DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 14274--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 22, 2022, 11:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/editorial-story-jay-proves-racist-163741292.html
[quote]As Gov. Ron DeSantis and loyalist legislators carry on a
campaign to control and silence curriculum pertaining to the
role historic racism has played in shaping America, research
from local historian Tom Garner puts a harsh light on the moral
and factual wrongness of how Florida Republicans are trying to
manipulate public education and whitewash history that's already
been hidden for far too long.
The fact is that historic racism from white Americans against
Black Americans continues to shape the places we call home
today. The town of Jay is a living local example of that which
contradicts the dishonest "culture wars" being pushed by Florida
politicians.
As reported by Jim Little, in the early 1920s the Jay area was
home to as many as 175 Black residents, almost all of whom were
farmers. Today, there are only 13 Black residents in the Jay
area and only four in the town itself, according to 2020 census
data.
What triggered that exodus of generations of local black farmers
was a story largely hidden from public knowledge. After nearly
15 years of research, Garner explains how an argument between a
Black farmer and a white farmer started it all.
In short, when a white farmer became angry that he could not
immediately use a piece of farming equipment owned by the Black
farmer, he attacked the Black farmer with an iron bar. The Black
farmer pulled out a gun and shot the white farmer in self
defense. But he was forced to flee from being lynched before he
was arrested. The resulting uproar from white outrage in the
1920's drove nearly the entire population of Black farmers from
their land by 1930 and Jay infamously became a "sundown town" in
the decades afterward.
...
the story shows how vicious and deep rooted Southern racism
drove generations of family off of land and totally reshaped a
town that would most likely look extremely different today had
those Black families and farmers been allowed to exist freely in
peace.
...
And this hard, local history underscores the shameful effort by
Florida's political class to whitewash, control and manipulate
education and history that has already been buried for far too
long.[/quote]
Any plans to give the land back?
#Post#: 14294--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: June 23, 2022, 9:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.propublica.org/article/georgia-dei-crt-schools-parents
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WOVkTQVU_fg
#Post#: 16278--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 3, 2022, 5:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/11/01/race-republicans-stephen-miller-trump/
[quote]Political appeals to White insecurity are now explicit
The story of racial politics in the United States over the last
half-century isn’t complicated. The passage of the Voting Rights
Act helped solidify African American support for Democrats — and
provided an opportunity for Republicans in areas hostile to the
expansion of voting rights for Blacks.
...
Instead of talking specifically about limiting the power of
Black Americans (as was common in the Jim Crow era), Republican
candidates talked about issues with obvious racial subtexts:
integration efforts, states’ rights, support for social
services. Richard M. Nixon’s 1968 presidential campaign focused
on crime — very much with the understanding of how that focus
would be interpreted by White Americans.
In recent years, the facade has slipped. Former president Donald
Trump’s appeals to White insecurity were far more explicit than
those of prior political candidates. That was in part because he
shared that insecurity and saw how it played in conservative
media. But it was also timing: A surge in immigration in 2014
and the emergence of Black Lives Matter that same year
heightened the concerns of heavily White older [s]Americans[/s].
This was measurable and measured.
...
it is a non-insignificant effort to make a very specific,
unsubtle appeal to the concerns of White [s]Americans[/s].
...
The right’s backlash against this vague thing called “woke” is
largely a function of treating individual calls for respecting
minority voices as somehow being a systemic call to do so. It is
the idea that there is a hierarchy of power that exerts itself
outside of the law and forces compliance through shaming and
compliance. So some professor at San Diego State who puts
“she/her” in her Twitter bio becomes part of the vanguard of
organized oppression against real [s]America[/s].
This idea that Whites are disadvantaged is cultural and
generational and amplified repeatedly in an increasingly
unconstrained right-wing media. Miller’s unsubtle intertwining
of hostility to immigration and race manifests in this ad that
specifically asserts that White [s]America[/s] is on the
decline.
The appeals used to be coded, quiet. Present and identifiable,
but shying away from specific “they’re coming for you” language.
