DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 29478--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: rp Date: March 4, 2025, 6:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This video is the perfect encapsulation of False Leftism:
HTML https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1896651863224987869?t=MYmhEsAZLPDcun55zPeGOg&s=19
[Quote]
NEW - Elon Musk was shown today with a swastika in his hand at
the carnival in Düsseldorf, Germany.
[/Quote]
#Post#: 29479--------------------------------------------------
Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
By: rp Date: March 4, 2025, 7:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/Fx1Jonny/status/1895429443696443876?t=EFkzv9nanSTz5ieNur2DTw&s=19
[quote]
They teach us that Hitler killed 6,000,000 Jews
But they don’t teach that Churchill killed 3,000,000 in the
Bengal Famine
Or the King Leopold killed 13 fucking million Congolese
They are very selective about what we know and what they don’t
want us to know!
How is Churchill who’s celebrated any better than Hitler?
From what I can see they’re both monsters
#Post#: 29480--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Western Revisionism of WWI and WWII
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 4, 2025, 4:45 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]How is Churchill who’s celebrated any better than Hitler?
From what I can see they’re both monsters[/quote]
Only egalitarians would consider Churchill and Hitler equally
bad based on the above information. Non-egalitarians would look
at whom each targeted. The deaths attributed to Churchill can be
considered a net gain for Western civilization, whereas the
deaths attributed to Hitler are surely a net loss for Western
civilization. Hence Westerners naturally prefer the former to
the latter. In contrast, anti-Westerners such as ourselves
prefer the latter (if true.....) to the former. I explained this
back on the old blog:
[quote]The simple answer is that the British Empire was
Jew-friendly whereas National Socialist Germany was hostile
towards Jews. But this goes beyond mere Jewish personnel
infiltration of academia and subsequent conscious promotion of a
Zionist-protagonist version of history. It is my contention that
even among non-Jewish Westerners, hostility towards Jews is
judged more negatively simply on account of Jews being known for
their disproportionate contribution to every field of Western
civilization:
so that hostility towards Jews is viewed (accurately!) as action
slowing Western progress:
In contrast, the British Empire’s colonialism is viewed with
relatively mild revulsion because its colonies were territories
originally belonging to non-Western civilizations, hence
colonialism is subconsciously viewed (accurately!) by Westerners
as action to weaken the rivals of Western civilization, which is
comforting to Westerners’ sense of security. Ultimately,
Westerners judge everything by whether it advances or retards
Western progress:[/quote]
#Post#: 29489--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 5, 2025, 7:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Stewart at least understands what the conflict is about;
Kulinski still doesnt:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYAtmZj8z2A
As I have repeatedly emphasized the whole time, Russia is a much
more authentically Western country than any influenced by the
Counterculture. Rightists can sense this (hence like Russia) and
so can we (hence hate Russia). Only False Leftists cannot
because they are still stuck in Kulinski mode. Stewart is not a
True Leftist, but at least he is able to acknowledge the
rightist framing which is in fact the accurate one.
#Post#: 30009--------------------------------------------------
Re: Leftist vs rightist moral circles
By: antihellenistic Date: April 23, 2025, 3:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]The world needs China's idea of statecraft, which
emphasizes harmony among nations, in contrast to the Western
tradition that focuses on competition between states, says
Professor Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University.[/quote]
Source :
1. China Chat | Jeffrey Sachs: World Needs China’s Idea of
Statecraft. (2025). Retrieved April 23, 2025, from News.cn
website:
HTML https://english.news.cn/20250329/b68511e07a3f41189ae8456e27f6ceba/c.html
2.
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXiVAZ2TYvw
Recall Hitler's view :
[quote]The New York Times Sunday, November 18, 1934
[17 November 1934] The Nazi price-fixing program, recently
placed in the hands of former Chancellor Heinrich Bruening's
one-time price dictator, Dr. Karl Goerdeler, must take the place
of "capitalism's accidental market happenings," Herr Backe
asserted.
"We have placed conscious Nazi coordination and regulation of
markets in its stead," he said. "In place of the accidental
equalization between supply and demand we have put conscious
equalization between need and its coverage.
"In place of those almost slavish subordinations of man and his
activities to an alleged law of wild price fluctuations in all
sorts exchanges we have put conscious control of markets through
responsible determination and fixing of prices.
"This fixed order farmer and consumer alike."
