DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Issues
*****************************************************
#Post#: 8130--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2021, 12:14 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Uganda isn't even a NATO country and it is doing more than most
NATO countries:
HTML https://qz.com/africa/2048615/uganda-will-host-hundreds-of-afghan-refugees/
--- Quote ---
> Uganda will host thousands of Afghan refugees
> ...
> Uganda’s minister for relief, disaster preparedness and
refugees, Esther Anyakun, told the country’s Daily Monitor
newspaper that president Yoweri Museveni had granted a request
by the US to let them stay in Uganda for three months. The US
will then relocate them, she said, without specifying where.
>
> Uganda hosts more refugees than any other country in Africa.
Around 1.5 million people have found asylum there, according to
the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, most of them
from neighboring South Sudan. Uganda is known for having
friendly policies that give refugees plenty of rights, including
education, work, and property ownership.
--- End Quote ---
We previously covered Uganda's strong record on refugees here:
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/a-review-of-refugee-resettlement-by-numbers/
--- Quote ---
> Compare and contrast Uganda and Denmark. The latter’s GDP per
capita is about 77 times larger than the former’s. Yet in
January, the enlightened Danes passed a law allowing the
authorities to seize the jewelry of refugees, supposedly in
order to cover the costs of hosting them.
>
> Uganda’s 2006 Refugee Act, however, allows refugees in that
country to work, travel and even start their own businesses.
--- End Quote ---
If Uganda can take 1.5 million refugees, Denmark (whose
population is ~1/10 of Uganda's) can take 1.5 million x 77/10 =
11.5 million. It has not. Therefore Denmark must be destroyed:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/denmark/
#Post#: 8136--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 18, 2021, 5:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/congressman-calls-us-evacuate-afghan-151554807.html
--- Quote ---
> 'Just put them on f---ing planes and get them out of there,'
wrote Rep. Ruben Gallego on Twitter.
>
> Gallego, a veteran, argued that the US could easily evacuate
refugees and deal with paperwork later.
> ...
> "There are tons of cruise ships that are empty. There are
bases everywhere around the world and there is this whole
massive country that is used to assimilating immigrants (and
Canada)," he wrote.
> ...
> Gallego's tweet echoes a similar one the congressman wrote on
Sunday, where he argued that it was important to help the
refugees before worrying about the paperwork involved.
> ...
> "Land them any where in the United States. We are a country of
330 million people. We can easily absorb 100,000 people."
--- End Quote ---
This is the kind of attitude we need!
Similarly, there should be hundreds of navy ships deployed to
ferry refugees across the Mediterranean 24/7. I have been saying
this since 2015, yet to this day refugees are still forced to
use dinghies.....
#Post#: 8262--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 23, 2021, 10:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4NIhs5hL04
This attitude used to be normal. Pressure from our enemies made
it rare. We must make it normal again.
#Post#: 8326--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 25, 2021, 11:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Well spotted!
HTML https://www.businessinsider.com/asylum-seekers-get-second-chance-after-cases-rejected-blank-spaces-2021-8
--- Quote ---
> 60,000+ asylum-seekers who had applications rejected by the
Trump administration over 'blank spaces' are about to get a
second chance
> ...
> long-time immigration attorneys began complaining in 2019 that
asylum cases were being rejected for a novel, pedantic reason:
irrelevant lines on the application being left blank.
>
> Some asylum-seekers had their cases rejected because they
listed two siblings, for example, but did not write "N/A" in the
remaining spaces provided for brothers and sisters they did not
have. Spanish speakers had their applications turned away for
not spelling out their name, for a second time, in a "native
alphabet."
>
> More than 60,000 applications were rejected for such reasons,
according to the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, which filed
a November 2020 lawsuit over the policy change, alleging that
was a mere bureaucratic pretext for denying humanitarian relief.
>
> In July 2021, a US federal judge approved a settlement in that
case. Under the agreement, US Citizenship and Immigration
Services will allow provide rejected applicants a chance to
apply again by July 20, 2022, with their application backdated
to the time their initial claim was rejected.
>
> USCIS said this month it will notify anyone who might be
eligible.
>
> "It was an outrageous policy clearly aimed to impede
individuals from obtaining the humanitarian benefits that
Congress has provided," Matt Adams, legal director at the
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, said in a statement. "It
aptly demonstrates the Trump administration's utter disregard of
the law."
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 8355--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 26, 2021, 10:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/afghan-girl-seen-viral-photo-202009696.html
--- Quote ---
> A moving photo of a young Afghan girl skipping on the tarmac
of a Belgian airport after being evacuated from her war-torn
native country has gone viral.