The coding is gone. The elevation of racial fear is explicit.
The Southern strategy is gone; the Jim Crow appeals to Blacks
usurping power are back.
That PRRI poll found that two-thirds of Republicans think
American culture and way of life have changed for the worse
since 1950. The America First Legal ad is nostalgic for that era
in all the wrong ways.[/quote]
#Post#: 16526--------------------------------------------------
Re: Demographic Blueshift
By: rp Date: November 19, 2022, 12:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://youtu.be/STcNiGRM50c
#Post#: 16553--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 20, 2022, 2:00 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/opinion-donald-trump-running-president-120000877.html
[quote]Trump was, and continues to be, the chief executive not
of a nation, or of the Republican Party, or even of a cult, but
of a culture — namely a culture of white supremacy.
This is actually worse than it sounds. Even very “woke”
Americans tend to see white supremacy as an isolated dynamic
synonymous with racism, the “bad” America. But what many people
don’t realize is that white supremacy is a culture that is much
broader and deeper than that. It is about racialized power, an
assumed authority of white people (chiefly men) to set and
enforce the social and moral order as they see fit, often in the
service of values that on their face sound noble, like tradition
or family.
In this culture, the presidency, electoral politics, the
Constitution, rule of law, democratic ideals, liberalism,
decency — all are incidental. They can never matter as much as
white peoples’ ultimate right to power.
The gravitational pull of white supremacy in America is not new.
It is part of who we’ve always been. What is new is that in
2022, under the increasingly thin guise of conservatism — and
greatly aided by the internet, social media and big media like
Fox News — the culture of white supremacy has gone fully, almost
gleefully mainstream. Republican policy agendas have been
replaced with relentless attacks on critical race theory and the
whole notion of social justice
...
what is particularly worrisome is that Trump doesn’t have to win
elections for this culture to persist. As long as Trump remains
Trump — unapologetically bigoted, xenophobic, right in all
circumstances — he’ll have loyal supporters in his culture war.
Elections are just a technicality.
This is dangerous because in 2022, this culture war is
increasingly veering toward actual combat. American history has
been written in violence, most often perpetrated by whites
against the “Other” — Indigenous folks, Black people, immigrants
of color.[/quote]
Yes:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-we-lose/
Which is why we need:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/firearms/
Continuing:
[quote]a majority of Republicans agree with the sentiment that
“the American way of life is disappearing so fast” that “they
may have to use force to save it.” Many of these Republicans
don’t fit the typical profile of an extremist, at least not on
the surface. “Those committing far-right violence — particularly
planned violence rather than spontaneous hate crimes — are older
and more established than the typical terrorist and violent
criminal,” she writes. “They often hold jobs, are married and
have children. Those who attend church or belong to community
groups are more likely to hold violent, conspiratorial beliefs.
They are not isolated ‘lone wolves,’ they are part of a focused
community that echoes their ideas.”
...
“the bedrock idea uniting right-wing communities who condone
violence is that white Christian men in the United States are
under cultural and demographic threat and require defending —
and that it is the Republican Party and Donald Trump, in
particular, who will safeguard their way of life.” Case in
point: talk about civil war rose exponentially — by nearly 3,000
percent — after the Justice Department’s search of Mar-a-Lago.
...
In one of the most indelible moments captured on video during
the Capitol riots, white rioters surrounded and screamed
“fucking n-----r” at a Black cop.
...
White supremacy is meant for all white people, whether they
approve of it or not; the culture war spearheaded by Trump is
therefore a white problem and has to be cast as such, and fought
as such.
But that’s not happening, even in the wake of the midterm
defeats. Trump and his ilk have faced little organized
resistance to an ecosystem that benefits far too many. For all
the anger and disgust with Trumpism there aren’t enough white
people speaking forcefully against white supremacy to counter
those who are speaking forcefully to it. Joe Biden, for example,
has denounced white supremacy, but he was careful to describe it
as a fringe ideology unique to MAGA Republicans, not an
ecosystem that touches everyone and has become self-sustaining.
That reasoning is less than convincing.
