URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 19392--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 10, 2023, 2:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "I no longer agree with their idea that the Neolithic
       agricultural lifestyle led to the birth of a race of superior
       people. In fact, I think the opposite is true – that agriculture
       caused degradation  of the human genome. Humans have essentially
       been domesticated and this is not a good thing."
       "It’s much easier for small bands of hunter-gatherers to avoid
       conflict and maintain equilibrium with their environment"
       "Pre-agricultural people were in control of their environment
       and their own destiny. People in hierarchical societies are
       controlled by their rulers."
       Therefore you are by definition not an Aryanist (or a National
       Socialist, given the anti-Fuehrerprinzip third statement), but
       an explicitly anti-Aryanist Gentilist.
       And to the extent that you, an anti-Aryanist, feel intuitively
       closer to Ascesis (self-proclaimed "Aryanist") than to me
       (founder), should leave in no doubt whose version of Aryanism is
       the authentic one.
       "I’m not fanatically anti-Western like the people on here. I
       would have no problem with America being one of the
       superpowers."
       It is possible to be fanatically anti-Western while being
       pro-American. Our entire geopolitical plan revolves around
       ensuring America remains one of the superpowers but merely
       turning anti-Western! This is why we keep highlighting the
       contrast between Western and American aesthetics:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg10112/#msg10112
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg10239/#msg10239
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg10255/#msg10255
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg14902/#msg14902
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg17162/#msg17162
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg18363/#msg18363
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg18391/#msg18391
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/counterculture-era/counterculture-and-western-civilisation/msg18904/#msg18904
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/western-civilization-is-ugly-48/msg929/#msg929
       etc..
       I do agree, however, that you are not anti-Western. Your view
       that domesticated humans are bad is implicitly a pro-Western
       one:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_empire
       [quote]A developed hydraulic civilization maintains control over
       its population by means of controlling the supply of water. The
       term was coined by the German-American historian Karl August
       Wittfogel (1896–1988), in his book Oriental Despotism: A
       Comparative Study of Total Power (1957). Wittfogel asserted that
       such "hydraulic civilizations"—although they were neither all
       located in the Orient nor characteristic of all Oriental
       societies—were essentially different from those of the Western
       world.
       ...
       The typical hydraulic empire government, in Wittfogel's thesis,
       is extremely centralized, with no trace of an independent
       aristocracy – in contrast to the decentralized feudalism of
       medieval Europe.[/quote]
       See also:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/aryan-hydraulic-empire/
       #Post#: 19401--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: Follower of Arya Date: May 10, 2023, 4:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=FRG_03 link=topic=1853.msg19349#msg19349
       date=1683646263]
       So "Follower of Arya" what are YOU going to do about it?
       Everyone who has come here to complain haven't explained their
       solutions, just attack. If you aren't subverters why don't you
       help the people you supposedly agree with instead of insulting
       and appealing to virtueism?
       [/quote]
       Well for one I’m not sitting on the internet posting news
       articles all day and waiting for democracy to win for us. Opsec
       is important for those who are actually serious about taking
       action, we aren’t just going to talk about it on an exposed
       forum where anyone can see it and report it. We aren’t LARPers.
       (Do you people seriously not see the problem in having a network
       so exposed that people can’t actually discuss their activities
       from fear of legal intervention or punishment?)
       And Ascesis is offering help. That’s why they came here.
       [quote]So, order the leftist to get armed for defense and
       counter-attack, simple...[/quote]
       So you just… order the leftist? You don’t recruit them, train
       them, fund or build their equipment, prepare intentional
       communities to protect yourselves and receive the refugees who
       survive?
       This is what we mean by LARPing: none of you have any actual
       clue of how to recruit and build a defence force. You think that
       it’s ‘simple’. You think it’s just (other people) rocking up
       with a gun and taking some lucky hits.
       Good luck to you all.
       #Post#: 19403--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: Junito18 Date: May 10, 2023, 5:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Therefore you are by definition not an Aryanist (or a National
       Socialist, given the anti-Fuehrerprinzip third statement), but
       an explicitly anti-Aryanist Gentilist. "
       You're not an "Aryanist" by your original definition either if
       you're now classifying people by geographic origin. As I said
       before, which ethnicity is "Aryan"? Do you also think it's the
       Capybara?
