DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 30393--------------------------------------------------
The Freemason connection and Historical contradictions
By: Hano J Date: June 7, 2025, 3:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello Aryans. Can anyone explain the whole Freemason - NS
connection? In one area, we are told that the Germans closed
down the lodges in Europe. In Denmark, this is an undeniable
fact of history. There are gravestones in the Masonic graveyard
in Copenhagen mentioning this, including TV records and photos.
At the same time, there is also a connection between Hassan
Al-Banna.What is the true story here
#Post#: 30394--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Freemason connection and Historical contradictions
By: antihellenistic Date: June 7, 2025, 8:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Hano J link=topic=3210.msg30393#msg30393
date=1749286726]
Hello Aryans. Can anyone explain the whole Freemason - NS
connection? In one area, we are told that the Germans closed
down the lodges in Europe. In Denmark, this is an undeniable
fact of history. There are gravestones in the Masonic graveyard
in Copenhagen mentioning this, including TV records and photos.
At the same time, there is also a connection between Hassan
Al-Banna.What is the true story here
[/quote]
The true story is, National Socialism ban Freemasonry
#Post#: 30396--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Freemason connection and Historical contradictions
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 7, 2025, 6:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Freemasonry was behind the democratization of many countries
over the past several centuries, thus Hitler saw Freemasonry as
hostile to the anti-democratic National Socialism.
The typical Freemasonic strategy was entryism into existing
anti-colonialist movements and steering them in a pro-democracy
direction. As such, they would have viewed al-Banna's movement
as a prime target for entryism:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hassan_al-Banna
[quote]Al-Banna's ideology featured criticism of Western
materialism, British imperialism, and the traditionalism of the
Egyptian ulema.[13] He appealed to Egyptian and pan-Arab
patriotism but rejected Arab nationalism and regarded all
Muslims as members of a single nation-community.[12][11][13]
Following the abolition of the Caliphate in 1924, al-Banna
called on Muslims to prepare for armed struggle against colonial
rule; he warned Muslims against the "widespread belief" that
"jihad of the heart" was more important than "jihad of the
sword".[14] He allowed the formation of a secret military wing
within the Muslim Brotherhood, which took part in the
Arab-Israeli conflict.[13] Al-Banna generally encouraged
Egyptians to abandon Western customs
...
Al-Banna was appalled by the many conspicuous signs of foreign
military and economic domination in Ismailia: the British
military camps, the public utilities, farms, food supply were
owned by foreign interests, and the comfortable villas of the
foreign management of the Suez Canal Company, next to the simple
shacks of the Egyptian workers.[22]
...
He called on Muslims to prepare for jihad against colonial
powers
...
The Muslim Brothers launched a pro-Palestine campaign which
contributed to making the Palestine issue a widespread Muslim
concern.[/quote]
To whatever extent Hitler supported al-Banna, it does not imply
Hitler supported Freemasonry. Instead, we should interpret it as
Hitler attempting to rival the Freemasons in determining the
path of a post-colonial Egypt, by offering al-Banna an
alternative to Freemasonic support.
(I honestly do not understand why this is such a difficult
concept for so meny to grasp. This is the same concept as what I
have been recommending the America to do with Iran etc., namely
support Iran so that it does not need to depend on Russian
support. Just because both America and Russia would be offering
support to Iran does not mean America is aligning with Russia:
it means America is giving Iran a way to quit Russia. But this
explanation has fallen on deaf ears all these years. Either
people are like: "Russia (bad) is supporting Iran, therefore
Iran must be bad too!" or they are like: "Iran is good,
therefore Russia (which supports Iran) must be good too!")
Related:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/freemasons-say-they're-needed-now-more-than-ever-so-why-are-their-ranks-dwindlin/
*****************************************************