URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 5817--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 23, 2021, 10:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Today we will ridicule the complexity of one of the most
       definitive and most annoying elements of Western dress:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Necktie
       [quote]The necktie that spread from Europe traces back to
       Croatian mercenaries serving in France during the Thirty Years'
       War (1618–1648). These mercenaries from the Croatian Military
       Frontier, wearing their traditional small, knotted neckerchiefs,
       aroused the interest of the Parisians.[2] Because of the
       difference between the Croatian word for Croats, Hrvati, and the
       French word, Croates, the garment gained the name cravat
       (cravate in French).[3] The boy-king Louis XIV began wearing a
       lace cravat around 1646, when he was seven, and set the fashion
       for French nobility. This new article of clothing started a
       fashion craze in Europe; both men and women wore pieces of
       fabric around their necks. From its introduction by the French
       king, men wore lace cravats, or jabots, that took a large amount
       of time and effort to arrange. These cravats were often tied in
       place by cravat strings, arranged neatly and tied in a bow.
       International Necktie Day is celebrated on October 18 in Croatia
       and in various cities around the world, including in Dublin,
       Tübingen, Como, Tokyo, Sydney and other towns.[4][5][/quote]
       I just came over from watching TYT make fun of Carlson wearing a
       bowtie, so let's start with the bowtie:
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4b/HowToTieBowtie_VersionA.png/491px-HowToTieBowtie_VersionA.png
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c7/HowToTieBowtie_second-way-A.png/436px-HowToTieBowtie_second-way-A.png
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6c/HowToTieBowtie_VersionB.png/491px-HowToTieBowtie_VersionB.png
       The cravat is worse, however:
  HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/af/Neckclothitania-1818.gif
       And of course the standard tie is the worst:
       [quote]the four-in-hand knot. The four-in-hand knot may be the
       most common.
       the Pratt knot (the Shelby knot)
       the half-Windsor knot
       the Windsor knot (also redundantly called the "full Windsor" and
       the "Double Windsor").
       ...
       Small knot (also "oriental knot", "Kent knot"): the smallest
       possible necktie knot. It forms an equilateral triangle, like
       the half-Windsor, but much more compact (Fink–Mao notation: Lo
       Ri Co T, Knot 1). It is also the smallest knot to begin
       inside-out.
       Nicky knot: an alternative version of the Pratt knot, but
       better-balanced and self-releasing (Lo Ci Ro Li Co T, Knot 4).
       Supposedly named for Nikita Khrushchev, it tends to be equally
       referred to as the Pratt knot in men's style literature. This is
       the version of the Pratt knot favored by Fink and Mao.
       Atlantic knot: a reversed Pratt knot, highlighting the structure
       of the knot normally hidden on the back. In order for the wide
       blade to remain in front and rightside-out, the knot must begin
       rightside-out, and the thin end must be wrapped around the wide
       end. (Ri Co Ri Lo Ci T; not catalogued by Fink and Mao, but
       would be numbered 5r according to their classification.)
       Prince Albert knot (also "double knot", "cross Victoria knot"):
       A variant of the four-in-hand with an extra pass of the wide
       blade around the front, before passing the wide blade through
       both of the resultant loops (Li Ro Li Ro Li Co T T, Knot 62). A
       version knotted through only the outermost loop is known as the
       Victoria knot (Li Ro Li Ro Li Co T, Knot 6).
       Christensen knot (also "cross knot"): An elongated, symmetrical
       knot, whose main feature is the cruciform structure made by
       knotting the necktie through the double loop made in the front
       (Li Ro Ci Lo Ri Lo Ri Co T T, Knot 252). While it can be made
       with modern neckties, it is most effective with thinner ties of
       consistent width, which fell out of common use after the 19th
       century.
       Ediety knot (also "Merovingian knot"): a doubled Atlantic knot,
       best known as the tie knot worn by the character "the
       Merovingian" in the 2003 film The Matrix Reloaded. This tie can
       be knotted with the thin end over the wide end, as with the
       Atlantic knot, or with the wide end over the thin end to mimic
       the look seen in the film, with the narrow blade in front. (Ri
       Co Ri Lo Ci Ri Co Ri Lo Ci T – not catalogued by Fink and Mao,
       as its 10 moves exceed their parameters.)