Earlier in his address Herr Backe, after predicting the triumph
of "regulated" economy over "free" economy, assailed capitalism
as looking "only to rentability or profit."[/quote]
Source :
The New York Times: Sunday November 18, 1934. (2024). Retrieved
November 12, 2024, from Nytimes.com website:
HTML https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1934/11/18/95497535.html?pageNumber=8
[quote]On 5 July 1942 Hitler expressed the opinion in a table
talk that if the German economy had been able so far to deal
with innumerable problems,
.. this was also due in the end to the fact that the direction
of the economy had gradually become more controlled by the
state. Only thus had it been possible to enforce the overall
national objective against the interests of individual groups.
Even after the war we would not to be able to renounce state
control of the economy, because then every interest group would
think exclusively of the fulfilment of its wishes. 120
...
As Hans Mommsen has shown, the German opposition to Hitler,
which recruited almost exclusively from the upper class and here
primarily from the nobility, regarded National Socialism and
Bolshevism as being identical. Trott said, for example: 'What
presents itself to us as a dirty brown muck at home faces us
with Asian hardness and brutality in Moscow'?' Hassell feared
that 'socialism in the Hitlerian form' inevitably had the
objective of destroying the upper classes through an
Bolshevization And in a memorandum prepared by Lieutenant
Commander Liedig at the end of 1939, which illuminates the
opinions of the group around Oster in Intelligence and is also
typical of the political concepts of Beck and Halder, it says:
'A revolutionary dynamics of destruction of all the historic
links and all the cultural tie-ins which once made up the
dignity and fame of Europe is the only, and the total, secret of
his [Hitler's] statesmanship."[/quote]
Source :
Hitler : The Policies of Seduction by Zitelmann, Rainer Page
232, 404 - 405
HTML https://archive.org/details/hitlerpoliciesof0000zite/page/232/mode/2up?q=not+be+able+to+renounce
[quote]The Berlin Court of Social Honor invoked the most drastic
of all penalties against a factory owner in the
Berlin-Brandenburg district. It found him guilty of failure,
despite repeated warnings, to improve sanitary conditions in his
plant, of failure to pay his workmen and employees promptly
although the factory was fully occupied with orders, of making
arbitrary deductions from wages and salaries, of mistreating
those who protested against these abuses, and of trying to stir
up dissension among the men (“disturbing the community spirit
within the plant community”) and deprived him of the right to
operate his plant.
A wholesale news dealer in Breslau met with the same fate at the
hands of the Court of Social Honor there. The court ordered that
he be deprived of control of his business on the grounds that he
had persistently paid wages and salaries below the officially
fixed minimums, had grossly insulted his workmen and employees,
and had forced minors to work 59 hours a week without overtime
pay.[/quote]
Source :
Deuel, Wallace R. People under Hitler (Harcourt, Brace and
Company, 1942) Page 329 - 330
[quote]NAZI ARRESTS
Hamburg Traders Perturbed
TECHNICAL OFFENCES
HAMBURG, Wednesday.
A series of arrests of leading merchants in the past three
months has perturbed the business community. Many directors of
important firms have' been taken into custody and charged with
violating complicated currency' regulations.
General Goering has ordered an independent investigation, and it
is hoped that the cases will be settled out of court, but the
Chamber of Commerce has protested to the Nazi Governor, (Herr
Kauffmann).
Apparently the alleged offences, are merely technical, while the
arrests are damaging the credit of leading firms.