...
the central question of whether white supremacy will hold or
yield to a multiracial society started with the Civil War and
never went away.
...
“Democrats have no cultural competence,” Phillips says. “They
suffer from implicit bias, and ignorance.” Meaning that while
the party lauds diversity and justice, and now features Black
people and people of color in the ranks of top leadership, it
has always been loath to tackle white supremacy head-on.
...
the moment’s demand for meaningful racial change that centers
white supremacy as the enemy remains a model for a powerful kind
of new politics, where a multiracial coalition of Americans push
for equitable change, at the ballot box and in the
boardroom.[/quote]
Hence:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/
#Post#: 17028--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 12, 2022, 6:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/adolfoflores/racist-lawmakers-immigrantion-laws-attorneys-tactic
[quote]Inside the courthouse where Hartzler worked as an
attorney with the Federal Defenders of San Diego, hundreds of
distraught parents faced criminal charges of entering the US
without authorization, which former president Donald Trump used
to separate them from their children.
...
If defense attorneys could prove that it was unconstitutional
and inherently racist, a judge would strike the entire thing,
potentially affecting hundreds of cases.
Their research into the law's formation bolstered their case. It
showed how congressional lawmakers in the early 1900s invoked
overt racism to justify the legislation at the time, discussing
how the “mixture blood” of white, Native Americans, and Black
people would inflict “great penalty” on the US. They also said
Mexicans were “illiterate, unclean, peonized masses” who were
“poisoning the American citizen.”
The federal defender’s investigation into the laws relied
heavily on research already done by UCLA history professor Kelly
Lytle Hernández, who discovered and documented how eugenicists
shaped these laws.
...
When the laws that form the basis of the modern immigration
system were passed in the 1920s, some members of Congress openly
embraced eugenics, supported segregation, and used racist
language.
When Congress passed the National Origins Act of 1924, which
restricted how many immigrants could enter the US, particularly
non-Europeans, it exempted people from the Western Hemisphere,
including Mexicans. This upset lawmakers who wanted to restrict
all immigration from Mexico, but those efforts failed under
pressure from employers, particularly those in agriculture.
During attempts to restrict immigration from non-European
countries, US lawmakers heard testimony from a eugenicist who
said that controlling which immigrants were allowed in was the
best way to promote “race conservation,” and compared drafters
of deportation laws to “successful breeders of thoroughbred
horses.”
Sen. Coleman Livingston Blease, a Democrat from South Carolina
who defended lynching and supported segregation, proposed a
solution regarding Mexican immigrants that would appease
nativists and employers: make crossing the border without
authorization a crime. It would force Mexican workers to enter
only through a port of entry, allowing the US to control how
many entered while ensuring that employers had enough of the
laborers they depended on. The law making it a crime to enter
the US without authorization was approved in 1929.
For employers, undocumented workers became an easily exploitable
group who could be threatened with deportation and jail time.
Decades later, the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act upheld
the system established by the 1924 law, though it granted
immigration quotas to mostly Western and Northern European
countries. The law also reenacted illegal entry and reentry.
In a court filing for one of Hartzler’s cases, she pointed to a
925-page report that served as the basis for the 1952 statute
that repeatedly uses the term “wetback” to prove Congress sought
to discriminate against Latinos. Sen. Pat McCarran, a Democrat
from Nevada and chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, used
“wetback” — a racist term originally referring to Latinos who
swam across the Rio Grande — to refer to both authorized and
unauthorized immigrants.
“There is a flood of people who come across the boundary. They
are called wet-backs, and they come across legally or illegally
during the various harvest seasons,” court records quote
McCarran as saying during a hearing.
The report would go on to state that the purpose of the US
immigration system was to “maintain the balance of the various
elements in our white population.”
...
These laws were also the beginning of the association in the US
between undocumented immigrants and criminality, which hit a
peak during the Trump administration, Gonzalez O'Brien
said.[/quote]
#Post#: 17410--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 9, 2023, 4:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.history.com/news/great-depression-repatriation-drives-mexico-deportation
[quote]The U.S. Deported a Million of Its Own Citizens to Mexico
During the Great Depression
Up to 1.8 million people of Mexican descent—most of them
American-born—were rounded up in informal raids and deported in
an effort to reserve jobs for white people.
