URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Colonial Era
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 17367--------------------------------------------------
       Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: January 4, 2023, 10:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl Marx Views on
       Race
       Read the sentences which given bold and red-colored bold to
       quickly know the content without longtime reading
       1. [b]John Locke (1632 - 1704), British Liberal Philosopher[/b]
       --- Quote ---
       > Although he wrote against slavery in general, Locke was an
       investor and beneficiary of the slave trading Royal Africa
       Company. In addition, while secretary to the Earl of
       Shaftesbury, Locke participated in drafting the Fundamental
       Constitutions of Carolina, which established a quasi-feudal
       aristocracy and gave Carolinian planters absolute power over
       their enslaved chattel property; the constitutions pledged that
       "every freeman of Carolina shall have absolute power and
       authority over his negro slaves".
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke#Slavery_and_child_labour
       ...
       --- Quote ---
       > ...Eighteen-century American colonist were hardly alone in
       their hipocrisy. They were, indeed in the company of their
       seventeenth-century philosophical forebears, among the greatest
       of whom was John Locke. The preeminent theorist of natural
       rights and human freedom was himself a merchant adventurer in
       the African slave trade and an instrument of English colonial
       policy who proposed legislation to ensure that "every freeman of
       Carolina shall have absolute power and authority over his negro
       slaves."
       --- End Quote ---
       John Locke was contributed to the enforcement of constitution's
       rule of Carolina's British colonial territory which contents of
       law was this sentences. The sentences was about treatment on
       "black" slavery by "white" British on territory of Carolina:
       [b]
       --- Quote ---
       > But yet no slave shall hereby be exempted from that civil
       dominion his master hath over him, [color=red][b]but be in all
       other things in the same state and condition he was in before.13
       --- End Quote ---
       But he considered some of enslavements are "unjust", like this
       historical records of enslavement of group of people by group of
       people :
       --- Quote ---
       > His few examples are only of unjust enslavement :
       [color=red]Greek Christians by the Turks, Israelites by the
       Assyrians, Anglo-Saxons by the Danes.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0090591786014002005
       --- Quote ---
       > ...his long colonial service and personal interests which
       began in 1667 upon joining the household of Anthony Ashley
       Cooper—merchant adventurer, [color=red][b]Lord Proprietor of
       Carolina, and, in 1672, Earl of Shaftesbury and Lord Chancellor.
       Besides serving as Ashley’s personal secretary and counselor
       (for fifteen years), Locke served as secretary to the Lords
       Proprietors of Carolina (between 1671 and 1675) and the Council
       of Trade and Foreign Plantations (from 1673 to 1674). He also
       gained financially from his service under Ashley, investing
       alongside his patron in the Royal African Company (£400 in 1674
       and £200 more in 1675) and in the Bahamas trade (£100 in 1675)
       which he liquidated at profit (in 1676).8 Locke remained in
       Shaftesbury’s colonial affairs until late 1682 when Shaftesbury
       fled to Holland and fell mortally ill. To judge by reading and
       correspondence, Locke never ceased to be informed about the new
       world, even during his political exile between 1683 and 1690. He
       again accepted colonial service from 1696 to 1700, under William
       III, as a leading commissioner of the Board of Trade for
       colonial affairs.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/epdf/10.1177/0090591708317899
       2. Voltaire (1694 - 1778), French Liberal Philosopher
       --- Quote ---
       > Unlike most other philosophes, Voltaire – a self-described
       ‘merchant philosopher’ – held shares in the Compagnie des Indes
       throughout his adult life.15 The Compagnie administered trading
       colonies in South Asia and possessed a monopoly over the French
       transatlantic slave trade until it was absorbed by the Crown in
       1769.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Voltaire inherited three shares in the Compagnie des Indes
       from his father on 1st January 1722, when the trading company’s
       principal commercial activity was the transatlantic slave trade;
       he boasted of them to the marquise de Bernières the year he
       acquired them, noting that ‘a good part of my fortune’ was
       invested in the organization.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > In the midst of the British siege on Pondicherry, as he was
       clearly concerned with the fate of French India, Voltaire
       received a manuscript called the Ezourvedam from Louis Laurent
       de Fayd’herbe, the chevalier de Maudave.89 The text took the
       form of a dialogue between two Brahmins: Chumontou, who ‘defends
       the unity of God’, and Biache, a superstitious figure ‘immersed
       in the darkness of idolatry,’ which ‘Chumontou rejects … as
       contrary to good sense.’90 Voltaire was captivated by the
       Ezourvedam and its potential to legitimize disputes about the
       origin of humanity and the morality of coercing labour from
       certain peoples. Unaware of the fact that it was a forgery
       written by the French Jesuit Jean Calmette, Voltaire dedicated
       the fourth chapter of the 1761 edition of his Essay on Universal
       History to the supposedly ancient Indian text. He argued that
       the Ezourvedam disproved the Book of Genesis: the manuscript’s
       purported antiquity showed that humans existed before Adam and
       Eve and that therefore the Old Testament presented an incorrect
       and possibly derivative account of human genesis. Thus, Voltaire
       contended, this manuscript confirmed his longstanding belief
       that humans of different races were created in different events
       and thus that ‘the black race is a species of man different from
       ours’.9
       >
       > ...
       >
       > In the Letters of Amabed, Voltaire draws on the Ezourvedam,
       and writes through the eyes of Amabed, another fictional Indian.
       Amabed wonders ‘whether [Africans] have descended from the apes,
       or whether the apes have come from them’, before concluding with
       the latter, as ‘Our sages have said that man is the image of
       GOD.’101 As this late output clearly shows, Voltaire did not
       change his views on the essential inferiority of Black Africans;
       however, he notably stopped referring to slavery as something
       inherently associated with Blackness, despite mentioning the
       trade in his Letters of Amabed. This coincided with increasing
       revolts in France’s slave plantations and growing public
       sentiment in metropolitan Europe against slavery.102
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://academic.oup.com/hwj/article/doi/10.1093/hwj/dbac025/6693575?login=false
       How Voltaire see the Jews :
       --- Quote ---
       > He praised the Jews' "sober and regular way of life, their
       abstinence, their toil." ... Rousseau spoke of the Jews with
       understanding sympathy.10
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://archive.org/details/rousseaurevoluti00dura/page/630/mode/2up?q=630&view=theater
       How Voltaire see the Chinese and their culture :
       --- Quote ---
       > He further maintained that a rational government should model
       itself after the Chinese empire, making the pursuit of wisdom
       derived from 'the natural laws' the 'principal administrative
       objective of the government' as well as the basis of civil
       society.12
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://books.google.co.id/books?redir_esc=y&hl=id&id=v6hGGJ2Jj7gC&q=190#v=snippet&q=190&f=false
       How Voltaire see Islam :
       --- Quote ---
       > In 1748, after having read Henri de Boulainvilliers and George
       Sale,[166] he wrote again about Mohammed and Islam in "De
       l'Alcoran et de Mahomet" ("On the Quran and on Mohammed"). In
       this essay, Voltaire maintained that Mohammed was a "sublime
       charlatan"[f] Drawing on complementary information in Herbelot's
       "Oriental Library", Voltaire, according to René Pomeau, adjudged
       the Quran, with its "contradictions, ... absurdities, ...
       anachronisms", to be "rhapsody, without connection, without
       order, and without art".[167][168][169][170]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltaire#Islam
       3. David Hume (1711 - 1776), Scotland Liberal Philosopher
       --- Quote ---
       > "I am apt to suspect the negroes to be naturally inferior to
       whites. There scarcely ever was a civilized nation of that
       complexion, nor even any individual eminent either in action or
       speculation.11
       >
       > ...
