URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 10233--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 22, 2021, 9:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And don't even get me started on the further Western inferiority
       called:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_cleaning
       [quote]Dry cleaning still involves liquid, but clothes are
       instead soaked in a water-free liquid solvent,
       tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene), known in the industry
       as "perc", which is the most widely used solvent. Alternative
       solvents are 1-bromopropane and petroleum spirits.[1][/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachloroethylene
       [quote]The International Agency for Research on Cancer has
       classified tetrachloroethylene as a Group 2A carcinogen, which
       means that it is probably carcinogenic to humans.[10] Like many
       chlorinated hydrocarbons, tetrachloroethylene is a central
       nervous system depressant and can enter the body through
       respiratory or dermal exposure.[11] Tetrachloroethylene
       dissolves fats from the skin, potentially resulting in skin
       irritation.
       Animal studies and a study of 99 twins showed there is a "lot of
       circumstantial evidence" that exposure to tetrachloroethylene
       increases the risk of developing Parkinson's disease ninefold.
       Larger population studies are planned.[12] Also,
       tetrachloroethylene has been shown to cause liver tumors in mice
       and kidney tumors in male rats.[13]
       ...
       Tetrachloroethylene exposure has been linked to pronounced
       acquired color vision deficiencies after chronic exposure.[22]
       ...
       Tetrachloroethylene is a problematic soil contaminant because
       its density causes it to sink below the water table, inhibiting
       cleanup activities.[/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1-Bromopropane
       [quote]In the EU, 1-bromopropane has been classified as
       reproductive toxicant per Registration, Evaluation,
       Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals, which makes it a
       "substance of very high concern".[11]
       ...
       In 2013, a peer-review panel convened by the U.S. National
       Toxicology Program unanimously recommended that 1-bromopropane,
       be classified as reasonably anticipated human carcinogens.[15]
       ...
       Reported symptoms of overexposure affect the nervous system and
       include confusion, slurred speech, dizziness, paresthesias, and
       difficulty walking, unusual fatigue and headaches, development
       of arthralgias, visual disturbances (difficulty focusing), and
       muscle twitching. Symptoms may persist over one year.[9] Other
       symptoms include irritation of mucous membranes, eyes, upper
       respiratory tract, and skin, as well as transient loss of
       consciousness.[7] Loss of feeling in the feet, an example of
       paresthesia, is colloquially called "dead foot" by workers who
       suffer from it.[5]
       ...
       Animal studies of 1-bromopropane have showed that it is a
       carcinogen in those models.[7] Rodents exposed to 1-bromopropane
       developed lung, colon, and skin cancer at higher rates.[6]
       ...
       Stratospheric ozone layer damage
       ...
       According to United States Environmental Protection Agency, the
       ODP is 0.013-0.018 in the US latitudes, and between 0.071-0.100
       in tropical latitudes.[17][/quote]
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/
       #Post#: 10374--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 1, 2022, 8:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Since I mentioned the hand dryer over here:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/decolonized-housing-(america-edition)/msg10370/#msg10370
       and tumble driers above, I should also mention that hair dryers
       (obviously also of Western origin) are similarly wasteful, as
       well as unhealthy:
  HTML https://headandshoulders.com/en-us/healthy-hair-and-scalp/hair-care/how-blow-drying-hair-damages-your-scalp
       [quote]Blow drying is known to damage your hair. The heat from a
       dryer can disrupt your hair cuticles and can also put the scalp
       under strain.
       Heat damage on your scalp
       When you’re blow drying your hair, that’s not all you’re drying
       out.
       When you blow dry your hair, you’re instantly heating the
       moisture in both your hair and your scalp.
       This causes a knock-on effect:
       Water inside the hair fibre can turn to steam and create
       permanent damage blisters
       The heat can dry out the scalp[/quote]
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9e/HairDryer.jpg
       WTF is wrong with Westerners? (Answer: they are Westerners.)
       By the way, dress decolonization isn't just about clothes; we
       can also discuss the inferiority of Western hairstyles here.
       #Post#: 10397--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 3, 2022, 9:04 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Let's keep going:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_comb
       [quote]A hot comb (also known as a straightening comb or
       pressing comb) is a metal comb that is used to straighten
       moderate or coarse hair and create a smoother hair texture.[1] A
       hot comb is heated and used to straighten the hair from the
       roots. It can be placed directly on the source of heat or it may
       be electrically heated.[2][left][/left]
       ...
