URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Colonial Era
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 67--------------------------------------------------
       Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 2, 2020, 11:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OLD CONTENT
  HTML https://revcom.us/i/438/800_TrumpLyncher-article.jpg
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LVQomlXMeek
       Note the section starting how the Republican Party (in 1896 it
       was the leftist party), which had many former slaves and ethnic
       cooperation allied with the Populist party, which was mostly
       Americans of European descent and these people were mostly
       farmers. The new Republican-Populist alliance was the Fusion
       Party that promptly started to sweep popular support and
       elections. This angered the Democratic Party (then the
       racist-heavy right wing) and they staged a coup... thus leftists
       were not armed well enough then... they should be NOW!
       More information here:
       www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/08/wilmington-massacre
       /536457/
       Local North Carolina conservatives have considered those
       perpetrating this event as local heroes, and recently changed
       tone to blame the Dems (now the party with strong leftist
       elements) of racism.
       ---
       www.huffpost.com/entry/lynchings-black-americans-reconstruction-
       eji-report_n_5eea6f94c5b6d4397ade568a
       [quote]White mobs and individuals lynched at least 2,000 more
       Black Americans than previously documented, according to a new
       report from the Equal Justice Initiative.
       The report, released Tuesday, documents confirmed lynchings
       during the Reconstruction era, from 1865 to 1876, after the end
       of the Civil War and Black Americans’ emancipation from slavery.
       The group’s previous report on the subject, from 2015, detailed
       4,500 racial terror lynchings from 1877 to 1950 — adding up to
       nearly 6,500 confirmed lynchings of Black people in the U.S.
       from 1865 to 1950.
       EJI notes that thousands more lynchings “may never be
       documented,” defining lynchings as when Black people were
       “attacked, sexually assaulted and terrorized by white mobs and
       individuals” who were largely “shielded from arrest and
       prosecution.”
       The new report details attacks like one from 1865, when six
       Black men were lynched in North Carolina after demanding a white
       landowner pay them for their work. And the following year in New
       Orleans, white mobs attacked people marching for Black voting
       rights, killing an estimated 33 Black people.
       “We cannot understand our present moment without recognizing the
       lasting damage caused by allowing white supremacy and racial
       hierarchy to prevail during Reconstruction,” wrote EJI Director
       Bryan Stevenson in a news release.
       ...
       The report notes that white perpetrators of violence against
       Black people during Reconstruction were “almost never held
       accountable,” and many were even “celebrated.”[/quote]
       NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
       ---
       www.yahoo.com/news/racial-violence-pandemic-red-summer-090452290
       .html
       [quote]Racial strife flaring across the United States. Black
       Americans standing up to societal structures in unpredictable
       ways. And people enduring months of a deadly pandemic infecting
       millions worldwide, shuttering businesses and heightening fears
       of a lengthy economic downturn.
       That was 1919, during what would later be coined the "Red
       Summer," when communities across America were reeling from white
       mobs inciting brutality against Black people and cities were
       still wrestling with a third wave of the so-called Spanish flu
       pandemic that emerged the previous year.
       The story line parallels with today: violence against Black
       people, leading to mass demonstrations and calls to end systemic
       racism, converging with a months-long coronavirus pandemic. Such
       commonality is not lost on historians and scholars of African
       American history.
       ...
       What happened during the Red Summer of 1919?
       The general mob-led violence against Black people actually began
       before the summer in localized incidents.
       In the book "Red Summer: The Summer of 1919 and the Awakening of
       Black America," author Cameron McWhirter described what led up
       to a deadly riot in Jenkins County, Georgia, in April, when
       Black churches were burned and Black men killed.
       It was just the start: "In coming months, similar horrors would
       afflict cities and towns across America. The violence that April
       Sunday was only the beginning of what would become known as the
       Red Summer of 1919, when riots and lynchings spread throughout
       the country, causing havoc and harming thousands — yet also
       awakening millions of blacks to fight for rights guaranteed
       them, but so long denied."
       ...
