URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5010--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 20, 2021, 10:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/rights-dead-living-clash-scientists-145833951.html
       [quote]Rights of the dead and the living clash when scientists
       extract DNA from human remains
       ...
       Authorities in Chile have denounced the research. They believe a
       looter plundered the girl from her grave and illegally took her
       from the country. The Chilean Society of Biological Anthropology
       issued a damning statement. It asked, “Could you imagine the
       same study carried out using the corpse of someone’s miscarried
       baby in Europe or America?”[/quote]
       I cannot. But the reason it happens to everyone else is because
       it's OK to be a "white" archaeologist:
       [quote]Plundering skulls for science
       We have seen a rush for human remains before. More than a
       century ago, anthropologists were eager to assemble collections
       of skeletons. They were building a science of humanity and
       needed samples of skulls and bones to determine evolutionary
       history and define the characteristics of human races.
       Researchers emptied cemeteries and excavated ancient tombs. They
       took skulls from massacre sites. “It is most unpleasant work to
       steal bones from a grave,” the father of anthropology, Franz
       Boas, once grumbled, “but what is the use, someone has to do
       it.”
       The case of Qisuk, an Inuit man, provides an especially
       egregious example. In 1897, the explorer Robert Peary brought
       Qisuk and five others to New York from Greenland, so
       anthropologists could more easily study their culture. Four of
       them, including Qisuk, soon died of tuberculosis.
       Anthropologists and doctors conspired to fake Qisuk’s burial to
       trick his surviving 8-year-old son, then dissected the body and
       defleshed the bones. Qisuk’s skeleton was mounted and hung at
       the American Museum of Natural History. (It is still disputed
       today whether Qisuk was only stored at the museum or put on
       public display.)
       By the end of the 20th century, U.S. museums held the remains of
       some 200,000 Native American skeletons.
       These skeletons helped write the American continent’s history
       and foster an appreciation for Native cultures. Yet the insights
       gleaned from these gathered remains came at a steep price:
       Native Americans’ religious freedoms and human rights were
       systematically violated. Many Native Americans believe their
       ancestors’ spirits have been left to wander. Others insist that
       all ancestors should be afforded honor and their graves should
       be protected.
       Today, a U.S. federal law provides for the return of stolen
       skeletons. Still, the legacy of these collections will haunt us
       for generations. Many Native Americans are profoundly
       distrustful of archaeologists. And even after nearly 30 years of
       active repatriation of human remains, there are still more than
       100,000 skeletons in U.S. museums. By my estimation, it will
       take 238 years to return these remains at this rate – if they
       are ever even returned at all.
       Seeking consent
       For too long scientists failed to ask basic ethical questions:
       Who should control collections of human remains? What are the
       positive and negative consequences of studies based on
       skeletons? And how can scientists work to enhance, rather than
       undermine, the rights of the people they study?
       One place to look for answers is the Belmont Report. Published
       in 1979, this was the scientific community’s response to the
       Tuskegee Study. Over the course of 40 years, the U.S. government
       denied medical treatment to more than 400 black men infected
       with syphilis, to watch the disease’s evolution. In the
       aftermath of the resulting scandal, the Belmont Report insisted
       that biomedical researchers must have respect for people, try to
       do good as well as avoid harm, and fairly distribute the burdens
       and benefits of research.
       Although these guidelines were intended for living subjects,
       they provide a framework to consider research on the dead. After
       all, research on the dead ultimately affects the living. One way
       to ensure these protections is to seek informed consent from
       individuals, kin, communities or legal authorities before
       conducting studies.[/quote]
       Western academics think nothing of initiating any type or
       quantity of violence so long as they get research done out of
       it. (This is even more obvious when we look at their history of
       experimenting on non-humans.) It is this entire value system
       which must be toppled. No knowledge is worth any initiated
       violence. Anyone who thinks otherwise is already a Westerner.