...
These were the “repatriation drives,” a series of informal raids
that took place around the United States during the Great
Depression. Local governments and officials deported up to 1.8
million people to Mexico, according to research conducted by
Joseph Dunn, a former California state senator. Dunn estimates
around 60 percent of these people were actually American
citizens, many of them born in the U.S. to first-generation
immigrants. For these citizens, deportation wasn’t
“repatriation”—it was exile from their country.
...
The logic behind these raids was that Mexican immigrants were
supposedly using resources and working jobs that should go to
white Americans affected by the Great Depression. These
deportations happened not only in border states like California
and Texas, but also in places like Michigan, Colorado, Illinois,
Ohio and New York. In 2003, a Detroit-born U.S. citizen named
José Lopez testified before a California legislative committee
about his family’s 1931 deportation to Michoacán, a state in
Western Mexico.
“I was five years old when we were forced to relocate,” he said.
“I…bec[a]me very sick with whooping cough, and suffered very
much, and it was difficult to breathe.” After both of his
parents and one brother died in Mexico, he and his surviving
siblings managed to return to the U.S. in 1945. “We were lucky
to come back,” he said. “But there are others that were not so
fortunate.”
The raids tore apart families and communities, leaving lasting
trauma for Mexican Americans who remained in the U.S. as well.
Former California State Senator Martha M. Escutia has said that
growing up in East Los Angeles, her immigrant grandfather never
even walked to the corner grocery store without his passport for
fear of being stopped and deported. Even after he became a
naturalized citizen, he continued to carry it with him.
The deportation of U.S. citizens has always been
unconstitutional, yet scholars argue the way in which
“repatriation drives” deported non-citizens was
unconstitutional, too.
“One of the issues is the ‘repatriation’ took place without any
legal protections in place or any kind of due process,” says
Kevin R. Johnson, a dean and professor of public interest law
and Chicana/o studies at the University of California, Davis,
School of Law. “So you could argue that all of them were
unconstitutional, all of them were illegal, because no modicum
of process was followed.”
Instead, local governments and officers with little knowledge of
immigrants’ rights simply arrested people and put them on
trucks, buses or trains bound for Mexico, regardless of whether
they were documented immigrants or even native-born citizens.
Deporters rounded up children and adults however they could,
often raiding public places where they thought Mexican Americans
hung out. In 1931, one Los Angeles raid rounded up more than 400
people at La Placita Park and deported them to Mexico.[/quote]
Nothing has changed:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/ice/
Continuing:
[quote]Although there was no federal law or executive order
authorizing the 1930s raids, President Herbert Hoover’s
administration, which used the racially-coded slogan, “American
jobs for real Americans,” implicitly approved of them. His
secretary of labor, William Doak, also helped pass local laws
and arrange agreements that prevented Mexican Americans from
holding jobs. Some laws banned Mexican Americans from government
employment, regardless of their citizenship status. Meanwhile,
companies like Ford, U.S. Steel and the Southern Pacific
Railroad agreed to lay off thousands of Mexican American
workers.[/quote]
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/ethnonepotism/
Continuing, the results were exactly as I have repeatedly
attempted to explain:
[quote]modern economists who’ve studied the effect of the 1930s
“repatriation drives” on cities argue the raids did not boost
local economies. “The repatriation of Mexicans, who were mostly
laborers and farm workers, reduced demand for other jobs mainly
held by natives, such as skilled craftsman and managerial,
administrative and sales jobs,” write economists in a 2017
academic paper circulated by the non-partisan National Bureau of
Economic Research. “In fact, our estimates suggest that it may
have further increased their levels of unemployment and
depressed their wages.”[/quote]
Another article from the same site:
HTML https://www.history.com/news/the-brutal-history-of-anti-latino-discrimination-in-america
[quote]In 1931, police officers grabbed Mexican-Americans in the
area, many of them U.S. citizens, and shoved them into waiting
vans. Immigration agents blocked exits and arrested around 400
people, who were then deported to Mexico, regardless of their
citizenship or immigration status.
