URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 1240--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 20, 2020, 11:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Post the particular Heydrich quotes that you want us to include,
       and I will consider them.
       #Post#: 1250--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: christianbethel Date: September 21, 2020, 8:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=159.msg1240#msg1240
       date=1600662412]
       Post the particular Heydrich quotes that you want us to include,
       and I will consider them.
       [/quote]
       [quote]To take the place of emigration, and with the prior
       approval of the Führer, the evacuation of the Jews to the East
       has become another possible solution. Although both courses of
       action emigration and evacuation, must, of course, be considered
       as nothing more than... temporary expedients, they do help to
       provide practical experience which should be of great importance
       in view of the coming Endlösung (Final Solution) of the Jewish
       question.
       Speech at the Wannsee Conference, Berlin, (20 January 1942),
       as quoted in Why Did the Heavens Not Darken : The "Final
       Solution (1990) by A. J. Mayer, p. 304[/quote]
       [quote]It is natural that people do not want to be involved with
       us too much. There is no problem down to the smallest
       egotistical longing which the Gestapo cannot solve. Regarded in
       this way we are, if a joke is permitted, looked upon as a cross
       between a general maid and the dustbin of the Reich.[/quote]
       #Post#: 1275--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: johnnyjohnnyjohnny Date: September 24, 2020, 5:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=159.msg1205#msg1205
       date=1600404171]
       That is a matter of opinion. It could be argued that dyeu itself
       comes from dia, as for something to shine, the light must travel
       across/through space from the source to the eye.
       [/quote]
       OMFG THE AMMOUNT OF HUBRIS
       > It could be argued that dyeu itself comes from dia
       No, in fact, it couldn't be argued, since that's really, really,
       really stupid, and shows how little you know.
       "It could be argued that dyeu itself comes from dia" oh yeah?
       For real? *Dyeu-, a word from Proto-Indo-European that was
       spoken between 4500 BC and 2500 BC, is derived from diá-, a word
       from Ancient Greek, that was spoken since 900BC at the earliest?
       I didn't know Ancient Greeks had time travel!
       Imagine how much hubris do you have to have to open your mouth
       when you very clearly know jack shit about anything remotely
       related to the topic.
       LMAO the amounts of reaching and bullshit you spew are
       incredible.
       Also, no, it's not "opinion" (LMAO), but rather, rigurous
       derivation and etymological research.
       The dia- in diabolos comes from *δισα (disa,
       since you probably can't read greek), from Proto-Indo-European
       *dwís (related to δίς (dís, “twice”) and
       δύο (dúo, “two”)). *dwís comes from *dwóh₁.
       The ultimate root for divine is Proto-Indo-European *deywós,
       through Latin deus, and Old French divin.
       So, not even remotely connected etymologies.
       Not related at all. ChristianBethel, don't trust this dude.
       Either way, the meaning or connotation of neither word comes
       from VEDIC AND PERSIAN USE.
       #Post#: 1277--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: guest5 Date: September 24, 2020, 9:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]From Vulgar Latin *dīa, from Latin diēs (“day”)
       (reanalyzed as a 1st declension noun), back-formed from the
       accusative diem (whose vowel was once long), from Proto-Italic
       *djēm, the accusative of *djous, from Proto-Indo-European
       *dyḗws (“heaven, sky”). Akin to Catalan and Portuguese
       dia, etc. Not etymologically related to English day, from
       Proto-Germanic *dagaz. Compare English dial. [/quote]
  HTML https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/d%C3%ADa
       [quote]Dyḗus (lit. "daylight-sky-god"), also Dyḗus
       ph₂tḗr (lit. "father daylight-sky-god"),[1][2] is
       the reconstructed name of the daylight-sky god in
       Proto-Indo-European mythology. Dyēus was the bright sky of
       the day conceived as a divine entity and as the seat of the
       gods, the *deywṓs. Associated with the vast diurnal sky
       and with the fertile rains, Dyēus was often paired with
       *Dhéǵhōm, the Earth Mother, in a relationship of union
       and contrast.