       >
       > ...Hume's racism was deliberate rather than casual. The
       revision proves that Hume did seriously consider objections to
       his racist position. His response, however, was to sharpen his
       attack on blacks further. His racism should thus be read as
       something he was willing to defend, rather than as an offhand
       remark.
       >
       > Villanova University
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://www.jstor.org/stable/2709889?read-now=1&seq=3#metadata_info_tab_contents
       4. Immanuel Kant (1724 - 1804), German Liberal Philosopher
       --- Quote ---
       > Although he is attentive to the possibility of fluidity and
       change over time he also undermines this by falling back on a
       schema of fixed racial characteristics that condemned certain
       peoples, Blacks above all, to an inferior status. Given Kant’s
       scholarly authority, his works carried considerable weight among
       his contemporaries, and he bears considerable responsibility for
       amplifying abhorrent stereotypes developed first by slaveowners
       in the Caribbean. But over his career he seems to have become
       aware of his own contradictions, and his ideas appear to have
       evolved considerably. By the end of his life he was forcefully
       denouncing colonial conquest and slavery and mocking the
       self-important claims of Europeans. Scholars debate today
       whether Kant’s ideas of universal freedom can be divorced from
       his own racial categories in order to use them to fight against
       racial essentialism.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://blackcentraleurope.com/sources/1750-1850/kant-on-the-different-human-races-1777/
       ...
       [color=red]
       --- Quote ---
       > [color=red][b]Native Americans, he goes on, are a race (or
       rather, a semi-race) stunted in its development because their
       ancestors migrated to a different climate before they had fully
       adapted to their earlier environment. As a result, they are
       weak, inert, ‘incapable of any culture’; and they occupy the
       lowest level of the racial hierarchy that Kant claims to have
       determined:
       >
       > That their temperament has not become entirely adequate to any
       climate can also be inferred from the fact that it is hard to
       find any other reason why this race, which is too weak for hard
       labour and too indifferent for industrious work, and which is
       incapable of any culture3 even though there are enough examples
       and encouragement in the vicinity [namely, the example set by
       the European colonial settlers], stands far below even the
       Negro, who occupies the lowest of all other levels which we have
       mentioned as racial differences (TPP 8: 176).
       >
       > ...
       >
       > He cites Hume’s comment that no Negro has ever shown any
       talent, concluding (2: 253) that the differences between blacks
       and whites are ‘essential’ and seem to be ‘as large with regard
       to mental powers as they are in colour’.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://pure.rug.nl/ws/files/2768306/Kants_second_thoughts_on_race.pdf
       --- Quote ---
       > While Kant's perspective on the topic of European colonialism
       became more balanced, he still considered Europeans "civilized"
       to the exception of others:
       >
       > But to this perfection compare the inhospitable actions of the
       civilized and especially of the commercial states of our part of
       the world. The injustice which they show to lands and peoples
       they visit (which is equivalent to conquering them) is carried
       by them to terrifying lengths. America, the lands inhabited by
       the Negro, the Spice Islands, the Cape, etc., were at the time
       of their discovery considered by these civilized intruders as
       lands without owners, for they counted the inhabitants as
       nothing. In East India (Hindustan), under the pretense of
       establishing economic undertakings, they brought in foreign
       soldiers and used them to oppress the natives, excited
       widespread wars among the various states, spread famine,
       rebellion, perfidy, and the whole litany of evils which afflict
       mankind.
       >
       > — Immanuel Kant, "Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical
       Sketch" (1795)[177]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant#Racism
       5. Karl Marx (1818 - 1883), German Communist Philosophers
       --- Quote ---
       > "Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of
       countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe
       out North America from the map of the world and you will have
       anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization.
       Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of
       nations.10- Karl Heinrich Marx
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       1.
  HTML https://archive.org/details/karlmarxracistfullcopyi
       2.
  HTML https://archive.org/details/handbookofmarxism/page/n351/mode/2up
       3.
  HTML https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.228834/page/n107/mode/2up
       Hitler's view about race (1889 - 1945)
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/5e1670c61b0f2f430e3300eb6352dc5a/4f15adcd00022294-a8/s1280x1920/855f5d7658133a87b54d7ae6a4708ef219f5cfc4.jpg
       Source : Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler
       (Hitler-Bormann Documents) page 13. Hitler's Recorded
       Conversation on 7th February 1945
       --- Quote ---
       > “...The third point is that a person must be racially
       flawless. Let him be Germanic, or Roman, or Chinese, or a Jew,
       or an Indian, or a Negro, and so on. I respect all equally. We
       can work with and count on all of them. Each has his established
       traits. Depending on what one is looking for, this one or that
       one is to be preferred for the job in question. It is no
       different with people than with horses or dogs. Once one has
       established the proper race for a particular task, one can rest
       assured that the task will be resolved" - Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 143
       --- Quote ---
       > “That is how I see the parties of today’s Germany from the
       racial standpoint. “If, starting from this realization, we
       examine the advantages and disadvantages of keeping the races
       and tribes apart in our German fatherland, we can see nothing
       but disadvantages! The German Volk would only be more
       splintered, set against one another, atomized by stirring up the
       racial problems; so it would be rendered insignificant asfar as
       foreign policy goes. That is why I have forbidden more than once
       and at the next Gauleiter conference I shall unequivocally
       repeat my prohibition against any talk or writing about racial
       theory and the racial problem. We must do precisely the
       opposite! The community of the Volk, the community of the Volk,
       the community of the Volk. that must be our battle ciy!
       Everything that unites and allies the strata must be brought
       out, cultivated, and promoted, and everything that separates
       them, everything that serves to awaken the old prejudices must
       be avoided, fought against, removed. We must make good the
       mistakes that were made on both sides" - Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 213
       --- Quote ---
       > “Much as I gaze in awe at the Jews’ laws for maintaining and
       preserving the purity of their race, I must nevertheless proceed
       from my belief that racial theories, should they become the
       subject of public discussion, may prove a national disaster
       rather than a blessing. - Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 213, 214
       --- Quote ---
       > “We must accept the mixing of blood as it is. We must not call
       one blood worse than another, one mixture better than another.