       #Post#: 5624--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 17, 2021, 12:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We need more of this:
  HTML https://www.city-journal.org/california-ethnic-studies-programs-merchants-of-revolution
       [quote]California public schools are embarking on a new
       experiment: education as social justice. Earlier this year, the
       state Department of Education approved an ethnic studies model
       curriculum, and individual school districts have begun to
       implement programs that advocate “decolonizing” the United
       States and “liberating” students from capitalism, patriarchy,
       and settler colonialism.
       ...
       According to slides and contemporaneous notes from the session,
       the Santa Clara Office of Education began the presentation with
       a “land acknowledgement,” claiming that Santa Clara County and
       the public school system “occupy the unceded territory of the
       Muwekma Ohlone Nation, the sovereign nation and original people
       of the skies, land, and waters.” The premise of this ritual,
       which has become common in progressive organizations, is that
       the American government, founded by white settlers, is an
       illegitimate colonial power that should return the land to the
       Native American tribes.
       ...
       Pacheco then argued that the United States is a political regime
       based on “settler colonialism,” which he describes as a “system
       of oppression” that “occupies and usurps land/labor/resources
       from one group of people for the benefit of another.” The
       settler colonialist regime, Pacheco continues, is “not just a
       vicious thing of the past, but [one that] exists as long as
       settlers are living on appropriated land.” The white colonialist
       regime of the United States is a “parasitic system” responsible
       for domestic violence, drug overdoses, and other social
       problems. In a related PowerPoint slide, Pacheco presented
       examples of this oppression, including “men exploiting women,”
       “white people exploiting people of color,” and “rich people
       exploiting poor people.”
       What is the solution? Pacheco argues that teachers must “awaken
       [students] to the oppression” and lead them to “decodify” and
       eventually “destroy” the dominant political regime. The first
       step in this process is to help students “get into the mind of a
       white man” such as Christopher Columbus and analyze “what
       ideology led these white male settlers to be power and land
       hungry and justify stealing indigenous land through genocide.”
       Pacheco describes this process as transforming students into
       “activist intellectuals” who “decodify systems of oppression”
       into their component parts, including “white supremacy,
       patriarchy, classism, genocide, private property, and God.”
       Teachers must be careful, though: Pacheco and the other
       panelists suggested that local educators hide this revolutionary
       pedagogy from administrators and families. “District guidelines
       and expectations are barriers,” said one panelist. “[We] have to
       be extra careful about what is being said, since we can’t just
       say something controversial now that we’re in people’s homes
       [because of remote learning].” In addition, teachers must
       acknowledge that they, too, can become oppressors in the
       classroom. “Inherently, [it is the] oppressor who sets the
       rules.” Teachers must “recognize [their] own privilege and
       [their] own bias” in order to align themselves with the
       oppressed and work toward dismantling systems of
       oppression.[/quote]
       #Post#: 5979--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 30, 2021, 10:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How bad things are:
  HTML https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2021/04/16/teaching-issues-can-be-among-biggest-obstacles-retaining-bipoc-women-faculty
       [quote]BIPOC women are often assigned more new course
       preparations and more service courses with larger enrollments.
       This informal or invisible teaching overload means that the
       “same” teaching load is experienced quite differently.
       Imagine the teaching load of one instructor assigned all new
       course preparations or introductory service courses with
       enrollments of 150 students each. Then compare that to the
       teaching load of a person assigned only previously taught
       courses or elective courses on their own research topics with
       enrollments of just 15 students of fewer. If both these
       individuals have the “same” 2-2 (or 5-5) teaching assignment, is
       that really the same load? Absolutely not.
       How are BIPOC faculty women supposed to publish with heavy
       teaching loads? The truth is that they often cannot. This unfair
       diversion of their time and energy away from publishing
       contributes to lowered productivity -- compared to white male
       peers -- related to the grants and publications that are the
       institutional currency for tenure and promotion.