       Parisian Francois Marcel Grateau is said to have revolutionized
       hair styling when he invented and introduced heated irons to
       curl and wave his customers' hair in France in 1872. His Marcel
       Wave remained fashionable for many decades. Britain's Science
       and Society Library credits L. Pelleray of Paris with
       manufacturing the heated irons in the 1870s.[4]
       ...
       Potential consequences
       It is not uncommon to burn and damage hair when using a
       traditional hot comb. A hot comb is often heated to over 65
       degrees Celsius (149 degrees Fahrenheit), therefore if not
       careful severe burns and scarring can occur.
       The hot petrolatum used with the iron was thought to cause a
       chronic inflammation around the upper segment of the hair
       follicle leading to degeneration of the external root
       sheath.[21]
       In 1992, a hot comb alopecia study was conducted, and it was
       discovered that there was a poor correlation between the usage
       of a hot comb and the onset and progression of disease. The
       study concludes that the term follicular degeneration syndrome
       (FDS) is proposed for this clinically and histologically
       distinct form of scarring alopecia.[22][/quote]
       #Post#: 10433--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 7, 2022, 3:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/beijing-olympics-ceremonies-uniforms-deemed-231414370.html
       [quote]During the medals ceremonies, the Beijing Olympics
       organizers said that staff will don three designs featuring
       “traditional Tang dynasty fabrics and other traditional Chinese
       cultural elements.”[/quote]
       Oh, really?
       [img width=1280
       height=678]
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIAtTxiVcAICfFL?format=jpg&name=4096x4096[/img]
       [img width=1155
       height=1280]
  HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FIAtVaXVgAIF87y?format=jpg&name=large[/img]
       [quote]“The dress shows the Chinese charm with modern and simple
       techniques,” the committee wrote.[/quote]
       No, it doesn't! These are wholly Western clothes in idea, with
       merely tasteless "Chinese" tourist junk pasted on top! Note the
       long (leather? certainly not cloth) boots (with high heels for
       the women - see model furthest to the right of the top picture).
       Note the sexual dimorphism of the collar (centred for men, left
       over right for women) and the torso shaping (straight down for
       men, widening below the waist for women). Note the Santa
       workshop hats. Note the gloves. Note the puffy sleeves. Note the
       high jacket cutoff of the model furthest to the left of the top
       picture. This summarizes how deeply the Eurocentrist rot has
       eaten into China: that which is actually uniquely Western it
       normalizes as "modern", while what it calls "Chinese" might as
       well be a self-insult.
  HTML https://smallimg.pngkey.com/png/small/129-1297667_clip-free-stock-collection-of-free-failing-clipart.png
       It would be bad enough if they were consciously deciding to be
       Western, but this is worse: they cannot get out of the Western
       framework even when they are trying to!
       #Post#: 10436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: guest55 Date: January 7, 2022, 9:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Iran claims the "mullet" is a western hairstyle. I would argue
       that it is not....
       #Post#: 10479--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 10, 2022, 1:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Success:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/texas-schools-rethink-gender-based-160100723.html
       [quote]Texas Schools Rethink Gender-Based Dress Code Policies
       After Discrimination Claims Raise New Legal Issues
       Hope Cozart was perplexed when she received a letter from her
       son Maddox’s school in April telling her he needed to cut his
       hair because it was too long. Even so, she obliged: She took
       Maddox to get a haircut, which consisted of shaved sides with a
       little more hair left at the top. Cozart would braid or plait
       her son’s hair to keep it out of his face.
       But school officials from the Troy Independent School District,
       where Maddox was enrolled at Raymond Mays Middle School, outside
       of Temple, were still unhappy with the new cut. He was
       disciplined for breaking his school’s dress code, which at the
       time prohibited male students from wearing their hair in a
       ponytail, bun or top knot. Maddox was placed in in-school
       suspension for more than 10 days and later in lunch detention,
       Cozart said. Her daughter, who had a similar hairstyle, never
       faced any issues.[/quote]
       Which proves that the dress code was never motivated by
       practical considerations, but solely by Western expectations of
       sexual dimorphism accentuation.
       [quote]“He was getting pulled out of class daily, sometimes by
       multiple teachers, and examined like he was an object,” said
       Cozart, noting that her son is biracial and that his hair style
       relates to his Black culture.
       Cozart’s experience is part of a series of recent conflicts
       across the state over school dress codes, some of which have
       turned into civil rights court battles over gender and race.