       Rather, we must employ other means to breed a higher form from
       this gray mass. We must try’ to bring to the surface the
       valuable traits of the people living in Germany, to cultivate
       and to develop them, and we must find ways and means to prevent
       the propagation of all the bad, inferior, criminal, and decadent
       tendencies and all the congenital diseases so damaging to the
       Volk. - Adolf Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant Page 214
       --- Quote ---
       > “I’m very glad, Herr Hitler, to hear you say this. There’s
       such a lot of nonsense talked about blond men, about the Nordic
       race, about the cult of Wotan and the spirit ofthe Edda, as if
       no one else on the globe had any right to exist, or at best to
       exist only in a second-class position, as subhuman creatures.
       These idiotic windbags have no idea what harm their spouting
       causes. For all they do is arouse inferiority complexes and
       hatred in those who don’t happen to be lucky enough to be blond,
       and so they divide the German Volk into two racial halves: the
       Germanic and the non-Germanic people.”
       >
       > “I’ve expressly and repeatedly forbidden this sort of thing!”
       Hitler interrupted, flaring up. “All that rubbish about the
       Thing places, the solstice festivals, the Midgard snake,1 and
       all the rest of the rubbish they dredge up from German
       prehistory! Then they read Nietzsche with fifteen-year-old boys
       and,using incomprehensible quotations, paint a picture ofthe
       superman, exhorting the boys: ‘That is you—or that is what you
       are to become.’
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 277
       --- Quote ---
       > "...Negroes, on the other hand, were granted them only in
       exceptional cases, when they had made themselves deserving
       through especially outstanding achievements for the Empire. ...
       “I have a similar institution in mind for Germany. - Adolf
       Hitler
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Wagener - Hitler Memoirs of a Confidant page 289
       --- Quote ---
       > "We have this people of ours that are not to be defined as a
       race, and that is now clear to millions. However, gentlemen:
       when I began my apprenticeship twentyfive years ago, this was
       not so; there I was always told by middle-class bourgeois
       circles:Yes, people and race are one and the same! No – people
       and race are not the same. Race is a component of blood, a blood
       nucleus, but the people are very often composed not of one race
       but of two, three, four or five different racial nuclei." -
       Adolf Hitler's Speeches on Platterhof 26 May 1944
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and
       Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces page 86
       John Locke, Voltaire, David Hume, Immanuel Kant, and Karl Marx
       were devout White Nationalist
       Hitler was Betraying White Nationalist?
       #Post#: 18813--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: 90sRetroFan
       Date: April 11, 2023, 5:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our old enemy Paul Gottfried (Jew) concedes to us again:
  HTML https://chroniclesmagazine.org/featured/marx-was-not-woke/
       --- Quote ---
       > Marx was not in the least concerned with nonbinary oppression,
       raging homophobia, or the inherently evil nature of being white.
       This father of “scientific socialism” focused on socioeconomic
       antagonisms expressing themselves as class conflict.
       > ...
       > by the 1960s, blacks had become more and more drawn into
       revolutionary activism, although they would soon be joined by
       others in what can be described as the post-Marxist left.
       Although members of what eventually evolved into the woke,
       antifascist left looked for an “oppressed class,” their choices
       had nothing to do with Marx’s proletariat. The real working
       class wanted nothing to do with cultural revolutionaries, and
       fights broke out between the two groups in American cities in
       the 1960s.
       > ...
       > Corporate capitalists who donate money to the Democratic
       National Committee and to its counterparts in Western Europe and
       the Anglosphere will not go begging if the eco-militants get
       their way. The state-protected rich are already making profits
       by converting to green energy. The corporate class enjoys the
       benefits of government contracts and having their earnings
       protected in tax-exempt funds. If capitalists pour their money
       into Black Lives Matter, critical race theory, and LGBT, it is
       not because they are Marxists. Rather, they represent what Pedro
       Gonzalez characterizes as “the counterrevolution of the left.”
       > ...
       > Behemoth, a famous Marxist study published by Franz Neumann in
       1934, seems to be as applicable to our present ruling class as
       it was to economic elites under the Third Reich. Neumann’s study
       may be describing our woke capitalists even more plausibly than
       those German plutocrats whom Neumann thought were building a
       corporate state in alliance with Hitler. Curiously, German
       industrialists and bankers may have been more reluctant to jump
       onto the Nazi train than our corporate elites have been to join
       the cheering gallery for gender reassignment and anti-white
       racism.
       --- End Quote ---
       I am especially pleased to see Gottfried academically agree with
       us that wokeism is closer to Hitlerism (which he as a Jew of
       course dislikes) than to Marxism.
       --- Quote ---
       > Unlike Marxism, moreover, the woke left has long ceased paying
       homage to science
       > ...
       > Woke beliefs have no necessary connection to what is
       empirically provable, since from the woke perspective, Western
       science and empirical demonstration are tainted by white,
       masculine, racist prejudice. Communism in Europe, at least in
       practice, never showed the frenzied nihilistic energy that seems
       endemic to the woke left. From tearing down statues to
       abolishing genders to inciting mob violence against white
       Americans to throwing open borders for invasion by Third World
       migrants, the woke left seems far more socially and culturally
       destructive than most past Communist governments.
       > ...
       > It opposes particularity, at least in the Western white world,
       and works to obliterate anything that is specifically Western.
       Indeed, wokeism offers the example of a thoroughly unhinged left
       that Communist governments and parties, as well as the Cold War
       in the West, all kept in check. Wokeism privileges those with
       deviant sexual appetites, anti-Christian and antiwhite
       fixations, and repugnance for bourgeois institutions, groups
       whom the Communists quite properly kept from rising in their
       parties and governments. The Communists held generally
       traditional moral views even if they practiced tyranny.
       --- End Quote ---
       "Anti-Christian" is of course an inaccurate description of
       wokeism. Wokeism is Christian and hence anti-traditional. It is
       communism which was anti-Christian and hence traditional.
       --- Quote ---
       > by the end phase of the Cold War in the 1980s,
       neoconservatives were frequently making the charge that
       Communist regimes discriminated against homosexuals. This charge
       was perfectly true because in comparison to leftward-drifting
       Western countries, Communist governments were, in some sense,
       more socially conservative.
       --- End Quote ---
       Homophobia of course comes from Judaism, not from Christianity.
       --- Quote ---
       > Moreover, those Eastern European governments—including the
       northeastern parts of Germany—that were formerly under Soviet
       control have resisted woke takeover far better than Western
       Europe, the U.S., and the Anglosphere.
       --- End Quote ---
       This is what I have been saying all along, for which I get
       called "Anglophile" as an insult. The simple truth is that the
       Counterculture never happened in Turandom like it happened in
       the Anglosphere. How much of this is due to communism insulating
       Turandom from Counterculture media and how much because of
       Turanian blood conferring immunity to wokeism requires further
       study.
       From the enemy comments:
       --- Quote ---
       > As someone who was born and raised in a former communist
       country in Eastern Europe, I full agree with Paul’s theses.
