URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Human Evolution
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1484--------------------------------------------------
       Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: guest5 Date: October 10, 2020, 8:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Human evolution speeding up? More people born with extra artery
       in their arm, study shows
       [quote]“We’ve collected all the data published in anatomical
       literature and continued to dissect cadavers donated for studies
       in Adelaide and we found about one third of Australians have the
       median artery in their forearm and everyone will have it by the
       end of the century if this process continues.”[/quote]
       [quote]Researchers say this isn’t the only sign evolution is
       continuing in humans. The study points to a growing number of
       people born without wisdom teeth and born with a fabella, a
       small bone in the back of the knee joint.[/quote]
  HTML https://www.studyfinds.org/evolution-speeding-up-extra-artery/
       #Post#: 8580--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 4, 2021, 12:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.mensafoundation.org/what-we-do/awards-and-recognition/mensa-foundation-prize/foundation-prize-winners/2021-danielle-posthuma/
       [quote]Statistical geneticist Dr. Danielle Posthuma of the
       Netherlands has been awarded the third Mensa Foundation Prize
       for her research directly identifying, for the first time,
       hundreds of human genes highly correlated to variations in
       intelligence.
       “Genetic science and engineering is currently the hottest topic
       in biology — witness its impact on Covid-19,” Prize Committee
       Chair Dr. Harry Ringermacher said. “Dr. Posthuma’s studies of
       genetic correlation with intelligence are the first to succeed
       in identifying specific genes within the human genome. Her
       credentials, visibility in her field, and publications were also
       excellent.”
       As head of the Department of Complex Trait Genetics at the Vrije
       Universiteit Amsterdam and Amsterdam University Medical Centre,
       Dr. Posthuma leads a group of 30 researchers from diverse
       fields, including statistics, stem cell biology, and
       bioinformatics. She has led two large-scale genetic discovery
       studies into intelligence. The first, whose results were
       published in 2017, led to the discovery of 52 genes linked to
       intelligence. A year later, in an even larger study of more than
       200,000 people, Dr. Posthuma was able to identify another 939
       genes associated with intelligence.[/quote]
       So at least we now know 991 genes to eliminate. These will be
       the same 991 that Western eugenicists will be trying to breed
       for. (Jews probably carry many of them.)
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/other/racial-jewishness-archive-from-true-left-forum/
       [quote]“Intelligence is one of the most highly investigated
       traits in psychology and also one of the most heritable traits
       in humans,” Dr. Posthuma said.[/quote]
       In Western psychology, to be more precise. Because Western
       civilization knows this is what is needed to sustain itself. Of
       course, we will not let it succeed unopposed. While AI is by far
       the biggest threat:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/if-western-civilization-does-not-die-soon/
       the threat of increased human intelligence through genetic
       engineering is also not to be underestimated:
       [quote]Dr. Posthuma estimates that the current genetic results
       explain up to about 10 percent of heritable traits related to
       intelligence, with future studies expected to expand the
       knowledge even further.[/quote]
       #Post#: 16727--------------------------------------------------
       How the Great Depression shaped people’s DNA
       By: guest78 Date: November 28, 2022, 8:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How the Great Depression shaped people’s DNA[quote]
       Epigenetics study finds that children born during the historic
       recession have markers of accelerated ageing later in
       life.[/quote]
       [quote]The worst recession in US history shaped how well people
       would age — before they were even born. Researchers have found
       that the cells of people who were conceived during the Great
       Depression, which lasted from 1929 to 1939 and, at its height,
       saw about 25% of the US workforce unemployed, show signs of
       accelerated ageing.
       The study authors measured these changes in the cells’ epigenome
       — the collection of chemical markers attached to DNA that
       determines when, where and by how much genes are expressed in
       each cell. And they think the pattern of markers that they
       uncovered could be linked to higher rates of both chronic
       illness and death.
       The work, published on 8 November in the Proceedings of the
       National Academy of Sciences, adds to a cache of studies
       indicating that exposure to hardship such as stress and
       starvation during the earliest stages of development can shape
       human health for decades. The findings highlight how social
       programmes designed to help pregnant people could be a tool for
       fighting health disparities in children, says co-author Lauren
       Schmitz, an economist at the University of Wisconsin–Madison.
