DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 26273--------------------------------------------------
Re: Reproductive decolonization
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 1:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I wish this were true:
HTML https://twitter.com/MomsPostingLs/status/1786836011491725510?t=5BZQ_FTp9nwhlOG9JusbyQ&s=19
[Quote]
[Img]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GMwd4jaW8AAIMoz?format=jpg&name=medium[/img]
[/Quote]
#Post#: 26274--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Reproductive decolonization
By: Mujahid Date: May 5, 2024, 2:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
That’s just “white” women or “Asian” men hating on “white” men
becoming passport bros.
#Post#: 26275--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 5, 2024, 4:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Looks like a rightist account, so I'm guessing the former.
#Post#: 26276--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 4:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
What is your personal opinion on the Arctic Alliance? Do you
agree with WNs that "Yellows" are closer to "Whites" than other
"non Whites" are closer to "Whites"?
#Post#: 26278--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 5, 2024, 5:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"What is your personal opinion on the Arctic Alliance?"
Behaviour we would expect of the psychologically colonized.
"Do you agree with WNs that "Yellows" are closer to "Whites"
than other "non Whites" are closer to "Whites"?"
I do not. The cold habitat convergent evolution argument at best
applies only to northern "yellow" gene pools:
HTML https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Parham-Habibzadeh/publication/342118086/figure/fig2/AS:904147901628420@1592577066983/World-Temperature-Map-January-2020-to-February-2020.png
There is also no explanation by the Arctic Alliance proponents
of why cold-habitat-evolved New Worlders (Inuit etc.) are
excluded from the Arctice Alliance. I suggest the so-called
"Arctic Alliance" is actually subconscious Turanism. Since the
steppe does not reach the New World, the cold-habitat-evolved
New Worlders are excluded.
#Post#: 26279--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 5:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"I suggest the so-called "Arctic Alliance" is actually
subconscious Turanism."
If that is true, then why do rightists not view other Turanized
"non Whites" (e.g. Indians, Iranians) favourably? I assumed the
term "Arctic Alliance" was an implicit invocation of Giant blood
memory, as the Steppe is a temperate, not polar climate,
although now it does indeed seem somewhat contradictory that
New World arctic evolved peoples are not viewed in the same
positive light.
#Post#: 26280--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 5:52 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Going off the previous point, why is it that the female in
almost all "WMAF" relationships has a Gentile (Fuxishi) rather
than Turanian (Huaxia) phenotype? Perhaps the males do have
Giant blood memory, and hence would be willing to reproduce with
other Ice Age evolved "non Whites", but chose "Asians" as they
are the most populous and hence there is a large supply of them.
Or, perhaps, having Giant blood memory, they do not even care so
much about Ice Age blood so much as they do about Gentile blood
(with Giant blood being the first preference, since only Giant
blood (aside from Turanian blood) created the conditions
necessary for Western Civilization), and would even be willing
to reproduce with tropically evolved Indians, but are hesitant
due to the latter being less psychologically colonized (what
rightists call "prudish").
What do you think?
#Post#: 26282--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 5, 2024, 6:12 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"why do rightists not view other Turanized "non Whites" (e.g.
Indians, Iranians) favourably?"
Because India and Iran are not cold enough to begin with and
thus fail even the explicitly stated Arctic Alliance criterion.
The subonscious considerations only kick in after the conscious
criterion has been fulfilled.
"why is it that the female in almost all "WMAF" relationships
has a Gentile (Fuxishi) rather than Turanian (Huaxia)
phenotype?"
Please post pictures of what you mean. I need to confirm we are
thinking about the same phenotypes.
#Post#: 26283--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 6:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hmmm It looks like I may have been wrong.
Amy Chua (I would classify as Turanian leaning, because of the
"cat like" "deviant" smile)
[Img]
HTML https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/images/faculty/chua-amy.jpg[/img]
Priscilla Chan, a robust, but more Oblong, rather than square,
face shape, so I would classify as mixed (with very little Aryan
blood in the mixture, of course) rather than explicitly Fuxishi:
[Img]
HTML https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/no8qbiC_bY1bavdLpTdzfokxs5o=/0x0:4165x3280/1200x675/filters:focal(1750x620:2416x1286)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/55637287/GettyImages_615868688.0.jpg[/img]
Of course, Chua and Chan are both married and have reproduced
with Jews, so my face shape theory should still be accurate when
looking at couples where the male is a non Jewish "White"
liberal (i.e. a humanist with Giant blood memory).
#Post#: 26285--------------------------------------------------
Re: Arctic alliance
By: rp Date: May 5, 2024, 7:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Because India and Iran are not cold enough to begin with and
thus fail even the explicitly stated Arctic Alliance criterion.
The subonscious considerations only kick in after the conscious
criterion has been fulfilled."
This is similarly to what we were discussing earlier regarding
why WNs consider "White" Turanians superior to "non White"
Turanians: the Turanian-Giant mix in their mind is superior to
the Turanian-non-Giant-Gentile mix, due to Giants sitting atop
the Gentile hierarchy, although still being inferior to
Turanians in their minds.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page