DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 25623--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 24, 2024, 5:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I also feel she doesn't hate "Whites" as much as she should. For
example, I noticed that "Whites" were invited to her (Hindu)
wedding and were giving her hugs. Even more than non Aryan "non
White" men flirting with Aryan women, my blood boils when I see
"Whites" flirting with them (which was the only intent of the
hug, let's be honest if they are "White"). Call it mate
guarding, if you want, but it's not like I am saying I want to
control her, just wish she herself would disassociate herself
from subhumans.
This all goes back to her progressivism and lack of commitment
to justice.
#Post#: 25625--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 24, 2024, 5:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I also feel she doesn't hate "Whites" as much as she should."
In order for her to do so, she has to: 1) hate Western
civilization; 2) believe that Western civilization was not an
accident but a predictable expression of "whiteness".
At present she appears to like Western civilization:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/re-mate-choice-copying-2640/msg25541/#msg25541
so even if 2) is already fulfilled (is it?) she would tend to
like "whites".
""Whites" flirting with them (which was the only intent of the
hug, let's be honest if they are "White")."
I'm not sure about such a general statement. They often hug both
men and women; do you think they are flirting with both?
A more sensible criticism would be that since this is a Hindu
wedding, guests should not bring in Western manners.
"Call it mate guarding"
But this is not your wedding.....
"This all goes back to her progressivism"
Can you elaborate on which particular progressive attitudes she
has displayed?
#Post#: 25626--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 24, 2024, 6:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I'm not sure about such a general statement. They often hug
both men and women; do you think they are flirting with both?"
"Whites" only view women as sexual goys, so any interaction
between "White" men and "non-White" women I am suspicious of.
"A more sensible criticism would be that since this is a Hindu
wedding, guests should not bring in Western manners."
Even in India, where there are a marginal number of "Whites" we
still find Western attitudes in weddings, like friends shaking
hands with the newlyweds to congratulate them (shaking hands is
an unhygienic Western concept btw), Western clothing
(specifically only for the male, i.e suit and tie) for the
wedding reception, etc. I can show you many wedding reception
photos where the woman is wearing a saree but the man is wearing
a suit and tie...
I am also of the opinion that "Whites" should not be invited at
all to Hindu weddings, but I don't know if that is an extreme
position.
"But this is not your wedding....."
I know, but I am saying if it was, hypothetically, and I were
the groom.
"Can you elaborate on which particular progressive attitudes she
has displayed?"
I mentioned earlier she was promoting the availability of
alternatives to meat that taste like meat to get Westerners to
give up meat. Is this not the progressive attitude of wanting to
convert meat-eating Westerners to veganism, as we discussed
earlier? But I suppose even this is a better form of activism to
reduce animal cruelty in the short term as opposed to just
sitting on your ass and doing nothing IRL.
#Post#: 25628--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 24, 2024, 8:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"(shaking hands is an unhygienic Western concept btw)"
Continue here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/social-decolonization/
"Western clothing (specifically only for the male, i.e suit and
tie) for the wedding reception, etc. I can show you many wedding
reception photos where the woman is wearing a saree but the man
is wearing a suit and tie..."
Continue here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/dress-decolonization/
"Is this not the progressive attitude of wanting to convert
meat-eating Westerners to veganism, as we discussed earlier? But
I suppose even this is a better form of activism to reduce
animal cruelty in the short term as opposed to just sitting on
your ass and doing nothing IRL."
Which is why I do not consider this to be sufficient evidence of
progressivism. Do you have anything else?
#Post#: 25657--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 26, 2024, 10:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=2640.msg25586#msg25586
date=1711083470]
"Just watched another podcast with their mother and based on her
phenotype, it looks like that's where the older sister got her
Aryan blood from. On the other, hand, I have seen a picture of
their father, and not only is he is so subhuman looking, the
younger daughter is basically a carbon copy of him,
phenotypically speaking, which is where she probably got her non
Aryan blood from."
Please post pictures.
[/quote]
Would you agree that the mother is more highly evolved than the
father?
#Post#: 25666--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 26, 2024, 8:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If you believe in the theory that Oblong is an intermediate
stage in gracilization process towards Oval, then yes. I myself,
however, am suspicious of this theory, as previously explained
(I am italicized; Zea_mays is not):
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/human-evolution/re-sexual-dimorphism-preferences/msg965/#msg965
[quote]Whenever in doubt, I recommend going back to neoteny.
