DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Volunteer
*****************************************************
#Post#: 31157--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 8, 2025, 11:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"A weakened U.S with its nuclear arsenal depleted would allow
India or China to emerge as the leading global power. What do
you think?"
But would either India or China be both able and willing to
pressure the Great Replacement to completion in the rest of the
world? I fear they would not only dislike the idea of the Great
Replacement, but worse would compete for "white" refugees
fleeing the nuclear devastation (needless to say at the expense
of "non-white" refugees). We could easily end up with
significant
white" populations in both India and China!
The success of the Great Replacement depended on Western
countries continuing to be perceived by "non-whites" as the best
places for "non-whites" to live in for at least several more
generations. (This is one reason why I did not even want China
to economically grow as quickly as it did. I wanted it to grow
just enough for most Chinese to be able to afford to emigrate to
Western countries, not (as in reality) so much that they now
have no incentive to do so.) An intra-Western nuclear exchange
would definitively end this perception in all the affected
areas.
#Post#: 31158--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: rp Date: October 9, 2025, 12:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
But would either India or China be both able "and willing to
pressure the Great Replacement to completion in the rest of the
world? I fear they would not only dislike the idea of the Great
Replacement, but worse would compete for "white" refugees
fleeing the nuclear devastation (needless to say at the expense
of "non-white" refugees). We could easily end up with
significant
white" populations in both India and China"
Yes. Already we see many medical tourists from Western countries
in India, some of whom would end up settling there.
But I was thinking with enough anti "White"sentiment, they would
be compelled to seek the genocide of "Whites" worldwide, a task
now made easier by the weakened state of Western countries. But
I will admit this does not does not take into consideration the
existing geopolitical tensions between nuclear armed
China/India/Pakistan. What do you think?
"I wanted it to grow just enough for most Chinese to be able to
afford to emigrate to Western countries, not (as in reality) so
much that they now have no incentive to do so.)"
With India as well. Economic growth also leads to more
consumerism/Indians seeking to replicate the first world
lifestyle (along with the higher carbon footprint). However, I
will say they still have incentive to emigrate, as there are
other problems (i.e. the unsustainability of maintaining a first
world life style with the size of India in what is ultimately a
third world country, as well as the dysfunctional nature of its
democracy, or in the case of China, the harsh work
culture/authoritarian nature of the state).
#Post#: 31161--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 9, 2025, 3:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"But I was thinking with enough anti "White"sentiment, they
would be compelled to seek the genocide of "Whites" worldwide, a
task now made easier by the weakened state of Western
countries."
In my pessimistic estimation, the weakened state of Western
countries, instead of increasing "white" genocidal intent, is
more likely to lead to complacency among "non-whites" and hence
the evaporation of what little "white" genocidal intent there
used to be.
The disappointing truth is that anti-"whiteness" itself does not
necessarily lead to "white" genocidal intent. Instead, among
"non-white" non-Aryans, it leads to vindictive Eurocentrism. In
a particularly revealing example, I encountered a discussion
among (self-proclaimed proudly anti-"white") "non-white"
non-Aryan men whose fantasy was that when "non-whites" rule the
world, imprisoned "white" men would as their main source of
entertainment watch livestreams of "non-white" men having sex
with "white" women outside prison, and then these "white" men's
semen would be harvested and used to actually impregnate the
"white" women, who would then give birth to a new generation of
"whites" to restock the cycle, thereby ensuring that endless
future generations of "non-white" men will never run out of
monoethnic "white" women sexual partners. This form of
anti-"whiteness" leads to positive desire to preserve "white"
blood in perpetuity! The structural contrast between this
fantasy and Pierce's fantasy (ending of The Turner Diaries)
explains why we are losing so badly.
HTML https://smallimg.pngkey.com/png/small/129-1297667_clip-free-stock-collection-of-free-failing-clipart.png
This is nothing new either:
HTML https://www.econjobrumors.com/topic/four-things-you-didnt-know-about-martin-luther-king
[quote]One of King's closest friends, Rev. Ralph Abernathy,
wrote a book in 1989 in which he talked about King's obsession
with white prostitutes. King would often use church donations to
have drunken sex parties, where he would hire two to three white
prostitutes, occasionally beating them brutally. This has also
been reported by the FBI agents who monitored King.[/quote]
"I will say they still have incentive to emigrate"
We still have global warming to drive climate refugees, but if
NATO countries and Russia become a nuclear fallout zone, even
heat might not be enough to make radioactivity seem preferable.
#Post#: 31162--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: rp Date: October 9, 2025, 3:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"my pessimistic estimation, the weakened state of Western
countries, instead of increasing "white" genocidal intent, is
more likely to lead to complacency among "non-whites" and hence
the evaporation of what little "white" genocidal intent there
used to be.