       Victoria knot
       Eldredge knot
       Trinity knot
       Tulip knot
       Vidalia knot
       Caped Eldredge knot
       Trinity-Eldredge knot
       St.Andrew knot
       Balthus knot
       Hanover knot
       Grantchester knot
       Plattsburgh knot[/quote]
  HTML http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/85ways.shtml
       [quote]THE 85 WAYS TO TIE A TIE
       ...
       There is an overwhelming amount of information about knots, knot
       tying, knot science, knot history, and knot theory in this book.
       Think I'm kidding?
       In order for you to know how to tie all these 85 different
       knots, you first have to learn all the different moves:
  HTML http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/FIGS/NOTMYDESK/tie10.jpg
  HTML http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/FIGS/NOTMYDESK/tie6.jpg
  HTML http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/FIGS/NOTMYDESK/tie9.jpg[/quote]
       Finally, if after all the above you still do not consider
       Western dress to be the most inferior the world, here is a
       necktie that suits you:
       [img]
  HTML https://media.istockphoto.com/photos/hangman-sketched-on-blackboard-picture-id466313780?k=20&m=466313780&s=612x612&w=0&h=6oFFBSBvS3Hu5Zs5QRQXvZOOmWaUM0TWDRCMLeWksm4=[/img]
       #Post#: 5858--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 24, 2021, 10:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another uniquely Western item that has has always annoyed me is
       the handbag. Ever since I was a child, I did not understand why
       women's clothes did not have pockets while men's clothes did.
       Either pockets are a good idea, in which case they should be
       used by everyone, or they are a bad idea, in which case they
       should be used by no one. This was actually how it was in
       non-Western civilizations. Western civilization, of course, only
       cares about sexual dimorphism:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handbag
       [quote]In the 17th century, young girls were taught embroidery
       as a necessary skill for marriage; this also helped them make
       very beautiful handbags.[3] By the late 18th century, fashions
       in Europe were moving towards a slender shape for these
       accessories, inspired by the silhouettes of Ancient Greece and
       Rome. Women wanted purses that would not be bulky or untidy in
       appearance, so reticules were designed. Reticules were made of
       fine fabrics like silk and velvet, carried with wrist straps.
       First becoming popular in France, they crossed over into
       Britain, where they became known as "indispensables."[4] Men,
       however, did not adopt the trend. They used purses and pockets,
       which became popular in men's trousers.[5]
       The modern purse, clutch, pouch, or handbag came about in
       England during the Industrial Revolution, in part due to the
       increase in travel by railway. In 1841 the Doncaster
       industrialist and confectionery entrepreneur Samuel Parkinson
       (of butterscotch fame) ordered a set of traveling cases and
       trunks and insisted on a traveling case or bag for his wife's
       particulars after noticing that her purse was too small and made
       from a material that would not withstand the journey. He
       stipulated that he wanted various handbags for his wife, varying
       in size for different occasions, and asked that they be made
       from the same leather that was being used for his cases and
       trunks to distinguish them from the then-familiar carpetbag and
       other travelers' cloth bags used by members of the popular
       classes. H. J. Cave (London) obliged and produced the first
       modern set of luxury handbags, as we would recognize them today,
       including a clutch and a tote (named as 'ladies traveling
       case').
       ...
       In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud argued that purses were
       sexually suggestive as the structure of the purse symbolized
       female genitalia and sexuality. ... Freud compared women
       retrieving items from their purse as a representation of
       masturbation. According to Freud’s argument, women who carried
       purses openly displayed their sexuality due to the sexual
       symbolism of the purse.[7][/quote]
       As if this were not bad enough, Western critics of handbags
       based their opposition also on sexual dimorphism!
       [quote]many critics said that women did not need them and that
       bags of such size and heavy material would 'break the backs of
       ladies.'[/quote]
       This is Western civilization for you.....
       #Post#: 5872--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: Zhang Caizhi Date: April 25, 2021, 5:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am not sure if Thai student uniforms in Thai public schools
       are based on western student uniforms or not.
       Every student in Thai public schools have to wear the uniform
       regulated by the Ministry of Education of Thailand like in the
       image below.
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/ZR9WMcPY/Ban-Hat-Suea-Ten-School-2010-06.jpg
  HTML https://postimg.cc/5YV9H8kD
       #Post#: 5897--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 25, 2021, 11:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       While it has been modified to suit the warmer climate, I am
       fairly sure that it was based on a Western template. The folded
       collars, the shoes, etc. are dead giveaways.
