URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: True Left vs Right
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 25964--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
       By: antihellenistic Date: April 15, 2024, 9:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Competitive, Western Behaviour
       [quote]Like a tug-of-war between two teams, highly competitive
       individuals strongly yearn for success and they make every
       effort to beat their rivals. Given this motivation, how do such
       competitors allocate resources? In particular, do competitive
       individuals care for opponents' interests, or do they only
       strive to maximize their own gains? Additionally, are
       competitive individuals more likely to endorse manipulation as a
       means to surpass others? These questions motivated this study.
       We aim to expand the understanding of competitiveness.
       Specifically, we examine how competitive individuals perform in
       hypothetical resource allocation games and the relationships
       between competitiveness and Machiavellianism.
       As an individual difference, competitiveness was first studied
       in sports (Triplett, 1898) and its construct has been gradually
       expanded. Hyper-competitiveness (i.e. competing to win; CW)
       constitutes a neurotic need to win at any cost to maintain a
       sense of self-worth and power (Horney, 1937). Hyper-competitive
       individuals exhibit a strong desire to compete; and winning
       strengthens their self-esteem and feeling of superiority over
       others. They regard rivals as enemies and might use unfair
       strategies to win (Orosz et al., 2018). Studies have
       investigated how competitiveness relates to the Big Five
       personality traits. For instance, CW is positively related to
       neuroticism but negatively related to agreeableness (Fletcher &
       Nusbaum, 2008; Ross et al., 2003). Additionally, CW is
       positively associated with dominance (Ryckman et al., 1996) and
       aggressive driving behavior (Houston et al., 2003). Thus, CW is
       regarded as unhealthy competitiveness (Ryckman et al., 2009).
       In contrast to the more extreme CW, a broader type of
       competitiveness – general competitiveness (i.e. competing to
       surpass; CS) was introduced later. CS indicates a desire to win
       in interpersonal situations but does not stress a neurotic need
       (Spence & Helmreich, 1978) like CW does. CS is a potentially
       adaptive characteristic in varied occupations. Some studies have
       investigated the relationships between CS and other personality
       traits. For example, it is found that CS is positively related
       to neuroticism (e.g., anxiety and anger facets) and extraversion
       (e.g., assertiveness and excitement-seeking facets) but
       negatively related to agreeableness (Fletcher & Nusbaum, 2008).
       ...
       Research consistently indicates that CW and Machiavellianism are
       positively related in Western culture (e.g., Houston, Queen, et
       al., 2015; Mudrack et al., 2012).[/quote]
       Source :
       Zhang, M., Andersson, B., & Wang, F. (2021). Are competitive
       people less altruistic and more manipulative? Associations among
       subtypes of competitiveness, hypothetical altruism, and
       Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 181,
       111037–111037.
  HTML https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111037
       #Post#: 28195--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
       By: antihellenistic Date: October 9, 2024, 2:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western Capitalist and Liberalist Economic Systems make a
       Rightist Darwinian Way of Life Continuing
       [quote]While the law [of competition] may be sometimes hard for
       the individual, it is best for the race, because it insures the
       survival of the fittest in every department. We accept and
       welcome, therefore, as conditions to which we must accommodate
       ourselves, great inequality of environment, the concentration of
       business, industrial and commercial, in the hands of the few,
       and the law of competition between these, as being not only
       beneficial, but essential for the future progress of the
       race[/quote]
       - Andrew Carnegie, The Gospel of Wealth (p. 655)
       #Post#: 28196--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Exposing people with the Western Darwinian Worldview
       By: antihellenistic Date: October 9, 2024, 2:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]To aid the bad in multiplying is, in effect, the same as
       maliciously providing for our descendants a multitude of
       enemies. Institutions which 'foster good-for-nothings' commit an
       unquestionable injury because they put a stop to that natural
       process of elimination by which society continually purifies
       itself.[/quote]
       - Herbert Spencer, 1874. Study of Sociology. London: MacMillan.