       Communism, in practice, is almost the exact opposite of wokism
       in the US. The features which it shares…as Paul points out…are
       common to many other ideas and political forms throughout
       history.
       >
       > From a cultural perspective, all the communist countries in
       E.E. were very socially conservative by Western standards. Not
       just today’s Western standards, but even the contemporary ones.
       --- End Quote ---
       I am always happy to reach academic agreement with our enemies
       before exterminating them. And all of Turandom must indeed be
       exterminated. We will finish what Hitler started.
       See also:
  HTML http://aryanism.net/blog/aryan-sanctuary/the-last-word-on-marxism/
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg6274/#msg6274
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/true-left-breakthrough-anti-whiteness-476/msg6764/#msg6764
       #Post#: 18839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: April 13, 2023, 7:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Karl Marx's White Nationalism
       He promoting racial theory from French ethnologist to his close
       associate to made Communist ideology, Friedrich Engels through
       correspondence
       --- Quote ---
       > Letter to Friedrich Engels, August 7, 1866
       >
       > ...
       >
       > A very important work which I shall send on to you (but on
       condition that you send it back, as it is not my property) as
       soon as I have made the necessary notes, is: ‘P. Trémaux,
       Origine et Transformations de l’Homme et des autres Êtres, Paris
       1865. In spite of all the shortcomings that I have noted, it
       represents a very significant advance over Darwin. The two chief
       theses are: croisements [crossings] do not produce, as is
       commonly thought, variety, but, on the contrary, a unity typical
       of the espèces. The physical features of the earth, on the other
       hand, differentiate (they are the chief, though not the only
       basis). Progress, which Darwin regards as purely accidental, is
       essential here on the basis of the stages of the earth’s
       development, dégénérescence, which Darwin cannot explain, is
       straightforward here; ditto the rapid extinction of merely
       transitional forms, compared with the slow development of the
       type of the espece, so that the gaps in palaeontology, which
       Darwin finds disturbing, are necessary here. Ditto the fixity of
       the espece, once established, which is explained as a necessary
       law (apart from individual, etc., variations). Here
       hybridisation, which raises problems for Darwin, on the contrary
       supports the system, as it is shown that an espece is in fact
       first established as soon as croisement with others ceases to
       produce offspring or to be possible, etc.
       >
       > In its historical and political applications far more
       significant and pregnant than Darwin. For certain questions,
       such as nationality, etc., only here has a basis in nature been
       found. E.g., he corrects the Pole Duchinski, whose version of
       the geological differences between Russia and the Western Slav
       lands he does incidentally confirm, by saying not that the
       Russians are Tartars rather than Slavs, etc., as the latter
       believes, but that on the surface-formation predominant in
       Russia the Slav has been tartarised and mongolised; likewise (he
       spent a long time in Africa) he shows that the common negro type
       is only a degeneration of a far higher one.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source: Marx-Engels Collected Works, Volume 42, p. 303; First
       published: in Der Briefwechsel zwischen F. Engels und K. Marx,
       Stuttgart, 1913
  HTML https://wikirouge.net/texts/en/Collection:Marx-Engels_Collected_Works/Volume_42
       Friedrich Engels reply his letter positively to agree on its
       theory on discriminating the "non-whites"
       --- Quote ---
       > Letter to Karl Marx, October 2, 1866
       >
       > Regarding Moilin and Trémaux I will write at greater length in
       the next few days; I have not quite finished reading the latter
       yet, but I have come to the conclusion that there is nothing to
       his whole theory because he knows nothing of geology, and is
       incapable of even the most common-or-garden literary-historical
       critique. That stuff about the **** Santa Maria and the whites
       turning into Negroes is enough to make one die of laughing.
       Especially the idea that the traditions of the Senegal ****
       necessarily deserve credence, just because these fellows cannot
       write! In addition, it is another pretty notion of his to
       ascribe the differences between a Basque, a Frenchman, a Breton,
       and an Alsatian to the surface-structure, which is, of course,
       also to blame for the people speaking four different languages.
       >
       > Perhaps the man will demonstrate in the 2nd volume how he
       explains that we Rhinelanders on our Devonian transitional
       massif (which has not been covered again by the sea since long
       before the coal was formed) did not become idiots and **** ages
       ago, or else he will assert that we are really ****.
       >
       > The book is utterly worthless, pure theorising in defiance of
       all the facts, and for each piece of evidence it cites it should
       itself first provide evidence in turn.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source : Source: Marx-Engels Collected Works, Volume 42, p. 320;
       First published: in Der Briefwechsel zwischen F. Engels und K.
       Marx, Stuttgart, 1913.
  HTML https://wikirouge.net/texts/en/Letter_to_Karl_Marx,_October_2,_1866
       #Post#: 20459--------------------------------------------------
       Re: NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization)
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: June 17, 2023, 8:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > Holding up a mirror to mainstream philosophy, this provocative
       book explains the evolving outline of the racial contract from
       the time of the New World conquest and subsequent colonialism to
       the written slavery contract, to the "separate but equal" system
       of segregation in the twentieth-century United States. According
       to Mills, the contract has provided the theoretical architecture
       justifying an entire history of European atrocity against
       non-whites, from David Hume's and Immanuel Kant's claims that
       blacks had inferior cognitive power, to the Holocaust, to the
       kind of imperialism in Asia that was demonstrated by the Vietnam
       War.
       --- End Quote ---
       The Racial Contract Paperback – June 21, 1999
  HTML https://www.amazon.com/Racial-Contract-Charles-W-Mills/dp/0801484634
       #Post#: 20521--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: Zea_mays
       Date: June 19, 2023, 10:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Recall that Engels and Marx wanted to completely eliminate
       "counter-revolutionary" Slavic peoples:
       --- Quote ---
       > Entire races would be left behind after a workers' revolution,
       feudal remnants in a socialist age; and since they could not
       advance two steps at a time, they would have to be killed. They
       were racial trash, as Engels called them, and fit only for the
       dung-heap of history.
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/national-socialism-is-revolutionary-not-reactionary/msg11178/#msg11178
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/national-socialism-is-revolutionary-not-reactionary/msg11179/#msg11179
       This plan was later attributed to National Socialists, even
       though their propaganda was explicitly integrationist towards
       Slavic individuals who rejected communism:
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/national-socialism-is-revolutionary-not-reactionary/msg11243/#msg11243
       ------
       Marx was rather impolite towards one of the leaders of the first
       successful political party to profess a Marxist ideology:
       --- Quote ---
       > Ferdinand Lassalle (born 11 April 1825, died 31 August 1864)
       was a Prussian-German jurist, philosopher, socialist and
       political activist who is best remembered as the initiator of
       the social-democratic movement in Germany. "Lassalle was the
       first man in Germany, the first in Europe, who succeeded in
       organising a party of socialist action"
       > [...]
