URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2459--------------------------------------------------
       Temperature effects
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 24, 2020, 2:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OLD CONTENT
       We hereby commence the pushback against the popular HBD notion
       (tacitly grounded in Western standards) that colder habitats
       evolve superior people on average. It all depends on what
       standards we use to measure superiority.
       www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22345077
       [quote]Sexual dimorphism in body composition across human
       populations: associations with climate and proxies for short-
       and long-term energy supply.
       ...
       CONCLUSIONS:
       The inverse correlation between lean mass dimorphism and
       adiposity dimorphism indicates a sex-trade-off between these two
       tissue accretion strategies. At colder temperatures, females
       invest disproportionately more in adiposity, and males
       disproportionately more in lean mass. Dimorphism also increased
       in proportion to proxies for short-term but not long-term energy
       availability. These findings suggest that phenotypic plasticity
       contributes to variability in body composition dimorphism, and
       that the occupation of dimorphic niches regarding reproductive
       energetics may be important.[/quote]
       In other words, warmer habitats evolve lower sexual dimorphism
       on average. Therefore, by Aryan standards (low sexual dimorphism
       is superior), warmer habitats evolve superior people on average.
       ---
       bigthink.com/surprising-science/humans-evolved-live-in-cold
       [quote]Humans emerged from a tropical environment. For the most
       part, our bodies are not well adapted to the cold. You might be
       feeling that this winter as you battle the frost winds and dream
       of sunnier days. The fact that we can live in cold climates is a
       result of many behavioral adaptations. Though, in recent years
       we've also found that some populations have genetically evolved
       to be able to better adapt and live in the cold.
       ...
       Tapper goes on to say:
       At the higher latitudes, you're confronting seasonality for the
       first time. . . They were experiencing winter. No other primate
       lives where there's no fruit in winter. There may be a dry
       season, but there's not a cold winter like these individuals in
       Dmanisi were experiencing.
       It's believed that by shifting to a more meat-centric diet that
       they were able to live in such an environment.
       ...
       According to research from the Biological Sciences and Molecular
       Medicine at the University of California Irvine, scientists
       discovered that after early humans had migrated to colder
       climates, their chance of survival increased when their mtDNA
       was mutated and generated greater body heat production.
       Professor Douglas C. Wallace states that:
       In the warm tropical and subtropical environments of Africa it
       was most optimal for more of the dietary calories to be
       allocated to ATP to do work and less to heat, thus permitting
       individuals to run longer, faster and to function better in hot
       climates… In Eurasia and Siberia, however, such an allocation
       would have resulted in more people being killed by the cold of
       winter. The mtDNA mutations made it possible for individuals to
       survive the winter, reproduce and colonize the higher
       latitudes.[/quote]
       In other words, cold-adapted humans are thermodynamically more
       wasteful twice over, once via their diet and once in how they
       allocate energy after eating.
       ---
       www2.palomar.edu/anthro/adapt/adapt_2.htm
       [quote]A study of 100 human populations during the early 1950's
       showed a strong negative correlation between body mass and mean
       annual temperature of the region. In other words, when the air
       temperature is consistently high, people usually have low body
       mass. Similarly, when the temperature is low, they have high
       mass.
       ...
       A corollary of Bergmann's rule stated that a linear shaped
       mammal will lose heat to the environment faster than a more
       compact one of similar size. The boxes below illustrate this
       fact. Note that the long, narrow box has the same volume but
       greater surface area. It is comparable to a tall, slender
       animal.
  HTML https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/adapt/images/Bergmann's_boxes_2.gif
       In 1877, the American biologist Joel Allen went further than
       Bergmann in observing that the length of arms, legs, and other
       appendages also has an effect on the amount of heat lost to the
       surrounding environment. He noted that among warm-blooded
       animals, individuals in populations of the same species living
       in warm climates near the equator tend to have longer limbs than
       do populations living further away from the equator in colder
       environments. This is due to the fact that a body with
       relatively long appendages is less compact and subsequently has
       more surface area. The greater the surface area, the faster body
       heat will be lost to the environment.[/quote]
       While we (for good reason!) place a lot of emphasis on the
       selective pressures exerted by the subsistence farming
       lifestyle, it is also possible that (and this would explain why
       farming began in warm regions) is that some initial
       physiological neotenization occurred as a result of warm
       climate, which came with mentality changes that made these
       proto-Aryans think that farming would be a good idea, thus
       creating the selective pressure that then led to further and
       more comprehensive neotenization.