       #Post#: 28393--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
       By: antihellenistic Date: October 26, 2024, 6:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western Moral Rightism : Eugenics
       [quote][s]Christianity[/s] Judeo-Christianity and Eugenics:
       Eugenics (from Greek εὖ (eû, “well”) +
       γένος (génos, “born”)) is the
       improvement of the human population via artificial selective
       pressure; through methods such as: selective breeding,
       sterilisation, genetic screening and segregation. While we speak
       of artificial means, eugenics is a naturally occurring process
       (albeit significantly slower) that has refined and improved the
       human population since our creation.
       The philosophy of artificial eugenics was first developed by
       Francis Galton (Charles Darwin's cousin) and inspired by his
       cousin's theory of evolution. Eugenics works on the basic
       principle of increasing reproduction of ‘desirables’ and
       decreasing reproduction of ‘undesirables.’
       While there are moral and biblically sound methods of eugenic
       artificial selective pressure, such as those prior listed, there
       are extremely immoral methods that contradict scripture, such as
       murder, through euthanasia, culling and abortion.
       Murder, especially that of children (abortion), is wicked,
       depraved and under no circumstances is a biblically acceptable
       method of eugenics [Genesis 9:6, Job 24:14]; however
       preventative methods that stop the initial creation of
       undesirable offspring without any harm, is acceptable.
       Eugenics was widely and openly practiced in the Western World in
       the early 20th century with major support from Christians who
       biblically justified it on the following principles:
       —Honouring God’s Image— (Eugenics forbidden to alter our
       morphology and anatomy. [Genesis 1:27])
       —Prevention of Suffering— (Responsibility to prevent suffering
       brought on by poor genetic health and disorders, which are all
       the product of mutations after our creation. [Acts 10:38; Luke
       9:2])
       —Stewardship of Creation— (Safeguarding God’s creation [Genesis
       1] includes maintaining the ecological balance of the natural
       world, which includes population improvement, which is already
       employed for flora and fauna for increased usefulness and
       condition hardening.)
       —Healthfulness— (Responsibility to maintain the health of our
       bodies, including genetic health.)
       —God's Laws of Nature— (In nature the fitter better perpetuate
       their genes among their population which makes the population
       fitter.)
       —Be Fruitful and Multiply— (The reckless breeding of the unfit
       is not fruitful, God created Adam as a thoroughbred which shined
       over the world like a light among the darkness as the pinnacle
       of His creation. [Genesis 1:28; 9:1,7])
       Why should eugenics be employed for mankind?
       
       Increased intelligence, ancestral purification, improved
       athletic ability, removal of genetic disorders, improved natural
       health, increased quality of life, increased life expectancy,
       decreased artificial health needs, decreased dietary and water
       requirements, improved immune system, increased resiliency to
       diseases, increased resiliency to climate and extreme
       temperatures, as well many other benefits.[/quote]
       Source :
  HTML https://t.me/TheFascifistArchive/11997
       #Post#: 29882--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
       By: antihellenistic Date: April 10, 2025, 11:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western Eugenic Culture Rise Again
       [quote]After the Second World War, a kind of insanity took over
       that is only now beginning to fade. The title of the Times
       article I started with is a question: Should we optimize human
       life? Of course we should. That’s what education, health care,
       culture, and technology are all about. You could argue that if
       we have the means to improve our species, we have a duty to
       improve it.
       What has held us back for decades is the fear that if we start
       taking human genetics seriously again, we can no longer pretend
       there aren’t genetic differences between races. We’ve even gone
       through a period when we’re supposed to pretend that race has
       nothing to do with genes or biology — that it’s a “social
       construct.”
  HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/16-1-768x578.jpg
       When’s the last time professors and journalists tried to make us
       believe anything so colossally stupid?
       And even now, we’re supposed to worry that only rich white
       people can afford embryo selection, so our intolerable racial
       gaps will get even more intolerable. The Times article calls
       this prospect “dystopian.”
  HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/17-768x386.png
       Even so, after decades of deliberate ignorance, I see signs of
       light.[/quote]
       Source :
       Taylor, J. (2025, April 10). We’re All Eugenicists Now -
       American Renaissance. Retrieved April 11, 2025, from American
       Renaissance website:
  HTML https://www.amren.com/videos/2025/04/were-all-eugenicists-now/
       #Post#: 30697--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Exposing people with the Western Darwinian Worldview
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 1, 2025, 7:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Continuing from:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/msg30681/#msg30681
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hHURLv9RcW4
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page