       Although the study is far from the first to link big historical
       events to changes in the epigenome, the fact that the signal
       appears in data collected from people in their seventies and
       eighties is “mind-blowing”, says Patrick Allard, an
       environmental epigeneticist at the University of California, Los
       Angeles.[/quote]
       Entire article:
  HTML https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03789-z?utm_source=pocket-newtab
       [quote]How were Native Americans affected by the Great
       Depression?
       Between 1887 and 1933, over half of the tribal land base was
       lost to land thieves, tax sales, and governmental sales of
       "surplus lands." These policies launched a cycle of poverty that
       continues at the beginning of the twenty-first century.[/quote]
       Entire article:
  HTML https://www.encyclopedia.com/economics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/native-americans-impact-great-depression
       [quote]Among the suggested causes of the Great Depression are:
       the stock market crash of 1929; the collapse of world trade due
       to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff; government policies; bank failures
       and panics; and the collapse of the money supply.[/quote]
       Entire article:
  HTML https://www.stlouisfed.org/the-great-depression/curriculum/economic-episodes-in-american-history-part-5
       #Post#: 21266--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 2, 2023, 8:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So I was reading this from our enemies:
  HTML https://incels.is/threads/it-never-even-began-for-you-if-your-parents-were-35-or-older-when-you-were-born.511218/
       [quote]I would like to start this thread with a dedication to
       Dr. Hendrik Verwoerd, may his memory be a blessing, may the Lord
       avenge his blood.
       I was born in early 1997. My parents were born in mid/late 1960,
       making them 36 when I was born, easily 5-10 years older than 90%
       of my peers's parents when I was growing up.
       I'm also the oldest child in my family, so they don't even have
       that excuse for having me when they were **** geriatric, and I
       love Dr. Verwoerd and Apartheid, and in South Africa back then,
       people had children at much more normal ages.
       ...
       children of older fathers are confirmed to be uglier, and
       children of older mothers are more likely to have various mental
       illnesses.[/quote]
       Uglier by Western standards only, and mental illnesses as
       defined by Western psychiatry only.
       [quote]Dr Verwoerd's father was 27 and his mother was 28. I love
       Dr. Verwoerd. I love Apartheid.
       Paul Kruger's father was 24 and his mother was 19, which is very
       close to the ideal age for females to have children.
       ...
       Marthinus Wessel Pretorius's father (the great Andries
       Pretorius) was 20 and his mother was 19.[/quote]
       Besides Verwoerd and Kruger whom we have already covered:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/enemies/orania/msg15130/#msg15130
       [quote]The entrance to the town displays a bust of Paul Kruger,
       a monument that commemarates the Battle of Blood River[4], the
       day Jan van Riebeeck landed in South-Africa, Paardekraal and a
       bust of Hendrik Verwoerd,[5] considered[6] by some as the
       "father of Apartheid";[/quote]
       note:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marthinus_Wessel_Pretorius
       [quote]An Afrikaner (or "Boer"), he helped establish the South
       African Republic (Zuid-Afrikaansche Republiek or ZAR; also
       referred to as Transvaal)[/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Republic
       [quote]Under a law of 1855, only white people were permitted to
       be citizens of the ZAR and to own land.[22] The constitution of
       the ZAR stated: "The volk (people) are not prepared to allow any
       equality of the non-white with the white inhabitants, either in
       the church or the state".[23][/quote]
       Back to enemy topic, just one more example from them of why they
       think people should reproduce at an early age:
       [quote]Clarence Thomas's father was 17 (the ideal age to have
       children) and his mother was 19. Justice Thomas is probably the
       greatest legal mind the world has ever seen.[/quote]
       ::)
       By the way, just to emphasize that the author is an enemy, this
       is his signature quote:
       [quote]I love Dr. Verwoerd. I love Apartheid.
       I love Dr. Verwoerd. I love Apartheid.
       I love Dr. Verwoerd. I love Apartheid.
       I love Ian Smith. I love Rhodesia.
       I love Ian Smith. I love Rhodesia.
       I love Ian Smith. I love Rhodesia.
       I love Robert E. Lee. I love the Confederacy.
       I love Robert E. Lee. I love the Confederacy.
       I love Robert E. Lee. I love the Confederacy.
       I love Strom Thurmond. I love Segregation.