       "And to the extent that you, an anti-Aryanist, feel intuitively
       closer to Ascesis (self-proclaimed "Aryanist") than to me
       (founder), should leave in no doubt whose version of Aryanism is
       the authentic one."
       The authentic Aryanism is the ideology developed by the 20th
       century German dictator Adolf Hitler. You know, the man who said
       "It was the Jews who brought the negro to the Rhine. The motive
       behind this is clear and his intention is always the same. He
       wants to destroy the hated white race through bastardization. He
       continues to bring negroes in as a flood and force the mixing of
       races." No wonder your movement has made no progress in a
       decade. Saying that National socialism is non-racist is a pretty
       fucking indefensible position when there are quotes like that.
       Now, who is the authentic anti-racist - you, who feels close to
       Adolf Hitler, or me, who does not?
       #Post#: 19405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: antihellenistic Date: May 10, 2023, 9:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]The authentic Aryanism is the ideology developed by the
       20th century German dictator Adolf Hitler. You know, the man who
       said "It was the Jews who brought the negro to the Rhine. The
       motive behind this is clear and his intention is always the
       same. He wants to destroy the hated white race through
       bastardization. He continues to bring negroes in as a flood and
       force the mixing of races." No wonder your movement has made no
       progress in a decade. Saying that National socialism is
       non-racist is a pretty **** indefensible position when there are
       quotes like that.
       Now, who is the authentic anti-racist - you, who feels close to
       Adolf Hitler, or me, who does not?[/quote]
       This is the answer, we already discuss it for years. :
       1.
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/hitler-the-face-of-anti-tribalism/
       2.
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/racial-view-of-western-philosopher-from-john-locke-to-karl-marx/
       [quote]Now, who is the authentic anti-racist - you, who feels
       close to Adolf Hitler, or me, who does not?[/quote]
       Still us who are authentically "anti-racist", your worldview
       support continuous technological advancement which suitable for
       racialist people. Jews of Israel are the best example of people
       who bear similar vision with you
       #Post#: 19406--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: christianbethel Date: May 10, 2023, 11:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Junito18 link=topic=1853.msg19403#msg19403
       date=1683715062]The authentic Aryanism is the ideology developed
       by the 20th century German dictator Adolf Hitler. You know, the
       man who said "It was the Jews who brought the negro to the
       Rhine. The motive behind this is clear and his intention is
       always the same. He wants to destroy the hated white race
       through bastardization. He continues to bring negroes in as a
       flood and force the mixing of races." No wonder your movement
       has made no progress in a decade. Saying that National socialism
       is non-racist is a pretty **** indefensible position when there
       are quotes like that.
       Now, who is the authentic anti-racist - you, who feels close to
       Adolf Hitler, or me, who does not?
       [/quote]
       You're do realize that Hitler regretted writing Mein Kampf
       because he had to lie to the people in order to gain support,
       right? You do realize Hitler was indicting the French in that
       passage right and had no ill will towards 'blacks', right?
       Haven't you read the 'Hitler: The Face of Anti-tribalism'
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/hitler-the-face-of-anti-tribalism/<br
       />thread? You can read, right?
       #Post#: 19407--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: christianbethel Date: May 10, 2023, 11:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Follower of Arya link=topic=1853.msg19401#msg19401
       date=1683710414]
       [quote author=FRG_03 link=topic=1853.msg19349#msg19349
       date=1683646263]
       So "Follower of Arya" what are YOU going to do about it?
       Everyone who has come here to complain haven't explained their
       solutions, just attack. If you aren't subverters why don't you
       help the people you supposedly agree with instead of insulting
       and appealing to virtueism?
       [/quote]
       Well for one I’m not sitting on the internet posting news
       articles all day and waiting for democracy to win for us. Opsec
       is important for those who are actually serious about taking
       action, we aren’t just going to talk about it on an exposed
       forum where anyone can see it and report it. We aren’t LARPers.
       (Do you people seriously not see the problem in having a network
       so exposed that people can’t actually discuss their activities
       from fear of legal intervention or punishment?)
       And Ascesis is offering help. That’s why they came here.
