DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Issues
*****************************************************
#Post#: 31670--------------------------------------------------
Re: Japan
By: PotatoChip Date: December 14, 2025, 7:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Is Japan About To Get Nukes?
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wwr0IT0oBpo
#Post#: 31671--------------------------------------------------
Re: WMDs
By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 14, 2025, 9:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
On elementary inspection, Japan getting nukes would appear to
help us, as it increases the global ratio of nukes in
"non-white" hands relative to nukes in "white" hands, which
reduces our disadvantage in a hypothetical Turner-Diaries-style
confrontation.
But the above paragraph assumes Japan would actually use its
nukes the way we want it to, which is currently unrealistic.
Under current circumstances, it is far more likely that Japan
would point them at China, and China seeing a nuclear-armed
Japan would similarly point its own nukes towards Japan. Thus
the real effect is to increase the global ratio of nukes pointed
towards "non-whites" (which is Trump's and Putin's actual
intention) relative to nukes pointed towards "whites", which
increases our disadvantage.
The best way to undermine the Trump-Putin plan would be for
China to become the strongest public voice supporting a
nuclear-armed Japan (including offering whatever practical
assistance might be needed towards this end), which would
reassure Japan that China has no intention of nuking itself,
which would reciprocally also enable China to feel safer knowing
that Japan now has no way to credibly accuse China of hostility
towards itself. This is folkism.
Of course, the above paragraph will obviously never happen under
Xi (though I would love to be proven wrong). So, my conclusion
remains unchanged: no improvement can be expected until Xi is
replaced by a folkist.
#Post#: 31672--------------------------------------------------
Re: WMDs
By: PotatoChip Date: December 14, 2025, 10:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Lest we forget this assessment in which (starting @45:28) Taiwan
bares the full brunt of a nuclear escalation between the US and
China. I suspect Japan's nukes, if it has them by then, would
also be used on Taiwan?
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsrCWehWSuU
#Post#: 31969--------------------------------------------------
Re: Iran
By: PeacefulPeasant Date: January 17, 2026, 4:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
In a fairer world either everyone has nukes, or no one has
nukes. This should be the first indicator to most that this
world is not even close to being fair, and many are working over
time to ensure it remains unfair, especially to those that do
not have "white skin". How long will this continue before
balance is restored by lynching all the "whites"?
#Post#: 31972--------------------------------------------------
Re: WMDs
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 17, 2026, 4:34 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
No one had nukes from prehistory until the 1940s. Western
civilization changed it all:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nuclear_weapons
[quote]In the first decades of the 19th century, physics was
revolutionized with developments in the understanding of the
nature of atoms including the discoveries in atomic theory by
John Dalton.[1] Around the turn of the 20th century, it was
discovered by Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden and then Ernest
Rutherford, that atoms had a highly dense, very small, charged
central core called an atomic nucleus. In 1898, Pierre and Marie
Curie discovered that pitchblende, an ore of uranium, contained
a substance—which they named radium—that emitted large amounts
of radiation. Ernest Rutherford and Frederick Soddy identified
that atoms were breaking down and turning into different
elements. Hopes were raised among scientists and laymen that the
elements around us could contain tremendous amounts of unseen
energy, waiting to be harnessed. In 1905, Albert Einstein
described this potential in his famous equation, E = mc2.
H. G. Wells was inspired by the work of Rutherford to write
about an "atom bomb" in a 1914 novel, The World Set Free, which
appeared shortly before the First World War.[2] In a 1924
article, Winston Churchill speculated about the possible
military implications: "Might not a bomb no bigger than an
orange be found to possess a secret power to destroy a whole
block of buildings—nay to concentrate the force of a thousand
tons of cordite and blast a township at a stroke?"[3]
At the time however, there was no known mechanism which could be
used to unlock the vast energy potential that was theorized to
exist inside the atom. The only particle then known to exist
within the nucleus was the positively-charged proton, which
would act to repel protons set in motion towards it. Then in
1932, a key breakthrough was made with the discovery of the
neutron. Having no electric charge, the neutron is able to
penetrate the nucleus with relative ease.[/quote]
But Westerners never blame Western science and machinism. In
contrast:
[quote]In January 1933, the Nazis came to power in Germany and
suppressed Jewish scientists.[/quote]
But even this was not enough:
[quote]Physicist Leo Szilard fled to London where, in 1934, he
patented the idea of a nuclear chain reaction using neutrons.
The patent also introduced the term critical mass to describe
the minimum amount of material required to sustain the chain
reaction and its potential to cause an explosion (British patent
630,726).[/quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Szilard
[quote]He was born as Leó Spitz in Budapest, Kingdom of Hungary,
on February 11, 1898. His middle-class Jewish parents[/quote]
Szilard should have been executed before he was able to flee.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page