URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 2567--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: November 30, 2020, 5:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Beijing calls on Washington not to discriminate against Chinese
       firms
       [quote]China is again accusing the U.S. of abusing allegations
       of national security to impose unfair restrictions on Chinese
       firms. The Foreign Ministry statement comes amid reports that
       Washington is about to add Chinese chipmaker SMIC and oil and
       gas producer Cnooc to a defense blacklist.[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Le6vqL1UOg
       #Post#: 2617--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: December 3, 2020, 1:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       House passes bill targeting Chinese companies
       [quote]The U.S. House of Representatives passed a law to delist
       Chinese companies if they do not fully comply with the country's
       auditing rules, giving President Donald Trump one more tool to
       threaten Beijing with before leaving office. [/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ucmnc29OcA
       #Post#: 2670--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: December 4, 2020, 10:48 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       White House: Pres. Donald Trump to sign bill that could delist
       Chinese companies from U.S. exchanges
       [quote]The U.S. House of Representatives passed a law to kick
       Chinese companies off U.S. stock exchanges if they do not fully
       comply with the country’s auditing rules, giving President
       Donald Trump one more tool to threaten Beijing with before
       leaving office.
       The measure passed the House by unanimous voice vote, after
       passing the Senate unanimously in May, sending it to Trump, who
       the White House said is expected to sign it into law.
       “The Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act” bars securities
       of foreign companies from being listed on any U.S. exchange if
       they have failed to comply with the U.S. Public Accounting
       Oversight Board’s audits for three years in a row.
       While is applies to companies from any country, the
       legislation’s sponsors intended it to target Chinese companies
       listed in the United States, such as Alibaba, tech firm
       Pinduoduo and oil giant PetroChina.
       Measures taking a harder line on Chinese business and trade
       practices generally pass Congress with large margins. Both
       Democrats and Trump’s fellow Republicans echo the president’s
       hard line against Beijing, which became fiercer this year as
       Trump blamed China for the coronavirus ravaging the United
       States.
       Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen, who co-authored the bill
       with Republican Senator John Kennedy, said in a statement that
       American investors “have been cheated out of their money after
       investing in seemingly-legitimate Chinese companies that are not
       held to the same standards as other publicly listed companies.”
       Kennedy said China was using U.S. exchanges to “exploit”
       Americans. “The House joined the Senate in rejecting a toxic
       status quo,” he said in a statement.
       The act would also require public companies to disclose whether
       they are owned or controlled by a foreign government.
       The American Securities Association praised passage of the bill
       saying it was necessary to protect Americans from “fradulent
       companies controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.”
       ‘Non-discriminatory environment’
       The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to
       a request for comment. Chinese foreign ministry spokeswoman Hua
       Chunying said before the vote that it was a discriminatory
       policy that politically oppresses Chinese firms.
       “Instead of setting up layers of barriers, we hope the U.S. can
       provide a fair and non-discriminatory environment for foreign
       firms to invest and operate in the U.S.,” Hua told a news
       conference.
       A spokesman for Alibaba pointed to a comment on the bill from
       May, when it was passed by the Senate. Chief Financial Officer
       Maggie Wu told investors the firm would “endeavor to comply with
       any legislation whose aim is to protect and bring transparency
       to investors who buy securities on U.S. stock exchanges.”
       Chinese authorities have long been reluctant to let overseas
       regulators inspect local accounting firms, citing national
       security concerns.
       Officials at China’s securities regulator indicated earlier this
       year they were willing to allow inspections of audit documents
       in some circumstances, but past agreements aimed at solving the
       dispute have failed to work in practice.
       Shaun Wu, a Hong Kong-based partner at law firm Paul Hastings,
       said increased enforcement against Chinese companies was likely
       even though Democrat Joe Biden will become president in
       January.[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcpvnBSLGCs
       #Post#: 2676--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 5, 2020, 3:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jywSzmFa_Ig
       The correct approach, of course, is for the US to take this
       opportunity to openly side with China against Australia. If the
       US were willing to do this, I guarantee it could win over China
       to a new vision of cooperation.
       But will Biden do this? Of course not. Biden is still stuck in
       the False Left mentality that the US is less close to China, a
       fellow former victim of colonization by two of the same colonial
       powers:
       1)
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_colonization_of_the_Americas
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Hong_Kong
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Weihaiwei
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concessions_in_Tianjin#British_concession_(1860%E2%80%931943)
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jiujiang#History
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhenjiang#History
       etc.
