URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 24086--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: not ergfj3 Date: November 25, 2023, 5:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >he leaks his users IPs just because multiple posts made through
       similar tor exit nodes are uhhh obviously part of a conspiracy
       agenda to """influence""" his dead ten follower schizo cult or
       whatever
       keeeeeeeeek does 90sRetroFan really? not a good look at all, i
       think @UN deserves an apology
       #Post#: 24087--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: Vrily Date: November 25, 2023, 5:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >Point out what is sexual in the example video. Oh wait, you
       already refused to do so
       "If media of children is made to make them sexually tantalizing,
       then I do not need to provided specific timestamps in said media
       to prove that they are being sexualized. If you want specifics,
       look at that Cuties video I sent. Furthermore, you have failed
       to address the point that sexualization of children counter
       original nobility. Do you think no one notices it when you try
       to derail from points you cannot disprove?"
       Plus by your own admission, it does not need to be full blown
       prnography to be sexual:
       [center]
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/xr571b3.png[/center]
       Therefore, it is an adulteration of original nobility.
       Considering this, it is obvious you just wanted me to timestamp
       for you as is common with pedos:
  HTML https://youtu.be/O13G5A5w5P0?t=226
       Therefore, I refuse to timestamp for you on the grounds that I
       don't need to watch your ~1H15M creepshit to debunk you, and
       that it was just an attempt for you to get sick satisfaction
       from trying to trick me into doing a humiliation ritual in a
       manner that provides you fap material.
       >"none of this looks good for you."
       ???? Okay honest to God I only saw that when I checked to see if
       you responded. Even better, I can PROVE it was not me. Let's
       start with this:
       [center]
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/7fkCFhX.png[/center]
       [list]
       [li]If it was a real supporter, they would come out immediately
       and say we're not the same person.[/li]
       [li]I use Tor & VPN by default; these IPs are shared by a lot of
       people. You can post my other IP addresses I've posted with, and
       you'll see that they come from all over. This post, for
       instance, should come from a Norwegian IP.[/li]
       [li]Any Aryanist reading this who knows me knows I'm not from
       the Netherlands.[/li]
       [li]Anyone reading this can tell I am very confident in my
       argument right now. I don't need fake alts to self-hype
       (although you may). But if I were, I'd know to switch IP
       addresses. I have experience doing this, for instance, when you
       recently tried IP banning me.[/li]
       [li]Thanks for doxxing Numinous retard.[/li]
       [/list]
       But with the chance this is actually just 90sRF, I will say that
       even then I AM NOT FALLING FOR THE DISTRACTION PSYOP. Are you
       THIS DESPERATE? Are you so embarassed by Numinous'
       schizopostings that you want to make it look like I have been
       posting them? You are a pedofreak and you have lost the
       argument. Even now I DO NOT FORGET THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO
       DISTRACT FROM WHAT YOU CANNOT DEBUNK. ONWARDS:
       >Initiated violence is problematic to Aryanists. Initiated
       violence is what you have admitted you want you do to people
       with non-violent sexual preferences that you dislike. Therefore
       you are problematic to Aryanists.
       "This applies to LGBT and recreational sex, not pedophilia. The
       initiatory/retaliatory violence dichotomy is crucial, but it
       does not cover life's nuances. If I am "violent" for wanting to
       stop a kid from jumping into a pit of punji sticks and (at best)
       suffering lifelong physical and emotional scars because of it,
       then so be it.
       But you are kidding yourself if you seriously believe that
       Aryanism does not support any initiatory violence itself. For
       instance, you can be non-violently racist by adhering to your
       tribe's clothing, food, music, culture, superstition, Et cetera
       by not hurting anyone or anything. But as monoculturalists, we
       know that even "non-violent racism" is bad in itself. Why?
       Because racism is still the prioritization of selfishness over
       honor. And in the real world, "non-violent racism" very quickly
       turns into tribalism and all the cruelty it entails. Just as we
       know that even "non-violent pedophilia" is bad in itself, as it
       is obscenely exploitative and easily one of the worse ways to
       adulterate original nobility. In the real world, your
       "non-violent pedophilia" quickly turns into child r@pe and human
       trafficking. "Plausible deniability" doesn't mean shít."
       #Post#: 24088--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: Vrily Date: November 25, 2023, 5:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @erfjc3
       ascesis.a0001.net/contact/
       #Post#: 24090--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 25, 2023, 5:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I refuse to timestamp for you"
       I know.
       "I am very confident in my argument"
       You are so confident in your argument that you refuse to argue.
       Trump is so confident that there was election fraud against him
       in 2020 that he refuses to present evidence of it.
       "I use Tor & VPN by default"
       "I'm not from the Netherlands."
       Yes, that's how VPN works.
       "I don't need fake alts to self-hype"
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/sockpuppetry2-1024x439.png
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/sockpuppetry3-1024x425.png
       #Post#: 24091--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: not ergfj3 Date: November 25, 2023, 5:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why another pic IPdoxxing your sites users? I already told you
       it's tor exit nodes, if you don't want to get it thats fine but
       don't doxx your users no matter what kind of trickery you
       suspect is going on because of a limited knowledge of VPNs and
       or tor exit nodes
       #Post#: 24092--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: Vrily Date: November 25, 2023, 6:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >You are so confident in your argument that you refuse to argue.