       [quote]So, order the leftist to get armed for defense and
       counter-attack, simple...[/quote]
       So you just… order the leftist? You don’t recruit them, train
       them, fund or build their equipment, prepare intentional
       communities to protect yourselves and receive the refugees who
       survive?
       This is what we mean by LARPing: none of you have any actual
       clue of how to recruit and build a defence force. You think that
       it’s ‘simple’. You think it’s just (other people) rocking up
       with a gun and taking some lucky hits.
       Good luck to you all.
       [/quote]
       So I guess creating the Jamia from the Quran is LARPing. Gotcha.
       #Post#: 19408--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: christianbethel Date: May 10, 2023, 11:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Junito18 link=topic=1853.msg19389#msg19389
       date=1683682057]
       I’d never heard of Konrad Lorenz, to be honest. And I haven’t
       fully thought it through. I can’t, for example, give you a list
       of which pre-agricultural populations I would consider to be
       superior. I heard about this idea at the start of 2021 here
  HTML https://andreashofer72.medium.com
       and here
  HTML http://the-big-ger-picture.blogspot.com/2022/10/could-morpho-psychology-ever-become.html<br
       />and at first I was arguing with the author, since at that time
        I
       believed in “Aryanism” and was saying the same things that you
       are saying now, but over time I realised that he is probably
       right. Like I said, Varg teaches a variation of this. And there
       is also a book called ‘Sex at Dawn’ which teaches a variation of
       this, although I admit I’m yet to read it. [/quote]
       So you admit to following the teachings of a 'White'
       Nationalist/Supremacist.
       [quote]But can’t you see that any complex agricultural society
       needs to maintain a high population otherwise it will simply be
       conquered by its larger neighbours? I suppose you would argue
       that it need not fear neighbouring hunter-gatherers since they
       would have a small population and neighbouring farmers would not
       attack them because they are noble. But imagine one of the
       farmer societies went bad and did attack them simply to become
       more powerful. That society would win in the evolutionary
       contest and hence, by the principle of natural selection, all
       the farmer societies will end up being expansionist and having
       high populations since those are the societies that will win.
       This is just natural selection at work. [/quote]
       Someone correct this idiot for me. I'm not qualified enough to
       answer this.
       [quote]I know it isn’t. I’m not saying that we should all become
       hunter-gatherers, only that people who are less domesticated are
       superior. we can have traits of the hunter-gatherers without
       becoming literal hunter-gatherers with stone age technology. As
       I said, I think that both the hunter-gatherers and the
       agriculturalists killed animals.[/quote]
       We already do. There was rampant race-mixing throughout history
       which degraded the Aryan race and removed all but trace amounts
       of Aryan blood in present-day humans- look how that turned out.
       You and I both know agriculturists did not kill animals. They
       didn't need to- they grew their own food!
       #Post#: 19409--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: christianbethel Date: May 10, 2023, 11:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Ascesis link=topic=1853.msg19388#msg19388
       date=1683681053]
       @antihellenistic
       I'm not responding to you because I've already had to repeat
       myself fifty times to 90sRF, and a many more times with others —
       all because you retards can't answer my points without
       argumentative fallacies. So I'm not going to do it all over
       again for you, merely because you want to prove what a good boy
       you are to 90sRetroFan from trueleft.createaforum.com
       Plus, I think its funny that the more I ignore you, the larger
       your font size and responses get. I know who you are, and your
       actual intentions. So no, I'm not going to take you seriously.
       But feel free to seethe out even more walls of text though, I
       will be happy to scroll right past them like I've been doing for
       the past week.
       [/quote]
       You sound like Destiny/Vaush/Hasan Piker. Not people you'd want
       to be compared to.
       #Post#: 19410--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: Ascesis Date: May 10, 2023, 11:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       >But can’t you see that any complex agricultural society needs
       to maintain a high population otherwise it will simply be
       conquered by its larger neighbours?
       The same applies to clans of Hunter-Gatherers, doesn't it?
       >But imagine one of the farmer societies went bad and did attack
       them simply to become more powerful. That society would win in
       the evolutionary contest and hence, by the principle of natural
       selection, all the farmer societies will end up being
       expansionist and having high populations since those are the
       societies that will win. This is just natural selection at work.