       Ward said that white people were responding to the "ever-present
       white fear of a loss of social status and dominance" and were
       "resentful of this disruption of social, economic and political
       order."
       In addition, the influx of African Americans into northern
       cities continued as the Spanish flu spread in 1918 before the
       pandemic subsided in the summer of 1919, and whites were blaming
       Black migrants for the spread of illness.
       Historical accounts also described how white military members,
       who had returned to Washington after the end of World War I,
       seized on sensationalist rumors of Black men assaulting white
       women, which was amplified in D.C.'s newspapers. An estimated 40
       people were killed that July in the nation's capital, with
       hundreds of federal troops deployed to stamp out the unrest.
       ...
       In recounting those events, The Washington Post wrote that jobs
       were scarce at the time, and many whites felt slighted that a
       small number of Blacks could secure low-level government jobs.
       "Unlike virtually all the disturbances that preceded it — in
       which white-on-black violence dominated — the Washington riot of
       1919 was distinguished by strong, organized and armed black
       resistance, foreshadowing the civil rights struggles later in
       the century," according to The Post.
       Some of the worst multi-day violence occurred in Chicago, where
       about two dozen Black people and 15 white people were killed.
       The uprisings were sparked after a Black teenager on a raft,
       Eugene Williams, drifted into a whites only section of Lake
       Michigan and drowned after a white man began throwing rocks at
       him, the Chicago Tribune reported.
       From April to November, some 30 riots broke out across the
       eastern U.S., with hundreds of accounts of beatings, lynchings
       and the burning of churches and buildings. As a result of the
       violence, the Ku Klux Klan also saw a resurgence.
       ...
       As bloody as that summer was, it failed to result in any
       protections for African Americans, and if anything, Ward said,
       "that reign of racial terror, where again the exculpatory work
       of the white press, police, grand juries and others ensured that
       perpetrators were protected rather than punished, undoubtedly
       prolonged the period of American apartheid."
       Saje Mathieu, a history professor at the University of
       Minnesota, added that some of the violence of 1919 was in many
       ways milder in comparison to the "absolute devastation and
       destruction" of the massacres in Tulsa, Oklahoma, two years
       later and in Rosewood, Florida, in 1923.
       The fight for racial justice in 2020 follows a series of
       high-profile incidents of Black Americans being killed at the
       hands of police or former law enforcement and of Black Americans
       having to affirm their place and existence while doing ordinary
       things and often facing the threat of police being called on
       them.
       Mathieu said the blatant racism of 1919 reverberates in other
       ways today, including by white women who are caught on viral
       videos questioning a Black person's agency and yet don't see
       themselves as exhibiting racism. Social media users label them
       as a "Karen."[/quote]
       NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
       #Post#: 68--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 2, 2020, 11:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/1898-wilmington-massacre-essential-lesson-163016733.html
       [quote]The 1898 Wilmington Massacre Is an Essential Lesson in
       How State Violence Has Targeted Black Americans
       In the summer of 1865, just after the Civil War, Union
       commanders in the battered port city of Wilmington, N.C.,
       appointed a former Confederate general as police chief and
       former Confederate soldiers as policemen.
       The all-white force immediately set upon newly freed Black
       people. Men, women and children were beaten, clubbed and whipped
       indiscriminately. A Union officer with the Freedmen’s Bureau
       maintained a ledger of daily police assaults: A Black man
       whipped 72 times. A Black woman dragged for two miles with a
       rope around her neck. A Black man, “his back all raw,” beaten by
       police with a buggy trace.
       “The policemen are the hardest and most brutal looking and
       acting set of civil or municipal officers I ever saw. All look
       bad and vicious,” the Union officer reported.
       For generations, police and other white authority figures have
       perpetuated white supremacy and privilege by assaulting Black
       Americans. Slave patrols were an early form of policing. White
       police enforced racist post-Civil War Black Code laws and 20th
       century Jim Crow segregation. They tolerated, and sometimes
       participated in, lynchings of Black men.
       Today, the image of a white police officer in Minneapolis
       pressing his knee against George Floyd’s neck as he pleaded for
       mercy has opened a window on America’s unbroken history of
       brutality against African-Americans by white men in uniform.
