URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Re: China and United States Relations
       By: rp Date: November 29, 2020, 2:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       BTW, I have noticed that the propaganda trick of the False
       Leftist Jews is to claim they are "communist" (they are actually
       democratic socialists. I do not think there even exist actual
       communist Jews anymore) and therefore are "pro-China" because
       "China" is also "communist" (it is not). They can then
       infiltrate the discourse and claim that Deng Xiaoping (whom
       these False Leftist Jews particularly harbor animosity towards)
       was "pro-Capitalist" (he was not), so they can say that Dengism
       must be completely done away with, whereupon they can install
       their own system of Judeo-technocratic "socialism".
       Fortunately, it appears there are True Leftists, such as the
       twitter account linked, who although mistakenly that Communism
       is good, are quick to call out these False Leftist Jews as "fake
       socialists". However, the solution is not to embrace Maoism, but
       Dengism (Third Worldism).
       #Post#: 2543--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 29, 2020, 5:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "This is why I warned against uncritical "pro-China" False
       Leftists, such as Mark Ames* (Jew), Max Blumenthal (Jew), and
       Dan Cohen (Jew). By purporting to be "pro-China", they are
       forcing China to make policies that are amenable to the
       sensibilities of Westerners, such as building Israeli railroads.
       Another example of this is them peddling Orientalist stereotypes
       about how "Asians" wear masks** because they "respect their
       elders", and masking such stereotypes as "praise" for China,
       which the cowardly Chinese diplomats then slavishly accept."
       This is a variant of the Goy biscuit trick. It is doubly
       effective because Chinese Eurocentrists thirst for praise from
       "whites" (including Jews), and thus upon receiving any are
       assured to work even harder to receive more of the same.
       But I would say the Israeli railroads are also a consequence of
       China's extremely stupid approach of trying to avoid taking a
       side. China is also building railroads in Iran, for example, so
       in order to not give the impression that it is doing Iran any
       special favours, China builds railroads in Israel too. The most
       stupid aspect of this is that China seems to honestly believe
       that by doing so, both Iran and Israel will trust China more,
       when in reality neither will. The only way to gain true allies
       is to openly declare enemies. China does not seem to understand
       this most elementary principle of politics.
       "it appears there is a slavish pro-Western sentiment among
       certain parts of the Chinese population. How do you suppose we
       tackle this?"
       Superficially, I would advise them to study how Japan fell for
       the same trick only decades earlier, and hence learn from their
       neighbour's mistake enough not to repeat it.
       Of course, the only radical cure is:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/psychological-decolonization/
       What makes things more confusing is that, while there exist
       self-proclaimed "anti-Western" activists in China, they are not
       actually anti-Western! Sure, they reject the mainstream Chinese
       Eurocentrist ranking of civilizations:
       [code]Western
       .
       Chinese
       .
       everyone else[/code]
       but merely replace it with:
       [code]Chinese
       Western
       .
       .
       .
       everyone else[/code]
       which only makes an exception for Chinese alone out of vanity,
       while reinforcing the main assertion that Western is still
       superior to the rest (in other words, they are pro-Western aside
       from their vanity).
       The correct ranking is:
       [code]everyone else (any order)
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       .
       Western[/code]
       Anti-Eurocentrism is emphatically not about promoting the idea
       of Chinese superiority. It is about promoting the idea of
       Western inferiority, and by such a large margin as to be
       ludicrous. But at present almost no one appears to get this.
       Still, I am trying to get the message out.
       #Post#: 2544--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: rp Date: November 29, 2020, 6:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "It is doubly effective because Chinese Eurocentrists thirst for
       praise from "whites" (including Jews)"
       To illustrate how slavish this mentality is, here are examples
       of the selfsame Jews (i.e. Mark Ames who I said I would cover)
       being racist toward "Asians":
  HTML https://twitter.com/korcounterprop/status/1101091053031976961?s=20
       [img]
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D0fcPvdU0AAk8XJ?format=jpg&name=medium[/img]
       "Superficially, I would advise them to study how Japan fell for
       the same trick only decades earlier, and hence learn from their
       neighbour's mistake enough not to repeat it."