The raid was just one incident in a long history of
discrimination against Latino people in the United States. Since
the 1840s, anti-Latino prejudice has led to illegal
deportations, school segregation and even
lynching—often-forgotten events that echo the civil rights
violations of African Americans in the Jim Crow-era South.
...
Latinos were barred entry into Anglo establishments and
segregated into urban barrios in poor areas. Though Latinos were
critical to the U.S. economy and often were American citizens,
everything from their language to the color of their skin to
their countries of origin could be used as a pretext for
discrimination. Anglo-Americans treated them as a foreign
underclass and perpetuated stereotypes that those who spoke
Spanish were lazy, stupid and undeserving. In some cases, that
prejudice turned fatal.
Mob Violence Terrorized Latinos
Mob violence against Spanish-speaking people was common in the
late 19th and early 20th centuries, according to historians
William D. Carrigan and Clive Webb. They estimate that the
number of Latinos killed by mobs reach well into the thousands,
though definitive documentation only exists for 547 cases.
The violence began during California’s Gold Rush just after
California became part of the United States. At the time, white
miners begrudged former Mexicans a share of the wealth yielded
by Californian mines—and sometimes enacted vigilante justice. In
1851, for example, a mob of vigilantes accused Josefa Segovia of
murdering a white man. After a fake trial, they marched her
through the streets and lynched her. Over 2,000 men gathered to
watch, shouting racial slurs. Others were attacked on suspicion
of fraternizing with white women or insulting white people.
Even children became the victims of this violence. In 1911, a
mob of over 100 people hanged a 14-year-old boy, Antonio Gómez,
after he was arrested for murder. Rather than let him serve time
in jail, townspeople lynched him and dragged his body through
the streets of Thorndale, Texas.
...
Forced Deportations in the 1920s and '30s
In the late 1920s, anti-Mexican sentiment spiked as the Great
Depression began. As the stock market tanked and unemployment
grew, Anglo-Americans accused Mexicans and other foreigners of
stealing American jobs. Mexican-Americans were discouraged and
even forbidden from accepting charitable aid.
As fears about jobs and the economy spread, the United States
forcibly removed up to 2 million people of Mexican descent from
the country—up to 60 percent of whom were American citizens.
Euphemistically referred to as “repatriations,” the removals
were anything but voluntary. Sometimes, private employers drove
their employees to the border and kicked them out. In other
cases, local governments cut off relief, raided gathering places
or offered free train fare to Mexico. Colorado even ordered all
of its “Mexicans”—in reality, anyone who spoke Spanish or seemed
to be of Latin descent—to leave the state in 1936 and blockaded
its southern border to keep people from leaving. Though no
formal decree was ever issued by immigration authorities, INS
officials deported about 82,000 people during the period.
...
Latino Children Suffered in Segregated Schools
Another little-remembered facet of anti-Latino discrimination in
the United States is school segregation. Unlike the South, which
had explicit laws barring African American children from white
schools, segregation was not enshrined in the laws of the
southwestern United States. Nevertheless, Latino people were
excluded from restaurants, movie theaters and schools.
Latino students were expected to attend separate “Mexican
schools” throughout the southwest beginning in the 1870s. At
first, the schools were set up to serve the children of
Spanish-speaking laborers at rural ranches. Soon, they spread
into cities, too.By the 1940s, as many as 80 percent of Latino
children in places like Orange County, California attended
separate schools. Among them was Sylvia Mendez, a young girl who
was turned away from an all-white school in the county. Instead
of going to the pristine, well-appointed 17th Street Elementary,
she was told to attend Hoover Elementary—a dilapidated, two-room
shack.
The bare-bones facilities offered to students like Mendez lacked
basic supplies and sufficient teachers. Many only provided
vocational classes or did not offer a full 12 years of
instruction. Children were arbitrarily forced to attend based on
factors like their complexion and last name.
