DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 1350--------------------------------------------------
Communist Party
DIR By: Cthens
Date: October 2, 2020, 4:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Before I became an Aryanist, i was joining the PCUSA. Now they
are heavily helping me join. Should I Join?
#Post#: 1352--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communist Party
DIR By: guest5
Date: October 2, 2020, 4:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Absolutely!
--- Quote ---
> In fact, the attitude of entryism is not to treat the entered
organization as an enemy organization at all, but rather as a
potential future ally. Entryists are loyal to the entered
organization. Entryists work with the entered organization and
for the aims of the entered organization. The only difference
between an entryist and an ordinary loyal member of the
organization is that the entryist attempts to place the aims of
the organization in the larger context of his movement’s
ideological goals. For example, an entryist into a political
party will try his genuine best to help that party gain power,
but will also persuade that party to use its power for the sake
of a more profound idea. The best example of such a project is
the entryism of Dietrich Eckart and Hitler himself into the DAP,
which by their influence later became the NSDAP.
--- End Quote ---
HTML http://aryanism.net/politics/beyond-propaganda/entryism/
--- Quote ---
> I am a German Communist. — Goebbels
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
>
> Lenin is the greatest man, second only to Hitler, and that the
difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is very
slight. — Goebbels
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 1353--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communist Party
DIR By: Cthens
Date: October 2, 2020, 4:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Wow I've never heard those two quotes! Awesome thank you. Also
another question that probably shouldn't be included in this
thread? Should we be preparing for a civil war in the US? How
numerous is our support?
#Post#: 1354--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communist Party
DIR By: guest5
Date: October 2, 2020, 11:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> “Expect nothing, but be prepared for anything.”
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> We’ve learned that the mind avoids stress, seeks comfort, and
plays tricks to skirt stress. Knowing these mental tendencies
allows us to notice when tricks occur, stop such thought
processes, and redirect attention in ways to deal with the
stress. Recall that learning is converting something stressful
into something that becomes comfortable. This conversion cannot
occur if we give into the mind’s tricks to skirt stress.
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> When the student expects an attack from one direction, her
attention is directed only there. Meaning, she can’t be
attentive to all directions. When she learns not to expect an
attack from any particular direction she is attentive to all
directions.
--- End Quote ---
HTML https://warriorsway.com/expectations/
HTML https://www.azquotes.com/public/picture_quotes/cf/4d/cf4d97bc513e75cb162f1dbd218f96ab/yamamoto-tsunetomo-751424.jpg
"How numerous is our support?"
HTML https://www.brainyquote.com/photos_tr/en/m/margaretmead/100502/margaretmead1-2x.jpg
In fact, it only takes one Arhat to change the world....
HTML https://i.pinimg.com/originals/ba/db/2f/badb2fdc745941eebb488f2e5eead4bd.jpg
#Post#: 1457--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communist Party
DIR By: Killthebank
Date: October 9, 2020, 8:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I'm confused. Those Goebbels quotes contradict what is written
here:
HTML http://aryanism.net/politics/national-socialism-and-communism/
Did Goebbels lie or was he confused about what communism really
was?
#Post#: 1500--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communist Party
DIR By: guest5
Date: October 12, 2020, 7:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Did Goebbels lie or was he confused about what communism really
was?
If you read Mein Kampf you'll see that the NSDAP was trying to
pull Marxists and Bolsheviks out of the Jewish Communist camp
into the NSDAP. Goebbels was trying to appeal to these people
with statements such as the ones I quoted.
--- Quote ---
> To attract people, to win over people to that which I have
realised as being true, that is called propaganda. In the
beginning there is the understanding, this understanding uses
propaganda as a tool to find those men, that shall turn
understanding into politics. Success is the important thing.
Propaganda is not a matter for average minds, but rather a
matter for practitioners. It is not supposed to be lovely or
theoretically correct. I do not care if I give wonderful,
aesthetically elegant speeches, or speak so that women cry. The
point of a political speech is to persuade people of what we
think right. I speak differently in the provinces than I do in
Berlin, and when I speak in Bayreuth, I say different things
from what I say in the Pharus Hall. That is a matter of
practice, not of theory. We do not want to be a movement of a
few straw brains, but rather a movement that can conquer the
broad masses. Propaganda should be popular, not intellectually
pleasing. It is not the task of propaganda to discover
intellectual truths. Those are found in other circumstances, I
find them when thinking at my desk, but not in the meeting hall.
— Goebbels, Speech on 9 January 1928 to an audience of party
members at the "Hochschule für Politik", a series of training
talks for Nazi party members in Berlin
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> “You talk of socialism! Is it not right for the German worker,
after the past 60 years have proven the complete bankruptcy of
his political ideal, to feel despair about socialism and the
future of his class?”
> “Never! Because:
> 1. He fought for 60 years not for socialism, but for Marxism.
Marxism, whose theories are fatal to peoples and races, is the
exact opposite of living socialism.
> 2. Marxism was never the political idea of a German worker. He
only accepted this jumble of Jewish ideas because he had no
other choice in his struggle for the freedom of his class.
> 3. Marxism is the death not only of nationally-minded peoples,
but above all of the class that fights with total devotion for
its realization: the working class.
> The worker has no right to doubt socialism, but rather the
duty to doubt Marxism. The sooner he does that, the better. The
clock has almost struck midnight.”
>
> — Goebbels, Der Nazi-Sozi, Elberfeld: Verlag der
Nationalsozialistischen Briefe, (1927)
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> Lenin sacrificed Marx and instead gave Russia freedom. You
want to sacrifice German freedom for Marx. Even the Bolshevik
Jew has clearly recognized the compelling necessity of the
Russian national state and has early and wisely adjusted himself
to it.
>
> — Goebbels, Rebuke to German communists. National Socialism or
Bolshevism? (Nationalsozialismus oder Bolschewismus?) NS-Briefe
(October 25, 1925)
--- End Quote ---
--- Quote ---
> All propaganda has a direction. The quality of this direction
determines whether propaganda has a positive or negative effect.
Good propaganda does not need to lie, indeed it may not lie. It
has no reason to fear the truth. It is a mistake to believe that
the people cannot take the truth. They can. It is only a matter
of presenting the truth to people in a way that they will be
able to understand. A propaganda that lies proves that it has a
bad cause. It cannot be successful in the long run. A good
propaganda will always come along that serves a good cause. But
propaganda is still necessary if a good cause is to succeed. A
good idea does not win simply because it is good. It must be
presented properly if it is to win. The combination makes for
the best propaganda. Such propaganda is successful without being
obnoxious. It depends on its nature, not its methods. It works
without being noticed. Its goals are inherent in its nature.
Since it is almost invisible, it is effective and powerful. A
good cause will lose to a bad one if it depends only on its
rightness, while the other side uses the methods of influencing
the masses. We are, for example, firmly convinced that we fought
the war for a good cause, but that was not enough. The world
should also have known and seen that our cause was good.
However, we lacked the effective means of mass propaganda to
make that clear to the world. Marxism certainly did not fight
for great ideals. Despite that, in November 1918 it overcame
Kaiser, Reich, and the army because it was superior in the art
of mass propaganda. — Goebbels, Nuremberg Rally 1934, Der
Kongress zur Nürnberg 1934 (Munich: Zentralverlag der NSDAP.,
Frz. Eher Nachf., 1934), pp. 130-141.
--- End Quote ---
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1