       ---
       I remember reading the Communication part of aryanism.net (out
       of curiosity of course), and I had a mind pop about how warmth
       usually equals welcoming, friendly, and empathetic while cold
       equals unfriendly, calculated, detached, frigid (hence the idiom
       "as cold as ice"). I thought it had some correlation with some
       of the core messages of this website and that a lot of those on
       the right who are interested into evolutionary biology always
       relate to whites being descended from the Arctic and relying on
       that as to why they claim they've created more complex
       civilizations (via destroying everything in their path with
       "cold calculation." This is a random tangent, but I'm just
       curious....
       ---
       Definitely! One of the most dangerous enemy strategies we are
       fighting against is the Arctic Alliance, which I guess deserves
       reposting in this thread:
       vdare.com/articles/john-derbyshire-at-amren-the-arctic-alliance-
       revisited
       [quote][quote]I divide the human race into Arctics and
       non-Arctics on paleoanthropological grounds. So Arctics are
       those present-day races whose remote ancestors inhabited the
       forests and tundra of northern Eurasia—the whites and the
       yellows, to a first approximation. In my book We Are Doomed I
       used the synonym “Ice People.”
       In the world today, the Arctics exhibit two characteristics that
       separate them quite clearly from non-Arctics, or “Sun
       People.”.[/quote]
       FUCK YOU. We are Sun People.[/quote]
       See also:
       www.stormfront.org/forum/blogs/u64037-e3293/
       [quote]In warm climates, people survive easily. They do not need
       to devote much effort to finding food, as fruit grows
       plentifully in the forests year-round. Contemporary
       hunter-gatherers living in tropical areas eat relatively little
       meat, and anthropologists believe Africans have always been
       highly herbivorous[1].
       ...
       In cold climates, on the other hand, food is difficult to come
       by, as fruit does not grow the whole year round. Consequently,
       people need to hunt to survive. In fact, primitive peoples in
       Arctic climates rely virtually exclusively on animal foods.
       Hunting requires creating tools and understanding of the
       behavior of animals, both of which are spurs to the evolution of
       intelligence.[/quote]
       #Post#: 8030--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 12, 2021, 12:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Example:
  HTML https://sports.yahoo.com/nebraska-high-school-football-player-dies-following-heat-exposure-at-practice-221332158.html
       [quote]Geiger's father Scott Hoffman told the World-Herald that
       his son was 6-foot-3½ and 389 pounds and didn't have any known
       medical conditions.
       "He was a big kid, but he was a healthy big kid," he
       said.[/quote]
       He was a cold-adapted big kid.
  HTML https://ewscripps.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/a703f95/2147483647/strip/true/crop/1920x1080+0+0/resize/1280x720!/quality/90/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fewscripps-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F0b%2F56%2F68892238462e899e412edd0de3b4%2Fkid.png
       Note sibling similarities:
  HTML https://images.gofundme.com/YF_MwxgSqPSNQo1ZIRfi3BSgXkA=/1200x800/https://d2g8igdw686xgo.cloudfront.net/59138609_1628664239511675_r.jpeg
       #Post#: 20860--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 10, 2023, 4:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/extreme-heat-killing-europe-elderly-150042521.html
       [quote]For the elderly, increased vulnerability can be explained
       by several factors.
       “First, as people age, their bodies become less efficient at
       regulating temperature and adapting to heat stress,” says Dr
       Raquel Nunes, Assistant Professor in Environmental Change and
       Public Health, at Warwick Medical School.