       Hitler described two Japans: one Western and one non-Western. We
       are seeing rightists exalt the former and True Leftists exalt
       the latter. Similarly, I believe there are two Chinas: one
       Western and one non-Western. We are seeing False Leftists exalt
       the former and True Leftists exalt the latter.
       "What makes things more confusing is that, while there exist
       self-proclaimed "anti-Western" activists in China,"
       Yes. The "Communists*" (Judeo Socialists) of PSL/ANSWER (which
       has been infiltrated by False Leftists and the aforementioned
       Jews) are an example of this. The Twitter account I linked
       tackles this fake "anti-Western" sentiment very well. It
       specifically calls out clout chasing Westernized "Asians" who
       are involved with these groups. I actually replied to one of
       their tweets regarding the "Asians wear masks" meme:
  HTML https://twitter.com/Ram31970822/status/1331600491034324996
       The account also points out how many "pro-DPRK" "anti-war"
       groups such as Code-Pink (led by Jewess [s]Susan[/s] Medea
       Benjamin) have said that they hope by becoming more "diplomatic"
       with the DPRK, the North Koreans will be able to gain more
       "rights". It shows that Jews most likely have something similar
       stored  down the pipeline for China.
       *It is my firm belief that the only true communists in the
       Western world are those Nazbols such as Eric Striker (Gentile),
       while those who claim to be communists are deliberately using
       deceptive language, or are simply misguided but
       well-intentioned.
       #Post#: 2546--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 29, 2020, 1:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Hitler described two Japans: one Western and one non-Western.
       We are seeing rightists exalt the former and True Leftists exalt
       the latter. Similarly, I believe there are two Chinas: one
       Western and one non-Western. We are seeing False Leftists exalt
       the former and True Leftists exalt the latter."
       This is a sign of how far rightwards the False Left has shifted,
       that a position that used to be primarily associated with
       rightism in Hitler's time (though, to be fair, some liberals
       back then would also have shared the position) is now assumed to
       be primarily associated with "leftism". And with today's
       rightists - who are becoming less neocon and more paleocon at an
       alarming rate - being outright hostile to China, the False
       Leftists are able to set up a false dichotomy between rightists
       wanting China to fail and "leftists" wanting a Westernized China
       to "succeed" (by Western standards). Thus the idea that China
       should despise Western standards has been sidelined.
       (And of course there are some self-proclaimed "anti-Western"
       activists in China who claim to "despise Western standards", but
       what they really mean by this is they despise the Counterculture
       era (which they call "Western", while what is actually Western
       they call "advanced"/"developed"/etc.).)
       "I actually replied to one of their tweets regarding the "Asians
       wear masks" meme:"
       You should try to be a lot more active on Twitter. With that
       said, I would be careful with using the term "Orientalist" as it
       is easily misunderstood. While indeed the historical
       colonial-era Orientalists were known for ignorant attempts at
       positively stereotyping other countries, that was a different
       time when most Orientalists had never personally visited the
       countries they were stereotyping and probably did not even
       personally know anyone from those countries, therefore can be
       excused for their ignorance and even given some credit for good
       intentions. Today's stereotypers tend to be far more
       well-travelled and certainly have plenty of acquaintances - many
       are sexpats FFS! - from the countries they are stereotyping, and
       hence their motives behind their stereotyping are far less pure
       to say the least.
       "The account also points out how many "pro-DPRK" "anti-war"
       groups such as Code-Pink (led by Jewess Susan Medea Benjamin)
       have said that they hope by becoming more "diplomatic" with the
       DPRK, the North Koreans will be able to gain more "rights"."
       I think we can summarize the present attitudes as follows:
       Rightists view people of non-Western countries as enemies to be
       destroyed. [paleocon]
       False Leftists view people of non-Western countries as victims
       to be helped by Westernization. [neocon]
       True Leftists view people of non-Western countries as potential
       soldiers with which to kill Western civilization, provided they
       become Woke. [SJW]
       Further worsening the confusion, rightists often accuse False
       Leftists of being SJW!
       #Post#: 2547--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: rp Date: November 29, 2020, 2:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "(And of course there are some self-proclaimed "anti-Western"
       activists in China who claim to "despise Western standards","
       And their counterparts in the West are the "pro-China" False
       Leftist activists.