       Student and Colleague Resistance
       Students behaving aggressively in the classroom also play a role
       in derailing tenure. White students disproportionately challenge
       the authority of BIPOC women and are twice as likely to
       inappropriately question them when being taught about social
       justice issues (e.g., systemic racism). Eric Grollman notes that
       “There are scholars who’ve been attacked for what they teach in
       the classroom” and that these experiences are not “anecdotal” or
       “isolated” incidents. They are unfortunately common features for
       these women, as evidenced by the research on their raced and
       gendered classroom experiences. Unfortunately, as Saida Grundy
       elaborates in her article “A history of white violence tells us
       attacks on black academics are not ending (I know because it
       happened to me),” BIPOC women are alert to the fact they could
       be next to be attacked.
       Colleagues can also behave aggressively toward and interfere
       with the tenure of BIPOC women when it comes to teaching. These
       women’s transformative teaching is often in conflict with their
       white male colleagues’ more traditional (e.g., lecture)
       approaches to pedagogy. When BIPOC faculty teach about inclusive
       topics like race, white colleagues can antagonistically label it
       as marginal and illegitimate knowledge. Many BIPOC women faculty
       have told me of white colleagues, chairs and deans who
       constantly and intensely pressure them to revert to lecture-only
       teaching that focuses on the white male “classics.”
       In a public letter, Michelle Gibbs describes such unchecked
       hostilities as reasons she left her institution: “There are not
       enough white faculty and administrators willing to publicly
       teach white students how to hold themselves accountable for
       their racist behavior in the classroom. This unpaid emotional
       labor is often left to Black and Brown faculty who recognize it,
       feel it, and (all alone) are left to call it out. It is
       exhausting work and doesn’t win us any favors with colleagues
       and administrators.” She isn’t alone. Undue stress results in
       other BIPOC women exiting higher education institutions, too.
       And for those who stay, such discrimination wreaks havoc on
       their publication productivity.
       Unsound Tenure and Promotion Practices
       Student and colleague resistance to BIPOC women’s classroom
       authority, pedagogy and content is not without consequence. It
       can significantly impact tenure and promotion reviews through
       practices that are common but not methodologically sound. Let’s
       focus on two of those practices: the incorrect use of student
       evaluations and flawed teaching observation processes.
       Colleges and universities often contribute to the demise of
       BIPOC faculty retention by using student evaluations in
       incredibly incorrect ways in reviews. For starters, many misuse
       the student evaluation data by using the mean score, focusing on
       outlier comments and comparing faculty to one another.
       Additionally, many improperly use the student evaluations as the
       primary or only measurement of teaching quality. Those practices
       don’t adhere to the general guidance about interpreting such
       data and evaluating teaching, and they result in inaccurate
       conclusions about teaching quality in reviews.
       Arriving at unfounded conclusions about teaching quality is
       problematic for “normal” contexts. Yet it is even more
       problematic when reviewing the teaching of BIPOC women. Instead
       of presenting a sound view of teaching quality, these practices
       amplify the raced and gendered biases frequently found in
       student evaluations. And then colleagues, chairs and deans turn
       around and use these inaccurate and unsupported claims of poor
       teaching quality to deny the tenure and promotion of BIPOC
       women.
       The flawed teaching observations of many colleges and
       universities also have a direct impact on tenure and promotion
       decisions. Does the following sound familiar? A faculty member
       is “informed” that “someone” will be observing their teaching,
       and it happens with no/minimal discussion about the nature or
       focus of the observation. None of these features aligns with
       appropriate teaching observation practices.
