URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8358--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 26, 2021, 11:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "Chechens are herders"
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chechens#History
       [quote]The Chechens are one of the Nakh peoples, who have lived
       in the highlands of the North Caucasus region since
       prehistory.[29] There is archeological evidence of historical
       continuity dating back to 3000 B.C.[30][29] as well as evidence
       pointing to their ancestors’ migration from the Fertile Crescent
       c. 10,000–8,000 B.C.[30][/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakh_peoples#Traditional_economy
       [quote]Agricultural structures
       Lack of arable land in sufficient quantities in the mountainous
       areas, forced Vainakhs to use their territory of residence as
       efficiently as possible. They leveled the steep slopes,
       organized terraces suitable for agriculture. On the barren rocky
       slopes of rocks, which are unsuitable for agriculture, Vainakhs
       hew foundations for terraces. On carts harnessed donkeys and
       oxen, they brought black soil of the lowlands, and filled with
       it artificial terraces.[38] For maximum harvest was organized by
       the entire irrigation system, which consisted of a small
       artificial stream canals connected with the mountain rivers,
       these canals were called Taatol, they also built a small stone
       canals called Epala, and quite small wooden troughs Aparri. Some
       scholars notably I. Diakonov and S. Starostin proposed that
       Epala and Aparri may correspond to Urartian irrigation canal
       name "pili" and Hurrian "pilli/a".[39] Some irrigation
       structures were built also on lowlands but they were less
       complicated.[/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chechens#Culture
       [quote]They partook in numerous rites and rituals, many of them
       pertaining to farming; these included rain rites, a celebration
       that occurred on the first day of plowing[/quote]
       #Post#: 8359--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: guest30 Date: August 26, 2021, 11:33 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Nazi apologist @SirGalahad, Emily's best friends, fellow Nazi
       comrades
       [quote]...I like to believe that a good chunk of the racist
       quotes attributed to Hitler were merely a means of him securing
       power and influence, which can be somewhat corroborated by the
       fact that Hitler wanted both Mein Kampf (his own work) and Myth
       of the 20th Century (Alfred Rosenberg's work) out of
       circulation. But again, even if Hitler held racists views, which
       I won't rule out the possibility of, that doesn't prove our
       entire ideology false.[/quote]
       If you all "Aryanism" people believe that Hitler had absolute
       control of government, then, like what @v3456 say on previous
       post on this thread, he no need to compromise with society and
       conditions of people whim he led, he can implement totally
       opposition to racism policies and force his people (Hitler's
       German people) to accept that people of "color" or "Non-White
       European" people are fellow creature and need to be integrated
       and respected, and if some of Hitler's government officials
       rejected his anti-racist worldview, he can removed them from
       government circle without consulting to people and his political
       co-worker, but the fact is opposite, Hitler let the racist
       policies implemented, even on 1941, 8 years after Hitler took
       absolute control of Germany, the racist Nuremberg law still
       enabled in Germany society, I already show that to you all on
       previous post on this thread and on thread about "Aryanism's
       hostility towards Russia and Eastern European people", so from
       that, Hitler did not seriously implement policy of opposition to
       racism, and even we can say that Hitler indeed leader that
       implementing racist ideology to German people, Hitler sometimes
       said about the bad side of colonialism on his private
       conversation, what the real action that he seriously did to help
       colonized people? Nothing, he not placed his concentration of
       his troops to defeat the colonial nations like British Empire
       (United Kingdom), instead he concentrated most of his troops to
       attack ruthlessly against a nation which already implemented
       policies which oppose racism and that is Stalin's Russia, what
       Hitler's quotes that you provide to me is outnumbered by many
       racist statements of Hitler and also his policies and what
       action of his troops and government's officials did to people
       other than "White European"
       I will give you again the proof of Hitler's racist policies that
       used by his troops during wartime
       Source :
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_prisoners_of_war_in_World_War_II#African_and_Arab_prisoners
       Around 120,000 prisoners from the French colonies were captured
       during the Battle of France.[9] Most of these troops, around
       two-thirds, came from the French North African possessions of
       Tunisia, Morocco and, particularly, Algeria.[30] Around 20
       percent were from French West Africa.[30] The rest were from
       Madagascar and Indochina.[30] Influenced by Nazi racial
       ideology, German troops summarily killed between 1,000 and 1,500
       black prisoners during the Battle of France.[31][32] Among those
       captured who narrowly escaped execution was Léopold Sédar
       Senghor, an academic who would become the first President of
       independent Senegal in 1960.
