DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 18092--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: February 22, 2023, 11:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"Overbite =/= Aryan teeth"
Fine. But would you say overbite = neotenous appearance?
Also, another thing I forgot to mention, the first heroine's jaw
seems a little robust, irrespective of the gonial angle:
[img]
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fs2.lookforward.info%2Fimgs%2F201907%2F19%2F2%2F15635192451660.jpg&hash=98c05fce41a02665518c7967e19496d6e6535dbb[/img]
IMO ideally the jaw should be gracile as well in order to reduce
its visibility, along with a good gonial angle. So the second
heroine beats her in that department. I have noticed this in my
own face: my right jaw bone is thicker than my left and as a
result is more visible.
Sure, she compares favourably to the other two actresses in the
picture, but not so much to the second heroine in the older
message.
#Post#: 18093--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 23, 2023, 12:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"would you say overbite = neotenous appearance?"
I never thought about it like that. Is it common for children
who have overbite to automatically lose it as they grow up?
"reduce its visibility"
Visibility is a poor way to judge gracility, as faces with less
fat will have more visible bone structure than faces with more
fat. A better way to judge gracility is bone volume. If we could
directly measure circumferences etc. this would be easy, but
relying on photos and videos alone requires comparisons with
other people in the same shot, which is what the exercise is
for. I will wait for your response to the second part.
#Post#: 18094--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: February 23, 2023, 12:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I never thought about it like that. Is it common for children
who have overbite to automatically lose it as they grow up?"
I would think so. From my observation, puberty mostly results in
lower jaw as oppsoed to upper jaw growth, but I could be wrong.
" A better way to judge gracility is bone volume. "
I agree. In my case, I was able to feel my jawbone, but this is
impossible to do with the actress!
#Post#: 18096--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 23, 2023, 12:30 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I am so awesome that I managed to find a third guy (note the
subhuman brow ridge in the thumbnail) to use as a yardstick:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLTZcSyltIA
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYRy8bVe0Sg
Who pairs worse with him?
#Post#: 18097--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: February 23, 2023, 12:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I noticed the first heroine from the first exercise is present
in the second video. Is she the one you want me to compare, or
is it the other female character?
#Post#: 18098--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 23, 2023, 1:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"I noticed the first heroine from the first exercise is present
in the second video."
All three parts of the exercise feature the same two heroines.
That's the point!
"Is she the one you want me to compare"
In the first part, you have already said that you think Kwan
facially pairs better with Tam (who is our first yardstick).
In the remaining two parts, you should say who, Kwan or Chow,
facially pairs better with Cheung (second yardstick) and Fong
(third yardstick).
#Post#: 18099--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: February 23, 2023, 1:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"All three parts of the exercise feature the same two heroines.
That's the point!"
Oh, ok! I just realized I misread the second part as "Same
heroine paired with two different heroes" instead of "same two
heroines paired with a different hero". I also didn't recognize
Chow because of the hairstyle in the first video of the third
exercise.
To answer your question,in the third exercise, I believe Kwan
pairs worse with him because he has such a short face. Despite
the sharp contrast in gracility/neoteny between himself and
Chow, the contrast in fwhr between Kwan and the hero is even
sharper that it makes him look even more subhuman.
It goes without saying that in both videos, Fong pairs much more
favorably with the other female characters than with the
respective heroines.
#Post#: 18101--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 23, 2023, 2:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Although you have skipped over the second part (why??), even
just using the first and third parts, no one (except Westerners)
could possibly think that Fong is more highly evolved than Tam.
Therefore, given your agreement that Chow pairs better with Fong
whereas Kwan pairs better with Tam, the theoretical expectation
should be that Kwan beats Chow.
#Post#: 18102--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: February 23, 2023, 2:41 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I intended to do it after the third since it was on a different
page. That being said:
[quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=1634.msg17638#msg17638
date=1674521699]
There is a second part to this exercise. Now we look at the same
two heroines paired with a different hero. Previously posted:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/issues/media-decolonization/msg16308/#msg16308
[quote]
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UuAaHqDmkNg[/quote]
Posting for the first time:
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80cZg8VEeIg
Which is the (relatively) better match this time round (because
both are actually terrible)? You can probably see where this is
leading. By holding one variable constant at a time while
changing the other (all the way to absurdity), a clearer picture
will emerge.
[/quote]
Chow is the better match due to the fwhr.
#Post#: 18103--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: February 23, 2023, 2:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This should reinforce the previous conclusion, then?
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page