URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18693--------------------------------------------------
       Islam above National Socialism
       By: antihellenistic Date: April 2, 2023, 12:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       After 6 years seeing and learning National Socialism. I more
       prefer Islamic national movement to make Western Civilization
       destroyed, seeing it's worldview and society rule is more
       clearly integrationist, socialistic, and empathic than anything.
       And it's  movement around the world still solid and exist, so it
       make our struggle more easily. But of course I'm not want to
       make more enemies, I still not want this forum got beaten by
       other rightist and false-leftist. I'm got many political and
       ideological insight from this National Socialism forum by the
       way. We still have common enemy and same goals. Destroy Western
       Civilization and regulate human beings from being degenerate
       further. I still share information and political knowledges on
       this forum, so don't worry.
       #Post#: 23245--------------------------------------------------
       Building American Idealism
       By: antihellenistic Date: October 30, 2023, 10:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you want to see the "Americanism" suit for anti-colonialism
       today, the "Americans" must keep this idealist got preserved and
       enforced :
       [quote]It may be wondered why a number of American
       anthropologists reject the concept of race. The answer has been
       given by two Polish anthropologists, Katarzyna Kaszycka and
       Goran Štrkalj (2002, p. 334). They write:
       Americans have become very sensitive to race, and the term has
       acquired strongly sensitive connotations. Many American
       scientists have opted for the non-existence of human races.
       Furthermore, the growing demands of “political correctness”
       militate against the use of the term in and outside science. . .
       . Few scientists dare to study racial origins, lest they be
       branded racists simply for being interested in the problem.
       The reason for the rejection of the concept of race by a number
       of American anthropologists is apparent from the title of
       Montagu’s book, Man’s Most Dangerous Myth. Montagu evidently
       believed that people’s consciousness of race is dangerous
       because it tends to foster racial antagonisms that can escalate
       into conflict. To prevent this, it would be better for the
       concept of race to be suppressed. In Europe, most
       anthropologists accept the validity of the concept of race.
       Thus, a survey of Polish anthropologists carried out in 2001
       found that 75 percent agreed with the proposition, “There are
       biological races within the species Homo sapiens” (Kaszycka and
       Strzalko, 2003). It is mainly in the United States that the
       existence of race has come to be denied by a number of
       anthropologists and a few biologists and social scientists who
       have sacrificed their scientific integrity to political
       correctness.[/quote]
       Source :
       Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis
       Second Revised Edition page 21
  HTML https://dn790009.ca.archive.org/0/items/RaceDifferencesInIntelligenceAnEvolutionaryAnalysis/%5BRichard_Lynn%5D_Race_Differences_in_Intelligence_A%28b-ok.xyz%29.pdf
       Of course, American leftism today is doing politics correctly.
       Their only wrongdoing are keeping the reds (Republicans,
       Alt-Rightist, and White Nationalist, Judaism) have the same
       rights as the leftist, so they hardly to be defeated.
       Recall :
       [quote]Judging someone’s worth according to performance, as far
       as Hitler was concerned, superseded questions of ethnic standing
       within the German community. Though many National Socialists
       based their world view on scientific research on race, the
       government under Hitler also relied on education to realize
       human potential. Goebbels wrote in his diary in June 1936, “the
       Führer sharply disapproves of the work of all the race
       committees." Hitler based his attitude on the potential negative
       impact such activities could exercise on national unity.[/quote]
       Source :
       (2013. Richard Tedor, Hitler's Revolution, Ch. 1, 'The Nation as
       One' section)
       Hitler did "political correctness" long before counter-culture
       and leftism rising on "Americans"
       #Post#: 23366--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islam above National Socialism
       By: observer Date: November 3, 2023, 7:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       coal take, there is no contradiction between the two biggest
       abrahamic religions and a national socialist lifestyle, now
       something is to be said about how much these fit into aryanism
       but they certainly are a good start if you are just trying to
       live a noble life, placing one above the other creates an
       imbalance that certain groups seeking to exploit division will
       attack earlier or later, presenting it as a "us / them" issue
       that "if you want to be national socialist, you MUST take a
       stand on"... anyways i neither want a christian supremacist in
       my ranks or a muslim one, both's hostility is unfounded and
       results from an improper reading of noble scripture, much in the
       opposite of the ignoble jewish religion that preaches hostility
       in a proper reading...
       #Post#: 23370--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Islam above National Socialism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: November 3, 2023, 8:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The Islamist vs National Socialist debate is over whether to
       rely on enforced* tradition alone (Islamist belief) or whether
       racial idealism is needed (National Socialist belief). The
       following are examples of National Socialist quotes that an
       Islamist would disagree with:
       "This method is: first, to create better fundamental conditions
       of social development by establishing a profound feeling for
       social responsibilities among the public; second, to combine
       this feeling for social responsibilities with a ruthless
       determination to prune away all excrescences which are incapable
       of being improved." - Adolf Hitler
       Islamism is basically just the first item. The Islamist believes
       everyone can be improved enough via tradition that none need to
       be pruned.
       "It is less a matter of artificially improving the existing
       generation - which, owing to human characteristics, is
       impossible in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred - and more a
       matter of securing from the very start a better road for future
       development." - Adolf Hitler
       The Islamist believes a hundred out of hundred can be improved
       via tradition.
       "Nothing would be a worse mistake on our part than to seek to
       educate the masses there [Russia]. It is to our interest that
       the people should know just enough to recognise the signs on the
       roads." - Adolf Hitler
       The Islamist thinks educating Russians is the way to go.
       (* That this itself is often initiated violence is also
       frequently downplayed by Islamists.)
       *****************************************************