       > Lassalle and Marx became friends during the Revolutions of
       1848. When the protests were crushed, Lassalle was imprisoned
       and Marx fled Germany. They continued correspondence through
       letters, and would not meet again until 1861. In the meantime
       Marx grew to distrust Lassalle under influence of Engels, who
       had never much sympathy for him. Marx often responded to
       Lassalle's warm letters by mirroring this tone, but in his
       letters to Engels he expressed antipathy towards Lassalle,
       including calling him "the Jewish n***er Lassalle".[31] Lassalle
       continued to believe that their friendship was genuine until at
       least 1862.[32] Franz Mehring called Marx's "attitude to
       Lassalle [...] the most difficult psychological problem his life
       offers".[33]
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Lassalle#Relations_with_Marx
       #Post#: 22954--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Leftists against progressivism
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: October 21, 2023, 8:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Christoph Meiner, the Progressivist Counter-Revolutionary
       Politicians
       --- Quote ---
       > Meiners, with his preoccupation with human beauty and his
       counterrevolutionary politics, shadows the background of German
       racial theory.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > In the early 1790s, Meiners began to move racial discourse in
       Gottingen beyond comparisons between Europeans and non-Europeans
       and to concentrate on an intra-European hierarchy of lightness
       and beauty, with ancient Germans on top.24 In a series of
       articles vaunting the superiority of Germans among Europeans,
       Meiners describes non-German Europeans' color as 􀁔dirty
       white" and compares it unfavorably with the "whitest, most
       blooming and most delicate skin" of the Germans. The early
       Germans he describes as "taller, slimmer, stronger, and with
       more beautiful bodies than all the remaining peoples of the
       earth." Meiners maintains, following Tacitus, that Germans
       possess the prized quality of racial purity. By the late
       eighteenth century, Meiners was making claims for stereotypical
       Nordic Teutonic attributes that some in the academic world would
       echo for another hundred years.25 That was radical enough, but
       he did not stop there.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People - Nell Irvin Painter Page 67 and 69
       About Meiner :
       --- Quote ---
       > Christoph Meiners (31 July 1747 – 1 May 1810) was a German
       racialist, philosopher, historian, and writer born in Warstade.
       He supported the polygenist theory of human origins. He was a
       member of the Göttingen School of History.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Meiners was a polygenist: he believed that each race had a
       separate origin. He was a very early practitioner of scientific
       racism. Meiners studied the physical, mental and moral
       characteristics of each race, and built a race hierarchy based
       on the evidence that was considered common in scientific and
       anthropological circles at the time. Meiners split humanity into
       two divisions which he labeled the "beautiful White race" and
       the "ugly Black race".
       >
       > ...
       >
       > ...Meiners claimed the Negro was the most unhealthy race on
       earth because of the Negro's poor diet, mode of living and lack
       of morals he said.[4]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > ...Meiners also claimed Native Americans were an inferior
       stock of people. He claimed that Indians cannot adapt to
       different climates, different types of food or modes of life and
       that when they are exposed to these new conditions they lapse
       into a “deadly melancholy”.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Meiners wrote that the noblest race was the Celts, and they
       were able to conquer various parts of the world, were more
       sensitive to heat and cold and their delicacy is shown by the
       way they are selective about what they eat. Meiners claimed
       Slavs are an inferior race, "less sensitive and content with
       eating rough food”; he described stories of Slavs eating
       poisonous fungi without coming to any harm. He claimed that
       their medical techniques were also backwards such as the Slavs
       baking sick people in ovens then making them roll in the
       snow.[4]
       >
       > Below the Slavs are the peoples of the Middle East and Asia,
       all limited in intelligence and of an evil disposition, which
       goes together with lack of adaptability and insensitivity.[4]
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christoph_Meiners
       Revolutionary Worldview :
       --- Quote ---
       > National Socialism in fact constituted a unique and radical
       kind of modern revolutionism. — Stanley G. Payne in A History of
       Fascism, 1914-1945. pg. 204
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote ---
       > We are not a charitable institution but a Party of
       revolutionary socialists. — Joseph Goebbels
       --- End Quote ---
       --- Quote ---
       > A negro with his taboos is far superior to a human who firmly
       believes in Transubstantiation. - Adolf Hitler, December 13,
       1941
       --- End Quote ---
       Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 146
       ...
       --- Quote ---
       > The dirt was visible on the blacks only when the missionaries,
       in order to teach them decorum, obliged them to wear clothes. In
       its natural state, the negro is very clean. For a missionary,
       the smell of dirt is agreeable. From this point of view, they
       themselves are the dirtiest pigs. They have water horrors. Adolf
       Hitler, February 19, 1942
       --- End Quote ---
       Source: Adolf Hitler - Table Talk pages 319 - 320
       --- Quote ---
       > The white races did, of course, give some things to the
       natives, and they were the worst gifts that they could possibly
       have made, those plagues of our own modern world-materialism,
       fanaticism, alcoholism and syphilis. For the rest, since these
       peoples possessed qualities of their own which were superior to
       anything we could offer them, they have remained essentially
       unchanged. Where imposition by force was attempted, the results
       were even more disastrous, and common sense, realizing the
       futility of such measures, should preclude any recourse to their
       introduction. One solitary success must be conceded to the
       colonizers: everywhere they have succeeded in arousing hatred, a
       hatred that urges these peoples, awakened from their slumbers by
       us, to rise and drive us out. - Adolf Hitler, 7th February 1945
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       Bormann, Martin – Testament of Adolf Hitler (Hitler-Bormann
       Documents) Page 13 - 14
       #Post#: 22988--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: October 23, 2023, 3:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thomas Carlyle
       --- Quote ---
       > This Teutonic/Saxon race chauvinism increased in Carlyle and
       Emerson as they aged, but far more so in Carlyle. His
       identification with his Saxons as Germans seemed boundless, as
       he completely embraced German nationalism and Teutonic race
       chauvinism along the lines of Charles Villers and romantics like
       the two Schlegels, de Stael's friends.22 As early as 1820. in
       his twenty-fifth year, Carlyle was already admiring German
       writers for the "muscle in their frames. ,,23 A decade later. he
       was delivering popular lectures on German themes. One of several
       1837 lectures was entitled "On the Teutonic People, the German
       Language. the Northern Immigration, andthe Nibelungen Lied." the
       pagan German epic that later inspired Richard Wagner's Ring
       cycle. It may seem odd to readers today, but when Carlyle spoke
       of "the German people," he was including much of the population
       of Britain. In any case, Carlyle came to sound a lot like the
       willfully excerpted version of Gelmania by the Roman author
       Tacitus, which was then beginning to circulate among German
       nationalists. Alert to the values of his time. Carlyle sexes his
       German nationalism masculine.
       >
       > His Germans are "the only genuine European people, unmixed
       with strangers. They have in fact never been subdued; and
       considering the great. open, and fertile country which they
       inhabit, this fact at once demonstrates the masculine and
       indomitable character of the race. They have not only not been
       subdued, but been themselves by far the greatest conquerors in
       the world. ,,24 Those themes of masculinity and race purity
       would soon reappear in Emerson, with masculinity of far greater
       consequence. On the matter of racial purity Emerson would waver.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 113
       About Thomas Carlyle :
       --- Quote ---
       > Thomas Carlyle was born on 4 December 1795 to James
       (1758–1832) and Margaret Aitken Carlyle (1771–1853) in the
       village of Ecclefechan in Dumfriesshire in southwest Scotland.