       One of the most terrifying examples erupted more than a century
       ago, when white supremacist soldiers and police helped hunt down
       and kill at least 60 Black men in Wilmington in 1898. The
       murders were part of a carefully orchestrated coup that toppled
       a multi-racial government in the South’s most progressive
       Black-majority city.
       Like many police assaults against Black people in American
       history, the goal was more than just punishment and humiliation.
       It was to prevent black citizens from exercising their
       constitutional rights. Today, as American celebrates
       Independence Day it is an opportune moment to reflect on
       America’s troubled racial history and how to move forward.
       The 1898 coup capped a months-long White Supremacy Campaign in
       North Carolina designed to strip black men of the vote and
       remove them from public office forever. The prime target was
       Wilmington, where black men served as councilmen, magistrates
       and police officers in a city with a thriving black middle class
       and some 65 black doctors, lawyers and educators.
       (Today in North Carolina, conservatives in the state legislature
       have continued to try to squash the Black vote through voter
       suppression laws and racial gerrymandering schemes that have
       been stuck down by federal courts as unconstitutional.)
       The 1898 coup, plotted by white politicians and businessmen,
       would not have been possible without the city’s white soldiers
       and police, who led white vigilantes on a killing spree on Nov.
       10, 1898. This came after white supremacists had bullied the
       white police chief into firing the city’s 10 black policemen.
       The soldiers served in two all-white state militias in
       Wilmington manned and commanded by white supremacists. Both
       units ostensibly reported to the state’s governor, but in fact
       served as the private militias of the white supremacists who
       directed the coup.
       Like politicians in the aftermath of George Floyd’s killing, the
       coup leaders pressured the governor to call out the militias –
       the National Guard of the day – on the pretext that blacks were
       rioting. In fact, it was whites who were rioting, led by
       soldiers and police. They burned a Black owned newspaper and
       shot Black men down in the streets, many of them simply trying
       to get home safely.
       The militiamen had served in the Spanish-American War in the
       summer of 1898 and had not yet been mustered out of federal
       service. That meant U.S. soldiers were unleashed against
       law-abiding Black citizens of Wilmington – 122 years before
       President Trump threatened to deploy the U.S. military against
       street protesters.
       Like the white vigilantes who were indicted for shooting Ahmaud
       Arbery in Georgia after accusing him of burglary, white
       vigilantes in Wilmington in 1898 shot Black men accused during
       the White Supremacy Campaign of raping white women and stealing
       white jobs.
       As part of the coup, white supremacists banished leading Black
       and white political allies from Wilmington after forcibly
       evicting them from office and replacing them with coup leaders.
       Militiamen escorted them to the train station at gunpoint. In
       the weeks after the coup, more than 2,100 African-Americans fled
       Wilmington, turning a black-majority city into a white
       supremacist citadel.
       It was the most successful and lasting coup in American history.
       It instituted white supremacy as official state policy for half
       a century and prevented Black citizens from voting in
       significant numbers until passage of the Voting Rights Act in
       1965. Two years before the coup, 126,000 black men registered to
       vote in North Carolina. Four years after the coup, the number
       was 6,100.
       After the coup, no Black citizen served in public office in
       Wilmington until 1972. No Black citizen from North Carolina was
       elected to Congress until 1992. No one was prosecuted or
       punished for the killings and violence. President William
       McKinley ignored pleas from Black leaders to send in federal
       marshals or U.S. troops to protect Black citizens.
       The coup was the natural outgrowth of North Carolina’s – and
       America’s – long history of relying on white police to
       perpetuate white supremacy amid fears of Black uprisings.
       In 1831, white supremacist newspapers in North Carolina
       published hysterical stories warning, falsely, of an army of
       well-armed slaves marching from Virginia to Wilmington to kill
       white people, torch the city, and launch a national slave
       rebellion during Nat Turner’s famous Virginia slave uprising.