       I must have reposted this like five times by now, yet you keep
       on ignoring what I am saying:
       "This applies to LGBT and recreational sex, not pedophilia. The
       initiatory/retaliatory violence dichotomy is crucial, but it
       does not cover life's nuances. If I am "violent" for wanting to
       stop a kid from jumping into a pit of punji sticks and (at best)
       suffering lifelong physical and emotional scars because of it,
       then so be it.
       But you are kidding yourself if you seriously believe that
       Aryanism does not support any initiatory violence itself. For
       instance, you can be non-violently racist by adhering to your
       tribe's clothing, food, music, culture, superstition, Et cetera
       by not hurting anyone or anything. But as monoculturalists, we
       know that even "non-violent racism" is bad in itself. Why?
       Because racism is still the prioritization of selfishness over
       honor. And in the real world, "non-violent racism" very quickly
       turns into tribalism and all the cruelty it entails. Just as we
       know that even "non-violent pedophilia" is bad in itself, as it
       is obscenely exploitative and easily one of the worse ways to
       adulterate original nobility. In the real world, your
       "non-violent pedophilia" quickly turns into child r@pe and human
       trafficking. "Plausible deniability" doesn't mean shít."
       "If media of children is made to make them sexually tantalizing,
       then I do not need to provided specific timestamps in said media
       to prove that they are being sexualized. If you want specifics,
       look at that Cuties video I sent. Furthermore, you have failed
       to address the point that sexualization of children counter
       original nobility. Do you think no one notices it when you try
       to derail from points you cannot disprove?"
       Plus by your own admission, it does not need to be full blown
       prnography to be sexual:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/xr571b3.png
       Therefore, it is an adulteration of original nobility.
       Considering this, it is obvious you just wanted me to timestamp
       for you as is common with pedos:
  HTML https://youtu.be/O13G5A5w5P0?t=226
       Therefore, I refuse to timestamp for you on the grounds that I
       don't need to watch your ~1H15M creepshit to debunk you, and
       that it was just an attempt for you to get sick satisfaction
       from trying to trick me into doing a humiliation ritual in a
       manner that provides you fap material.
       >
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Faryanism.net%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fsockpuppetry2-1024x439.png&hash=fa24242d37746b8d5a35d2a60305bf6d060a681a
       ...
       That is literally just inspect element and/or you mimicking the
       same IP. If I really were posting under alts, why would I
       continuously post under the same IP after supposedly getting
       caught, after even outright stating if I were do post under alts
       I'd switch IP addresses? Considering how small this entire
       "community" is, I feel like I'd know someone supposedly
       supporting me. Literally even if I was doing this, it wouldn't
       disprove what I am saying. You are not fooling anyone. You are a
       disgusting kike desperate to deflect from the fact that you
       proven wrong about your obsession with pedophilia.
       #Post#: 24094--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 25, 2023, 6:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://i.ytimg.com/vi/a8dvztH11bE/maxresdefault.jpg
       #Post#: 24095--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: not ergfj3 Date: November 25, 2023, 6:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Vrily link=topic=2463.msg24092#msg24092
       date=1700958341]
       That is literally just inspect element and/or you mimicking the
       same IP. If I really were posting under alts, why would I
       continuously post under the same IP after supposedly getting
       caught, after even outright stating if I were do post under alts
       I'd switch IP addresses? Considering how small this entire
       "community" is, I feel like I'd know someone supposedly
       supporting me. Literally even if I was doing this, it wouldn't
       disprove what I am saying. You are not fooling anyone. You are a
       disgusting kike desperate to deflect from the fact that you
       proven wrong about your obsession with pedophilia.
       [/quote]
       It aint exactly a miracle that we just so happen to be in a
       similar node range, as europe has very few exit relay operators,
       not sure why this a giant problem for 90sRetroFan but ok
       Anyways what would even be the point? i'm not influencing this
       discussion, just said that i liked some of @Vrilys posts
       #Post#: 24099--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: Vrily Date: November 25, 2023, 7:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >you support pedophilia and child prostitutiion
       >I prove this is wrong
       >you try to ignore my arguments as you always do when you lose
       >I point this out
       >you try to distract by making alts to make me look bad
       >I prove you made them yourself
       >even through all of this, I direct you back to what you've been
       desperately trying to ignore
       >you clearly give up trying
       >you now just lazily try to equate me with Trump because I claim
       victory after your repeated attempts to derail and distract
       >tfw you still don't get why I brought this up
       Now that AS is proven to make alts to try to elevate himself in
       an argument, we get to ask: is this the first time he has done
       so? Probably not. Here's your wise "leader" everyone. Ditch this
       dumpster fire and check this out instead:
       ascesis.a0001.net
       #Post#: 24100--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Eroticism =/= sexuality
       By: Vrily Date: November 25, 2023, 7:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >It aint exactly a miracle that we just so happen to be in a
       similar node range, as europe has very few exit relay operators,
       That is still one Hell of a coincidence. Perhaps it really is a
       fluke, or some flaw with Createaforum. But if you care to prove
       you're not actually AS then send me an email and we can go from
       there
       >not sure why this a giant problem for 90sRetroFan but ok.
       Anyways what would even be the point?
       He's trying to make it look like I created a different account
       just to hype myself up
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page