       His parents were members of the Burgher secession Presbyterian
       church.[16] James Carlyle was a stonemason, later a farmer, who
       built the Arched House wherein his son was born. His maxim was
       that "man was created to work, not to speculate, or feel, or
       dream."[17] Nicholas Carlisle, an English antiquary, traced his
       ancestry back to Margaret Bruce, sister of Robert the Bruce.[18]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Fielding writes that Carlyle "was often ready to play up to
       being a caricature of prejudice".[234] Targets for his ire
       included the French, the Irish, Slavs,[235] Turks, Americans,
       Catholics, and, most explicitly, blacks and Jews. According to
       Duffy, when he charged Carlyle with having "taught [John]
       Mitchel to oppose the liberation of the negroes and the
       emancipation of the Jews", Carlyle replied:
       >
       > Mitchel ... would be found to be right in the end; the black
       man could not be emancipated from the laws of nature, which had
       pronounced a very decided decree on the question, and neither
       could the Jew.[236]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Henry Crabb Robinson heard Carlyle at dinner in 1837 speak
       approvingly of slavery. "It is a natural aristocracy, that of
       colour, and quite right that the stronger and better race should
       have dominion!"[244] The 1853 pamphlet "Occasional Discourse on
       the **** Question" expressed concern for the excesses of the
       practice, considering "How to abolish the abuses of slavery, and
       save the precious thing in it."[245]
       --- End Quote ---
       Important information about Thomas Carlyle :
       --- Quote ---
       > While some Germans were eager to claim Carlyle for the Reich,
       others were more aware of incompatibilities. In 1936, Theodor
       Deimel argued that because of the "profound difference" between
       Carlyle's philosophical foundation of "a personally shaped
       religious idea" and the Völkisch foundation of National
       Socialism, the designation of Carlyle as the "first National
       Socialist" is "mistaken".[254] Ernst Cassirer rejected the
       notion of Carlyle as proto-fascist in The Myth of the State
       (1946), emphasizing the moral underpinning of his thought.
       Tennyson has also commented that Carlyle's anti-modernist and
       anti-egoist stances disqualify him from association with
       20th-century totalitarianism.[255]
       --- End Quote ---
       ...
       --- Quote ---
       > More recently, figures associated with neoreaction and the
       alt-right have claimed Carlyle as an influence, notably Curtis
       Yarvin,[218] Jonathan Bowden,[219] and Kerry Bolton.[220]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Carlyle#Racism_and_antisemitism
       Therefore National Socialism were reject Nordicism, not embrace
       it
       #Post#: 23002--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: October 24, 2023, 3:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       William Zebina Ripley
       --- Quote ---
       > William Zebina Ripley (October 13, 1867 – August 16, 1941) was
       an American economist, lecturer at Columbia University,
       professor of economics at MIT, professor of political economy at
       Harvard University, and racial anthropologist. Ripley was famous
       for his criticisms of American railroad economics and American
       business practices in the 1920s and 1930s, and later for his
       tripartite racial theory of Europe. His work of racial
       anthropology was later taken up by racial physical
       anthropologists, eugenicists, white supremacists, Nordicists,
       and racists in general, and it was considered a valid academic
       work at the time, although today it is considered to be a prime
       example of scientific racism and pseudoscience.[1][2]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > The Races of Europe, overall, became an influential book of
       the era in the then-accepted field of racial taxonomy.[8]
       Ripley's tripartite system of racial classification was
       especially championed by the racist propagandist Madison Grant,
       who changed Ripley's "Teutonic" type into Grant's own Nordic
       type (taking the name, but little else, from Deniker), which he
       postulated as a master race.[9] It is in this light that
       Ripley's work on race is usually remembered today, though little
       of Grant's racist ideology is present in Ripley's original
       work.[citation needed]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Z._Ripley
       More information about William Zebina Ripley
       --- Quote ---
       > Ripley thereby conferred a measure of scientific recognition,
       although Lapouge's fanatic Aryanffeutonic chauvinism destroyed
       his standing in France. Questionable scholarship aside, Ripley
       had set out to transcend "the current mouthings" of the racist
       lunatic fringe, and his thoroughness inspired confidence for
       years. Ordinary readers judged his book scientific. and
       anthropologists hailed his methodology.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 149
       Georges Vacher de Lapouge
       --- Quote ---
       > Count Georges Vacher de Lapouge (French: [vaʃe də
       lapuʒ]; 12 December 1854 – 20 February 1936) was a French
       anthropologist and a theoretician of eugenics and scientific
       racism. He is known as the founder of anthroposociology, the
       anthropological and sociological study of race as a means of
       establishing the superiority of certain peoples.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > De Lapouge wrote L'Aryen: son Rôle Social (1899, "The Aryan:
       His Social Role"), in which he opposed the Aryan,
       dolichocephalic races to the brachycephalic races. Vacher de
       Lapouge thus classified human races: first the Homo europaeus,
       Nordic or fair-haired, then the Homo alpinus, represented by the
       Auvergnat and Turkic peoples, finally the Homo mediterraneus,
       represented by the Neapoletan or Andaluz peoples.
       >
       > Vacher de Lapouge endorsed Francis Galton's theory of
       eugenics, but applied it to his theory of races. Vacher de
       Lapouge's ideas are comparable to those of Henri de
       Boulainvilliers (1658–1722), who believed that the Germanic
       Franks formed the upper class of French society, whereas the
       Gauls were the ancestors of the peasantry. Race, according to
       him, thus became almost synonymous with social class. Vacher de
       Lapouge added to this concept of races and classes what he
       termed selectionism, his version of Galton's eugenics. Vacher de
       Lapouge's anthropology was intended to prevent social conflict
       by defining a fixed, hierarchical social order.[3][4]
       >
       > In 1926, he prefaced and translated Madison Grant's
       publication The Passing of the Great Race (Le Déclin de la
       Grande Race, Payot, 1926). He also translated one work of Ernst
       Haeckel into French.[5][6]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Vacher_de_Lapouge#
       Ernst Haeckel
       --- Quote ---
       > Haeckel divided human beings into ten races, of which the
       Caucasian was the highest and the primitives were doomed to
       extinction.[37] In his view, 'Negroes' were savages and Whites
       were the most civilised: for instance, he claimed that '[t]he
       Negro' had stronger and more freely movable toes than any other
       race, which, he argued, was evidence of their being less
       evolved, and which led him to compare them to '"four-handed"
       Apes'.[38]
       >
       > In his Ontogeny and Phylogeny Harvard paleontologist Stephen
       Jay Gould wrote: "[Haeckel's] evolutionary racism; his call to
       the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to
       a 'just' state; his belief that harsh, inexorable laws of
       evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring
       upon favored races the right to dominate others ... all
       contributed to the rise of Nazism."[39]
       >
       > In his introduction to the Nazi party ideologue Alfred
       Rosenberg's 1930 book, [The Myth of the Twentieth Century],
       Peter Peel affirms that Rosenberg had indeed read Haeckel.[40]
       >
       > In the same line of thought, historian Daniel Gasman states
       that Haeckel's ideology stimulated the birth of Fascist ideology
       in Italy and France.[41]
       >
       > However, Robert J. Richards notes: "Haeckel, on his travels to
       Ceylon and Indonesia, often formed closer and more intimate
       relations with natives, even members of the untouchable classes,
       than with the European colonials." and says the Nazis rejected
       Haeckel, since he opposed antisemitism, while supporting ideas
       they disliked (for instance atheism, feminism, internationalism,
       pacifism etc.).[42]
       --- End Quote ---
       Important information about Ernst Haeckel
       --- Quote ---
       > The principal arguments of historians who deny a meaningful
       connection between Haeckel and Nazism are that Haeckel's ideas
       were very common at the time, that Nazis were much more strongly
       influenced by other thinkers, and that Haeckel is properly
       classified as a 19th-century German liberal, rather than a
       forerunner to Nazism.[91][92] They also point to
       incompatibilities between evolutionary biology and Nazi
       ideology.[93]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > ...Nazi propaganda guidelines issued in 1935 listed books
       which popularized Darwin and evolution on an "expunged list".