       In the Houston area, a lawsuit filed against Magnolia ISD in
       October accused the district of violating Title IX and students’
       14th Amendment protections by prohibiting male students from
       wearing long hair. This month, the district’s school board
       reached a settlement agreement and voted to eliminate its
       gender-based policy on hair.[/quote]
       This is a defeat for Western colonialism and a victory for
       America. I hardly need to remind everyone that in pre-colonial
       times, long hair (including mullets!) was the American standard
       for males as well as females:
       [quote]This year, the ACLU of Texas has sent at least two
       complaints to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil
       Rights concerning male students of Native American heritage
       being punished for wearing their hair long, which aligns with
       their cultural and religious beliefs, according to the
       organization.[/quote]
       Like so many other issues, hairstyle can unite all victims of
       Western civilization against our common oppressor:
       [quote]Mahogane Reed, an attorney with the NAACP’s Legal Defense
       Fund, said the 2020 case of the Black male students who were
       disciplined for wearing dreadlocks at Barbers Hill ISD
       illustrates how sometimes students are caught at an intersection
       of identities and can be affected by school dress codes that
       don’t account for cultural intricacies.
       ...
       Binary dress codes have also presented a dilemma for LGBTQ and
       nonbinary students such as Danielle Miller’s fifth grade child,
       Tristan, who is nonbinary and one of the seven plaintiffs in the
       lawsuit against Magnolia ISD.
       “When I explained that we would have to adhere to a boy’s dress
       code [to Tristan], it was just met with complete trauma, and I
       realized that we weren’t going to be cutting their hair and
       we’re going to have to do everything we had to to go ahead and
       fight this because it’s not OK,” Miller said during a media
       briefing with the ACLU.[/quote]
       Finally, let us recall how they used to treat us not so long
       ago:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scalping#Continued_Indian_Wars
       [quote]In 1851, the U.S. Army displayed Indian scalps in
       Stanislaus County, California. In Tehama County, California,
       U.S. military and local volunteers razed villages and scalped
       hundreds of men, women, and children.[47]
       Scalping also occurred during the Sand Creek Massacre on
       November 29, 1864, during the American Indian Wars, when a
       700-man force of U.S. Army volunteers destroyed the village of
       Cheyenne and Arapaho in southeastern Colorado Territory, killing
       and mutilating[48][49] an estimated 70–163 Native
       Americans.[50][51][52] An 1867 New York Times article reported
       that "settlers in a small town in Colorado Territory had
       recently subscribed $5,000 to a fund ‘for the purpose of buying
       Indian scalps (with $25 each to be paid for scalps with the ears
       on)’ and that the market for Indian scalps ‘is not affected by
       age or sex’." The article noted this behavior was "sanctioned"
       by the U.S. federal government, and was modeled on patterns the
       U.S. had begun a century earlier in the "American
       East".[53]: 206 
       From one writer's point of view, it was a "uniquely
       [s]American[/s]" innovation that the use of scalp bounties in
       the wars against indigenous societies "became an indiscriminate
       killing process that deliberately targeted Indian non-combatants
       (including women, children, and infants), as well as
       warriors."[53]: 204  Some American states such as
       Arizona paid bounty for enemy Native American scalps.[54]
       [/quote]
       NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
       Related:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-degendering/
       #Post#: 10508--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: Zea_mays Date: January 11, 2022, 12:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Lol.
       The double standard is the point of course, but I will also
       point out how Boris's hair is at least a departure from the
       excessive grooming standards of high-maintenance Western
       hairstyles which were popular from the late 1800s to 1950s.
       [img width=915
       height=1280]
  HTML https://i.redd.it/5sut3o18k4681.jpg[/img]
       In the Romantic era in the mid-1800s, it wasn't uncommon for men
       to have low-maintenance and "unprofessional" hairstyles:
  HTML http://www.americancivilwarstory.com/images/311xNxhessler1857.jpg.pagespeed.ic.0BOzv-MQpA.jpg
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/RobertCornelius.jpg/585px-RobertCornelius.jpg
       Boris would appear even less respectable if his hair looked
       "professional", like this:
  HTML https://i.pinimg.com/736x/1e/96/58/1e965835658501107ed0177e3fb2c9a5--pomade-hairstyle-men-mens-hairstyle.jpg
       Or this:
       [img width=1280
       height=853]
  HTML http://media.vanityfair.com/photos/55f99f43200c34353591eea7/master/pass/t-donald-trump-27-celebrities-hair-color-video.jpg[/img]
       [img width=1280
       height=720]
  HTML https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/images/2020-07/071620_mary_trump_intv_web.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://compote.slate.com/images/0c496dfa-94ab-407d-a0d1-c162851dfb82.jpg
       #Post#: 10530--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: bondburger Date: January 12, 2022, 11:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What footwear would you recommend wearing? Especially for if
       doing lots of walking. At most shoe shops I tend to have
       difficulty finding boots that are both small enough and
       leather-free, so I don't have much flexibility getting footwear
       conventionally (I do have leather-free boots, but they're
       probably not ideal since they're the only affordable ones I was
       able to find). Is there a nostalgic approach to this?
