URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 26485--------------------------------------------------
       The Problem on Nationalism
       By: antihellenistic Date: May 18, 2024, 11:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I talked with many Islamists and "New Leftists" who want total
       change from a capitalist democratic into a distributive
       socialist society, they are afraid of a nation-state system.
       Because it can be resulting capitalism and a competitive society
       being reinstated again by the classes of people who do not want
       to be responsible for their actions when we help them win and
       control the state. A society which divided because of its
       nation-state systems can make them potentially war against each
       other. Remember about how Western Civilization creates
       unnecessary inter-society war with their nationalist doctrine.
       We must reassess our nationalist sentiment.
       #Post#: 26488--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Problem on Nationalism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 19, 2024, 12:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Nationalism implies autarky, exclusively state-issued fiat
       currency and exclusively barter-based foreign trade. All these
       are antithetical to capitalism. Did you not explain this to
       them?
       #Post#: 26489--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Problem on Nationalism
       By: antihellenistic Date: May 19, 2024, 12:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Nationalism implies autarky, exclusively state-issued
       fiat currency and exclusively barter-based foreign trade. All
       these are antithetical to capitalism. Did you not explain this
       to them?[/quote]
       That's the ideal of using nation-state as a tool to implement
       socialism, I already say it to them. But they don't have
       solutions if the corrupt and westernized people retake the
       national state to be used by them for their own interest, used
       to implement back capitalist darwinian society, based on natural
       selection...
       #Post#: 26491--------------------------------------------------
       Re: The Problem on Nationalism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 19, 2024, 2:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Even if you started off with just one state for the whole world,
       capitalists could still retake that and then re-implement
       capitalism. But if we start off with multiple states, then if
       they retake one first and re-implement capitalism there, the
       others can militarily invade that one and thus prevent
       capitalism from spreading.
       Let's say there is a 0.5 probability of any state being retaken
       by capitalists each year. If we had only one state, then there
       is a 0.5 probability of that state being retaken. But if we had
       two states, then there would be 0.5 x 0.5 = 0.25 probability of
       both being retaken that year. Thus having two states is safer
       than having only one. And so on.
       This is similar to spreading out farms so that if a farm in one
       location has a bad harvest, at least we can compensate with a
       farm in another location having a good harvest (and which can
       then transport the food to the bad harvest location), thereby
       reducing the risk of famine.
       Another example:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ship_floodability
       [quote]Development of watertight compartments continued during
       the Song dynasty in China. The watertight compartments were
       there to ensure that if one part of the ship was leaking, the
       ship itself would not sink. [/quote]
       Even capitalists understand this principle:
  HTML https://www.wealthify.com/blog/why-you-shouldn-t-put-all-your-eggs-in-one-basket
       [quote]Basically, if you invest in just one company, you're
       solely relying on it to do well – and as we know, the markets go
       up and down, and they can be impacted by many factors, like news
       events, and market and economic trends.
       'Diversifying' your portfolio means investing in a range of
       assets (like stocks, bonds, commodities, and property, and
       indexes from around the world (such as the UK's FTSE 100 or the
       S&P 100 in the US), as a way to spread your risk. This means
       that any poorly performing investments could be balanced out by
       ones that are doing better, and local events (like Brexit) could
       have less of an impact.[/quote]
       (Of course, as we bring down the world population in a
       controlled way, then we will gradually need fewer and fewer
       states in total. Hopefully we will simultaneously be Aryanizing
       the remaining population, and thus reducing the risk of hostile
       usurpation that way. Towards the end of Aryanization, we should
       be safe enough even with only one state. But the mistake to
       avoid is to jump the gun to one state before the racial quality
       of the population is high enough.)
       *****************************************************