       This goes back to:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Thai_clothing#Modern_Rattanakosin
       [quote]From the 1860s onward, Thai royals "selectively adopted
       Victorian corporeal and sartorial etiquette to fashion modern
       personas that were publicized domestically and internationally
       by means of mechanically reproduced images."[11] Stitched
       clothing, including court attire and ceremonial uniforms, were
       invented during the reign of King Chulalongkorn.[11] Western
       forms of dress became popular among urbanites in Bangkok during
       this time period.[11] During the early 1900s, King Vajiravudh
       launched a campaign to encourage Thai women to wear long hair
       instead of traditional short hair, and to wear pha sinh
       (ผ้าซิ่น), a tubular
       skirt, instead of the chong kraben
       (โจงกระเบน
       ),
       a cloth wrap.[12]
       ...
       On 15 January 1941, Plaek Pibulsonggram issued a Thai cultural
       mandate to modernize and westernize Thai dress, by deeming
       long-practiced customs of wearing underpants, wearing no shirt,
       or wearing a wraparound cloth, as forms of inappropriate public
       attire.[13][/quote]
       This is what we are here to reverse.
       At least the uniform shown does not include neckties! That is
       the only good thing about it.
       #Post#: 5899--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: Zhang Caizhi Date: April 26, 2021, 12:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Brief differences between male and female students in public
       schools regulated by the Ministry of Education of Thailand:
  HTML https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_uniforms_in_Thailand
       [quote]
       Boys
       Shirts
       Most male students wear a white shirt with a left breast pocket.
       Initials or logo on the left breast and the name of the school
       or student ID number on the right breast. Embroidery in red or
       blue.
       Pants and belt
       Three styles:
       Khaki shorts with brown leather belt
       Black shorts with leather belt in black or brown
       Blue shorts with belt, black or brown
       Shoes and socks
       Two styles:
       Khaki shorts wears brown socks and brown shoes
       Black or blue shorts wears white socks and black shoes
       Girls
       Blouses
       Elementary students: White blouse similar to boy's shirts,
       untucked shirt tails
       Secondary school: White blouse similar to boy's shirts, can have
       a ribbon and untucked shirt tails
       Upper secondary students: White shirt similar to boy's shirts
       Skirt
       Navy blue with six pleats in front and six in back
       Shoes and socks
       Black leather shoes and white socks
       [/quote]
       #Post#: 6266--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 10, 2021, 12:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What pathological Eurocentrism looks like:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3VVZAVuLtU
       #Post#: 6659--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 24, 2021, 2:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       North Korea just doesn't get it:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/north-korea-bans-mullet-haircuts-151158799.html
       [quote]North Korea has banned mullets, certain piercings, and
       skinny jeans in a bid to keep the country free from "decadent"
       Western fashion trends.[/quote]
       Counterculture is not Western! Try banning Western suits and
       neckties instead! Do you realize how colonized you look wearing
       that shit?
       [img width=1280
       height=853]
  HTML https://storage.googleapis.com/afs-prod/media/830a3e8eba7343de90122ccbfa451fa2/3000.jpeg[/img]
       #Post#: 7096--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Sports as a platform for protest
       By: guest5 Date: June 12, 2021, 2:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Robert Kraft Video Reveals How Out Of Touch Rich People Are
       [quote]Robert Kraft has a new ride... [/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfQk-f9B4qk&list=TLPQMTIwNjIwMjEWSoqF3vWqWg&index=9
       The comments are interesting....
       Eurocentric "blacks" are obviously some of the most disgusting
       Eurocentricists out there! Eurocentric "black" rappers are just
       imbeciles to boot, they will all be forgotten once Western
       civilization dies and the world begins to heal from this
       nightmare.
       The meaning behind the classical paintings in Beyoncé and
       Jay-Z’s “Apeshit”
       [quote]Why it matters that the video takes place in the
       Louvre.[/quote]
       [quote]And as an artistic choice, the Louvre is par for
       Beyoncé’s course. For the past few years, Beyoncé has
       increasingly cribbed from the iconography of classical Western
       art in her own image-making. [/quote]
  HTML https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/6/19/17476212/apeshit-video-beyonce-jay-z-carters-portrait-negresse-benoist
       They obviously only do it because they believe it makes them
       look "sophisticated" and "classy", by Western standards of
       course.
  HTML https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kbMqWXnpXcA/maxresdefault.jpg
       Let's pretend for a second "Apeshit" was meant to be offensive
       toward Western civilization, oh wait never mind, just read the
       lyrics....