       Unlike their white compatriots, the colonial prisoners of war
       were imprisoned in Frontstalags in France rather than being
       brought to Germany.[9] By keeping colonial soldiers in France on
       the pretext of preventing the spread of tropical diseases, the
       Germans also wanted to prevent the "racial defilement"
       (Rassenschande) of German women outlawed by the Nuremberg Laws
       of 1935.[31] Black troops were treated worse than their white
       compatriots, and some of them were used for "degrading"
       anthropological experiments or subjects of medical testing into
       diseases.[33] Although the living conditions for black soldiers
       gradually improved, they were still considerably lower than
       those of white French soldiers. The mortality rate among black
       soldiers was also considerably higher.[33]
       That tragedy happen in 1940, 7 years after Hitler took absolute
       power to control Germany, so for 7 years Hitler did not do
       anything to freed himself from "compromise" and totally
       implement "his view that opposing racism"
       Contrary to Russia under Stalin leadership, he bravely
       implemented policies that "colored" people can enter and work in
       Russia officially, he no need to compromise even tough he face
       the hundreds millions of "White European Russian" people that
       you, "Aryanism" comunity consider them as "racist" and carrying
       "ignoble Turanian blood", you can see Stalin's anti-racist
       policies through seeing my previous post on thread "Aryanism's
       hostility towards Russia and Eastern European people", so, even
       if Hitler openly implemented policies which oppose racism, he
       had a friend, that is Stalin's Russia, but of course such things
       did not happen, because Hitler was racist and he openly proud of
       that
       And of course, you all just pretending to not see what rebuttal
       information which I give to you and pretending that I am just
       repeating to say anything that you consider it already discussed
       on previous conversation
       #Post#: 8362--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: SirGalahad Date: August 27, 2021, 12:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]If you all "Aryanism" people believe that Hitler had
       absolute control of government, then, like what @v3456 say on
       previous post on this thread, he no need to compromise with
       society and conditions of people whim he led[/quote]
       It’s not that simple. Even as an authoritarian leader, you have
       to avoid pissing off a massive chunk of your population if you
       want to sufficiently unite the entire nation against the forces
       of the US, Britain, France, and the USSR combined. It doesn’t
       matter how much power you have if you don’t sufficiently appease
       enough of the general population, because it’ll either weaken
       the nation by fracturing its camaraderie at best, and lead to a
       revolt where you’re deposed from your position as leader at
       worst. As for why he didn’t promote his movement as non-ethnic
       from the outset like the USSR, my best guess is that communism
       wasn’t a racial ideology to begin with, so they didn’t need to
       cloak a racial ideology with more esoteric aspects that
       contradict the typical tendency towards tribalism in order to
       motivate the racially inferior majority like Hitler was forced
       to. Or maybe he simply believed that he needed to cloak those
       esoteric aspects of his racial ideology, when in actuality he
       didn’t need to and everything would have turned out virtually
       the same regardless. It wouldn’t be the first time that Hitler
       makes an error that costs him the future of the ideology. Or
       maybe he did erroneously base the concept of the Aryan race on
       who was ethnically German, but he wasn’t necessarily a tribalist
       and respected non-Germans. Or maybe it was both. That he did
       believe ethnic Germans were superior, and that he was a
       tribalist. There’s probably no way to completely put to rest all
       my doubts, unless I travel back in time and ask him myself.
       [quote]instead he concentrated most of his troops to attack
       ruthlessly against a nation which already implemented policies
       which oppose racism and that is Stalin's Russia[/quote]
       Because he had to. A state as powerful as the USSR wasn’t going
       to simply allow National Socialism to coexist with it. Hitler
       certainly drummed up his unbridled hatred for communism in
       public to motive Germans, but in private he admitted that he
       respected Stalin as a leader, and went on to state that on the
       surface level, the differences between communism and National
       Socialism were more minor than most people believed.
       [quote]By keeping colonial soldiers in France on the pretext of
       preventing the spread of tropical diseases, the Germans also
       wanted to prevent the "racial defilement" (Rassenschande) of
       German women outlawed by the Nuremberg Laws of 1935.[/quote]
       The original Nuremberg laws don’t mention black people at all.