       "You should try to be a lot more active on Twitter."
       Ok. After using it have I realized how useful of a tool it is
       for propaganda war (the account I mentioned is even called
       "Counterpropaganda re:Korea" FFS!). I have started following
       non-racist anti-Zionist "truther" accounts, as well as
       anti-racist anti-war accounts, such as the one mentioned.
       "With that said, I would be careful with using the term
       "Orientalist" as it is easily misunderstood."
       Ok. But what term would you prefer we use? Racist? Patronizing?
       "False Leftists view people of non-Western countries as victims
       to be helped by Westernization. [neocon]"
       But these same False Leftist "anti-war" types say they are
       "anti-neocon". Perhaps they are only against the neocon
       ideologues, while still sharing their ideology?
       #Post#: 2550--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 29, 2020, 11:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "And their counterparts in the West are the "pro-China" False
       Leftist activists."
       Are these also negative towards the Counterculture era?
       "I have started following non-racist anti-Zionist "truther"
       accounts, as well as anti-racist anti-war accounts, such as the
       one mentioned."
       Please also try to encourage firearm ownership among leftists.
       "Ok. But what term would you prefer we use? Racist?
       Patronizing?"
       It's not racist in the sense of ethnotribalist. Patronizing is
       closer, but it depends on the particular context. To supplement
       what I wrote in the previous post, the important thing to
       remember is that the historical Orientalists were creating their
       stereotypes for consumption primarily by their own society (for
       the sake of contrast), whereas today's stereotypers are creating
       their stereotypes for consumption primarily by the group being
       stereotyped (to exercise control over the group's behaviour). I
       suppose you could call it biscuit-feeding.....
       "But these same False Leftist "anti-war" types say they are
       "anti-neocon". Perhaps they are only against the neocon
       ideologues, while still sharing their ideology?"
       They associate neocons exclusively with eagerness to go to war,
       not with the eagerness to Westernize after war (which is the
       actual important part). By no coincidence, these same False Left
       anti-war types are also hopeless when I try to convince them
       about the necessity to invade Israel/Myanmar/Hungary/etc.. This
       is also why the True Left must make it clear from the outset in
       all presentations that we believe (as is obvious from all of
       history) in the necessity of military action for solving many
       problems in a decisive manner. What distinguishes us from
       rightists is the principle that we must use our military in
       strict accordance with Ahimsa.
       Also an update:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0974vd7XPw
       #Post#: 2551--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: rp Date: November 30, 2020, 12:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Crypto Jewish infiltration of 9/11 truth movement in action- The
       following CNN hitpiece on 9/11 truth features interview clips
       with 9/11 researcher Christopher Bollyn interspersed with Weev's
       "Jews did WTC" website:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bB6nDk_FEBs&feature=emb_title
       Weev is Jewish:
  HTML https://www.newsweek.com/neo-nazi-andrew-weev-auernheimer-daily-stormer-jewish-descent-768805<br
       />
       Weev now runs the largest Neo-Nazi website with Andrew Anglin
       (Jew) who is an ex-truther BS infectee.
       Another crypto-Jew who was involved in subverting the truth
       movement by mixing racism with Jew-awareness is the notorious
       Jew Quest. Quest has a strong friendship with the WN Michael
       Delaney (Gentile), another ex-truther BS infectee:
  HTML https://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/summer-cleaning/comment-page-1/#comment-175634
       [quote]White Nationalist, Michael Delaney had a strong
       friendship with the Jew “Quest” (Evren Hun Welshons, mother’s
       maiden name Kaplan) even after I repeatedly warned him that
       Quest was a Jew.[/quote]
       Between Weev (Jew) and Quest (Jew), could it be any clearer that
       Boromir Syndrome was instigated by the Jews in order to weaken
       opposition to Zionism? But no matter how much this information
       is provided to BS Gentiles, they will remain BS Gentiles. But
       you know what would change them? A bullet through their heads.