A fantastic speculation is that those arrested are technically
liable to decapitation for economic sabotage. Herr Lademann, a
member of Emden and Sons, a steam mercantile firm, committed
suicide in gaol.[/quote]
Sumber :
The Canberra Times (ACT : 1926 - 1995) Wednesday, 9 December
1937 Page 5 NAZI ARRESTS
HTML https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/2447083?searchTerm=Nazi%20Arrests
[quote]The plebeians of the Voelkischer Beobachter wanted to see
in the formation of the “occupational groups” “economic
construction directed by German socialism.” 121 “The National
Socialist state has the economy in its hands.... The nebulous
‘economic laws’ of liberalism . . . are no longer valid; they
are replaced by the will and purposes of the state. .. . After
twenty-one months in power, National Socialism has become master
of the economy.”[/quote]
Sumber :
Fascism and Big Business by Daniel Guerin Page 325
HTML https://archive.org/details/daniel-guerin-fascism-and-big-business-pathfinder-press-2000/page/325/mode/2up?q=become+master+of+the+economy
[quote]The economy of the Third Reich would be purged not only
of Jewish behaviors, whether “speculative,” “individualist,”
“bourgeois,” “liberal,” or “egotistical.” It was to be purged of
Jews[/quote]
Source :
Wiesen, S. Jonathan. Creating the Nazi Marketplace: Commerce and
Consumption in the Third Reich Page 55 (pdf version)
[quote]The Central Council and local leaders of Kyffhauser
joined the SS as a body. But when the "old fighters" saw General
Wilhelm Reinhard, who was still loyal to the Kaiser, joining the
SS atthe head of the Kyffhauser leaders, they felt they could
understand Himmler no longer; for Reinhard was one of those
reactionary military men stigmatised by the Schwarze Korps in
1935 as typifying that "middle-class nationalist arrogance which
excludes the worker from society and must give him the
impression that he is regarded as a third-class citizen.[/quote]
Source :
The Order of the Death's Head: The Story of Hitler's SS Heinz
Höhne Page 157
[quote]“I’ve said that already to many of the ex-Muscovites
we’ve had up here,” Inspector Kraus observed. “What did you
fellows want here? Fight Hitler! Isn’t it Hitler who has
fulfilled many of the communist demands? Curbed capitalism?
Broken the bourgeoisie? Cowed the church? Given security to the
workers? Refused to let Germany be bled white by the foreign
bank sharks?”
“Hitler has done that,” I said. “It was hard to admit, but it is
the truth.”[/quote]
Source :
Out of the Night: The Memoir of Richard Julius Herman Krebs
alias Jan Valtin Page 658 - 659
HTML https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.168200/page/n667/mode/2up?q=Isn%E2%80%99t+it+Hitler+who+has+fulfilled+many+of+the+communist+demands
Therefore, the conclusion from observing the history on Hitler's
regime's governmental and economic system, he was not part of
Western Civilization which value decentralization and market
mechanism economic system
‌
#Post#: 30012--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 23, 2025, 10:14 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Dgunist Sachs is our enemy:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Sachs#War_in_Ukraine
[quote]"All of this talk of defeating Russia, to my mind, is
reckless."[72] In June 2022, he co-signed an open letter calling
for a "ceasefire" in the war, questioning Western countries'
continuing military support for Ukraine.[73][/quote]
He pushes Confucianism, and worse, tries to pass it off as
Chinese (rather than Turanian) (which is as wrong as trying to
pass off Vedism as Indian (rather than Turanian)):
[quote]The world needs China's idea of statecraft, which
emphasizes harmony among nations, in contrast to the Western
tradition that focuses on competition between states, says
Professor Jeffrey Sachs of Columbia University.[/quote]
Harmony (False Left) vs competition (right) is a false dichotomy
based on monist thinking. The correct alternative to competition
is moral dualistic conflict, which ends with total and permanent
elimination of one side (hopefully evil), in contrast to
competition which keeps competitors in existence in order to
keep the competition interesting, and also in contrast to
harmony which also keeps as much as possible (including evil) in
existence to keep the harmony interesting. "Harmony" is
ultimately just the Confucianist version of sustainable evil.
"Harmony" is also the term used to sell the Duginist multipolar
world crap to cause former victims of Western colonialism to
forget about their duty to destroy their former colonizers.
#Post#: 30253--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 24, 2025, 5:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91YYGxfjUnw
While it is always good to annoy Trump, why give the mineral
deal to France, a Western colonial power? France might never
have directly colonized Greenland, but pre-colonial Greenland
was part of Inuit territory, and France certainly colonized
Inuit territory in Canada:
HTML https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/Nouvelle-France_map-en.svg/1024px-Nouvelle-France_map-en.svg.png
Even if France had never colonized any Inuit territory,
Greenland should display folkish solidarity with fellow victims
of Western colonialism, which certainly includes former victims
of French colonialism around the world. As such, why not give
the mineral deal to a non-Western country? Doing so would also
probably have annoyed Trump even more!
#Post#: 30617--------------------------------------------------
Re: Is Counterculture Still Alive?