       This makes it harder for older individuals to move heat from the
       core to the skin and maintain a stable internal temperature
       during hot conditions. Once the body can no longer cool itself,
       death can come in a matter of hours.[/quote]
       It all fits together. People living in warmer habitats would
       have been under greater selective pressure for ability to adapt
       to heat stress. Since aging reduces ability to adapt to heat
       stress, it should follow that people in warmer habitats evolved
       to be higher in average neoteny. This matches what we see not
       only physiognomically but also culturally:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg16234/#msg16234
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg6238/#msg6238
       Cold-habitat-evolved people are inferior!
       Also, our enemy Taylor on this topic from a while back:
  HTML https://www.amren.com/videos/2022/12/how-the-races-got-that-way/
       [quote]The most important environmental pressure that produced
       racial differences wasn’t altitude or living around cattle — it
       was the challenge of living far from the equator, where it was
       cold and the winters were long. It was much harder to survive in
       Europe and East Asia than in Africa, where it was warm and where
       there were berries and fruit all year round.[/quote]
       Sounds rather nice to me.
       [quote]the organ that came under the greatest evolutionary
       pressure in the north was the brain. If you’re not smart enough
       to make warm clothes and build shelter for the winter, you die.
       If you don’t store food to eat over the winter, you die. If you
       don’t make weapons and cooperate with others to bring down
       mammoths, you die. People living where it was warm didn’t have
       to do those things, so they were not under intense evolutionary
       pressure to evolve higher intelligence.[/quote]
       So, which type of humans would the mammoths prefer?
       [quote]People in the north had to evolve not just the
       intelligence to build shelter, make warm clothes, and invent
       weapons for killing big game. They had to think ahead, and this
       is one of the most important human traits. [/quote]
       This is thinking ahead:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-sustainable-evil/
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/progressive-yahwism/
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
       How much better would the world be with less thinking ahead?
       #Post#: 21609--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Aryan bones
       By: rp Date: August 20, 2023, 11:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Photo of actor Vijay at age 13:
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b3/Childvj.jpg/320px-Childvj.jpg
       Note how long his legs are compared to his torso. I myself
       assumed his legs were shorter before scrolling down the whole
       page and seeing his feet!
       #Post#: 21890--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: rp Date: September 3, 2023, 11:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://twitter.com/Sapratha/status/1696724899287495160
       [quote]Er. Shailesh Bharadwaj
       @Sapratha
       Yeah genius, that is why civilization emerged in the harsh
       winters of Scandinavia & Siberia as opposed to the hot & dry
       climates of Egypt & Sumer.
       Aristotle on why Persia has an empire while Europe doesn't:
       people inhabiting the cold are brave but lacking intellect
       [img]
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F4v6P2xWgAAP6rd?format=jpg&name=medium[/img]
  HTML https://twitter.com/CovfefeAnon/status/1695797257583448118
       [quote]
       Covfefe Anon
       @CovfefeAnon
       Imagine going through life pretending to not notice that the
       tropical species that doesn't have to plan for winter views
       wealth as purely something to show off and that the species that
       does have to plan for winter views it as a way to provide for
       the future[/quote]
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 21949--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: rp Date: September 7, 2023, 10:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.courthousenews.com/evolution-of-human-body-size-directly-related-to-climate-study-finds/
       #Post#: 22197--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: rp Date: September 18, 2023, 10:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Eurocentrist detected:
  HTML https://twitter.com/frontierindica/status/1699423872116805952?t=VNlA-FqZri6X8vlJN6P75Q&s=19
       [Quote]
       All the problems of the Indian sub continent would have been
       solved if the average temperature was 15 degrees lower
       (historically and continuing into the present).