       Haeckel was included by name as a forbidden author.[96] Gunther
       Hecht, a member of the Nazi Department of Race Politics, also
       issued a memorandum rejecting Haeckel as a forerunner of
       Nazism.[97] Kurt Hildebrandt, a Nazi political philosopher, also
       rejected Haeckel.[97] Eventually Haeckel was rejected by Nazi
       bureaucrats.[98]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernst_Haeckel#
       #Post#: 23034--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: October 25, 2023, 2:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Henry Herbert Goddard
       --- Quote ---
       > Henry Goddard kindly pronounced intelligence testing "the most
       valuable piece of information which mankind has ever acquired
       about itself. . . a unitary mental process [that is] the chief
       determiner of human conduct." 13
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 201
       About Henry Herbert Goddard
       --- Quote ---
       > Henry Herbert Goddard (August 14, 1866 – June 18, 1957) was a
       prominent American psychologist, eugenicist, and segregationist
       during the early 20th century. He is known especially for his
       1912 work The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of
       Feeble-Mindedness,[2] which he himself came to regard as flawed
       for its ahistoric depiction of the titular family, and for
       translating the Binet intelligence test into English in 1908 and
       distributing an estimated 22,000 copies of the translated test
       across the United States. He also introduced the term "moron"
       for clinical use.[2]
       >
       > ...
       >
       >
       > At the May 18, 1910, annual meeting of the American
       Association for the Study of the Feeble-Minded, Goddard proposed
       definitions for a system for classifying individuals with
       intellectual disability based on intelligence quotient (IQ).
       Goddard used the terms moron for those with an IQ of 51–70,
       imbecile for those with an IQ of 26–50, and idiot for those with
       an IQ of 0-25 for categories of increasing impairment. This
       nomenclature was standard for decades. A moron, by his
       definition, was any adult with a mental age between eight and
       twelve. Morons, according to Goddard, were unfit for society and
       should be removed from society either through
       institutionalization, sterilization, or both.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Goddard was a strong advocate of eugenics. Although he
       believed that "feeble-minded" people bearing children was
       inadvisable, he hesitated to promote compulsory sterilization –
       even though he was convinced that it would eliminate
       intellectual disability – because he did not think such a plan
       could gain widespread acceptance. Instead, he suggested that
       colonies should be established where the "feeble-minded" could
       be segregated.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > ...the Jews, Hungarians, Italians, and Russians"; however, he
       immediately followed this up by stating that "the figures would
       only need to be revised (reduced) by a relatively small amount"
       because "[very obviously high-grade intelligent immigrants] were
       so small a part of the group [of Ellis Island immigrants] that
       they did not noticeably affect the character of the group."
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Claims are made that the Immigration Act of 1924 was strongly
       influenced by intelligence testing, which was backed up by the
       American Psychologist.[10]
       --- End Quote ---
       Charles Davenport
       --- Quote ---
       > For Davenport, Poles, Irish, Italians, Hebrews, and others
       behaved differently, each according to their race. He believed,
       as did William Z. Ripley, that immigrants from southern and
       eastern Europe would make the American population "darker in
       pigmentation, smaller in stature, more mercurial. . .more given
       to crimes of larceny, kidnapping, assault, murder, ****, and sex
       immorality." 􀁼
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Undaunted, in 1922 Davenport' s Eugenics Record Office offered
       a model eugenical sterilization law meant to assist states in
       crafting involuntary sterilization laws that could withstand
       court challenge. In 1924 Virginia passed the first such act,
       stating that "heredity plays an important part in the
       transmission of insanity, idiocy, and imbecility, epilepsy, and
       crime." 19 The court test that followed increased the visibility
       of 􀁣degenerate families" and, in light of the
       long-standing prejudice against poor white southerners, gave
       degeneracy a poor and female southern face.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 193, 194
       About Charles Davenport
       --- Quote ---
       > Charles Benedict Davenport (June 1, 1866 – February 18, 1944)
       was a biologist and eugenicist influential in the American
       eugenics movement.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Davenport attempted to develop a comprehensive quantitative
       approach to human miscegenation. The results of their research
       was presented in the book Race Crossing in Jamaica (1929), which
       attempted to provide statistical evidence for biological and
       cultural degradation following interbreeding between white and
       black populations.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Sharing the racist views of many scientists during this time,
       those that Davenport considered to be genetically inferior
       included Black people and Southeastern Europeans.[1]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Charles Davenport spoke regularly with Congressman Albert
       Johnson, who was a cosponsor of the Immigration Act of 1924, and
       encouraged him to restrict immigration in that legislation.
       --- End Quote ---
       Important Information about Charles Davenport
       --- Quote ---
       > After Adolf Hitler's rise to power in Germany, Davenport
       maintained connections with various Nazi institutions and
       publications, both before and during World War II. He held
       editorial positions at two influential German journals, both of
       which were founded in 1935, and in 1939 he wrote a contribution
       to the Festschrift for Otto Reche, who became an important
       figure in the plan to "remove" those populations considered
       "inferior" in eastern Germany.[17] In a 1938 Letter to the
       Editor of Life magazine, he included both Franklin Roosevelt and
       Joseph Goebbels as examples of crippled statesmen who, motivated
       by their physical defects, have "led revolutions and aspired to
       dictatorships while burdening their country with heavy taxes and
       reducing its finances to chaos."[18]
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Although many other scientists had stopped supporting eugenics
       due to the rise of Nazism in Germany, Charles Davenport remained
       a fervent supporter until the end of his life.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Davenport
       Robert Yerkes
       --- Quote ---
       > Yerkes warned of the recently arrived foreign-born,
       "Altogether they are markedly inferior in mental alertness to
       the native-born American." He explained that differences between
       the white racial groups were " [a]lmost as great as the
       intellectual difference between negro and white in the
       army."􀂌 Once again, a scientist was speaking of "white
       racial groups" as a means of classification.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 201, 202
       About Robert Yerkes
       --- Quote ---
       > Robert Mearns Yerkes (/ˈjɜːrkiːz/; May 26,
       1876 – February 3, 1956) was an American psychologist,
       ethologist, eugenicist and primatologist best known for his work
       in intelligence testing and in the field of comparative
       psychology.