       It only applied to Jews. And from what I’ve read from anet,
       those who tried to apply them to non-Jewish peoples were sacked
       [quote]Black troops were treated worse than their white
       compatriots, and some of them were used for "degrading"
       anthropological experiments or subjects of medical testing into
       diseases[/quote]
       This was true in the US during WW2 as well. Black people, both
       as citizens and soldiers, were often treated worse than white
       people and lived in a segregated society, yet I rarely encounter
       people who consider the US the “bad guys” during WW2. The point
       is that if you consider Nazi Germany worse than the US, then the
       US is still the good guy even if they had done some morally
       repugnant things during the war. The same applies for those who
       view the US as worse than Nazi Germany
       [quote]he no need to compromise even tough he face the hundreds
       millions of "White European Russian" people that you, "Aryanism"
       comunity consider them as "racist" an carrying ignoble
       "Turanian" blood[/quote]
       I don’t hate Russians, but I do think that Russia is more racist
       than the US at this point, and I don’t think that a truly
       anti-western, anti-tribalist, Aryanist-leaning movement is
       nearly as likely to occur in Russia as it is to occur in
       America, which has a far more ethnically diverse population and
       tends to value conservatism less. America is commonly seen as a
       nation built up by the sum of all the contributions from
       incredibly diverse peoples emigrating from the Old World into
       the so-called New World. That kind of narrative is ripe for us
       to spin it in our favor. Russia has no such identity. If such a
       movement ever gains traction in Russia on a mass scale, then
       I’ll support Russia. And if it ever does gain traction, it
       definitely won’t be while Putin is in charge
       #Post#: 8364--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: guest30 Date: August 27, 2021, 2:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @SirGalahad, Emily's best friend, fellow Nazi comrade
       [quote]It’s not that simple. Even as an authoritarian leader,
       you have to avoid pissing off a massive chunk of your
       population...[/quote]
       Stalin even did not concern much about the will of the people or
       massive population, he can order the secret agent and police
       authority to mass kill and execute any ordinary people or high
       ranking people that have any idea that oppose his policy, his
       policy of "Great Terror" and "Great Purge" show the bravery of
       Stalin controlling mass "White European Russian" people, even
       force them to accept "colored non-White" people who came to
       their land for searching better condition of live, that is the
       example of heroic and authoritarian leader, but, on Hitler, he
       even did not made a total attempt to implement opposition to
       racism's policy to German people even tough the nation's
       condition is safe from any threat shown by other nations
       [quote]...if you want to sufficiently unite the entire nation
       against the forces of the US, Britain, France, and the USSR
       combined.[/quote]
       It was Hitler's fault that he made a decision to attack a nation
       which Hitler should not attacked them, invading Stalin's Russia
       only because they are "Bolshevist" and racially "Slavic
       Sub-human" which mixed by "Mongolian Asiatic" blood, and wanted
       the "Living Space" (More space to live for "white" people from
       not just German, but Western Europe as a whole, and the native
       Eastern European people will be relocated or will be wiped out)
       is an evil and unjustified decision, Stalin's Russia did not do
       anything harmful to nation outside of them, had Hitler seriously
       peace with Stalin, he can relaxed from foreign threats and had
       more power to control German people and implement policy that
       opposing racism like what you suppose more safely, but of course
       Hitler was a leader who very despise a nation which used
       ideology that treat kindly to people from "colored" race, and
       that is Stalinism, so Hitler feel "White European" people
       endangered, and from that reason he attacked Socialist Russia
       [quote]Because he had to. A state as powerful as the USSR wasn’t
       going to simply allow National Socialism to coexist with it.