While we agree that Oblong is less robust than Square, do you
not think that Oblong is actually the LEAST neotenous of all the
shapes, even less so than Square? I have seen children with
Square, Pentagon, Round and Oval faces, but have you ever seen a
child with an Oblong face? I haven't. Therefore Oblong could be
viewed as a terminal group for selective pressure that minimizes
neoteny.
From a face shape standpoint I agree Oblongs are the least
neotenous (I've also never seen a child with such a shape), but
if we also take into account somatotype, many Oblongs seem to be
rather tall/skinny. This leads me to think that they must have
at least some interplay with Ovals (who are the 'core'
ectomorphic type). Perhaps Oblongs are a terminal group rather
than a 'transition' group, but if shapes like the Square and
Pentagon--which are associated with core racial groups--can
transform, surely Oblongs could too?
Again let's look at how children's face shapes change as they
become adults.
Square adults were Square or Round children.
Pentagon adults were Pentagon, Oval or Round children.
Oval adults were Oval, Round or Pentagon children. (Note that
this is the same set as the Pentagon.)
Round adults were Round, Oval or Pentagon children. (Same set
again.)
Oblong adults were Oval or Square children.
Not only is the Oblong the odd one out in terms of not being
able to map onto itself, but also the Pentagon, Oval and Round
taken together map onto themselves. This suggests to me that the
Oblong is a dead end.
That is a very good argument. I suppose if I look at the
transitions in a more "fluid" manner, then having shapes take a
"detour" through a group like the Elongated Pentagon before
transforming into Oval makes more sense than going directly
through the Oblong.
It is interesting that you mention a connection between Rounds
and Ovals. It is technically possible for an Oval to be reduced
to a Round, although I'm not sure how common this is in real
life.[/quote]
#Post#: 25667--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 26, 2024, 8:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ok. I suppose it is possible for those with non Aryan phenotypes
to have Aryan personalities. For example, I mentioned my father
earlier. I should also mention that he does not have a very
Aryan face either.
#Post#: 25680--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: Obama Milk Date: March 27, 2024, 6:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@rp
>It may be brutal, but the truth is. I prefer honesty over
flattery. Also, you are illiterate. I called her face
"subhuman", not her. We don't call people subhuman unless they
exhibit subhuman behavior, as we judge people based on their
actions, not their looks.
Let me know how she reacts to you telling her that her "face
looks subhuman", and you calling her "illiterate" when she gets
mad. Since you "prefer honesty over flattery" this should be no
issue to you
>
HTML https://www.quora.com/profile/-----/answers
Young nigga, WHAT ARE YOU DOING?
[i]
#Post#: 25703--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 29, 2024, 7:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Just watched another podcast, where they discussed meat and
masculinity, and I think your hypothesis about gatherer blood
memory was correct. The younger sister, commenting on an ad that
showed how it was masculine to eat a burger, sarcastically
remarked "Yeah, cause there's nothing more primal than going
to the cash register and ordering a double whopper". While the
older sister also offered some False Leftist arguments about how
eating meat doesn't make one more masculine, as it contains lots
of chemicals (which may be true with processed meat), it was the
younger sister who explicitly made the remark about how eating
processed meat is not masculine because it is not "primal". This
shows that she would in fact prefer an actual "primal"
(Paleolithic hunter) man as a sexual partner, and would support
him hunting for meat. This is also part of a larger theme of how
non Aryan women condone violence by indirectly having their
partners do it.
In order for the older sister to be a more effective activist,
she must disassociate from not just her "White" friends, but
also from her sister. This will no doubt be hard, but it must be
done. In fact, I wouldn't even mind if the sister dies tbh. It
is far too risky to have a non Aryan in such close proximity (in
terms of kinship) to an Aryan.
#Post#: 25705--------------------------------------------------
Re: Mate choice copying
By: rp Date: March 29, 2024, 10:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=2640.msg25628#msg25628
date=1711329200]
"(shaking hands is an unhygienic Western concept btw)"
Continue here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/social-decolonization/
"Western clothing (specifically only for the male, i.e suit and
tie) for the wedding reception, etc. I can show you many wedding
reception photos where the woman is wearing a saree but the man
is wearing a suit and tie..."
Continue here:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/dress-decolonization/
"Is this not the progressive attitude of wanting to convert
meat-eating Westerners to veganism, as we discussed earlier? But
I suppose even this is a better form of activism to reduce
animal cruelty in the short term as opposed to just sitting on
your ass and doing nothing IRL."
[B]Which is why I do not consider this to be sufficient evidence
of progressivism. Do you have anything else?[/b]
[/quote]
Is not love for Western civilization considered progressivism,
as Western civilization is progressive?
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page