       While its existence is not directly attested by archaeological
       or written materials, Dyēus is considered by scholars the
       most securely reconstructed deity of the Indo-European pantheon,
       as identical formulas referring to him can be found among the
       subsequent Indo-European languages and myths of the Vedic
       Indo-Aryans, Latins, Greeks, Phrygians, Messapians, Thracians,
       Illyrians, Albanians and Hittites[/quote]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyeus
       #Post#: 1287--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: johnnyjohnnyjohnny Date: September 25, 2020, 2:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=NuminousSun link=topic=159.msg1277#msg1277
       date=1600999337]
       [quote]From Vulgar Latin *dīa, from Latin diēs (“day”)
       (reanalyzed as a 1st declension noun), back-formed from the
       accusative diem (whose vowel was once long), from Proto-Italic
       *djēm, the accusative of *djous, from Proto-Indo-European
       *dyḗws (“heaven, sky”). Akin to Catalan and Portuguese
       dia, etc. Not etymologically related to English day, from
       Proto-Germanic *dagaz. Compare English dial. [/quote]
  HTML https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/d%C3%ADa
       [/quote]
       God, again someone who doesnt know jack either. The "dia-" in
       diabolos (i.e. the one we're talking about) is this one:
  HTML https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/δια-#Ancient_Greek
       A preffix in ancient greek. It has no relation to the word in
       romance languages (i.e. what you posted), which started existing
       only more than a millenia later.
       #Post#: 1289--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 25, 2020, 4:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "at the earliest"
       It is logically possible to say that a word appeared at Time t
       at the latest by finding an instance of the word at t. It is
       logically impossible to say that a word appeared at t at the
       earliest, as the earliest known instance of the word at t does
       not preclude earlier usage.
       #Post#: 1290--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: johnnyjohnnyjohnny Date: September 25, 2020, 6:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=90sRetroFan link=topic=159.msg1289#msg1289
       date=1601026555]
       "at the earliest"
       It is logically possible to say that a word appeared at Time t
       at the latest by finding an instance of the word at t. It is
       logically impossible to say that a word appeared at t at the
       earliest, as the earliest known instance of the word at t does
       not preclude earlier usage.
       [/quote]
       Wrong. As "earliest known instance of the word does not preclude
       earlier usage", so does finding the suposedly latest instance of
       a word not preclude even later (as of yet unknown) usage. That
       is, finding an instance of a word only expands the range of time
       on which the usage of said word is confirmed.
       Either way, this is tangential to the topic.
       Keep coping.
       EDIT: changed "hardly tangential" to "tangential." The intended
       meaning stays the same, but this way its easier to infer it,
       even if previously the context was enough, in my opinion. (The
       intended meaning was that the argument was not related to the
       topic (hardly tangential, in the sense of hardly even lightly
       touching)).
       #Post#: 1295--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 25, 2020, 11:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "finding the suposedly latest instance of a word not preclude
       even later (as of yet unknown) usage"
       You are illiterate.
       [quote]It is logically possible to say that a word appeared at
       Time t at the latest by finding an instance of the word at
       t.[/quote]
       We are talking about when a word appeared, not when it was last
       in use.
       #Post#: 3547--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: johnnyjohnnyjohnny Date: January 22, 2021, 2:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I had abandoned the discussion because I have demostrated my
       point, and also it is clear to any onlooker what 90sRetroFan has
       been reduced to doing. Therefore it is pointless for me to keep
       posting and engaging him in his petty wording games within a
       tangent irrelevant to the topic. I only post again to make
       clearer the wording of my (now penultimate) post in the thread.
       I will not post further in this thread.
       #Post#: 8259--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Questions Regarding Aryanism
       By: christianbethel Date: August 23, 2021, 6:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What do Aryanists have to say about child euthanasia in National
       Socialist Germany? I'm very concerned, especially since Hans
       Asperger, the 'founder' of autism, was involved.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page