       [/Quote]
       #Post#: 23472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: antihellenistic Date: November 7, 2023, 12:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Aryan means being farmer, westerners means being intelligent and
       progressivist
       [quote]First, in temperate and cold climates, females became
       dependent on males for provisioning them with food because they
       were unable to hunt, whereas in the tropics women were able to
       gather plant foods for themselves. For this, women would have
       required higher intelligence to select as mates the men who
       would provision them. Second, women would have selected as mates
       men who could provision them and their children, and these would
       have been men with higher intelligence. This is a case of sexual
       selection, identified by Darwin as one of the driving forces of
       evolution. In the tropics, where women could collect plant and
       insect foods that are available throughout the year, women did
       not need men to provision them and would have been less prone to
       select men with high intelligence as mates.[/quote]
       Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn page 236
  HTML https://archive.org/details/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis/page/n233/mode/2up?q=northern+latitudes
       Continuing :
       [quote]A fourth selection pressure for enhanced intelligence
       acting on the peoples who migrated into Eurasia has been
       proposed by Satoshi Kanazawa (2008). He argues that intelligence
       evolved in hominids to solve novel problems, and that Eurasia
       presented migrants with these. He shows that mean annual
       temperature and the novelty of the environments have independent
       effects on the average intelligence of populations in different
       parts of the world. This theory has received some support from
       Valerie Stone (2002, p.420) who writes, “The major selection
       pressures acting on Homo erectus seem to have been those of
       foragers moving into new habitats with unfamiliar food
       resources. Archaic Homo sapiens, in contrast, were big game
       hunters and faced somewhat different selection pressures”—i.e.,
       those of catching and killing large animals.[/quote]
       #Post#: 23485--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 7, 2023, 5:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]in temperate and cold climates, females became dependent
       on males for provisioning them with food because they were
       unable to hunt, whereas in the tropics women were able to gather
       plant foods for themselves.
       ...
       women would have selected as mates men who could provision them
       and their children[/quote]
       Our enemies are literally proud that cold-habitat women evolved
       to select men on materialistic rather than romantic criteria!
       We should be grateful that warm-habitat women, who did not need
       to rely on male provisioning, could afford to be romantic.
       Taking the above further, do cold-habitat or warm-habitat men
       have more leverage to be patriarchal? Hence:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/colonialism-and-sexism/
       #Post#: 23488--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Temperature effects
       By: antihellenistic Date: November 7, 2023, 8:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Continuing :
       [quote]Villarreala finds that there is “evidence of profound
       social stratification by skin color.” Individuals with darker
       skin tone have significantly lower levels of educational
       attainment and occupational status, and they are more likely to
       live in poverty and less likely to be affluent, even after
       controlling for other individual characteristics (2010, pg.
       652). The results “indicate a very strong association between
       respondents’ skin color and their educational attainment.
       Individuals with darker skin tones have substantially lower
       education levels (pg. 665).” For instance, the odds of having a
       college education or more are 29.5 percent lower for respondents
       who are light brown compared with those who are white.
       Similarly, the odds of having a college education are 57.6
       percent lower for respondents who are dark brown compared with
       those who are white (pgs. 665 66).[/quote]
       Hitler even wasn't went to college
       [quote]The validity of the IQs is the question of the extent to
       which they provide genuine or valid measures of the cognitive
       abilities of samples. It has often been argued that the peoples
       who obtain low IQs are really just as intelligent as Europeans,
       but the tests are biased against them. The issue of test bias
       has been discussed at length by Jensen (1980) in his book Bias
       in Mental Tests, in which he demonstrates that the assumption
       that tests are biased towards Westerners is simply not tenable.
       Individuals and races that do well on intelligence tests also
       tend to do well in education, earnings, job performance, and
       socioeconomic status (Jensen, 1980, 1998; Herrnstein and Murray,
       1994). An Australian psychologist, Murray Dyck, (1996, p. 67)
       has given this verdict on the “bias” thesis: The evidence
       indicates that cognitive tests are equally reliable across
       races, are of equivalent item difficulty across races, yield
       similar subtest correlations…and factor analyses yield similar
       results. The question of whether standard ability tests are
       culturally biased has been answered: they are not.[/quote]
       Richard Lynn's research on Negro people
       [quote]During the last 200,000 years, the ancestors of the
       contemporary sub-Saharan Africans continued to inhabit the
       tropical and sub-tropical environments of equatorial sub-Saharan
       Africa. This environment was not strongly cognitively demanding
       for them, and primates had adapted to it for some 60 million
       years. The hominids up to and including Homo erectus were
       largely plant eaters, but they supplemented their diets with
       scavenging the carcasses of animals killed by lions, leopards,
       and cheetahs (Lee, 1968; Tooby and de Vore, 1989). The evolving
       Africans lived much as hunter-gatherer peoples in tropical and
       sub-tropical environments do today,subsisting largely on plant
       foods, of which numerous species are available throughout the
       year, and on insects and eggs, with only occasional
       supplementation from animal meats obtained from hunting. The
       ready availability of plant foods, insects, and eggs throughout
       the year meant that the evolving sub-Saharan African peoples in
       tropical and sub tropical Africa did not have to hunt animals to
       obtain meat.