       Scores of innocent slaves were lynched after being seized by
       white police and vigilantes in North Carolina towns. In
       Wilmington, four slaves accused of plotting a “diabolical”
       uprising were rounded up by police and decapitated by a white
       mob. Their severed heads were mounted on poles along a public
       highway known as “Niggerhead Road,” a name that endured until
       the 1950s.
       More than 60 years after Nat Turner’s execution, his slave
       revolt was cited by some white supremacists in Wilmington as
       justification for the militia and police violence required to
       put down a purported black riot in 1898.
       After the coup, the city’s fired Black policemen were replaced
       by white supremacists, most of whom had participated in the coup
       and murders. White police enforced new city policies that
       replaced Black workers with whites. Police often used brute
       force to ensure that newly passed Jim Crow laws were obeyed by
       Black citizens.
       During the 1898 campaign, white police stood by as nightriders
       burst into black homes in and around Wilmington, whipping Black
       men and threatening to kill them if they dared register to vote.
       On Election Day in November 1898, vigilantes beat Black voters
       and stuffed ballot boxes in full view of white policemen.
       Just a week ago in June 2020, three Wilmington police officers
       were fired after a recording emerged in which they used racial
       slurs as one officer vowed to “go out and start slaughtering”
       black people and “wipe ‘em off the f—-ing map.”
       A Democratic Party Hand Book, published in the summer of 1898 by
       what was then the party of white supremacy, laid bare the
       lasting intentions of the men who plotted Wilmington’s white
       coup: “This is a white man’s country and white men must control
       and govern it.”[/quote]
       NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
       #Post#: 256--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 11, 2020, 3:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ljvMws31Sw
       #Post#: 1152--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 13, 2020, 11:41 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/10/the-next-reconstruction/615475/
       [quote]The conditions in America today do not much resemble
       those of 1968. In fact, the best analogue to the current moment
       is the first and most consequential such awakening—in 1868. The
       story of that awakening offers a guide, and a warning. In the
       1860s, the rise of a racist demagogue to the presidency, the
       valor of Black soldiers and workers, and the stories of outrages
       against the emancipated in the South stunned white northerners
       into writing the equality of man into the Constitution. The
       triumphs and failures of this anti-racist coalition led America
       to the present moment. It is now up to their successors to
       fulfill the promises of democracy, to make a more perfect union,
       to complete the work of Reconstruction.
       They came for George Ruby in the middle of the night, as many as
       50 of them, their faces blackened to conceal their identities.
       As the Confederate veterans dragged Ruby from his home, they
       mocked him for having believed that he would be safe in Jackson,
       Louisiana: “S’pose you thought the United States government
       would protect you, did you?” They dragged him at least a mile,
       to a creek, where they beat him with a paddle and left him,
       half-dressed and bleeding, with a warning: Leave, and never
       return.
       ...
       As the historian Barry A. Crouch recounts in The Dance of
       Freedom, Ruby warned that the formerly enslaved were beset by
       the “fiendish lawlessness of the whites who murder and outrage
       the free people with the same indifference as displayed in the
       killing of snakes or other venomous reptiles,”[/quote]
       This description is accurate. Indifference, not hate, is the
       attitude of rightists. Only leftists are capable of hate.
       [quote]The last thing most white Americans wanted was to be
       dragged through a bitter conflict over expanding the boundaries
       of American citizenship. They wanted to rebuild the country and
       get back to business. John Wilkes Booth had been moved to
       assassinate Abraham Lincoln not by the Confederate collapse, but
       by the president’s openness to extending the franchise to
       educated Black men and those who had fought for the Union, an
       affront Booth described as “**** citizenship.”
       Lincoln’s successor, Andrew Johnson, viewed the Radical
       Republican project as an insult to the white men to whom the
       United States truly belonged. A Tennessee Democrat and
       self-styled champion of the white working class, the president
       believed that “Negroes have shown less capacity for government
       than any other race of people,” and that allowing the formerly
       enslaved to vote would eventually lead to “such a tyranny as
       this continent has never yet witnessed.” Encouraged by Johnson’s
       words and actions, southern elites worked to reduce the
       emancipated to conditions that resembled slavery in all but
       name.