The disappointing truth is that anti-"whiteness" itself does not
necessarily lead to "white" genocidal intent. Instead, among
"non-white" non-Aryans, it leads to vindictive Eurocentrism. In
a particularly revealing example, I encountered a discussion
among (self-proclaimed proudly anti-"white") "non-white"
non-Aryan men whose fantasy was that when "non-whites" rule the
world, imprisoned "white" men would as their main source of
entertainment watch livestreams of "non-white" men having sex
with "white" women outside prison, and then these "white" men's
semen would be harvested and used to actually impregnate the
"white" women, who would then give birth to a new generation of
"whites" to restock the cycle, thereby ensuring that endless
future generations of "non-white" men will never run out of
monoethnic "white" women sexual partners. This form of
anti-"whiteness" leads to positive desire to preserve "white"
blood in perpetuity! The structural contrast between this
fantasy and Pierce's fantasy (ending of The Turner Diaries)
explains why we are losing so badly."
I see what you are saying. But would you not agree the task of
"White" genocide is easier from a military perspective? With
sufficient anti colonial sentiment coupled with a strong
leadership, imagine how easy it would be for India or China to
simply launch military offensives against Western countries with
the goal of killing off all "Whites", as vengeance for
colonialism. It is unthinkable now due to the US's WMD arsenal,
but a significantly weakened US changes the picture.
Take Iran, for example. I would argue the main reason the
leadership hasn't declared war on Israel is because of the
latter's WMD arsenal. But with the WMDs out of the picture it
changes things up quite a bit.
#Post#: 31164--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 9, 2025, 5:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"But would you not agree the task of "White" genocide is easier
from a military perspective?"
Only if we strike literally immediately after your theorized
NATO vs Russia nuclear exchange. Otherwise, our targets would
not be waiting around idly. They would move to wherever they can
get the best protection.
"imagine how easy it would be for India or China to simply
launch military offensives against Western countries"
Would lt be easy? The distance involved alone would make it
difficult. The only Western country China could invade is
Russia, with which it has a land border. Anything else depends
on adjacent countries willing to let India or China station
enough troops there first. And military offensives would have to
be launched one at a time. NATO would continue to function,
which means that one NATO country attacked would lead to
counterattack by all NATO countries.
"Take Iran, for example. I would argue the main reason the
leadership hasn't declared war on Israel is because of the
latter's WMD arsenal. But with the WMDs out of the picture it
changes things up quite a bit."
Yes, but Iran is geographically near Israel. In contrast, from
where are we supposed to go to war against Britain, for example?
Finally, Orania has no WMD arsenal. Why hasn't it been
militarily destroyed yet?
#Post#: 31170--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: rp Date: October 10, 2025, 12:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"Would lt be easy? The distance involved alone would make it
difficult. The only Western country China could invade is
Russia, with which it has a land border. Anything else depends
on adjacent countries willing to let India or China station
enough troops there first. And military offensives would have to
be launched one at a time. NATO would continue to function,
which means that one NATO country attacked would lead to
counterattack by all NATO countries.."
I see. In that case, we just need some other strategies. For
example, we could advocate for a deep state coup against Trump.
But what is worrying is that establishment institutions are now
moving rightwards.
#Post#: 31175--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: christianbethel Date: October 10, 2025, 10:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Do you think Kirk's assassination is part of a greater turn of
events involving the American Republican Party or an isolated
incident?
#Post#: 31184--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: Pop Date: October 11, 2025, 4:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
From the accounts of Kirk turning against Israel, and the fact
that more in the GOP have been following that same path, I'd say
it is "part of a greater turn of events". Not sure that this is
why Kirk was assassinated, but it is certainly one of the more
plausible lines of questioning in this regard I have witnessed
so far. People with large followings, especially of the
Judeo-Christian variety, are obviously a threat to the state of
Israel if they suddenly 'change sides' so-to-speak...
#Post#: 31336--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: rp Date: November 11, 2025, 9:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=3161.msg31157#msg31157
date=1759984838]
"A weakened U.S with its nuclear arsenal depleted would allow
India or China to emerge as the leading global power. What do
you think?"
But would either India or China be both able and willing to
pressure the Great Replacement to completion in the rest of the
world? I fear they would not only dislike the idea of the Great
Replacement, but worse would compete for "white" refugees
fleeing the nuclear devastation (needless to say at the expense
of "non-white" refugees). We could easily end up with
significant
white" populations in both India and China!
[B]The success of the Great Replacement depended on Western
countries continuing to be perceived by "non-whites" as the best
places for "non-whites" to live in for at least several more
generations. [/B] (This is one reason why I did not even want
China to economically grow as quickly as it did. I wanted it to
grow just enough for most Chinese to be able to afford to
emigrate to Western countries, not (as in reality) so much that
they now have no incentive to do so.) An intra-Western nuclear
exchange would definitively end this perception in all the
affected areas.
[/quote]
As long as even a single "White" exists in a country, that
country is not safe for "non Whites"..
#Post#: 31352--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism.net Book
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 12, 2025, 6:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I am not sure what you are trying to say. Are you implying that
"non-whites" are safer in countries with no "whites"? Have you
noticed what is happening in Gaza?
"Non-whites" living among "whites" will be targeted as
individuals. "Non-whites" not living among "whites" will be
targeted as populations. The latter is not safer than the
former.
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/demographic-blueshift/msg3298/#msg3298
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page