DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 19068--------------------------------------------------
Plymouth Rock vs. Jamestown
DIR By: rp
Date: April 28, 2023, 11:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
An interesting video exploring the differences between Plymouth
Rock Pilgrims, who were anti-Anglican Church, and Jamestown
settlers, who were pro-Anglican Church:
HTML https://youtu.be/1jSozrTPPPw
The host even goes so far as to say that these differences
between the Pilgrims and Jamestown would come to define the
character of the American North and South, respectively. Could
it be that the Pilgrims, and by extension the North, had more
Aryan blood?
#Post#: 19069--------------------------------------------------
Re: Plymouth Rock vs. Jamestown
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: April 29, 2023, 1:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilgrims_(Plymouth_Colony)
--- Quote ---
> They held many of the same Puritan Calvinist religious beliefs
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puritans#Beliefs
--- Quote ---
> They believed that all of their beliefs should be based on the
Bible, which they considered to be divinely inspired.[47]
>
> The concept of covenant was extremely important to Puritans,
and covenant theology was central to their beliefs.
> ...
> human nature was corrupted by original sin and unable to
fulfill the covenant of works, since each person inevitably
violated God's law as expressed in the Ten Commandments. As
sinners, every person deserved damnation.[49]
>
> Puritans shared with other Calvinists a belief in double
predestination, that some people (the elect) were destined by
God to receive grace and salvation while others were destined
for Hell.[50] No one, however, could merit salvation. According
to covenant theology, Christ's sacrifice on the cross made
possible the covenant of grace, by which those selected by God
could be saved. Puritans believed in unconditional election and
irresistible grace—God's grace was given freely without
condition to the elect and could not be refused.[51]
> ...
> Too much emphasis on one's good works could be criticized for
being too close to Arminianism, and too much emphasis on
subjective religious experience could be criticized as
Antinomianism.
> ...
> Husbands were the spiritual heads of the household, while
women were to demonstrate religious piety and obedience under
male authority.[76] Furthermore, marriage represented not only
the relationship between husband and wife, but also the
relationship between spouses and God. Puritan husbands commanded
authority through family direction and prayer. The female
relationship to her husband and to God was marked by
submissiveness and humility.[77]
> ...
> While Puritans praised the obedience of young children, they
also believed that, by separating children from their mothers at
adolescence, children could better sustain a superior
relationship with God.[82] A child could only be redeemed
through religious education and obedience.
> ...
> Merton argued for a similar positive correlation between the
rise of English Puritanism, as well as German Pietism, and early
experimental science.[104] As an example, seven of 10 nucleus
members of the Royal Society were Puritans. In the year 1663, 62
percent of the members of the Royal Society were similarly
identified.[105]
> ...
> Men, and a handful of women, who engaged in homosexual
behavior, were seen as especially sinful, with some
executed.[107] While the practice of execution was also
infrequently used for rape and adultery, homosexuality was
actually seen as a worse sin.[135] Passages from the Old
Testament, including Lev 20:13., were thought to support the
disgust for homosexuality and efforts to purge society of it.
New Haven code stated "If any man lyeth with mankinde, as a man
lyeth with a woman, both of them have committed abomination,
they shall surely be put to death"[136] and in 1636 the Plymouth
Colony adopted a set of laws that included a sentence of death
for sodomy and buggery.[137] Prominent authors such as Thomas
Cobbert, Samual Danforth and Cotton Mather wrote pieces
condemning homosexuality.[135] Mather argued that the passage
"Overcome the Devil when he tempts you to the youthful sin of
Uncleanness" was referring "probably to the young men of
Sodom".[138]
>
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calvinism#Politics_and_society
--- Quote ---
> Calvin taught that if worldly rulers rise up against God they
should be put down. In this way, he and his followers stood in
the vanguard of resistance to political absolutism and furthered
the cause of democracy.[177] The Congregationalists who founded
Plymouth Colony (1620) and Massachusetts Bay Colony (1628) were
convinced that the democratic form of government was the will of
God.[178][179]
--- End Quote ---
"Could it be that the Pilgrims, and by extension the North, had
more Aryan blood?"
Not nearly enough!
See also:
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/john-johnson/americas-founding-principle-refugees-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-177640
--- Quote ---
> “Wouldn’t it be more accurate to call their attitudes towards
children Calvinistic rather than Puritan?”
>
> Puritanism is considered to be a subgroup of Calvinism, so it
would also be accurate to call this attitude Calvinistic. Really
it is an attitude derived from the Book of Proverbs, therefore
it could be called Solomonic. Whatever it is, it is thoroughly
anti-Christian.
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/john-johnson/americas-founding-principle-refugees-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-177645
--- Quote ---
> I won’t deny that many Puritans deserved to be roasted at the
stake, not only for child torture, but introducing witch hunts
mob ‘justice’ early democratic procedures to the US:
>
HTML https://livingbehindthegates.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/crucibleaccused.jpg
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/john-johnson/americas-founding-principle-refugees-welcome/comment-page-1/#comment-177673
--- Quote ---
> I can imagine Aryanist fiction being written about a small
number of Pilgrim-descended Aryan individuals who, having on one
hand been subject to Puritan childrearing by their parents and
on the other hand been exposed to New World Aryan mythology,
experience dream visions in which Piltzintecuhtli warns them
that Tlaloc is resurrecting in New England, and thus decide to
turn against Puritanism (and the Tanakh in general) to stop it
from happening, but ended up being persecuted as witches by the
majority. What do you think?
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 19071--------------------------------------------------
Re: Plymouth Rock vs. Jamestown
DIR By: rp
Date: April 29, 2023, 4:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
So they did have marginally greater amounts of Aryan blood.. But
would you say this was sufficient to cause the North to end
slavery/segregation sooner than the South? But then again, we
have seen many subhuman Gentiles from New England as well, such
as racist Malk Wahlberg, so idk.
Another difference I theorized was Turanian vs Giant blood, but
this is unlikely as the Southerners were direct descendants of
the plebian parliamentarians from the English Civil War, as the
narrator points out, and we know the parliamentarians were
directly influenced by John Locke's "Enlightenment" liberal
values, particularly those extolling the idea of "equality"
among "White" men (plebian hubris).
We can, however, say that the later generation of "White"
immigrants were almost all non-Aryan, as they chose to identify
with the "White" identity and reproduce, bringing us Trump and
his supporters.
#Post#: 19130--------------------------------------------------
Re: Plymouth Rock vs. Jamestown
DIR By: rp
Date: May 1, 2023, 10:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Puritanism is considered to be a subgroup of Calvinism, so it
would also be accurate to call this attitude Calvinistic. Really
it is an attitude derived from the Book of Proverbs, therefore
it could be called Solomonic. Whatever it is, it is thoroughly
anti-Christian.
>
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6XskATqKgg
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1