       Here’s why it matters. A Black woman faculty member recounted to
       me the damage that was done to her tenure review because of a
       teaching observation. In her colleague’s written observation
       report, he accused her of teaching controversial content, going
       so far as to say that he (a white male) would feel unwelcome as
       a student in her classroom. What was she teaching? Her scholarly
       expertise on structural racism. Let’s be clear: the observer did
       not report witnessing actual student discomfort. In fact, the
       Black woman faculty member won a teaching award shortly
       afterward for which she was nominated and voted to win by the
       students. Instead, the colleague wrote negatively about her
       teaching in her tenure review because he equated his offense
       about the course content with an assessment of its quality. Over
       and over again I have heard eerily similar versions of this
       experience from other BIPOC faculty.[/quote]
       Meanwhile, it's OK to be a "white" teacher:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/jersey-teacher-curses-black-students-224500985.html
       [quote]Dickinson High School teacher Howard Zlotkin targeted his
       Black students and used profanity as he complained about his
       ‘privilege’
       A New Jersey teacher has been removed from the virtual classroom
       after going a profanity-laced rant against his students about
       race, Black Lives Matter and George Floyd.
       ...
       “If you think I’m privileged then f— you, because my daughter
       thinks I’m privileged and I don’t speak to her,” he said on
       Zoom, which was recorded by a student.
       ...
       Williams and her mother, Margie Nieves, said they contacted
       school officials but did not hear back from them until they
       contacted the news station.
       “Who does that? Who would curse, I don’t even curse at my own
       daughter,” said Nieves.
       The mother and daughter said they were shocked to see that
       Zlotkin had returned to class and yet again cursed at students.
       He also called out Williams who had refused to complete the
       essay he asked her and the other Black students to write.
       “I don’t think you can make a case. You know what Timmia? You’re
       full of s–t too,” Zlotkin said during another recording of his
       remarks.
       ...
       When contacted by NBC New York, Dickinson High School officials
       said that Zlotkin was temporarily removed from the classroom and
       school as they look into the incident, but did not indicate if
       there would be any further discipline.[/quote]
       #Post#: 6050--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 2, 2021, 4:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I always hated Newton when I was in school:
  HTML https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/04/24/isaac-newton-latest-historical-figure-swept-decolonisation-drive/
       [quote]Sir Isaac Newton has been labelled as a potential
       beneficiary of “colonial-era activity” in draft plans to
       “decolonise” the engineering curriculum at Sheffield University.
       ...
       Newton, who lived until 1727, laid the foundations of modern
       science with his theory of gravity, in the seminal Principia,
       and theories on light, time, colour and calculus.
       ...
       it is known that he held shares in the South Sea Company that
       traded in slaves.[/quote]
       Newton had another area of interest:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Notes_on_the_Jewish_Temple
       [quote]Notes on the Jewish Temple is a manuscript by Isaac
       Newton, written in Latin, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek, which holds
       notes on the Jewish Temple and its rituals.
       Today the manuscript is found in the collections of the National
       Library of Israel in Jerusalem.
       ...
       The book contains Hebrew and Aramaic phrases which were copied
       to Hebrew letters by Newton, such as the phrase:
       "ברוך שם
       כבוד
       מלכותו
       לעולם ועד"
       (English: Blessed be the name of His glorious kingdom for all
       eternity).
       ...
       The manuscript contains references to a variety of sources,
       including the Old Testament, the Midrash (interpreting biblical
       stories) of the sophos Hillel and Shammai, the Talmud, the
       Zohar, and Targum Jonathan.[/quote]
       It is all linked. Western empirical science and Western
       colonialism (including slavery) are both at their roots products
       of fundamental gratitude to Yahweh for creating the material
       world in the first place. Newton embodies this attitude in a
       consistent way.
       Imagine how much simpler the world would be if Newton had never
       existed! How much of this could have been avoided:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
       #Post#: 6054--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: rp Date: May 2, 2021, 10:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I always hated Newton when I was in school:"
       You and me both. Guess that makes two of us. I've always viewed
       him as some mentally sick bastard who purposefully wanted to
       overcomplicate and overthink things out of his "curiosity".
       At least he didn't leave any offspring. But you could argue the
       amount of knowledge he discovered has been far more damaging to
       the rest of the world even though he did not reproduce.
