DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 30830--------------------------------------------------
Re: Leftists against progressivism
By: rp Date: August 21, 2025, 11:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/arctotherium42/status/1958292427292454914?t=Qc6PtjuJPpCaezYqKo6-rA&s=19
[quote]
I still can't believe they put "be polite,' "plan for the
future," and "writing" as white culture.
[Quote]
This is a real infographic produced by the Smithsonian in 2020
to educate people on "the ways white people and their
traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized."
This is what President Trump means when he says the Smithsonian
has long been "OUT OF CONTROL."
[img width=511
height=1280]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gy0ckpcWAAApIDg?format=jpg&name=large[/img]
#Post#: 30985--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 17, 2025, 7:53 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uhxaqwEU4Nk
Actually, all fishers deserve to be killed, including Don Jr.
(whom Trump obviously would not kill):
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHUhYDnbLtg
But to imply (as False Leftist Cousins does) that fishers are
somehow less deserving of being killed than drug smugglers is
absurd (and actually puts Cousins in the same camp as Trump, who
by pretending that the fishers are drug smugglers as an excuse
to kill them implies identically that drug smugglers are worse
than fishers). Why don't we ask the fish whom they would prefer
killed? From a True Left perspective, the only people in
narcotics who could be considered worse than fishers would be
the Western scientists who test drugs on animals.
At least Cousins confirms at 2:57 where his anthropocentrism
(and subhuman phenotype) comes from ancestrally. ;D
#Post#: 31083--------------------------------------------------
Re: Psychological decolonization
By: rp Date: October 1, 2025, 7:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGHp3k2YNqo
#Post#: 31086--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 1, 2025, 6:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Claiming Jews were not "white" in the US until the 20th century
is false, as we have extensively documented:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-false-left/jews-have-nothing-in-common-with-us!/msg23429/?topicseen#msg23429
[quote]European Jews have been legally classified as white since
the first US census in 1790, were legally white for the purposes
of the Naturalization Act of 1790 that limited citizenship to
"free White person(s)", and that they could find no legislative
or judicial evidence that American Jews had ever been considered
collectively non-white.[88][/quote]
Next, there is no contradiction in Jim Crow-era US saying an
American of Japanese ancestry is "non-white" due to being
non-"Caucasian" and also saying an American of Indian ancestry
is "non-white" despite being "Caucasian". It simply means
"Caucasianness" is a necessary but insufficient condition for
"whiteness". This guy does not appear to understand elementary
logic.
Also, originally, "Asian" meant Anatolian, not "Chinese,
Japanese or Korean", as we have pointed out over and over again:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/russia-the-last-colonial-empire/msg12797/#msg12797
In older British Empire documents, Chinese/Japanese/Koreans/etc.
were labelled as "Orientals" whie "Asian" was reserved for
Indians/Pakistanis/Bangladeshis/etc.:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orient#British_English
[quote]In British English, the term Oriental is sometimes still
used to refer to people from East and Southeast Asia (such as
those from China, Taiwan, Japan, Korea, Mongolia, Thailand,
Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Malaysia, Singapore, Myanmar,
Philippines, Indonesia, Timor-Leste and Brunei).[12] Judges in
the United Kingdom have been issued with guidelines to encourage
political correctness where oriental should be avoided because
it is imprecise and may be considered racist or
offensive.[13][14] Oriental is still a common name for Chinese
takeaways and traditional chip shops in Britain.[15][16]
"Asian" in Great Britain usually refers to people who come
specifically from South Asia (in particular Pakistan, India,
Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Maldives, Bhutan, and
Afghanistan), since British Asians as a whole make up
approximately 9.3% of the population within the United Kingdom,
and people of an ethnically South Asian background comprise the
largest group within this category.[17] "Orientals" refers
exclusively to people of East and Southeast Asian origin, who
constitute approximately 0.7% of the UK population as a whole.
Of these, the majority are of Chinese descent.[18] Orient is
also a word for the lustre of a fine pearl.[19] Hong Kong, a
former British colony, has been called "Pearl of the Orient"
along with Shanghai. In the UK, and much of the commonwealth, it
is not considered a pejorative term, with many East Asian people
choosing to use it themselves - notably in the names of East
Asian businesses such as restaurants and takeaway
outlets.[/quote]
This is still inaccurate, but at least somewhat less so by Roman
standards:
[quote]This is particularly relevant when referring to lands and
peoples not associated with the historic "Orient": outside of
the former Byzantine (Eastern Roman) Empire and Sasanian Empire
(Persia)[/quote]
To claim that Chinese etc. were labelled"Asian" first and
Indians etc. became "Asian" later is flat-out false. Even in the
US, "Oriental" was in use for the former until relatively
recently as a consequence of False Leftist pressure:
[quote]"With the U.S.A. anti-war movement in the '60s and early
'70s, many Asian Americans identified the term 'Oriental' with a
Western process of racializing Asians as forever opposite
'others'",[21] by making a distinction between "Western" and
"Eastern" ancestral origins.
...
In 2016, President Obama signed New York Congresswoman Grace
Meng's legislation H.R. 4238 replacing the word with Asian
American in federal law.[22][23][/quote]
Also, the whole notion of associating "white" supremacism with
capitalism is absurd. If it were true, why was the less
capitalist Confederacy more strongly "white" supremacist than
the more capitalist Union?
#Post#: 31101--------------------------------------------------
Re: Academic decolonization
By: rp Date: October 2, 2025, 9:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
www.tiktok.com/@theexaltedone666/video/7549975480431021334
#Post#: 31107--------------------------------------------------
Re: Childcare Issues
By: rp Date: October 3, 2025, 8:31 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.tiktok.com/@jorgethevanguard9/video/7543387951883881750
#Post#: 31108--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Childcare Issues
By: rp Date: October 3, 2025, 1:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.tiktok.com/@jorgethevanguard9/video/7543332793791614231
#Post#: 31110--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Childcare Issues
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 3, 2025, 4:49 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Swaddling is imprisonment. Why is this idiot complimenting it?
As a matter of fact:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swaddling
[quote]During Tudor times, swaddling involved wrapping the new
baby in linen bands from head to foot to ensure the baby would
grow up without physical deformity. A stay band would be
attached to the forehead and the shoulders to secure the head.
Babies would be swaddled like this until about 8 or 9
months.[9][/quote]
so his claim about swaddling being exclusively non-Western is
also false in the first place.
More about swaddling:
[quote]A child unswaddled would need constant watching; well
swaddled it is cast into a corner and its cries are ignored
...
swaddling, particularly where the head is covered, reduces the
baby's ability to cool its body temperature
...
swaddling simulates a strait jacket and prevents baby from
moving their arms to self-settle.[/quote]
I have always said that humans should look to gorillas to learn
about childcare.
#Post#: 31112--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 3, 2025, 5:09 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=rp link=topic=1649.msg31101#msg31101
date=1759459102]
www.tiktok.com/@theexaltedone666/video/7549975480431021334
[/quote]
I am finally starting to figure this guy out. I warned against
this type on the main site:
[quote]the only disagreement within leftist circles is whether –
the paganist view – traditional non-Western societies were
virtually flawless prior to Western interruption, or whether –
the National Socialist view - non-Western societies were already
fallen long before Western interruption[/quote]
I'm not saying don't post his videos, but you should also
critique them as you post them.
#Post#: 31113--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: rp Date: October 3, 2025, 6:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I do like some of his other videos.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page