       I love Alfred Deakin. I love the White Australia Policy.
       I love Enoch Powell. I love the British National Party.
       I love Ye. I love Death Con 3.
       I love Paul von Hindenburg. I love the German Empire.
       I love Harvey Weinstein. I love the Casting Couch.
       I love Andrew Jackson. I love the Trail of Tears.
       I love Éric Zemmour. I love Remigration.
       I love Augusto Pinochet. I love Free Helicopter Rides.
       I love Maurice Challe. I love the Sétif and Guelma Massacre.
       I love Bill Cosby. I love Jello Pudding.
       I love Eleftherios Venizelos. I love the Megali Idea.
       I love Al Jolson. I love Blackface.
       I love Brock Turner. I love 20 Minutes of Action.
       I love Clarence Thomas. I love AbWHOREtion Bans.
       I love Donald Cline and Quincy Fortier. I love Unwanted Sperm
       Donations.
       I love Johnny Rebel. I love Racism.
       I love Papa John. I love the **** Word.
       I love António de Oliveira Salazar. I love the Estado Novo.
       I love Godfrey of Bouillon. I love the Crusades.
       I love Slobodan Milošević. I love Kebab Removal.
       I love Madison Grant. I love Eugenics.
       I love Eric Clopper. I love Intactivism.
       I love Francisco Franco. I love Fascism.
       I love R Kelly. I love Human Urinals.
       I love Meir Kahane. I love the Jewish Defense League.
       I love Tomás de Torquemada. I love the Spanish Inquisition.
       I love Stephen Miller. I love Migrant Detention Centers.
       I love General Custer. I love Indian Removal.
       I love Derek Chauvin. I love His Mighty Knee.
       I love Cecil Rhodes. I love Colonialism.​[/quote]
       But this got me thinking: if our enemies think reproduction at
       an earlier age is beneficial to their objectives, does it follow
       that reproduction at a later age is beneficial to our
       objectives?
       The technical backdrop is that the later in life the parents
       conceive, the more time their eggs and sperm have had to mutate,
       and hence the more mutations are likely to be present in the
       conceived offspring. I do not dispute this.
       Instead, I posit that the more neotenous are likely to tend to
       reproduce at a later age, since they physically mature more
       slowly. This might be how an initial neotenization event during
       the Neolithic Revolution (since it would likely have been those
       personally least suited to hunting who would have had the most
       incentive to come up with farming) produced the additional
       mutations conducive to the other Aryan traits that we value,
       whereas the non-neotenized, continuing to reproduce earlier
       (despite also switching to farming after being taught it by us),
       failed to produce such mutations and hence continued to lack
       Aryan traits:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/mythical-world/uneducable-gentiles/
       Going by my observations of present-day people, I have noticed
       that while lower-neoteny men do not always reproduce early
       (mainly due to economic considerations), when they do reproduce
       later it is often with younger women (which they have a fairly
       consistent preference for). Higher-neoteny men seem to have less
       preference for younger women. This last observation might appear
       counterintuitive (if you imagine higher-neoteny men feel younger
       themselves and hence guess that they prefer younger women more
       than lower-neoteny men do), but applying my model it makes sense
       that it is the other way round.
       #Post#: 21269--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: rp Date: August 2, 2023, 8:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So higher neoteny men don't necessarily prefer younger women,
       but do you think it would be best for them to reproduce with
       young women regardless to avoid potential non-Aryan mutations?
       #Post#: 21272--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 2, 2023, 9:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No, more mutations are what we need! Those with non-Aryan
       mutations can always themselves be prohibited from reproducing.
       But we aren't going to achieve our racial ideal without further
       neotenization, which requires further mutations. Recall:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/questions-debates/people-with-'aryan-phenotype'/msg15212/#msg15212
       [quote]Perfect humans would be so neotenous as to be physically
       incapable of reproducing. The fact that Aryan bloodlines exist
       is evidence that Aryans are not perfect humans, but merely good
       enough to figure out what perfect humans should be like (see
       bold).
       Hopefully we can eventually breed a batch of fully neotenous
       humans as the endpoint of National Socialism, but such a batch
       would by definition be the last generation.
       ...