       #Post#: 10541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: guest55 Date: January 13, 2022, 7:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For Americans wouldn't shoes such as the Converse Chuck Taylor
       All-Stars work?:
       [img]
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a8/A_classic_Black_pair_of_Converse_All_Stars_resting_on_the_Black_%26_White_Ed._Shoebox_%281998-2002%29.JPG[/img]
       Since Converse is now a subsidiary of Nike we can also be sure
       that none are being sold in Israel anymore....
       [quote]Converse started making an early basketball shoe in 1917
       and redesigned it in 1922, when Chuck Taylor asked the company
       to create a better shoe with more support and flexibility. After
       Converse added Taylor's signature to the ankle patch they became
       known as Chuck Taylor All Stars. By the 1960s the company had
       captured about 70 to 80 percent of the basketball shoe market,
       but the shoe declined in popularity during the 1970s, when more
       and more basketball players wore other brands of shoes. Chuck
       Taylor All Stars enjoyed a comeback in popularity in the 1980s
       as retro-style casual footwear.[3][4][/quote]
       [quote]Ad from 1920 for the forerunner of the Chuck Taylor All
       Star, Converse "Non-Skids."
       Marquis Mills Converse founded the Converse Rubber Shoe Company
       in 1908 in Malden, Massachusetts. In 1917 the company designed
       the forerunner of the modern All Star shoe that it marketed
       under the name of "Non-Skids." The shoe was composed of a rubber
       sole and canvas upper and was designed for basketball
       players.[citation needed]
       In 1921, Charles "Chuck" Taylor, an American semi-professional
       basketball player, joined Converse as a salesman.[5] Within a
       year of Taylor's arrival, the company had adopted his ideas for
       improvements to the shoe's design to enhance its flexibility and
       ankle support. The restyled shoe also incorporated a distinctive
       All-Star logo on the circular patch that protected the ankle.
       After Taylor's signature was added to the ankle patch as his
       endorsement, they became known as Chuck Taylor All Stars, the
       first celebrity-endorsed athletic shoe.[6][7]
       To promote sales of Converse All Star shoes to basketball
       players, Taylor held basketball clinics in high school and
       college gyms and YMCAs all across the United States and taught
       the fundamentals of the game.[8] During the 1926–27 season
       Taylor also served as a player-manager of the company-sponsored
       basketball team called the Converse All Stars. The Chicago-based
       touring team was established to promote sales of the company's
       All Star basketball shoes.[9]
       Numerous professional basketball players were soon wearing All
       Stars. The shoes also became popular among younger basketball
       players, including athletes in the Olympic Games and American
       soldiers in the 1940s. Converse All Stars were the official shoe
       of the Olympics from 1936 to 1968.[6][10] During World War II
       All Stars were the official athletic training shoes of the U.S.
       armed forces.[6][/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Taylor_All-Stars
       #Post#: 10575--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: SirGalahad Date: January 15, 2022, 5:05 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @Mazda My main issue with Converse is that they're such a pain
       to put on. Especially the ones that go up to the ankle, like in
       the picture you showed. I kind of avoid shoes with shoelaces in
       general. I prefer sandals, shoes with velcro straps, or even the
       Vans slip-ons, which are very convenient:
  HTML https://scene7.zumiez.com/is/image/zumiez/image/Vans-Classic-Slip-On-Black-%26-White-Shoes-_266638.jpg
       Maybe I'm just lazy when it comes to shoes, and maybe I'm just
       overly passionate about a minor annoyance, but I feel like
       shoelaces were a pointless invention. Plus, if I'm in a hurry, I
       have to fight to loosen the shoe enough for me to shove my foot
       into it
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page