       Hitler certainly drummed up his unbridled hatred for communism
       in public to motive Germans, but in private he admitted that he
       respected Stalin as a leader, and went on to state that on the
       surface level, the differences between communism and National
       Socialism were more minor than most people believed.[/quote]
       A colonial states like Britain (United Kingdom) and France
       wasn't going simply to allow Nazi Germany to exist, but of
       course Hitler did not attacked them seriously even did not
       totally destroyed them, different to what Hitler did to Stalin's
       Russia, because.... Hitler admired British Empire and wanted
       their colonial territory to be preserved, and Hitler more
       compassionate towards "Western European White" people, because
       in Nazi racial law, they called as "Aryan"
       [quote]...As for why he didn’t promote his movement as
       non-ethnic from the outset like the USSR, my best guess is that
       communism wasn’t a racial ideology to begin with, so they didn’t
       need to cloak a racial ideology with more esoteric aspects that
       contradict the typical tendency towards tribalism in order to
       motivate the racially inferior majority like Hitler was forced
       to. Or maybe he simply believed that he needed to cloak those
       esoteric aspects of his racial ideology, when in actuality he
       didn’t need to and everything would have turned out virtually
       the same regardless. It wouldn’t be the first time that Hitler
       makes an error that costs him the future of the ideology. Or
       maybe he did erroneously base the concept of the Aryan race on
       who was ethnically German, but he wasn’t necessarily a tribalist
       and respected non-Germans. Or maybe it was both. [/quote]
       From beginning of his political career even until 1941, Hitler
       did not erase his racial laws, or changed it into not racist law
       even a bit, so Hitler was cloak his racial views for the sake
       maintain his good image to majority German people can be viewed
       in another perspective, Hitler indeed was leader who wanted
       "White Superiority" keep continue, if Hitler really oppose
       racism, cloaking his racial views is not an excuse, just declare
       that he will implement policies that oppose to racism to
       "colored" people, and any high officials and people who against
       that thing will be purged and executed, like what Stalin
       heroically did to majority ignorant Russian people
       [quote]The original Nuremberg laws don’t mention black people at
       all. It only applied to Jews. And from what I’ve read from anet,
       those who tried to apply them to non-Jewish peoples were sacked
       [/quote]
       Nuremberg laws officially applied to Non-Jewish people too in
       1935, and the prove of that you can see my previous post about
       the persecution of "black" people in Nazi Germany, it happen
       even after 1935, so the argument from "
  HTML http://aryanism.net
       "
       ("Aryanism" people's official website) that Nuremberg racial
       laws only apply to Jews is a lie
       [quote]This was true in the US during WW2 as well. Black people,
       both as citizens and soldiers, were often treated worse than
       white people and lived in a segregated society, yet I rarely
       encounter people who consider the US the “bad guys” during WW2.
       The point is that if you consider Nazi Germany worse than the
       US, then the US is still the good guy even if they had done some
       morally repugnant things during the war. The same applies for
       those who view the US as worse than Nazi Germany[/quote]
       Nazi and United States, alongside with Western European nations
       are more morally inferior and cruel rather than Stalin Russia
       that already promoting policies that oppose racism since 1924,
       so your comparation about Nazi Germany and United States, and
       another Western European colonial nations is useless
       [quote]but I do think that Russia is more racist than the US at
       this point, and I don’t think that a truly anti-western,
       anti-tribalist, Aryanist-leaning movement is nearly as likely to
       occur in Russia as it is to occur in America, which has a far
       more ethnically diverse population and tends to value
       conservatism less.[/quote]
       If Russia are racist, then many discrimination towards
       "Non-White Russian" people oftenly happen and covered by news,
       even world media news will report that, and the world community
       will condemn Russia as a whole, but until now rarely
       discrimination in Russia reported by the news and not famous, so
       your saying that Russia is more racist than "America" is just an
       hollow argument, and conservatism ideology not always concern on
       racial problem, so not all of conservative ideology are tend to
       racism, and if you all against conservatism as a whole, then my
       country will be your enemy too, since persecution towards
       minority of Chinese people and Eastern Indonesia Papua people by
       majority of native Indonesian people are frequent, even no every
       single government officials were racially from minority
       background, my nation are the most nation who are anti-immigrant
       in South East Asia, even Islamic people from another country
       many of my people not want to accept them
       [quote]America is commonly seen as a nation built up by the sum
       of all the contributions from incredibly diverse peoples
       emigrating from the Old World into the so-called New
       World.[/quote]
       Yes, "America" built by various diverse types of "White" people
       from Western Europe who emigrate from the Old World and mass
       killing and expulse the red skinned people that being indigenous
       people of "North America" continent, that's why Hitler admire
       North American people in Mein Kampf, they are mostly racially
       pure "White European" and rarely did an intermarriage to people
       from "colored" races
