DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Mythical World
*****************************************************
#Post#: 29666--------------------------------------------------
Re: The "Black" and "Whit
e" Identity Politics Scam
By: EU Date: March 24, 2025, 11:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Most ancient Europeans had dark skin, eyes and hair up until
3,000 years ago, new research finds
[quote]Most prehistoric Europeans had dark skin, hair and eyes
well into the Iron Age, about 3,000 years ago, new research
finds.
Scientists found that the genes that cause lighter skin, hair
and eyes emerged among early Europeans only about 14,000 years
ago, during the late stages of the Paleolithic period — also
known as the "Old Stone Age." But these light features were only
sporadic until relatively recently, said study senior author
Silvia Ghirotto, a geneticist at the University of Ferrara in
Italy.
Lighter skin may have carried an evolutionary advantage for
Europeans because it enabled people to synthesize more vitamin D
— needed for healthy bones, teeth and muscles — in Europe's
weaker sunlight. But lighter eye color — blue or green, for
example — does not seem to have had major evolutionary
advantages, and so its emergence may have been driven by chance
or sexual selection, Ghirotto told Live Science in an
email.[/quote]
Entire article:
HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/most-ancient-europeans-had-dark-skin-eyes-and-hair-up-until-3-000-years-ago-new-research-finds/ar-AA1AN5EZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=670257622da94c94ad25fbc00ad0e3c8&ei=29
#Post#: 29684--------------------------------------------------
Re: The "Black" and "Whit
e" Identity Politics Scam
By: PooPooHead Date: March 25, 2025, 7:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=EU link=topic=1787.msg29666#msg29666
date=1742876114]
Most ancient Europeans had dark skin, eyes and hair up until
3,000 years ago, new research finds
[quote]Most prehistoric Europeans had dark skin, hair and eyes
well into the Iron Age, about 3,000 years ago, new research
finds.
Scientists found that the genes that cause lighter skin, hair
and eyes emerged among early Europeans only about 14,000 years
ago, during the late stages of the Paleolithic period — also
known as the "Old Stone Age." But these light features were only
sporadic until relatively recently, said study senior author
Silvia Ghirotto, a geneticist at the University of Ferrara in
Italy.
Lighter skin may have carried an evolutionary advantage for
Europeans because it enabled people to synthesize more vitamin D
— needed for healthy bones, teeth and muscles — in Europe's
weaker sunlight. But lighter eye color — blue or green, for
example — does not seem to have had major evolutionary
advantages, and so its emergence may have been driven by chance
or sexual selection, Ghirotto told Live Science in an email.
Entire article:
HTML https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/most-ancient-europeans-had-dark-skin-eyes-and-hair-up-until-3-000-years-ago-new-research-finds/ar-AA1AN5EZ?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=670257622da94c94ad25fbc00ad0e3c8&ei=29[/quote]
Ah, now I see why you moved this post here? Turns out Max Muller
was right, and Bryant has in fact been proven wrong?:
[quote]Muller may have well felt the need to stress that "an
ethnologist who speaks of an Aryan race, Aryan eyes and hair,
and Aryan blood is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of
a dolicocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar"; after
all, it was he who had been a principal cause in such
misconceptions through his earlier remarks on the common blood
that the "English soldier" shared with the "dark Bengali".
(Muller 1854a, 29-30; ) quoted from Bryant, E. F. (2001). The
Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture : the Indo-Aryan
migration debate. Oxford University Press. chapter 1.[/quote]
Surprise, surprise! Even back in Muller's time, the Aryanist was
actually the anti-racist, while the westerner remains the true
racist...
#Post#: 29685--------------------------------------------------
Re: Aryanism vs Hyperboreanism
By: MaxMuller Date: March 25, 2025, 7:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Ah, now I see why you moved this post here? Turns out Max Muller
was right, and Bryant has in fact been proven wrong?:
[quote]
Muller may have well felt the need to stress that "an
ethnologist who speaks of an Aryan race, Aryan eyes and hair,
and Aryan blood is as great a sinner as a linguist who speaks of
a dolicocephalic dictionary or a brachycephalic grammar"; after
all, it was he who had been a principal cause in such
misconceptions through his earlier remarks on the common blood
that the "English soldier" shared with the "dark Bengali".
(Muller 1854a, 29-30; ) quoted from Bryant, E. F. (2001). The
Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture : the Indo-Aryan
migration debate. Oxford University Press. chapter 1.[/quote]
Surprise, surprise! Even back in Muller's time, the Aryanist was
actually the anti-racist, while the westerner remains the true
racist...
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page