       #Post#: 2558--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: rp Date: November 30, 2020, 5:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "whereas today's stereotypers are creating their stereotypes for
       consumption primarily by the group being stereotyped"
       Regardless of whomever the stereotypes are being created for to
       consume, stereotyping is nonetheless dishonourable and thus
       non-Aryan. Therefore, those who engage in stereotyping are
       non-Aryan, and hence, they are unsalvageable. So I do not waste
       my time on Twitter attempting to educate/persuade them (I am
       blocked by most of those cowards anyway), but rather focus on
       those who refuse to accept such stereotypes in the first place
       nor stereotype others, to begin with.
       "They associate neocons exclusively with eagerness to go to war,
       not with the eagerness to Westernize after war (which is the
       actual important part)."
       Do you think those anti-war activists who are opposed to this
       (such as @korcounterprop) are salvageable? Despite their
       incorrect use of vocabulary (i.e. "imperialism" to describe
       colonialism) they seem to be opposed to Westernization. Another
       distinction that separates these people (such as
       @korcounterprop) from False Leftists* (such as PSL) is their
       vehement opposition to stereotypes, even when those stereotypes
       purport to "praise" those whom they stereotype. In this regard,
       I think people like @korcounterprop are refusing the goy biscuit
       and are thus anti-Western.
       "By no coincidence, these same False Left anti-war types are
       also hopeless when I try to convince them about the necessity to
       invade Israel/Myanmar/Hungary/etc.."
       While I think potential True Leftists may not vocally support
       military invasion yet, they are very much supportive of forming
       alliances with the enemies of those countries as well as with
       non-Western countries that are the target of Westernization,
       which is what underscores their anti-war activism. Contrast this
       to the False Leftists who are merely opposed to war because it
       is "bad for the troops" or for some other vague concept of
       utopian "peace".
       *Given that these False Leftists (even supposed "communists)
       speak about the need for North Koreans to obtain "rights" could
       they really be classified as "communist"? I don't think
       "communists" would speak about "rights" but would instead solely
       focus on class. So I would say they are democrats, or to use a
       term that has come into popularity recently, "democratic
       socialists".
       #Post#: 2582--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 30, 2020, 11:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Do you think those anti-war activists who are opposed to this
       (such as @korcounterprop) are salvageable? Despite their
       incorrect use of vocabulary (i.e. "imperialism" to describe
       colonialism) they seem to be opposed to Westernization."
       A good test would be to see how they respond to non-colonialist
       imperialism. For example:
  HTML https://www.memri.org/tv/turkish-president-erdogan-conquest-region-allahs-justice-do-not-test-courage-capabilities-patience
       [quote]President Recep Tayyip Erdo&#287;an: "In our
       civilization, conquest is not occupation or looting. It is
       establishing the dominance of the justice that Allah commanded
       in the [conquered] region.
       [...]
       "First of all, our nation removed the oppression from the areas
       that it conquered. It established justice. This is why our
       civilization is one of conquest.[/quote]
       "Given that these False Leftists (even supposed "communists)
       speak about the need for North Koreans to obtain "rights" could
       they really be classified as "communist"? I don't think
       "communists" would speak about "rights" but would instead solely
       focus on class."
       I think it is just a matter of wording. A communist could argue
       that the proletariat has the "right" to own the means of
       production while the bourgeois do not have such a "right". The
       concept of "rights" does not necessarily imply the same "rights"
       for everyone.
       #Post#: 2585--------------------------------------------------
       Re: JEWS HAVE NOTHING IN COMMON WITH US!
       By: rp Date: December 1, 2020, 12:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "A good test would be to see how they respond to non-colonialist
       imperialism. For example:"
       I have searched @korcounterprop's timeline and there are no
       tweets on Turkey, but there are tweets condemning the Zionist
       YPG, who are anti-Turkey.
       "A communist could argue that the proletariat has the "right" to
       own the means of production while the bourgeois do not have such
       a "right"."
       Ok. But those organizations such as PSL/COEDPINK do not speak of
       the "rights" of the proletariat exclusively, but "rights" in
       general, in opposition to the alleged "totalitarian" gulags
       present in North Korea. A true communist would have no problem
       with gulags, as they would seek to strip the bourgeois of their
       "rights". As far as I can tell, even the PSL, which calls itself
       a "revolutionary Marxist" party, does not advocate for gulag
       torture. So it appears there is a contradiction, where they use
       Marxist terminology to advocate for liberal policies.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page