       #Post#: 8365--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: SirGalahad Date: August 27, 2021, 3:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote] If Russia are racist, then many discrimination towards
       "Non-White Russian" people oftenly happen and covered by news,
       even world media news will report that, and the world community
       will condemn Russia as a whole[/quote]
       Russia is over 80% ethnically Russian, and a majority of the
       other 19-20% consists of other ethnic groups that would be
       classified as “white”. Obviously we won’t hear as much about it,
       when non-whites are a rarer occurrence in Russia to begin with
       [quote]Yes, "America" built by various diverse types of "White"
       people from Western Europe[/quote]
       America has accepted the largest amount of immigrants from all
       ethnic backgrounds by far. Competing against other countries,
       it’s not even a contest. “White” people only make up 60% of the
       population, and they’re set to very quickly become a minority
       here. In fact, if we look at the data for the younger
       generations, “white” people already are a minority, so it’s only
       a matter of time before the older generations die off. What
       you’re saying isn’t even close to being true, and you know it
       #Post#: 8367--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: Cthens Date: August 27, 2021, 7:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=SirGalahad link=topic=159.msg8365#msg8365
       date=1630051329]
       [quote] If Russia are racist, then many discrimination towards
       "Non-White Russian" people oftenly happen and covered by news,
       even world media news will report that, and the world community
       will condemn Russia as a whole[/quote]
       Russia is over 80% ethnically Russian, and a majority of the
       other 19-20% consists of other ethnic groups that would be
       classified as “white”. Obviously we won’t hear as much about it,
       when non-whites are a rarer occurrence in Russia to begin with
       [quote]Yes, "America" built by various diverse types of "White"
       people from Western Europe[/quote]
       America has accepted the largest amount of immigrants from all
       ethnic backgrounds by far. Competing against other countries,
       it’s not even a contest. “White” people only make up 60% of the
       population, and they’re set to very quickly become a minority
       here. In fact, if we look at the data for the younger
       generations, “white” people already are a minority, so it’s only
       a matter of time before the older generations die off. What
       you’re saying isn’t even close to being true, and you know it
       [/quote]
       He is a bolshevik. He cares about nothing more than Stalin's
       aesthetics and he will destroy anything to settle his
       inferiority complex.  If he lived near Russia, as many Muslims
       do, he'd realize how dumb he really is.
       @kameradbaren what do you think the Russians thought and think
       of Hijab or Islam in general? They abhor it. They persecuted
       Muslims, not white Europeans in the Soviet time. And today, well
       just turn on Russian TV and see what they say about "Islam"
       #Post#: 8368--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: Cthens Date: August 27, 2021, 7:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Truly Russia does not care who she terrorizes. Before the
       Russians were terrorizing everyone else it was aimed at their
       own people. The Tsarina had a saying; "Russians love to feel the
       whip"
       They've just exported it.
       #Post#: 8369--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: guest30 Date: August 27, 2021, 8:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @SirGalahad, Emily's best friend, fellow Nazi comrade, and also
       Anglophile
       [quote]Russia is over 80% ethnically Russian, and a majority of
       the other 19-20% consists of other ethnic groups that would be
       classified as “white”. Obviously we won’t hear as much about it,
       when non-whites are a rarer occurrence in Russia to begin
       with[/quote]
       In other word, serious racism rarely happen in Russia, and even
       tough if Russian people are "more racist" towards foreign
       "colored Non-White European" people, at least their governments
       make a policy that oppose racism and oppression, like assisting
       nations that troubled by terrorism like Syria and Central Africa
       Republic (Congo), helping China and Iran against NATO nations's
       economic embargo and military agression, and helping today
       Afghanistan which liberated by Taliban Islamic people, so Russia
       is good for bilateral relationship for a nation, not like United
       States and their Western European allies who always forcing
       other nation to implement their oppressive economic system which
       only benefit themselves (United States and their allies), and
       threat them with embargo and military attack if they refused to
       implement that economic system, their foreign policy is still
       not yet changed even from colonial era until now, even tough
       their people are using "1960s counter-culture" philosophy as
       their way of life which you all "Aryanism" people considered as
       "noble" and emphatically good, that is the only reason why I
       still hate and not trust the West that you like, I know that you
       "Aryanism" people are mostly "white" people who live in Western
       European "developed" nation, you live with very much privilege
       and benefits that generated from their oppressive action in the
       past, colonialism, and what your governments doing today to the
       rest of the world, so not surprise if you don't know anything
       about what we feel from what your lovely Western European nation
       do to the rest of our people, people of non-Western European
       nations, so you all just force us to be friendly to your nation
       and against Russia, only because your people around you live
       with a culture which you consider more "empathically good" more
       than Russia and also us
       And I consider NATO nations is another revival of Western