By: SirGalahad Date: July 17, 2025, 9:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I had the opportunity to watch the new Superman movie, and I
wanted to comment on it, since a lot of people online are making
connections with how the main conflict in the movie is almost
identical and directly parallels the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Even though the director appears to be denying any connection to
the Israel-Palestine conflict, I would have to agree with such
people
Spoilers follow below, for anyone concerned:
The rumors are basically true. The plot centers around this
country known as Boravia, a U.S. ally that receives military aid
from the U.S., in order to conquer a country of poorer, weaker,
mostly non-white people once and for all, and to take the
territory for themselves. From what little we actually see of
Jarhanpur, the country being invaded by Boravia, the
Jarhanpurians are living in refugee camps. There's even subtle
anti-Turanian messaging, if you pay attention to the language
that the Boravians are speaking (it's not Hebrew)
So yeah. The movie is about Superman, who draws all his power
from the Yellow Sun, stopping "Boravia" (Israel) from invading
"Jarhanpur" (Palestine).
While the movie sticks with Superman's historical character of
trying not to kill villains due to a no-kill code, the movie
demonstrates in other ways that it has no qualms with villains
dying. At the end of the movie, the Justice Gang stop the
Boravian invasion in Superman's place, since Superman is busy
dealing with a distraction set up by the villains. Hawkgirl
picks up the leader of Boravia, flies into the sky, and drops
him to his death. This is played for comedic effect, as right
when the Boravian leader hits the ground, it cuts to an
alka-seltzer tablet falling into a cup of water and dissolving
As you would expect, even though the director denies basing the
movie off of any real events, this movie still has Zionists
frothing at the mouth and calling the movie ****, because they
know that even if the director didn't have ulterior motives, the
subtext will make fans of the movie anti-Israel regardless, when
they try to draw parallels between the injustices in the movie,
and any real-life injustices
There are some false leftists trying to poison the discourse by
pointing out that Superman was intended to allegorically
represent Moses and his story. This may be true in a historic
sense, since I have not read any of the Superman comics or paid
attention to the movies, and the two original creators of
Superman were both Jewish. But the fact is that this current
iteration of Superman has Zionists annoyed for the right
reasons. You have people countering the false leftists by
pointing out that in this movie, Superman is essentially an
anti-Moses, since it's later revealed that his biological
parents sent him to earth not to protect life there, but to
conquer it and establish a harem so that he can have his
metahuman genes dominate and reign supreme (in other words, his
biological parents are might-makes-right Yahwists). But Superman
REJECTS the will of his biological parents, and sides with his
adoptive parents and the earthlings that he felt he was meant to
protect. Although Moses was also adopted, he, unlike Superman,
would have always sided with the biological, Jewish side of
himself
There are other interesting parallels as well. The leader of
Boravia pulls a "We just want to get rid of Hamas!" by claiming
that he's conquering Jarhanpur so that he can liberate them from
their corrupt leadership. Superman says "You don't really
believe that, do you"?
In another scene, you have Lex Luthor, portrayed as an Elon
Musk-type character, showing a captured Superman his farm of
monkeys that are hooked up to machines and forced to type
internet comments that are anti-Superman and pro-Boravia, to
sway public opinion (a direct jab at right wing bot farms)
You could also interpret the movie as having a secondary
pro-immigrant message, since another idea promoted in the movie
is that, despite being an alien, Superman is just as "human" as
the rest of them, because he feels and suffers and loves, and
because he represents the IDEAL human (in the mind of the
director), because of his heart of gold, and his idealism and
strong sense of justice that clashes with the cynicism and
realism of the other characters in the movie who try to
discourage him. It makes me think of the general Atlantean idea
of "sometimes, immigrants are more truly American than those
with families who have been here for generations",
Near the end of the movie, just before the Justice Gang come and
stop the Boravian invasion and kill the leader, there was also
this touching scene where a Jarhanpurian kid raises a Superman
flag, and prays for Superman to save them all:
[img]
HTML https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fcomicbookclublive.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2024%2F12%2Fsuperman-flag-1024x640.webp&f=1&nofb=1&ipt=01549e42ce52496d297dd9580c23dc7dbdf28b2125cf0ca66bf8367c21332906[/img]
All in all, I would not consider this movie a masterpiece or
anything, but it was enjoyable enough, and I appreciate it for
sparking a lot of interesting discussion because of the
political undertones. I think this movie will also revive the
"What would Superman do?" ethos amongst both young and old
superhero fans. And in an era of cynicism, we desperately need
more role models, even if fictional
My only main criticism is casting a masculine mesomorph as
Superman, once again. Although I guess it makes sense that
Superman isn't ectomorphic, since his biological parents are
clearly inferior. In that sense, maybe it's better to portray
Superman as someone who has risen above their biology
#Post#: 30618--------------------------------------------------
Re: Re: Is Counterculture Still Alive?