       Throughout the South, when freedmen signed contracts with their
       former masters, those contracts were broken; if they tried to
       seek work elsewhere, they were hunted down; if they reported
       their concerns to local authorities, they were told that the
       testimony of Black people held no weight in court. When they
       tried to purchase land, they were denied; when they tried to
       borrow capital to establish businesses, they were rejected; when
       they demanded decent wages, they were met with violence.
       In the midst of these terrors and denials, the emancipated
       organized as laborers, protesters, and voters, forming the Union
       Leagues and other Republican clubs that would become the basis
       of their political power. Southern whites insisted that the
       freedmen were unfit for the ballot, even as they witnessed their
       sophistication in protest and organization. In fact, what the
       former slave masters feared was not that Black people were
       incapable of self-government, but the world the emancipated
       might create.
       From 1868 to 1871, Black people in the South faced a “wave of
       counter-revolutionary terror,” the historian Eric Foner has
       written, one that “lacks a counterpart either in the American
       experience or in that of the other Western Hemisphere societies
       that abolished slavery in the nineteenth century.” Texas courts,
       according to Foner, “indicted some 500 white men for the murder
       of blacks in 1865 and 1866, but not one was convicted.” He cites
       one northern observer who commented, “Murder is considered one
       of their inalienable state rights.”
       The system that emerged across the South was so racist and
       authoritarian that one Freedmen’s Bureau agent wrote that the
       emancipated “would be just as well off with no law at all or no
       Government.” Indeed, the police were often at the forefront of
       the violence. In 1866, in New Orleans, police joined an attack
       on Republicans organizing to amend the state constitution;
       dozens of the mostly Black delegates were killed. General Philip
       Sheridan wrote in a letter to Ulysses S. Grant that the incident
       “was an absolute massacre by the police … perpetrated without
       the shadow of a necessity.” The same year, in Memphis, white
       police officers started a fight with several Black Union
       veterans, then used the conflict as a justification to begin
       firing at Black people—civilians and soldiers alike—all over the
       city. The killing went on for days.
       These stories began to reach the North in bureaucratic
       dispatches like Ruby’s, in newspaper accounts, and in testimony
       to the congressional committee on Reconstruction. Northerners
       heard about Lucy Grimes of Texas, whose former owner demanded
       that she beat her own son, then had Grimes beaten to death when
       she refused. Her killers went unpunished because the court would
       not hear “negro testimony.” Northerners also heard about Madison
       Newby, a former Union scout from Virginia driven by “rebel
       people” from land he had purchased, who testified that former
       slave masters were “taking the colored people and tying them up
       by the thumbs if they do not agree to work for six dollars a
       month.” And they heard about Glasgow William, a Union veteran in
       Kentucky who was lynched in front of his wife by the Ku Klux
       Klan for declaring his intent to vote for “his old commander.”
       (Newspapers sympathetic to the white South dismissed such
       stories; one called the KKK the “phantom of diseased
       imaginations.”)
       ...
       “I saw in various hospitals negroes, women as well as men, whose
       ears had been cut off or whose bodies were slashed with knives
       or bruised with whips, or bludgeons, or punctured with shot
       wounds. Dead negroes were found in considerable number in the
       country roads or on the fields, shot to death, or strung upon
       the limbs of trees. In many districts the colored people were in
       a panic of fright, and the whites in a state of almost insane
       irritation against them.”
       When Schurz returned to Washington, Johnson refused to hear his
       findings. The president had already set his mind to maintaining
       the United States as a white man’s government. He told Schurz
       that a report was unnecessary, then silently waited for Schurz
       to leave.
       ...
       In his “Swing Around the Circle” tour, Johnson gave angry
       speeches before raucous crowds, comparing himself to Lincoln,
       calling for some Radical Republicans to be hanged as traitors,
       and blaming the New Orleans riot on those who had called for
       Black suffrage in the first place, saying, “Every drop of blood
       that was shed is upon their skirts and they are responsible.” He
       blocked the measures that Congress took up to protect the rights
       of the emancipated, describing them as racist against white
       people. He told Black leaders that he was their “Moses,” even as
       he denied their aspirations to full citizenship.[/quote]
       Does this remind you of anyone?
