DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 27701--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: rp Date: September 2, 2024, 8:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/ankitatIIMA/status/1812749957700751532?t=VsMfbYb34stq91qsw9kI_A&s=19
[quote]
💥@devduttmyth you fool, the monks who have taken the
oath of celibacy are supposed to keep distance from women not
because the women are impure.
Fertility is symbolism of lifecycles & the monks are seeking to
end those lifecycles for their souls. Which is why they keep
away.
For those who are in worldly life, Sanatan Dharm has always been
celebrating fertility and feminine divine.
[Img]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GSgueYWXIAAdhJP?format=png&name=small[/img]
#Post#: 27703--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 2, 2024, 8:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/telegony/msg22357/#msg22357
If you view an animal as a person, you would obviously not kill
it for meat, because you would prefer to keep it unchanged.
Similarly, if you view a woman as a goddess, you would just as
obviously not want to have sex with her, because you would
prefer to keep her unchanged.
I prefer my outlook to the one outlined in your quoted response,
as mine also exposes the degeneracy of those who celebrate
fertility (though in this case the responder's use of the term
"divine" is etymologically accurate - it's just that the devas
were actually the bad guys as we already know).
Related:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/eroticism-sexuality/
#Post#: 27711--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: You�re right Date: September 2, 2024, 11:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
“Similarly, if you view a women as a goddess, you would just as
obviously not want to have sex with her”
You’re right, and I apologize.
#Post#: 28494--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: rp Date: November 5, 2024, 9:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Non Aryan Muslim's argument against Hinduism:
HTML https://x.com/anasarcasm/status/1853474412479062262?t=4CI8T1uGZp1MbdJ-rYxhpA&s=19
[Quote]
This is true! Hinduism attracts amoral hippie type people with
no principles while Islam on the other hand attracts warriors
and real Gs like Dan Bilzerian & Andrew Tate.
[/Quote]
#Post#: 28796--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: SirGalahad Date: November 26, 2024, 9:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRetroFan @rp Do you guys have any opinions on ISKCON? I find
them pretty interesting, in the sense that they’re the one
example of successful Hindu proselytization in “the West”. And I
also appreciate that whenever they set up shop within colleges,
the food that they offer seems to usually be all vegan. I
respect that they’re not all sticking to lacto-vegetarian
dogmatism, and evolving to suit the greater pro-vegan tide. But
I think that their methods of proselytization can be a bit iffy,
and that gives them somewhat of a bad reputation. The founder
also didn’t say anything TOO bad throughout his life, but it
sounds like he’s said some stuff that at least raised a few
eyebrows
#Post#: 28797--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: rp Date: November 26, 2024, 10:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I consider ISCKON a valuable contributor to the U.S.
counterculture.
#Post#: 29080--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: rp Date: January 5, 2025, 11:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=2813.msg27703#msg27703
date=1725327190]
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/telegony/msg22357/#msg22357
If you view an animal as a person, you would obviously not kill
it for meat, because you would prefer to keep it unchanged.
Similarly, if you view a woman as a goddess, you would just as
obviously not want to have sex with her, because you would
prefer to keep her unchanged.
[B]I prefer my outlook to the one outlined in your quoted
response, as mine also exposes the degeneracy of those who
celebrate fertility[/b] (though in this case the responder's use
of the term "divine" is etymologically accurate - it's just that
the devas were actually the bad guys as we already know).
Related:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/eroticism-sexuality/
[/quote]
The quoted tweet is making the point that those in "worldly"
life (i.e. non ascetics) cannot remain celibate, and hence must
reproduce, which is why they need fertility. However, I agree
that fertility should not be celebrated in itself, as this will
lead to sustainable evil.
#Post#: 30166--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: rp Date: May 10, 2025, 8:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What is your opinion on the caste system? I mentioned previously
how caste can serve as a segue into racial idealism, but also a
tool for discrimination and bigotry.
#Post#: 30167--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 10, 2025, 9:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We should never be afraid to compare people racially, but it is
clearly wrong to claim that the caste system is a qualitatively
satisfactory system for classifying bloodlines. If two Aryanists
were trying to do Aryanization and one used the caste system
while the other relied on skeletal gracility irrespective of
caste, I guarantee the latter would deliver positive results
much more efficiently. I mean seriously:
[img width=797
height=1280]
HTML https://c8.alamy.com/comp/2D3XD0A/bengal-india-apr-09-2017-south-indian-hindu-cultural-and-traditional-god-procession-lead-by-brahmin-monk-and-his-devoteesfollowers-2D3XD0A.jpg[/img]
Note face shapes.
#Post#: 30169--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hinduism
By: SirGalahad Date: May 10, 2025, 10:50 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRetroFan I understand what RP is trying to say though,
because I could imagine the possibility of it being easier to
convince someone who already believes in a quality-based caste
system, that the standards of quality that they should follow
are actually OUR standards, rather than the standards set by
Vedic-Brahmin tradition. Whereas most people who reject the
caste system in India, tend to do so on egalitarian grounds, so
they would reject our message on an instinctual level, despite
it being the polar opposite to the current standard of quality
set by the Brahmins. We always stress that low quality people
largely can't be taught or convinced to join our side, but maybe
followers of the caste system would be the easiest group of low
quality people to convert (still not easy, but slightly more
possible)
But obviously, it goes without saying that the caste system in
India has more problems than simply having the wrong standard of
quality
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page