       If our breeding program does not go wrong, each new generation
       will be more neotenous than the previous, until eventually we
       reach the last generation that will physically remain children
       their entire lives. Because:
  HTML https://assets.ldscdn.org/78/72/78722287310fb46b8cff931600df9e66c310a52d1057634/meme_bible_matthew_children.jpeg[/quote]
       #Post#: 21273--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: rp Date: August 2, 2023, 9:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Are maturation and the Aryan mutations independent of each
       other? What I mean is, are the Aryan mutations the result of
       reproducing at a later age, or simply maturing sexually at a
       later age? For example, if the non-Aryans who had matured
       earlier had waited until a later age to reproduce, would they
       have gotten similar mutations?
       #Post#: 21274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 2, 2023, 10:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is unclear at present. It should be theoretically possible
       for non-Aryans who reproduce late to get an Aryan mutation, but
       it still wouldn't be the same ones that a contemporaneous Aryan
       who reproduces late gets. For example, a robust person F who
       reproduces late might (if lucky) get Gracilization Level 1,
       while a contemporaneous gracile person G reproducing late might
       (if lucky) get Gracilization Level 9. I doubt it is possible for
       F to get Gracilization Level 9 without ancestors who had already
       collected Gracilization Levels 1-8 (in which case F would not be
       robust!), no matter how late they leave it to reproduce.
       #Post#: 22093--------------------------------------------------
       College students in Zhengzhou compete for sperm quality
       By: Zhang Caizhi Date: September 14, 2023, 2:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       College students in Zhengzhou compete for sperm quality, with
       highest allowance of $837
       [quote]
       Male college students in Zhengzhou, Central China's Henan
       Province, will compete in a sperm-quality competition,
       participants of which could claim an allowance of up to 6,100
       yuan ($837). The competition has been set up as a move to
       encourage sperm donation from local young people.
       According to the statement from the official WeChat account of
       Henan Province Human Sperm Bank, the event will have a winner by
       evaluating the concentration, motility, volume, sperm
       malformation rate and the comprehensive power of their sperm.
       Joining the competition will be free of charge and winners could
       even be awarded up to 6,100 yuan.
       The competition result will be anonymously announced in the form
       of data, according to the sperm bank.
       Many college students from Zhengzhou, left their real names
       under the statement online and express their readiness for the
       sperm competition and donation.
       One of them who claimed to be a student from Zhengzhou
       University asked for likes from other netizens and claimed that
       he would donate the amount of sperm according to how many
       "likes" he gained from the netizens.
       An employee from the sperm bank told media that the purpose of
       the competition is to call for more college student to donate
       their sperm since their sperm quality is better.
       According to the employee, the donation process will last two to
       three months and the donors have to live in Zhengzhou in a long
       term.
       The employee advised the donors to make appointment in advance
       since there is a daily quota for sperm donation.
       As of the end of 2022, there were 29 sperm banks across the
       country. In February, sperm banks in multiple places across the
       country called for donation from the local college students and
       the topic of "less than 20 percent of the donors' sperm being
       qualified for sperm donation" aroused heated discussions.
       Global Times
       [/quote]
  HTML https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202309/1298085.shtml
       #Post#: 24229--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Human evolution speeding up? 
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 29, 2023, 8:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wtf?
  HTML https://www.deseret.com/2015/9/24/20572960/overweight-men-are-more-likely-to-have-sons-but-at-a-cost
       [quote]New research suggests that overweight men are more likely
       to father sons, according to a study from the journal Fertility
       and Sterility.
       The study, which looked at 8,500 couples who were in fertility
       treatments, found that slim men had 611 boys and 569 girls,
       while overweight men were 27 percent more likely to have sons,
       according to Metro.
       “The present study is the first to report that overweight and
       obese men lead to a higher sex ratio at birth compared with
       normal weight men,” the study’s researchers said, according to
       Daily Mail.
       ...
       one explanation may be that overweight men carry more Y
       chromosomes in their sperm
       ...
       , overweight dads could also pass on negative health effects.
       For example, research from the University of South Wales found
       that obese children are more likely to be born to obese fathers,
       according to News.com. Specifically, the study found that
       grandsons of overweight grandfathers were more likely to be
       obese than grandsons of thinner grandfathers, according to
       news.com.[/quote]
       If we were in charge, only low BMI men (and women) would be
       allowed to reproduce.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page