       [quote]Black Americans today do not face the same wave of terror
       they did in the 1860s. Still, George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and
       Ahmaud Arbery were only the most recent names Americans learned.
       There was Eric Garner, who was choked to death on a New York
       City sidewalk during an arrest as he rasped, “I can’t breathe.”
       There was Walter Scott in North Charleston, South Carolina, who
       was shot in the back while fleeing an officer. There was Laquan
       McDonald in Chicago, who was shot 16 times by an officer who
       kept firing even as McDonald lay motionless on the ground. There
       was Stephon Clark, who was gunned down while using a cellphone
       in his grandmother’s backyard in Sacramento, California. There
       was Natasha McKenna, who died after being tased in a Virginia
       prison. There was Freddie Gray, who was seen being loaded into
       the back of a Baltimore police van in which his spinal cord was
       severed. There was Tamir Rice, a 12-year-old in Cleveland with a
       toy gun who was killed by police within moments of their
       arrival.[/quote]
       NEVER FORGIVE. NEVER FORGET.
       #Post#: 2444--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 23, 2020, 2:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v771c6cx-Pg
       #Post#: 3085--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trump disapproval
       By: Starling Date: January 3, 2021, 5:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Want to understand Trump? Look at George Wallace
  HTML https://www.houstonchronicle.com/opinion/outlook/article/Want-to-understand-Trump-Look-at-George-Wallace-13254362.php
  HTML https://s.hdnux.com/photos/75/70/55/16223074/3/500x0.jpg
       Alabama Gov. George C. Wallace is shown in this Oct. 19, 1964
       file photo speaking in Glen Burnie, Md. at a rally supporting
       then Republican presidential candidate Sen. Barry Goldwater.
       [Goldwater was a Jew]
       Wallace, the one-time firebrand segregationist who was paralyzed
       by a would-be assassin's bullet as he campaigned for the
       presidency in 1972, died Sunday, Sept. 13, 1998. He was 79.
       [quote]
       In late September 1968, presidential election polls showed that
       third-party candidate George Wallace's campaign was surging.
       With the support of a quarter of white voters, Wallace was
       within single digits of the Democratic nominee, Vice President
       Hubert Humphrey. Wallace's dominance in Southern states
       threatened to prevent any candidate from securing an electoral
       college majority, which would throw the November election into
       the House of Representatives.
       His was an extraordinary rise. In his inaugural speech as
       Alabama governor just five years earlier, Wallace had promised
       “segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever.”
       He then gained national attention by personally standing in a
       schoolhouse door at the University of Alabama to block the
       admission of two black students.
       By 1968, he seldom used explicitly racist language but instead
       demanded “law and order” and railed against “crime,” “drugs,”
       “welfare mothers,” “forced busing” and “big city thugs.” He
       created the racially encoded language that still haunts our
       politics.
       So when President Trump whips up rallies with his thinly veiled
       racist attacks on brown-skinned immigrants, Muslims and
       unpatriotic blacks, it is not a new development. The racial
       divide has been a political tool for those willing to use it for
       50 years. As former President Obama pointed out in his Sept. 7
       speech: “It did not start with Donald Trump. He is a symptom,
       not the cause. He's just capitalizing on resentments that
       politicians have been fanning for years.”
       In 1968, the white backlash to the civil rights movement and the
       ‘60s urban riots drew voters to Wallace. But others took note -
       particularly Richard Nixon's campaign advisor Kevin Phillips
       who, in his book “The Emerging Republican Majority,” saw the
       potential of a major partisan realignment. Over the next six
       years, President Nixon adapted a more subtle version of the
       Wallace message, appealing to what he called “the silent
       majority.” In the years that followed, white voters in the once
       solidly Democratic South became the bedrock of the GOP.