  HTML https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/14/19/18480614-7464027-image-m-105_1568485675500.jpg
       Is Sally Hazelgrove Jewish?
  HTML https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/14/19/18480612-7464027-image-a-106_1568485968336.jpg
  HTML https://i.dailymail.co.uk/1s/2019/09/14/20/18480096-7464027-image-a-112_1568488282989.jpg
       #Post#: 7414--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 4, 2021, 10:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Again the Western obsession with sexual dimorphism:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/ukrainian-army-under-fire-making-185100601.html
       [quote]Ukrainian army under fire for making female soldiers
       march in high heels
       ...
       The military did not offer an explanation as to why women were
       made to march in different footwear than their male comrades,
       according to the Associated Press.
       ...
       Aside from accusing Ukrainian society as a whole of being
       “patriarchal” and sexist, a 2016 United Nations study titled
       “Invisible Battalion” leveled several charges of sexism against
       the Ukrainian military itself. Analyzing warfare and the
       military through “feminist studies,” the report accused the
       military of treating women as "second class," failing to supply
       them with proper uniforms and hygiene products, and failing to
       take many of them seriously.[/quote]
       Even civilians should not be wearing high heels! Besides the
       health effects previously covered:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-a-health-hazard/msg43/#msg43
       they are part of Western dress code:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dress_shoe#Women's_dress_shoes
       [quote]Pumps
       Pumps come in a variety of colors and styles. They can have a
       rounded or pointed toe, and are usually made of leather. They
       have a heel of at least 5 cm (2 inches)[citation needed]. Today,
       pumps have evolved beyond the classic working woman's shoe. Now,
       there are peep toe pumps, which have a small opening at the
       toes. There are also pumps with ankle straps. Not only have the
       styles evolved, the fabrics have as well. While almost all pumps
       used to be made of leather, pumps now come in a variety of
       materials, such as suede and wool.
       Slingbacks
       The slingback is similar to the pump in that it can have a
       rounded or pointed toe and usually has a heel, but it doesn't
       wrap all the way around the heel like pumps usually do. Instead,
       it has a narrow strap that is pulled up over the heel, leaving
       the rest of the heel exposed.
       Loafers
       Loafers are usually flat and typically thought of as both more
       masculine and comfortable than anything with a heel. The typical
       loafer has a round toe, and comes in darker colors, such as
       black or brown. A spin on the loafer is the cloak, which, like
       the loafer, is a slip-on shoe, but it has a heel and is
       considered a more "feminine" design.
       Mules
       Mules are shoes that slide onto the foot, and do not cover the
       heel or the back of the foot at all. These aren't considered
       dress shoes unless they have a heel.[/quote]
       and hence should be rejected on decolonization grounds alone.
       And of course the ultimate intent behind their design is to
       increase sexual dimorphism, therefore they should be rejected
       for this reason too.
       #Post#: 7599--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Dress decolonization
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 19, 2021, 9:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       And again. What is it about sexual dimorphism that is so
       important to Westerners?
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/norwegian-womens-beach-handball-team-172201500.html
       [quote]The Norwegian women's beach-handball team is facing fines
       for choosing to wear shorts at the European championship instead
       of bikini bottoms, according to a statement issued by the
       European Handball Federation (EHF) on Monday.
       ...
       "Women should wear a bikini where the top should be a
       tight-fitting sports bra with deep openings at the arms. The
       bottom must not be more than ten centimeters on the sides," the
       regulations say.
       ...
       Meanwhile, regulations for men's uniforms say that participants
       must wear "tight-fitting tank tops" and longer shorts "that are
       not too baggy" but "should be 10 centimeters above the
       kneecap."[/quote]
       It is clear that this has nothing to do with ergonomic
       efficiency. (Either bikini bottoms are more efficient, in which
       case men should also wear them, or else shorts are more
       efficient, in which case women should also wear them.) This is
       purely about the Western insistence that men and women dress
       differently even when performing the exact same activity, purely
       in order to accentuate sexual dimorphism.
       (Rightists who claim that Islam etc. also requires women to
       dress differently than men completely miss the point, which is
       that Islamic dress codes try to reduce women's visible sexual
       dimorphism as opposed to Western dress codes which try to
       increase women's visible sexual dimorphism. It is incredible
       that I even need to explain this.....)
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7AHeOUOzcCw
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page