URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Colonial Era
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 25262--------------------------------------------------
       An Overdue Reckoning: How Sweden Continues to Deny Its Settler-C
       olonial Past 
       By: Schwartze Katze Date: February 29, 2024, 11:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An Overdue Reckoning: How Sweden Continues to Deny Its
       Settler-Colonial Past
       [quote]Linnea Axelsson on Scandinavia’s Hidden History of
       Indigenous Oppression[/quote]
       [quote]For the past decades, the two communities of which I am a
       part—Sámi, from the part of Sápmi that falls within Sweden’s
       borders, and the Swedish majority society—have been developing
       in different directions. The former is making an effort to take
       a close look at history in order to slowly move towards greater
       openness. However, large parts of the latter seem to be
       rewriting history as a pure fantasy of Swedishness. In doing so
       the Swedish majority society is closing itself off to the
       outside world.
       Among Sámi organizations, in everyday encounters and elsewhere,
       there is a palpable desire to do away with the cultural
       stereotypes to which we ourselves have been reduced—that is,
       ideas about what the Sámi people are and can be as shaped by
       centuries of colonialism. Unfortunately many of Sweden’s leading
       politicians are busy working towards another end.
       As if fever-driven, they’re constructing the image of a Swedish
       ur-nation inhabited by a single homogenous people, a nation now
       being ravaged by foreign, inferior cultures. This imagined
       endangered, original Swedish society does a good job of
       concealing the reality of Sweden today—the vast gaps between the
       social classes, the alienation and gang violence that rose
       alongside the dismantling of the welfare state. (Decade upon
       decade, Sweden’s supportive structures have been eroded, along
       with the citizenry’s power to influence them. The deregulated
       Swedish school system may be the gravest example.)
       From a Sámi perspective, Sweden is a nation that will still only
       confess to “historical oppression” and “abuse” in order to avoid
       looking at itself in the mirror and having to use the word
       “colonialism.”
       At the crux of this is the Western attitude that uses cultural
       supremacy to justify its plundering.
       Sámi society, which weaves through Norway, Sweden, Finland and
       Russia, differs from these nation-states in a number of ways. A
       fundamental distinction is how the culture and some of its means
       of livelihood are in various ways connected to and predicated
       upon on reindeer husbandry, a way of life that has survived
       despite settler colonialism, despite the ongoing climate crisis
       and despite the rift between the Sámi people caused by the state
       regulation of reindeer husbandry.
       There have been a number of recent editorial in Dagens Nyheter,
       Sweden’s largest daily newsletter, one of which gets to the crux
       of the rift between Sámi who herd reindeer and those who do not,
       an artificial distinction asserted by the Swedish state when it
       drafted the current legal framework for reindeer husbandry and
       did so without any knowledge and consideration of or interest in
       Sámi society’s own structure and modes of cooperation.
       It is this piece of legislation that divided the Sámi into two
       groups: reindeer herders and non-reindeer herders. True Sámi,
       per this framework, were reindeer-herding Sámi from the
       mountains and to be protected from civilization. All other Sámi
       would be forcibly assimilated into Swedish society; they were to
       become Swedes and forget their language, culture and traditions;
       the reindeer husbandry laws have thus not only caused a rift in
       Sámi society, but have also reached inside the individual, into
       their sense of identity, belonging and value.
       The reindeer-herding Sámi gather in samebyar, or Sámi villages,
       which are not villages per se but an economic and administrative
       union in a geographical area where members have the right to
       engage in reindeer herding, and there the total amount of
       reindeer is regulated by the state. Each new member inducted
       into a Sámi village must be given a share of the pre-allocated
       number of reindeer, which are to coexist on land that is also
       being used by mining, forestry and wind power industries.
       Information about this chapter in Swedish-Sámi history is
       readily available, yet none of these articles describe how the
       eye of this needle came to be and is to this day maintained by
       colonial politics. Instead the journalist portrays herders as
       part of a malicious club working against their own interests and
       the interests of all other Swedes, and who, through through
       legal finagling, are trying to assert their claim on more than
       half of Sweden’s land.
       Furthermore, herders are portrayed as a threat to outdoor life
       in Swedish national parks, despite the fact these parks were
       often established on traditionally indigenous land where people
       are already working, living, and gathering medicine and
       materials and food—land that visitors are invited to “discover”
       as a beautiful wilderness with excellent opportunity for
       recreation.
       A decade after the area around Stora Sjöfallet (or The Great
       Falls, also once called the “Niagara Falls of the North”), the
       region I come from, was designated as a national park, its
       status as a site of natural preservation was simply revoked so
       that the associated river could be further regulated to better
       supply the electrical grid. The eponymous great waterfall is now
       but a memory. Even so, it is the Swedish state that is asserted
       as the protector of these lands, not the Sámi herders. As some
       would have it, these Sámi can hardly be said to steward their
       land anymore, now that they’ve started using motorized vehicles
       to get around.
       Here is an echo of a time when indigenous cultures were to be
       shielded from modernity, to be “preserved” as if in a bell jar.
       When, in addition to skis, snowmobiles are added to the
       equation, a Sámi is said to be forsaking tradition; but if a
       Sámi uses only skis, they are considered primitive and incapable
       of adapting to the modern world.
       When I try to put my finger on what about these texts is
       unsettling, I end up pointing to their intentions: the choice of
       angle and information. If you aim for the truth but insist on
       placing the scope just off-center, you end up with a skewed
       shot. Thus, by consistently choosing to ignore history,
       indigenous people fighting for their rights are transformed into
       a greedy minority fighting for special privileges. And this
       reframing takes place under the guise of scrutinizing said
       “privileges,” instead of openly declaring what lies at the core
       of the endeavor: the opinion that colonialization was the
       correct path because it has benefited Sweden.
       Sápmi has begun its reckoning, but Sweden continues to look
       away.
       These editorials hold a bitter brew. They have a particular way
       of turning a deaf ear to history and simply describing the
       situation as the writer would prefer it to be, an impulse that
       can also be observed in those who hold power and sway the world
       over. Also at the crux of this is the Western attitude that uses
       cultural supremacy to justify its plundering, reasoning that the
       value of nature is purely monetary, down to the last tree, the
       last fish, the last stream, and insisting that one is being
       superior to all others in every way, rather than imagining that
       we have something to learn from each other.
       A culture like this, by definition, can never see itself as a
       colonizer. This culture has a grand plan of constant
       improvement, and every related project and strategy is worth the
       cost. A culture like this will never comprehend the paradox of
       wanting to destroy nature in order to save nature, which is what
       “the green transition” is all about. This plan for a greener
       future is just more of the same. Civilization will continue as
       usual, but will now be plugged into a new, green grid. (As if it
       is a foregone conclusion that we want even more mines. After
       all, in these new mines other metals will be mined than were
       being mined before!) And at the heart of all this, of course, is
       the same old dirty story of money. Had Sápmi not been located in
       a part of Sweden full of forests, minerals and rivers, this
       situation would look very different.
       The grand history of nation-states is inevitably a history of
       lies and theft and formidable powers of imagination, as well as
       varying degrees of coercion and death. Nothing is easy about
       renegotiating one’s self-perception. Sápmi has begun its
       reckoning, but Sweden continues to look away. Sweden does look
       to the past, but with a false, nostalgic gaze. Its vision of
       history can only lead the country into a narrow and isolated
       future.[/quote]
  HTML https://lithub.com/an-overdue-reckoning-how-sweden-continues-to-deny-its-settler-colonial-past/
       *****************************************************