>
> The picture was taken at Melsbroek military airport near
Brussels on Wednesday.
>
> "This is what happens when you protect refugees," wrote former
Belgian Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt, one of many who shared
the photo, on Twitter. "Welcome to Belgium, little girl!"
--- End Quote ---
[img]
HTML https://s.yimg.com/ny/api/res/1.2/kW85YhahtT9uqjbmXsBxew--/YXBwaWQ9aGlnaGxhbmRlcjt3PTcwNTtoPTM5Ni41NjI1O2NmPXdlYnA-/https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/wD2vYnstsCnybMAjFtURrw--~B/aD03MjA7dz0xMjgwO2FwcGlkPXl0YWNoeW9u/https://media.zenfs.com/en/fox_news_text_979/15c0e0b0d88a93e0b353081eaf802443[/img]
#Post#: 8414--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 27, 2021, 11:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Did Mexico invade Afghanistan? No, but it is still taking in
Afghan refugees without hesitation:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag6kPT4Y-O8
Note the positivity in the comments section.
Meanwhile, apparently it's OK for NATO countries to be "white":
HTML https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/17680/europe-afghan-migrants
--- Quote ---
> "I am clearly opposed to us now taking in more people. That
will not happen under my chancellorship. Taking in people who
then cannot be integrated is a huge problem for us as a
country." — Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz.
>
> "As minister of the interior, I am primarily responsible for
the people living in Austria. Above all, this means protecting
social peace and the welfare state over the long term." —
Austrian Interior Minister Karl Nehammer.
>
> "It is clear to us that 2015 must not be repeated. We will not
be able to solve the Afghanistan issue by migration to Germany."
— Paul Ziemiak, general secretary of German Chancellor Angela
Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU) party.
> ...
> "Our country will not be a gateway to Europe for illegal
Afghan migrants." — Greek Minister for Migration and Asylum
Notis Mitarachi.
> ...
> Slovenia, which currently holds the EU's six-month rotating
presidency, said that the European Union will not allow a surge
in Afghan migration. Prime Minister Janez Janša tweeted:
>
> "The #EU will not open any European 'humanitarian' or
migration corridors for #Afghanistan. We will not allow the
strategic mistake from 2015 to be repeated. We will only help
individuals who helped us during the #NATO Operation. And to the
EU members who protect our external border."
--- End Quote ---
Which way will the US choose: the American way or the Western
way?
And if the former, does the US understand that the true American
destiny is to militarily invade all the above (and many more)
Western countries to turn all their territory into lebensraum
for the refugees whom they turned away?
#Post#: 8421--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: Dazhbog
Date: August 28, 2021, 6:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: 90sRetroFan link ---
>
>
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/afghan-girl-seen-viral-photo-202009696.html
>
> [quote]A moving photo of a young Afghan girl skipping on the
tarmac of a Belgian airport after being evacuated from her
war-torn native country has gone viral.
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
Meanwhile, this is what Duginist backlash herders turned this
image into:
HTML https://twitter.com/JimmySecUK/status/1430665629305081859
[img]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/E9q-sguWUAAG7rX?format=jpg&name=small[/img]
#Post#: 8422--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: rp
Date: August 28, 2021, 6:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If only the picture was reality...
#Post#: 8498--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: August 31, 2021, 12:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Some success:
HTML https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/courts-are-beginning-admit-that-some-immigration-laws-are-racist-2021-08-23/
--- Quote ---
> (Reuters) - A federal judge in Nevada ruled for the first time
last week that a longstanding law that makes it a felony to
reenter the United States after deportation is unconstitutional
because it’s explicitly racist in its origins.
> ...
> Judge Miranda Du of the U.S. District Court for the District
of Nevada dismissed on Aug. 18 a case against Gustavo
Carrillo-Lopez, who was indicted for being in the U.S. after
previously being deported. Du held that Carrillo-Lopez had shown
that the reentry law was "enacted with a discriminatory purpose
and that the law has a disparate impact on Latinx persons." The
government failed to show it "would have been enacted absent
racial animus."
>
> The ruling is a momentous judicial acknowledgment of the
plainly racist and nativist underpinnings of laws, like the
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, that criminalize
reentry. It marks a rare admission by the courts that
foundational elements of the federal immigration machinery –
enforcement processes we now take for granted – actually clash
with constitutional equal protection guarantees, and perpetuate
a stigmatizing disparate impact on Latinos and Hispanic people.
>
> It’s also a recognition that courts can and should strike down
laws motivated by bias, especially given the prevalence of
approaches to law enforcement that are inextricably linked to
race and identity, like drug-crime sentencing.
> ...