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 18, 2025, 6:25 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest that this movie represents an emerging new False
Leftist political correctness which involves being critical of
Israel but especially pro-Jewish on the condition that the
particular Jews being promoted are also critical of Israel. This
has been the explicit position taken by a fraction of Jews since
the Gaza genocide began, who have since been indoctrinating
non-Jews to value high-visibility Jewish participation in
anti-Israel demonstrations as a way to deflect accusations by
other Jews of "anti-Semitism". By encouraging non-Jews to rely
on this superficial defence ("How can we be anti-Semitic? We
have Jews leading us!"), deeper examination of the term
"anti-Semitism" (as we did long ago) to expose it as inherently
intellectually dishonest and bad-faith is discouraged. Thus I
see this as a tactical Jewish retreat with the intention of
preserving the "anti-Semtism" trick for future use by Jews in
contexts unrelated to Israel.
The implication of Superman vs Ultraman in this movie is that it
takes Jewish blood to challenge Jewish blood. Non-Jewish blood
(Justice Gang) can only play support roles, and are not implied
to be capable of defeating Ultraman on their own. In short, this
is just another rendition of:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_savior
[quote]The term white savior is a critical description of a
white person who is depicted as liberating, rescuing or
uplifting non-white people; it is critical in the sense that it
describes a pattern in which people of color in economically
under-developed nations that are majority non-white are denied
agency and are seen as passive recipients of white
benevolence.[1][2]
...
In film, the white savior is a cinematic trope in which a white
character rescues people of color from their plight. The white
savior is portrayed as messianic and often learns something
about themselves in the process of rescuing.[22]
...
White saviors are often male and are sometimes out of place in
their own society until they lead minorities or foreigners.
Screen Saviors: Hollywood Fictions of Whiteness labels the
stories as fantasies that "are essentially grandiose,
exhibitionistic, and narcissistic". Types of stories include
white travels to "exotic" Asian locations, white defense against
racism in the American South, or white protagonists having
"racially diverse" helpers.[24]
The white lead character is often delegated the role of racial
leader in films, taking it upon themselves to save non-white
minorities and immigrants from their struggles.[25][/quote]
For the record:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superman_(2025_film)
[quote]Produced by
Peter Safran
...
Starring
David Corenswet[/quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Safran
[quote]Peter Safran is the son of Ordell and Henry Safran, of
Ashkenazi Jewish descent.[2][/quote]
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Corenswet
[quote]Corenswet was born in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[4] He
grew up in Lower Merion, a suburb of Philadelphia.[5] His
father, John Corenswet, was from a Jewish family[/quote]
#Post#: 30660--------------------------------------------------
Re: False Leftists getting leftism wrong
By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 25, 2025, 6:19 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The following video is everything wrong with False Leftism
today:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StVvAnLCBHg
Their main proposal is that rightism need to be "put back in the
closet". Actually, the far-right being put in the closet during
the Counterculture era is how we got into the situation we are
in now! When rightism is in the closet, False Leftists
invariably delude themselves into believing that the problem of
rightism has already been solved, following which rightists have
the opportunity to organize and infiltrate until all of a sudden
they are in power! So why haven't False Leftists such as
Kulinski and Ball learned from this very mistake even as we are
currently suffering from its consequences?
I, a True Leftist, actually like it when our enemies openly let
us know who they are, because this allows us to know whom to
physically exterminate. But physical extermination is not an
option for False Leftists, therefore they do not see the
positive side of our enemies being out in the open.
Why are False Leftists like this? Answer: they are still stuck
to the notion that all genocide is bad, instead of realizing the
obvious truth that whether genocide is good or bad depends on
who is being genocided (duh!).
False Leftists think that believing that whether genocide is
good or bad depends on who is being genocided makes the believer
a rightist. No, it doesn't! It merely makes the believer a
serious problem solver. Sure, rightists also believe that
whether genocide is good or bad depends on who is being
genocided, but they disagree with us on who should be genocided.
This disagreement is what distinguishes rightism from leftism.
Leftism is not about being less ruthless than rightists. Leftism
is about wanting to direct ruthlessness at the opposite targets
than rightists want to.
But False Leftists will never understand this, and on this
account alone False Leftism will never defeat rightism. Only
True Leftism has any chance at all of truly defeating rightism.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page