...
school officials claimed that Latino students were dirty and
infected with diseases that put white students at risk. Besides,
they argued, Mexican-American students didn’t speak English and
were thus not entitled to attend English-speaking schools. (When
asked, officials conceded that they never gave students
proficiency tests.) “Mexicans are inferior in personal hygiene,
ability and in their economic outlook,” said one
official.[/quote]
NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
#Post#: 17498--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 16, 2023, 9:18 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
It's OK for tar and feathers to be "white":
HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/hidden-story-two-black-college-133738891.html
[quote]One cold April night in 1919, at around 2 a.m., a mob of
60 rowdy white students at the University of Maine surrounded
the dorm room of Samuel and Roger Courtney in Hannibal Hamlin
Hall. The mob planned to attack the two Black brothers from
Boston in retaliation for what a newspaper article described at
the time as their “domineering manner and ill temper.” The
brothers were just two among what yearbooks show could not have
been more than a dozen Black University of Maine students at the
time.
While no first-person accounts or university records of the
incident are known to remain, newspaper clippings and
photographs from a former student’s scrapbook help fill in the
details.
Although outnumbered, the Courtney brothers escaped. They
knocked three freshmen attackers out cold in the process. Soon a
mob of hundreds of students and community members formed to
finish what the freshmen had started. The mob captured the
brothers and led them about four miles back to campus with horse
halters around their necks.
Before a growing crowd at the livestock-viewing pavilion,
members of the mob held down Samuel and Roger as their heads
were shaved and their bodies stripped naked in the near-freezing
weather. They were forced to slop each other with hot molasses.
The mob then covered them with feathers from their dorm room
pillows. The victims and bystanders cried out for the mob to
stop but to no avail. Local police, alerted hours earlier,
arrived only after the incident ended. No arrests were made.
Incidents of tarring and feathering as a form of public torture
can be found throughout American history, from colonial times
onward. In nearby Ellsworth, Maine, a Know Nothing mob, seen by
some as a forerunner to the KKK, tarred and feathered Jesuit
priest Father John Bapst in 1851. Especially leading into World
War I, this method of vigilantism continued to be used by the
KKK and other groups against Black Americans, immigrants and
labor organizers, especially in the South and West. As with the
Courtney brothers incident, substitutions like molasses or
milkweed were made based on what was readily available. Although
rarely fatal, victims of tarring and feathering attacks were not
only humiliated by being held down, shaved, stripped naked and
covered in a boiled sticky substance and feathers, but their
skin often became burned and blistered or peeled off when
solvents were used to remove the remnants.
...
No condemnation
The tarring and feathering is also missing from official
University of Maine histories. A brief statement from the
university’s then-president, Robert J. Aley, claimed the event
was nothing more than childish hazing that was “likely to happen
any time, at any college, the gravity depending much upon the
susceptibilities of the victim and the notoriety given it.”
Rather than condemn the mob’s violence, his statement
highlighted the fact that one of the brothers had previously
violated unspecified campus rules, as if that justified the
treatment the men received.
...
most Americans have still never heard about the Black
sharecroppers killed in the Elaine Massacre in Arkansas that
year for organizing their labor or the fatal stoning of Black
Chicago teenager Eugene Williams for floating into “white
waters” in Lake Michigan. They weren’t taught about the Black
World War I soldiers attacked in Charleston, South Carolina, and
Bisbee, Arizona, during the Red Summer.
There is still work to do, but the recent anniversaries of
events like the Tulsa Massacre or the Red Summer, which
coincided with modern-day Black Lives Matter protests and the
killings of Americans like Breonna Taylor and George Floyd, have
sparked a renewed interest in the past.[/quote]
NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
#Post#: 17676--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: January 26, 2023, 5:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYqO80nEy5k
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/trump-a-fascist/msg13620/#msg13620
#Post#: 18623--------------------------------------------------
Re: Trumpism is an echo
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 27, 2023, 3:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsO3rMl1Kls
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page