       The Republican Party's Southern strategy initially focused on
       shifting voters with a segregationist bent to the party, but it
       proved adaptable to other whites uneasy with the increasing role
       of minorities in American life and politics. These appeals
       resurfaced many times over the years, most memorably in the
       infamous Willie Horton ad during George H.W. Bush's 1988
       campaign, but also in the symbolism of Ronald Reagan's decision
       to make his first 1980 campaign appearance at the Neshoba County
       Fair in Philadelphia, Miss. - where three civil rights workers
       were murdered in 1964. With the election of Obama and a growing
       awareness that whites will eventually be a minority in America,
       the ground for such appeals has stayed quite fertile.
       When Trump descended from Trump Tower in 2015, he immediately
       set himself apart from the gaggle of GOP presidential contenders
       by replacing the coy racial language of his predecessors with an
       unfiltered bullhorn. He has railed against prominent black
       leaders and athletes, talked about brown-skinned immigrants as
       murderers and rapists, and insisted dark-skinned Muslims
       constitute such a threat that we need to ban travel from entire
       countries.
       Wallace's bid for the presidency faltered in its final weeks,
       but a very small shift of voters in four states would have
       deadlocked the race. Wallace poured gasoline on the fire of
       racial division first, but Trump managed to carry that flame all
       the way into the White House. Who would have predicted that 50
       years after the 1968 election, polls would show that more than
       half of Americans think their president is a racist?
       Many factors have contributed to today's tribalistic politics,
       but race remains the bedrock of that division. Transcending
       racism is essential if our government is to break out of its
       current paralysis. If we do not succeed and Wallace's legacy of
       dividing us by race continues to shape American political life,
       then perhaps he won after all.
       [/quote]
       JJ had an excellent essay on Dixie that included a section on
       Wallace.
       #Post#: 3097--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: guest5 Date: January 4, 2021, 12:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]Many factors have contributed to today's tribalistic
       politics, but race remains the bedrock of that division.
       Transcending racism is essential if our government is to break
       out of its current paralysis.[/quote]
       That sentence alone gives me some hope that Americans will get
       their act together and save America before it's too late. If
       only more Americans spoke like this and used similar
       vocabulary....
       #Post#: 4387--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 21, 2021, 9:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What I was saying earlier:
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/regret-inform-history-not-save-132700762.html
       [quote]I regret to inform you all that history will not save
       America from itself
       I know you've been hearing this proclamation on network news and
       reading it in columns for years.
       "History will judge us." "History will repudiate Donald Trump
       and the January 6 rioters."
       ...
       This sounds good, but there is a danger in the notion that
       history will reveal the truth of our moment and sort the good
       from the bad.
       ...
       The past does not change, but our telling of it does. Americans
       are famous for concealment by omission. It is only in the last
       year or two that there has been widespread awareness of the
       Tulsa Massacre of 1921, for example, when racists destroyed
       "Black Wall Street" and murdered the people who lived there in a
       fit of organized rage.
       That was only one of our country's multiple genocides against
       Black Americans, but we don't talk about a lot of those. They
       aren't pleasant, and they do not fit in with the narrative that
       America is the longest standing multi-racial democracy in the
       world.
       Just as it was easier for Americans in the past to forget the
       importance of the Tulsa Massacre, it could be easier for
       Americans in the future to forget about the ugliness that led to
       the January 6 attack on The Capitol.
       It's also possible that future Americans could manipulate the
       events around January 6. We already saw that happen immediately
       after the attack. Some right wing media tried to pin the blame
       on Antifa and polling indicates that now that what half of
       Republicans believe. It's quite possible that future generations
       could believe that as well.[/quote]
       In short, history is written by the victors. To assume history
       will agree with us is to assume we will win. Instead of assuming
       we will win, we should focus on making sure we actually win.
       But no, "Americans" are not famous for concealment by omission.
       Westerners are. "Americans" did not find it easy to forget the
       Tulsa Massacre. Americans were the victims in the Tulsa
       Massacre! It was the Western occupiers, who massacred those
       Americans, who also found it easy to forget it.