       Here is a false leftist meme ridiculing him for this:
       [img]
  HTML https://preview.redd.it/0s0bh07mkhzz.jpg?auto=webp&s=7e4bac0485b3b02b163bd4fd9f77d4b39ee8abd7[/img]
       First of all, dying without reproducing is noble. However,
       Newton does not fit into this category because he had already
       done so much damage while he was alive that it was
       inconsequential. Therefore, it is incorrect to state that this
       was some kind of "loss" for Newton.
       On the other hand, those who actually die without reproducing
       because of their lack of interest in the material world are
       those who we should be praising.
       #Post#: 6078--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: guest5 Date: May 2, 2021, 6:45 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just keep in mind losing ones virginity does not necessarily
       equate to a person not reproducing. My aunt on my mothers side
       has plenty of sex with her partner, yet neither of them have
       ever reproduced any offspring, as an example. With equating
       sexual experience to mere reproduction you may get into a pickle
       debating someone who argues that sex is a spiritual experience
       more than a physical one. Just a thought....
       #Post#: 6086--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 2, 2021, 10:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "At least he didn't leave any offspring. But you could argue the
       amount of knowledge he discovered has been far more damaging to
       the rest of the world even though he did not reproduce."
       In particular, the ways in which the Industrial Revolution (many
       processes of which required calculus to design) raised total
       population carrying capacity could be called "Newtonian
       fecundity" if we want to stress the point.
       #Post#: 6171--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 5, 2021, 11:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Previously:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/academic-decolonization/msg3000/#msg3000
       Now more along similar lines:
  HTML https://reason.com/2021/05/04/california-math-framework-woke-equity-calculus/
       [quote]California's Department of Education is working on a new
       framework for K-12 mathematics that discourages gifted students
       from enrolling in accelerated classes that study advanced
       concepts like calculus.
       ...
       In fact, the framework concludes that calculus is overvalued,
       even for gifted students.
       "The push to calculus in grade twelve is itself misguided," says
       the framework.
       As evidence for this claim, the framework cites the fact that
       many students who take calculus end up having to retake it in
       college anyway. Of course, de-prioritizing instruction in high
       school calculus would not really solve this problem—and in fact
       would likely make it worse—but the department does not seem
       overly worried. The framework's overriding perspective is that
       teaching the tough stuff is college's problem: The K-12 system
       should concern itself with making every kid fall in love with
       math.[/quote]
       Of course we disagree with this superficial reasoning that tries
       to make it a mere administrative tweak to benefit larger numbers
       of students. Most leftists still do not have the courage to come
       out and say outright that calculus was never meant to have been
       invented, and therefore we have a positive ethical duty to
       terminate knowledge of it ASAP. However, they will not hold this
       position until they abandon progressivism and adopt
       regressivism:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/leftists-against-progressivism/
       #Post#: 6210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 8, 2021, 1:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And more:
  HTML https://www.foxnews.com/us/virginia-accelerated-math-courses-equity
       [quote]Virginia moving to eliminate all accelerated math courses
       before 11th grade as part of equity-focused plan[/quote]
       #Post#: 6675--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Academic decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 24, 2021, 10:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You know how far we have come when Jews have trouble getting
       published:
  HTML https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9583887/Acclaimed-British-author-Richard-Cohens-new-book-historians-cancelled-US.html
       [quote]A new history book by an acclaimed British author has
       reportedly been dropped by its US publisher over concerns it was
       'too white'.
       Richard Cohen was asked to produce more for work for his
       upcoming book 'The History Makers' because publishers were
       concerned the 780-page book failed to feature enough black
       historians, academics and writers.
       Mr Cohen, 75, who wrote the acclaimed Chasing The Sun, is said
       to have written 18,000 extra words covering the work of black
       historians.
       Academics such such as Frederick Douglass and Booker T
       Washington are said to have been covered in the additional work.
       But US publisher Random House has still decided to drop the
       book, according to the Guardian.[/quote]
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page