, listing it as part of the" U.S.-based
       Islamophobia network’s inner core".[15][/quote]
       [/quote]
       In the monarchist podcast, JAM said he originally started off as
       a libertarian, supporting Ron Paul in 2007. There was always an
       Islamophohobic undercurrent within the libertarian movement,
       most notably in the form of "South Park Libertarianism" (The
       show South Park was created by Jews Matt Stone and Trey Parker
       btw). The Ron Paul libertarian movement eventually became the
       overtly Islamophobic Tea Party movement, so I am not surprised
       about his trajectory.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page