       #Post#: 5217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 1, 2021, 10:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.yahoo.com/news/white-mobs-rioted-washington-1848-113301086.html
       [quote]White mobs rioted in Washington in 1848 to defend
       slaveholders' rights after 76 Black enslaved people staged an
       unsuccessful mass escape on a boat
       ...
       On the night of April 15, the Pearl left Washington. Seventy-six
       Black men, women and children, having quietly left area farms,
       hid beneath the deck. Drayton and Sayres steered the ship down
       the Potomac River. They were bound for Philadelphia, where
       slavery was illegal.
       The fugitives did not get far. Owners soon noticed their absence
       and formed a posse to find them. The posse, aboard a steamboat,
       overtook and commandeered the Pearl as it entered Chesapeake Bay
       on April 17. The next day, the fugitives and their white
       abettors were marched through Washington and thrown in the city
       jail.
       ...
       Furious at the conspirators’ challenge to the social order,
       Washington’s white population wanted to punish someone. With
       Drayton and Sayres awaiting trial behind bars, white
       supremacists turned against the abolitionist press.
       ...
       The nights of April 18 and 19, thousands gathered outside the
       National Era’s offices. They gave speeches and spread a false
       rumor about journalists’ involvement in the Pearl escape. The
       protesters’ leaders reportedly included U.S. government clerks.
       Soon the protesters turned violent. They threw rocks at the
       building the first night and intended to destroy it the second.
       ...
       James K. Polk, the nation’s president, both defended slavery and
       enriched himself by it. He enslaved more than 50 people on his
       Mississippi cotton plantation. While editing his letters, the
       final volume of them just published, I often read his complaints
       about escapes from there. Like other slave owners, he relied on
       relatives and paid agents to capture, return and physically
       punish the fugitives.
       After the Pearl escape, Polk shared the rioters’ belief in white
       supremacy and their indignation at resistance to enslavement. He
       also shared their hostility toward abolitionists and pro-reform
       newspapers, blaming those in his diary for the whole incident:
       “The outrage committed by stealing or seducing the slaves … had
       produced the excitement & the threatened violence on the
       abolition press.”
       ...
       Captains Drayton and Sayres suffered for their efforts.
       Convicted of illegally transporting slaves, they remained
       incarcerated until President Millard Fillmore pardoned them in
       1852.
       Even worse off were the people they had helped escape.
       Abolitionists bought a very few their liberty, but nearly all
       returned to slavery. Many were sold farther south, more distant
       than ever from their dream of freedom.[/quote]
       #Post#: 6315--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Trumpism is an echo
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 12, 2021, 1:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://us.yahoo.com/news/anti-white-watch-racist-answer-085222376.html
       [quote]Anti-White Watch, a platform “dedicated to documenting
       bias, policies, hate, and violence directed at ethnic-European
       people worldwide.” Its main web portal maintains a heat map and
       database of alleged anti-white incidents—focusing on accounts of
       brutal violence supposedly enacted by non-white perpetrators,
       pulled from across the web by admins and readers. It also
       catalogues numerous alleged hate-crime “hoaxes,” incidents that
       many on the right believe malicious actors—often assumed to be
       liberal elites—either inflate or fully fabricate in order to
       stoke racial tensions for their benefit, and to slander white
       people as racists.
       “They try to both minimize the apparent threat from the far
       right,” Kurt Braddock, an expert on white-supremacist
       communication and radicalization strategies at American
       University, told The Daily Beast, “and to make it seem like the
       real threat to America is minorities.”
       ...
       White bigots started fabricating accounts of violence allegedly
       committed by non-white people, especially Black men, at least as
       far back as the antebellum era. Initially, these tales served as
       a justification for America’s uniquely brutal form of slavery,
       and wider racist legal framework. After the Civil War, the same
       sort of fear-mongering anecdotes were repurposed to support
       segregation and other forms of oppression, as well as brutal
       reprisals against any non-white person who (literally) so much
       as looked at a white person wrong.
       ...
       These new efforts seem to be modeling themselves on the
       Anti-Defamation League[/quote]
       Reminder:
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/droptheadl/
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page