       > ...
       >
       > Yerkes used the results of tests such as these to argue that
       recent immigrants (especially those from Southern and Eastern
       Europe) scored considerably lower than older waves of
       immigration (from Northern Europe.) The results would later be
       criticized as very clearly only measuring acculturation, as the
       test scores correlated nearly exactly with the number of years
       spent living in the US. Nonetheless, the effects of Yerkes work
       would have a lasting effect on American xenophobia and
       anti-immigrant sentiment. His work was used as one of the
       eugenic motivations for harsh and racist immigration
       restrictions.[7]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Yerkes
       Carl Brigham
       --- Quote ---
       > Brigham was respecting the traditional American black white
       dichotomy. At the same time, he distributed white people across
       nineteen overlapping categories reflecting current antagonism
       toward immigrants from southern and eastern Europe. His four
       major groups consisted of native-born whites, total whites,
       foreign-born whites, and Negroes. Within these groups, Brigham
       differentiated between the above􀂏average foreigners and
       the below-average foreigners. Turks and Greeks just barely
       improved on the foreign-born average, while men from Russia,
       Italy, and Poland ranked at the bottom with the "Negro draft."
       Northwestern Europeans topped the chart,22
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 203
       About Carl Brigham
       --- Quote ---
       > Carl Campbell Brigham (May 4, 1890 – January 24, 1943) was an
       American eugenicist and professor of psychology at Princeton
       University's Department of Psychology and a pioneer in the field
       of psychometrics. He sat on the advisory council of the American
       Eugenics Society (today known as the Society for Biodemography
       and Social Biology)[1] and his early writings heavily influenced
       the eugenics movement and anti-immigration legislation in the
       United States. He created the SAT for The College Board.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > In 1923, Brigham published his influential book, A Study of
       American Intelligence. Analyzing the data from the World War I
       army mental tests, Brigham concluded that native-born
       (Caucasian) Americans had the highest intelligence out of the
       groups tested. He proclaimed the intellectual superiority of the
       "Nordic Race" and the inferiority of the "Alpine" (Eastern
       European), "Mediterranean", and "Negro" races and argued that
       immigration should be carefully controlled to safeguard the
       "American Intelligence". Brigham believed that in the early
       years of the twentieth century, American intelligence was
       declining because of recent immigration waves from Eastern
       Europe ("Carl Campbell Brigham: The Man who devised the SAT").
       Harvard Professor E.G. Boring suggested that Brigham was not
       collecting data with scientific purpose which biased his results
       in favor of his ideas (1923).
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Brigham
       #Post#: 23078--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Racial View of Western Philosopher from John Locke to Karl
       Marx
   DIR By: antihellenistic
       Date: October 26, 2023, 1:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Kenneth L. Roberts
       --- Quote ---
       > Kenneth L. Roberts (1885-1957) harbored a great distaste for
       southern and eastern Europeans especially Jews-and an abhorrence
       for racial "mongrelization." Both Roberts and Lorimer believed
       that immigration would extinguish the race of native Americans,
       because "races cannot be crossbred without mongrelization any
       more than dogs."
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Roberts termed immigration restriction "a matter of life and
       death for the American people." The threat was racial: either
       the United States would break up into a series of racial groups,
       fighting, bickering, haggling "over their alien racial
       differences," or, worse, 􀁣a new composite race of
       people wholly different from the Americans of the present day"
       would emerge, a motley, inefficient, mongrelized race.: Having
       roamed far and wide on the Post's dime. Roberts described Czechs
       as "backward, illiterate. dirty. thick-headed," and English
       workingmen as "runty, stunted, malformed, buck-toothed,
       obviously mal-nourished, diseased and generally wretched
       specimens." Southern Italians had descended from the mongrelized
       slaves of the Roman empire. Because the American nation, like
       ancient Greece and Rome, grew out of blond Nordic genius,
       mongrelization would ruin the United States as surely as it
       ruined the ancients.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Like Carl C. Brigham in A Study of American Intelligence.
       Roberts used the increasingly fashionable term 􀁣Nordic"
       to designate a superior race.
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 215, 216,
       217
       About Kenneth L. Roberts
       --- Quote ---
       > Kenneth Lewis Roberts (December 8, 1885 – July 21, 1957) was
       an American writer of historical novels. He worked first as a
       journalist, becoming nationally known for his work with the
       Saturday Evening Post from 1919 to 1928, and then as a popular
       novelist.
       --- End Quote ---
       
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Roberts_(author)#Immigration
       Edward Alsworth Ross
       --- Quote ---
       > Deemed an expert on immigration since his 1901 lecture on race
       suicide, Ross repeated familiar stereotypes in his widely read
       and influential The Old World in the New: The Significance of
       Past and Present Immigration to the American People (1914): Jews
       are loud and pushy; they lie and cheat; Jewish men pursue
       Gentile rather than Jewish girls. Ross repeated the familiar
       orthodoxy of the time that immigrants were lowering the level of
       American intelligence and American beauty. In a famous phrase
       echoing Shakespeare' s The Tempest, Ross called new immigrants
       􀁣the Caliban type" who "belong in skins, in wattled
       huts at the close of the Great Ice Age. These oxlike men are
       descendants of those who always stayed behind."':': Ross
       maintains, with many others at the time, that race purity
       produces beauty. As we know, William Z. Ripley had in 1908 also
       predicted that the crossing of heterogeneous strains would make
       Americans ugly. Ross foresees "a good many faces of a 'chaotic
       constitution,' " the outcome of the blending of "dissimilar"
       European races.
       >
       > ...
       >
       > Quotas should therefore severely limit the numbers of
       immigrants of certain races, never mind nationality. Like Carl
       C. Brigham in A Study of AmeIican Intelligence. Roberts used the
       increasingly fashionable term 􀁣Nordic" to designate a
       superior race
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
       The History of White People by Nell Irvin Painter page 217
       About Edward Alsworth Ross
       --- Quote ---
       > Edward Alsworth Ross (December 12, 1866 – July 22, 1951) was a
       progressive[1] American sociologist,[2] eugenicist,[3]
       economist,[4] and major figure of early criminology.[5]
       --- End Quote ---
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Alsworth_Ross
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 8
   DIR Next Page