       European powers inspired from of Nazi Germany's foreign policy
       This is NATO nations map in Western Europe
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/4b1a803fc7bdfd5d4ced77ac2426540e/ce6a486fce978e77-74/s1280x1920/534101a5700e8f3372e642bbbf0f0c7dcde44d07.jpg
       They still not boring enough to send their military troops to
       besiege Russia
       This is Nazi Germany's territory (Even Turkey which not occupied
       by Nazi Germany, is friendly towards Nazi, and also Spain, so
       the NATO nations map almost same like Nazi Germany alliance's
       map)
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/776a3247250989be9b87f989713c4412/b78dfbd9f4c02e4a-fc/s1280x1920/ed02d2775aea7d996b0c4c9a63188ee041fbe7af.jpg
       Nazi anti-Stalin Russia propaganda
  HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/c51f392db13b00cbee57fb993b6b0f43/251b4a633e38b048-fa/s540x810/25116b6b4f0e4751509f25979064e6ee88974c3d.jpg
       NATO capitalist and colonialist nations's anti-socialist
       propaganda
  HTML https://bostonraremaps.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/BRM2431-Europe-Unie_lowres-743x1024.jpg
       Nazi propaganda and NATO nations propaganda almost same,
       vilifying a nation that ever became socialist
       Hitler's ideology NOT YET DEAD in Western Europe, so Western
       Europe must be annihilated
       #Post#: 8370--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: guest30 Date: August 27, 2021, 8:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @Cthens, negro man who sympathize to Hitler's white supremacist
       ideology, National [s]Socialism[/s] Racialism
       [quote]@kameradbaren what do you think the Russians thought and
       think of Hijab or Islam in general? They abhor it. They
       persecuted Muslims, not white Europeans in the Soviet time. And
       today, well just turn on Russian TV and see what they say about
       "Islam"[/quote]
       In Soviet time, all of religious people were forced to accept
       socialism, and, you say that Soviet government not persecute
       "white European" people, see Stalin's Red Terror that caused 10
       millions deaths of "White European Ukrainian" people, and also
       another 20 millions death of "White European Russian" people
       because of deliberate famine which made by Stalin's heroic
       policy to make Russia became superpower against the barbarian
       racist Western European nations, Stalin did not concern much
       about race, as long as you are loyal to Comrade Stalin, whether
       your racial background, you are a good socialist, I already show
       the proofs of information about how Stalin implemented
       anti-racist policy in Soviet Russia that make the first
       anti-racist movement in 20th century in previous conversation
       post on thread "Aryanism's hostility towards Russia and Eastern
       European people"
       [quote]Truly Russia does not care who she terrorizes. Before the
       Russians were terrorizing everyone else it was aimed at their
       own people. The Tsarina had a saying; "Russians love to feel the
       whip"
       They've just exported it.[/quote]
       That is Russia's policy during Tsarist era, before socialist
       era, their way of life and their foreign policy is colonialist,
       I hate it, I more like Russia during Stalin era and his
       successor until socialist Russia fell in 1991
       #Post#: 8371--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: v3456 Date: August 27, 2021, 12:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=SirGalahad link=topic=159.msg8350#msg8350
       date=1630030655]
       @kameradbaren @v3456 Even supposing that any of your assertions
       about Hitler are correct, what does that have to do with the
       validity of our actual policies?
       Hitler doesn't have to be an ideologically blameless and
       infallible man for the concept of the Aryan race to hold weight.
       [/quote]
       As I previously said: You are spreading false information. You
       are trying to fill the minds of people with incorrect
       information that ultimately leads to wrong assumptions.
       Everyone who studied Mein Kampf and Hitler's actual racial
       policies is able to put the facts together and deduce that
       you're dishonest. If you keep lying about Hitler not being
       racist - what else are you lying about?  You are distorting a
       fundamentally good premise of rebranding National Socialism as a
       non-racist ideology into very lame historical revisionism that
       crumbles every time a person with some historical knowledge is
       trying to investigate your claims. You can see it in every post
       on the main site blog - people come every once in a while, say
       something rational like: "Guys, I like your ideology very much,
       but this revisionist nonsense must go..." Only to get ignored or
       banned.
       While some of your ideas may be noble, your methods are ignoble.
       You are going to lead astray many anti-racist
       National-Socialists and convince them they must believe in
       everything the main site claims instead of studying history
       rationally, learning from their mistakes and letting go of the
       toxic historical past. 90sRetroFan insists that White people
       must apologize for everything they've done, so it's only fair
       for you either a) to accept guilt and apologize instead of
       claiming that "it didn't happen... but they deserved it anyway";
       b) letting go of Hitlerism and starting anew.
       Hitler's own infallibility would have been irrelevant if
       Aryanist ideology did not proclaim an absolute cult of
       personality claiming to "emulating Hitler's own life journey".
       By turning a personality into a cult you become responsible for
       the justification of wrongdoings of such personality. Your own
       approach is also dishonest towards Hitler himself, who was a
       White supremacist and racist - so yes, despite the fact that I
       don't like Hitler, I gotta admit that you are disrespecting his
       personal views.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page