       This is why we should work towards an Aryanist world order that
       would prevent this (such as your UN example). I know what you're
       saying, but there are also ways to win wars without producing a
       massive population.
       >I know it isn’t. I’m not saying that we should all become
       hunter-gatherers, only that people who are less domesticated are
       superior.
       For the sake of clarity, you're saying that this is because
       domesticated civilized humans are more violent than primitive
       Hunter-Gatherers due to things like industry and Chauvinism,
       right?  In which case I think it'd be better to say that
       Hunter-Gatherers are really just less inferior than urbanites
       for this reason, and that low-impact agricultural civilization
       is still the ideal. I know something can always go wrong with
       any system, but its hands down better than the other options
       >As I said, I think that both the hunter-gatherers and the
       agriculturalists killed animals.
       They probably did, but Aryanism's point is that even then,
       agrarianism still made things like Veganism, art, and
       transcendent religion possible
       >we can have traits of the hunter-gatherers without becoming
       literal hunter-gatherers with stone age technology.
       Well does acquiring the traits of Hunter-Gatherers mean exactly?
       I think this would be self-defeating if taken at face value
       >High sexual dimorphism is needed by societies that are
       constantly at war (men) and produce many children (women). It
       wouldn’t be necessary for certain pre-agricultural societies.
       The thing is though, pre-agricultural societies actually
       were/are very sexually dimorphic in both bone structure between
       men and women, and the societal gender roles with women
       typically gathering fruit, and men hunting. It was only until
       the advent of agriculture do you really start to see sexual
       dimorphism decreased both skeletally and socially
       >And why would there need to be an alpha-beta dynamic?
       Competition for the boob lol:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominance_hierarchy
       There is a theory that one of the reasons why Humanity took so
       long to advance into civilization, is because the Alpha-Beta
       paradigm produced a lot of "Betas" who refused to contribute to
       the tribe whenever the "Alphas" would hog all of the women. But
       when the Neolithic Revolution came in, monogamy gave everyone a
       decent chance to find a partner, and therefore incentized
       everyone to get to work.
       I know this is completely theoretical, but I think this is
       entirely plausible, and simply makes sense when you consider the
       extreme sexual dimorphism and Alpha-Beta dynamic you find in
       primitive Hunter tribes compared to more "domesticated" agrarian
       cultures.
       >Like I said, is it easier to say ‘no’ to someone with authority
       in a civilised society with laws and hierarchies backed up by
       the army and a police force or a in a small band of
       hunter-gatherers? Would there even be people in non-agricultural
       societies with significant authority?
       The tribe leader would presumably have all of the authority.
       Power hungry tyrants exist everywhere my guy, primitive
       Hunter-Gatherer tribes are no different
       >but they were individually in control of how they responded to
       those challenges. You don’t have individual control if you live
       in a civilised society. How you live and what you’re allowed to
       do and say is dictated to you by others.
       I'd say the grass is always greener on the other side.
       Ultimately, nothing is stopping us from homesteading away from
       civilization, besides ourselves
       >The Mongols are an example of a pre-agricultural society that
       wouldn’t have had the right conditions for the sort of person I
       favour to develop. They were very warlike due to the lack of
       resources. And the horse meant that they could travel quite
       easily and could hence make war with many different groups of
       people.
       Mongolic behavior is simply a natural consequence of
       pre-agricultural modes of survival. If someone is going to
       overwhelm defenseless animals with force, or herd them using
       deception, what's actually stopping them from treating Humans
       the same way?
       >But my point isn’t that the problem is with the education
       system, but with how certain people’s minds work naturally.
       So then are you saying that agrarian culture is in conflict with
       how people naturally think?
       >I would have no problem with America being one of the
       superpowers.
       Same here, as long as America drops Zionism & Consumerism
       #Post#: 19411--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Why You All Suck
       By: christianbethel Date: May 10, 2023, 12:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       'Same here, as long as America drops Zionism & Consumerism'
       ...That's exactly what AS said. He said 'Our entire geopolitical
       plan revolves around ensuring America remains one of the
       superpowers but merely turning anti-Western!'
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page