       The humans that evolved in equatorial Africa were largely
       herbivorous and were not adapted for hunting large mammals, so
       this would have presented new cognitive problems for them.
       ...
       Another was cliffs towards which a group of men could drive a
       herd of herbivores, so that some of them would fall over the
       edge and be killed (or sufficiently injured for other members of
       the hunting group to kill them). Other natural traps were bogs
       and the loops of rivers, into which hunting groups could drive
       herbivores and then kill them. Archaeological excavations have
       shown that all these traps were used by early humans in Eurasia
       ...
       Like other peoples who have evolved in tropical and subtropical
       environments, the New Guineans and the Australian Aborigines
       were able to live on plant foods, insects, and eggs throughout
       the year. When the Australian Aborigines were studied in the
       desert of Western Australia in the 20th century, their diet
       remained largely unchanged: they obtained 70–80 percent of their
       food from plants and most of the remainder from eggs and
       insects. They had no well-developed group hunting techniques
       (Gould, 1969). It has been estimated that the Gadio people, a
       tribe of New Guineans, obtain 96 percent of their food from
       plants and only four percent from meat (Dornstreich,
       1973).[/quote]
       If the negro were evolutionary like that, then :
       [quote]A negro with his taboos is far superior to a human who
       firmly believes in Transubstantiation. - Adolf Hitler, December
       13, 1941[/quote]
       Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 146
       [quote]The dirt was visible on the blacks only when the
       missionaries, in order to teach them decorum, obliged them to
       wear clothes. In its natural state, the negro is very clean. For
       a missionary, the smell of dirt is agreeable. From this point of
       view, they themselves are the dirtiest pigs. They have water
       horrors. Adolf Hitler, February 19, 1942[/quote]
       Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk pages 319 - 320
       Richard Lynn's research on "whites" and "East-Asians" people :
       [quote]By about 10,000 years ago, when the ended and the ice
       sheets and tundra that covered northern Europe receded, the
       Europeans emerged with higher intelligence shown by an increase
       in their encephalization quotients (EQ), i.e. brain size in
       relation to body size. Richard Cutler (1976) estimated that
       preWürm Europeans had an EQ of 7.3, and by the end of the Würm
       glaciation they had an EQ of 8.1. With this increased
       intelligence, Europeans were able to make the Neolithic
       transition from hunter-gathering to settled agriculture.
       However, despite their high IQ, they were not able to develop
       early civilizations, such as those built by the South Asians and
       North Africans, mainly because the continent was still cold,
       covered with forest, and featured heavy soils that were
       difficult to plough. This environment was unlike that in which
       the early civilizations were built, which had light soils and
       river flood plains, which provided annual alluvial deposits that
       allowed for agricultural surpluses, which could sustain an urban
       civilization and intellectual class (Landes, 1998). From around
       2500 BC, the Europeans overcame these problems in the relatively
       benign climate of southern Europe, where they developed the
       first European civilizations in Crete and Greece. From around
       700 BC, the Italians began to build a civilization that
       eventually became the Roman Empire; by AD 200, they embraced the
       whole of Europe west of the Rhine, including the Danube basin,
       the Near East, and North Africa. These first European
       civilizations in Greece and Rome surpassed those of the South
       Asians and North Africans in science, mathematics, technology,
       literature, philosophy, and the arts. The western Roman Empire
       had collapsed by the end of the 5th century AD, and European
       culture suffered a setback in the ensuing period, commonly
       called the Dark Ages. However, from about the year AD 1,000, it
       revived, and by the year 1500, Europeans became the foremost
       people in virtually all areas of civilization (Murray, 2003).