> Ahilan Arulanantham, professor and co-director of the Center
for Immigration Law and Policy at the University of California,
Los Angeles School of Law, told me the ruling is significant
culturally because it airs out "incredible archival and
legislative history of these laws, which is really very sordid
and just racist."
>
> The U.S. has criminalized border crossing for more than 90
years, and the administrations of Presidents George W. Bush,
Barack Obama and Donald Trump all ratcheted up the deportation
and prosecution of immigrants for entering or reentering the
country illegally.
>
> But the historical record shows – quite clearly – that the
criminalization of unauthorized entry and reentry rests on
fundamentally racist foundations.
>
> That history was laid out in Carrillo-Lopez's case by UCLA
historian Kelly Lytle Hernandez and Benjamin Gonzalez O’Brien, a
political scientist at San Diego State University. The Aug. 3
ruling by Judge Simon in the District of Oregon also
acknowledged that history, and suggested Congress should
explicitly repudiate the racism underlying immigration laws.
Government lawyers in Carrillo-Lopez’s case too “conceded that
discriminatory intent motivated the passage” of some immigration
laws, Du wrote.
>
> I asked Gonzalez O’Brien whether it’s fair to say that it’s
generally accepted among historians and political scientists
that U.S. immigration laws of today have racist underpinnings.
>
> “Yeah, because if you look at that history in this country,
it’s fundamentally impossible to separate race and racism from
immigration policing,” Gonzalez O’Brien said. “The desire to
shape the racial and cultural characteristics of this country is
deeply intertwined with our immigration policy.”
> ...
> Du’s opinion is a rare court ruling laying out the strong
factual, moral and Constitutional grounds for striking down some
current laws because of their original racist intent. Still, the
likelihood that this particular ruling will be appealed means
the case may end up as an exemplar of how systemic racism
operates.
>
> Here, the people who held racist personal beliefs – lawmakers
in 1929 – are dead and gone. But their racist policies have been
continued and expanded by the government under both political
parties, none more so than the administration of the first
non-white president. And now, under a president who has spoken
more strongly about righting the racist wrongs of our past than
any before, the government will (more than likely) again defend
the reenactment of policies it admitted, per the ruling, were
racist in their conception.
>
> More than anything else, that speaks to the necessity for the
judiciary to follow Judge Du’s lead.
>
> Carrillo-Lopez’s public defender, Lauren Gorman, told me she’s
“overjoyed for Mr. Carrillo-Lopez and his family."
>
> “Though the racism and nativism embedded in the law’s
historical record is blatant, it has taken nearly 100 years for
a court to probe its outrageous history and assail the law’s
constitutionality,” Gorman said. “The Court’s decision is a
landmark ruling but one our Constitution demands.”
--- End Quote ---
Our enemies remind us of Du's background:
HTML https://vdare.com/posts/judge-miranda-du-viethamese-refugee-and-the-dangers-of-assimilation
True. So if we want more judges like her, we know what we need!
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/demographic-blueshift/
#Post#: 8821--------------------------------------------------
Re: Refugees Welcome
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: September 15, 2021, 10:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
As I keep saying, one of the most practical pro-refugee actions
any country can take is to refuse to accept deportees from
another country:
HTML https://www.dw.com/en/eu-escalates-row-with-gambia-over-expelled-migrants/a-59072367
--- Quote ---
> The European Union is mulling over Gambia's decision to deny
landing permits to flights carrying Gambian deportees from EU
countries — particularly Germany.
> ...
> According to initial plans, the first batch of "failed Gambian
asylum-seekers" was expected to arrive in Banjul, Gambia's
capital, on September 1. But an official from Gambia's Foreign
Ministry responsible for diaspora affairs told local media that
Gambia's new position is not to accept requests for
deportations.
> ...
> Tegulle insisted there is no reason why the EU should be
treating people like this in the age of globalization.
>
> "They didn't go to Europe to be deported back to Africa," he
said.
--- End Quote ---
Exactly! Let individuals decide for themselves where they want
to live!
--- Quote ---
> Is Gambia setting a precedent?
>
> There are fears that Gambia's refusal to welcome home migrants
expelled from the EU may become the new normal for African
countries.
--- End Quote ---
I hope so!
--- Quote ---
> International law expert Gawaya Tegulle said the recent
Gambian decision is not isolated, citing similar incidents
involving Sierra Leone, Guinea and Eritrea. He added that in
2016, Gambia had taken similar measures, only caving in later
after being threatened with sanctions by the West.
--- End Quote ---
The more sanctions imposed, the more the country's carrying
capacity will be reduced, and thus the more people will
emigrate. So bring it on!
*****************************************************
Page 7 of 23
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page