       2)
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_colonization_of_the_Americas
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_French_Concession
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concessions_in_Tianjin#French_concession
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guangzhouwan
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamian
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hankou#Foreign_concessions_period
       etc.
       than to Australia, a country whose head of state is the same as
       that of America's main former colonizer:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_II
       and whose flag:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Australia
       includes the very same colonialist insignia that America
       literally fought its Revolutionary War to remove from American
       soil FFS:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Revolutionary_War
       (See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/flag-decolonization/
       )
       #Post#: 2740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: December 7, 2020, 8:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A new round of anti-China campaigns: U.S. attacks are getting
       hysterical
       [quote]As it lashes out in its final weeks, the Trump
       administration has added new legislation against China. But is
       the target bilateral relations, or to make it impossible for
       President-elect Biden to undo the damage?[/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98WDqjvgxkQ
       #Post#: 2756--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: December 8, 2020, 11:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Chinese FM speaks with American business leaders on building
       stable and healthy relations
       [quote]Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi and American business
       leaders held a video conference in Beijing on Monday. [/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pn3-4TlKDKs
       #Post#: 2817--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 12, 2020, 10:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Important enemy article:
  HTML https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/12/12/the-vietnam-war-and-china-was-walt-rostow-right-with-an-endnote-on-the-linkage-to-us-israel-relations/
       [quote]Rostow was among a group of middle-aged intellectuals and
       academics, most also World War II veterans and, as in Rostow’s
       case, who had also served in the OSS (Office of Strategic
       Services, the predecessor to the CIA).  From that experience,
       and the ideology it reinforced, the advisors surrounding
       America’s post-war presidents were Hawks; even what today would
       be called “Neo-cons” and far-right advocates for U.S military
       intervention (or pre-emption).  But as the Vietnam war dragged
       on, their reputations were dragged through the mud.  In Rostow’s
       case—one of the last holdouts for U.S. victory—he constantly
       pushed LBJ (president Johnson) to commit more troops, more
       planes, more bombs, and more money.
       ...
       Rostow believed early on that communist China, if it continued
       to advance through the “stages of growth” into a high-tech,
       modern mass society, would be a profound regional, and if
       consolidated, a global competitive threat to nearly everything
       America stood for.
       ...
       Was Rostow right?  I believe he was, and more: he was not only
       right about the threat communism posed to Western freedoms and
       liberty, but about the dislocations and distortions in
       scientific and technological development: China’s culture is
       imitative and assimilative; it is the like the “Borg.”
       Resistance is futile.
       ...
       The CCP is the new cult-hero of the radical Left globalist, who
       views the U.S. as a dying establishment society of privilege.
       Except the Left doesn’t actually despise privilege; it despises
       being denied privilege for itself—and now, it wants it all for
       itself, with an objective of a unitarian, consolidated American
       political monism that destroys its opposition and consolidates
       its hegemony over all aspects of society in ways completely
       foreign to American traditions of individual freedom — economic
       and religious liberty, with a government subordinated to the
       civil public, and the civil public in control of its military,
       its property, currency, and most of its natural resources.
       ...
       China — and emulation of China — threaten to dismantle most if
       not all American routines and traditions, and in an insidious
       way that slowly but consistently encroaches on every aspect of
       American culture and custom.
       ...
       Rostow’s Cold War hawkish stance of defiance was right: It is
       modern, strong, sober and confident, in the face of another U.S.
       political world view that is anarchic, compliant, hysterical and
       weak.[/quote]
       Got all that standard Yellow Peril boilerplate? Now wait for it:
       [quote]Rostow’s family were Jewish immigrants from
       Russia[/quote]
       Who didn't see that coming?
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/
       #Post#: 2927--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: guest5 Date: December 18, 2020, 1:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Nikki Haley: Joe Biden Should Go After China
       [quote]Nikki Haley eyes 2024 run with op-ed calling for
       attacking China. [/quote]
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHzSJG5QKwc
       #Post#: 2934--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: acc9 Date: December 18, 2020, 5:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://edition.cnn.com/2020/11/03/tech/ant-ipo-postponed-beijing-jack-ma/index.html
       Thumbs up for the Chinese government to have stalled the IPO at
       the very last minute to avoid the launch of Ma's new enterprise
       to supply credit (without need of collateral) to facilitate
       young people's spending.  If not for their resolute action,
       China might be walking the footstep of the US in the late 60s
       and heading for the direction of an over inflated bubble economy
       thus jeopardizing the Renminbi and saving the US dollar from its
       overdue downfall.
       There is also say that Jack Ma is possibly a new recruit to
       Freemasonry and connected with the forces behind US Federal
       Reserve who are aiming at sucking the Chinese market which is so
       rapidly expanding. Conspiracy theory or not, the stark
       resemblance of the 'eye' in the logos of Ma's new Weixin
       company, Freemason, and the Federal Reserve is certainly an
       interesting point to note.
       #Post#: 2935--------------------------------------------------
       Re: China and United States Relations
       By: acc9 Date: December 18, 2020, 5:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Correction: should be Weibo, not Weixin.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page