       The reason on whites's material evolvement rather than East
       Asians
       A low level of social conformity and an element of psychopathic
       personality appear to be ingredients in creative achievement
       because they reduce anxiety about social disapproval and appear
       to facilitate the generation of the original ideas that are
       required for the highest levels of scientific discovery,
       artistic expression, and economic enterprise.There is also
       evidence for lower levels of creativity in the East Asians
       (Lynn, 2007). Another factor may be an historical accident,
       which has been discussed by Erich Weede and Sebastian Kampf
       (2002): throughout much of its history, China was a single state
       whose autocratic rulers were able to suppress liberties,
       including freedom of thought, more effectively than the rulers
       of the numerous European states, who were forced by competition
       to concede liberties to their peoples.[/quote]
       Therefore, if "whites" were evolutionary like that, then :
       [quote]We were ready to throw our forces into the scales for the
       preservation of the British Empire; and all that, mark you, at a
       time when, to tell the truth, I feel much more sympathetically
       inclined to the lowliest Hindu than to any of these arrogant
       islanders. Later on, the Germans will be pleased that they did
       not make any contribution to the survival of an out-dated state
       of affairs for which the world of the future would have found it
       hard to forgive them. We can with safety make one prophecy:
       whatever the outcome of this war, the British Empire is at an
       end. It has been mortally wounded. The future of the British
       people is to die of hunger and tuberculosis in their cursed
       island. - Adolf Hitler, 4th February 1945[/quote]
       Source : Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler
       (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 7
       [quote]Spain, France and England had all weakened, weakened and
       exhausted themselves in this futile colonial enterprise. The
       continent from which Spain and England gave birth, which they
       created piece by piece, has today acquired a completely
       independent way of life and completely selfish views. Even so,
       they were just an artificial world, without a soul, culture, or
       civilization of their own; and judging from that point of view,
       they were nothing more than dirt.  - Adolf Hitler, 7th February
       1945[/quote]
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 13
       [quote]The United States and Australia afford good examples.
       Success, certainly - but only on the material side. They are
       artificial edifices, bodies without age, of which it is it is
       impossible to say whether they are still in a state of infancy
       or whether they have already been touched by senility. In those
       continents which were inhabited, failure has been even more
       marked. In them, the white races have impose their will by
       force, and the influence they have had on the native inhabitants
       has been negligible. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945[/quote]
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 13
       [quote]The white races did, of course, give some things to the
       natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly
       have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism,
       fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these
       peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to
       anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially
       unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results
       were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the
       futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their
       introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the
       colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a
       hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by
       us, to rise and drive us out. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February
       1945[/quote]
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 13 - 14
       [quote]Transplant a German to Kiev, and he remains a perfect
       German. But transplant him to Miami, and you make a degenerate
       of him - in other words, an American - Adolf Hitler, 7th
       February, 1945[/quote]
       Source: Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler
       (Hitler-Bormann Documents) Page 15
       [quote]I have never liked France or the French, and I have never
       stopped saying so. ... - Adolf Hitler, 15th February
       1945[/quote]
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 29
       [quote]I have always abstained from criticizing or passing
       judgment on Italy. I have on the contrary always been at great
       pains to treat her as an equal. Unfortunately, the laws of
       nature have shown that it is a mistake to treat as equals those
       who are not your equals. - Adolf Hitler, 17th February
       1945[/quote]
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 33
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/5e1670c61b0f2f430e3300eb6352dc5a/4f15adcd00022294-a8/s1280x1920/855f5d7658133a87b54d7ae6a4708ef219f5cfc4.jpg
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 13
       Source of Richard Lynn's research :
       Race Differences in Intelligence by Richard Lynn page 194, 201,
       248, 251, 259, 263, 265
  HTML https://archive.org/details/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis
       Hitler was did total betrayal to the White Nationalism
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page