DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Human Evolution
*****************************************************
#Post#: 19041--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 27, 2023, 4:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Firstly, just posting the link to the post will do. There is no
need to repost the picture.
As for the faces, I would say that when both were young,
Davidson looked far better:
HTML https://alchetron.com/cdn/jaye-davidson-a590cc44-d686-4235-b110-9cda5b1a689-resize-750.jpeg
In particular, Holt has a wider chin:
HTML https://www.adweek.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/2015/05/LesterHoltRanchoCordovaHS_Featured.jpg
whereas Davidson's only chin flaw is the slight cleft.
On the other hand, Davidson aged terribly:
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4yp3IlWAAE3C7x.jpg
whereas Holt aged relatively well. So it depends on whether you
want to compare them at their best or compare their longer
trajectory over time. (Looking at the last picture, note
Davidson's relatively small facial hair area. The genetic
potential was definitely there......)
Does anyone else have an opinion on this?
#Post#: 19054--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: guest98 Date: April 28, 2023, 2:17 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"(Looking at the last picture, note Davidson's relatively small
facial hair area. The genetic potential was definitely
there......)"
The genetic potential to became aryanized/perfected? @90srf
#Post#: 19055--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 28, 2023, 3:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In that particular trait, at least.
#Post#: 19056--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: guest98 Date: April 28, 2023, 3:21 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
So if someone has a large facial hair area its not possible for
them to aryanize the lower half of their face? Or they can
aryanize only to a certain extent, whereas someone with no
facial hair could aryanize the lower half of their face to full
perfection?
#Post#: 19057--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: April 28, 2023, 4:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think they are separate phenomena. It should be technically
possible to breed gracile skull + large facial hair area, or
robust skull + small facial hair area. But our racial ideal just
happens to be gracile skull + small facial hair area, since this
is the combination of maximal neoteny.
We should try to co-opt the term "neckbeard" and use it to refer
to the inferior low-neoteny bloodlines that produce large facial
hair areas.
#Post#: 19063--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: rp Date: April 28, 2023, 6:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes. Neckbeards primarily refer to "White" redditors. However,
more and more redditors are being exposed as ethnic chauvinists,
so neckbeards have already become associated with "White" ethnic
chauvinism to an extent.
"robust skull + small facial hair area"
I think some Chinese men would fall into this category, for
example, Jack Ma.
#Post#: 19725--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: christianbethel Date: May 21, 2023, 1:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I propose the Fuhrer again:
HTML https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/getting-boot-9292733.jpg
Boot Jourdan Dunn.
#Post#: 19821--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: May 23, 2023, 8:57 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
(Why would you post this particular picture of Hitler in which
he has already aged terribly (even worse than Davidson)?)
New rule: we will only accept examples born after the end of
WWII.
#Post#: 19824--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: HikariDude Date: May 23, 2023, 9:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I think to make it fair we should accept examples that are
currently living, and each already accepted individual that dies
will be booted, leaving one available spot.
#Post#: 19825--------------------------------------------------
Re: Facial Aryanism
By: SirGalahad Date: May 23, 2023, 9:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@90sRetroFan You mentioned that Jaye Davidson aged poorly. I was
watching the original Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory
movie from 1971 with someone I know who likes the movie, and I
find it fun to look up cherished child actors to see how they
aged. To my surprise, the boy who played Charlie (Peter Ostrum)
aged pretty well, at least in terms of face shape (and a
thousand times better than Hitler):
HTML https://www.dailyactor.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/peter-ostrum-charlie-willy-wonka.jpg
HTML https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/getting-boot-9292733.jpg
The mustache and receding hairline aren’t ideal though. What do
you think? I’m hesitant to kick anyone out in favor of him, lest
Eurocentrism be reintroduced into this thread. I think that a
good number of white-passing people have already been seriously
proposed in proportion to the the rest of our current proposals.
I just stumbled upon Peter Ostrum as an example randomly, and
thought it was worth sharing
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page