DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 18539--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: SpiritualNarcissim Date: March 21, 2023, 7:29 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"A narcissist in this mythically accurate sense should refer to
one who would adamantly prefer solitude over lowering one’s
standards for the sake of companionship."
Fascinating!
"One version of the myth explains that Narcissus loved his own
reflection because he saw in it his dead twin sister who had
been his true love all along."
Tragic!
How do we best refer to the behavior styles that have been
described in the modern world with the definition academically
filed under "narcissism"? I suppose from a Gnostic viewpoint the
word "demonic" would suffice. I suppose a "narcissist" as
described in the modern sense of the word is also 'a tribe of
one'? I have even seen some who speak of "narcissism" on Youtube
state that "narcissism" is the feeling of "all for one and one
for none", which would obviously be the opposite of "one for all
and all for one"?
#Post#: 18540--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: SpiritualNarcissim Date: March 21, 2023, 7:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I see the problem with this statement already: "all for one and
one for none". Because, if all are devilish and the one is not,
from an absolute moral viewpoint the one should not be for any
of them and should remove themselves from the equation
altogether?
#Post#: 18548--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: guest98 Date: March 22, 2023, 2:24 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]I had never heard of the "smiling face of Yahweh"
before[/quote]
The women at 5:45 is what i mean when i say smiling face of
Yahweh
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/news/climate-weather-and-climate-effects-2020-and-beyond/msg18520/#msg18520:
HTML https://youtu.be/Ebujv7l7Mlc
I guess it's necessary to maintain appearances when one is among
one's own tribe.
[quote]narcissism is demonic
[/quote]
It could be someone who hates parts of themselves, or parts of
themselves where destroyed by the Yahweh parents and now they
can only see these parts of themselves in the outside and as the
enemy. Or in other words being enslaved to their own
subconscious projections. It is the opposite of inner
wholeness\inner integration, it is the outer darkness.
#Post#: 18549--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: SirGalahad Date: March 22, 2023, 3:43 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
@m94r I dislike this persisting culture in America of artificial
niceness. The most baffling thing about it, is that nobody seems
to be genuinely fooled by it, and yet we all collectively insist
on perpetuating it. Even more than fake smiles, I dislike fake
small talk as well. If we don’t actually care about the
responses and are just attempting to fill idle air, why let the
words leave our mouths in the first place? I of course show
genuine kindness to people deserving of it when I can, but I
think that I should be filtering what leaves my mouth to be as
genuine and meaningful as possible. Maybe this falls into the
category of “avoiding idle talk”, which many Muslims claim they
avoid
I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately actually, and it
makes me think of the stereotype of Chinese people supposedly
being “unfriendly”, “cold”, and “self-centered”. Are they
ACTUALLY anymore unfriendly, cold, and self-centered than
westerners or even other non-westerners for that matter, or are
they just more HONEST about how they’re feeling at any given
time? Even if the stereotype is true, which I can’t personally
verify since I haven’t been to China or had many first-hand
encounters with Chinese tourists and first-generation
immigrants, I would prefer that blunt emotional honesty that
gets Chinese people negatively stereotyped, than the artificial
niceness often promoted by these sinophobes. They’re not any
better. They’re just maliciously masking their feelings and then
attacking people who don’t
#Post#: 18556--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: 90sRetroFan Date: March 22, 2023, 5:10 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
" I should be filtering what leaves my mouth to be as genuine
and meaningful as possible. "
Yet despite your filtering, your genuineness is nevertheless
likely to be misinterpreted as also fake by those already
accustomed to others faking it. This is how the fakers ruin it
for everyone.
#Post#: 18562--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: "SpiritualNarcissism" Date: March 22, 2023, 11:32
pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Narcissist and Proud
[quote]When a clinical word creeps into daily conversation, it
tends to get watered down (stressed, depressed, addicted to
Twitter). It softens from a diagnosis into more of a quirk. “A
little OCD” might mean you simply love to perfect your
PowerPoints or stack your books in the Zoom background just so.
Adorable! But then there is another category of clinical word
that tends to get harsher as it spreads. For example,
narcissist. I don’t know many people who would humblebrag that
they are “a little narcissistic.” (“Fun fact: I just love to
gaslight my friends!”)
Ever since Trump perfected the template (grandiose,
manipulative, easily wounded, unable to tolerate even minor
scenarios in which he isn’t deemed central or special), the
label has been steadily spreading to celebrities, shitty
boyfriends, and sometimes mothers. #narctokadvice is flooded
with pictures of terrible exes whose faces are rubbed out and
replaced with Johnny Depp’s. Infinite listicles describe life
with a narcissist as a psychological war zone and explain how to
spot the signs and fight back: “How to Argue With a Narcissist”
or “5 Ways to Weaken a Narcissist” or “The 7 Lies We Learn From
Our Narcissistic Parents.” On #narctok, the final stage of
enlightenment is “no contact,” meaning forever cutting the
narcissist out of your life.
Elon Musk is a “narcissist” or sometimes a “narcissistic
sociopath” or a “toddler.” Ben Affleck is both a philosopher of
narcissism and a narcissist, according to this five-part YouTube
series on the subject, though the comments devolve into a debate
about whether J.Lo is also a narcissist and possibly Jennifer
Garner and — Who knows? — maybe all of their little nepo babies,
too.
For women, the bar is preposterously low. The
Kardashian-Jenners, Taylor Swift, Rihanna, Cardi B, Madonna, and
pretty much any other prominent female celebrity, not excluding
Beyoncé and especially Meghan Markle: all possible narcissists
according to one quotable shrink or another. Symptoms cited by
critics include singing, posing for pictures, posting pictures,
stealing too much attention, talking about their own life —
doing everything we demand of them and, honestly, many things we
all do ourselves.
What’s confusing about the insult is how many of the behaviors
we define as narcissistic in celebrities we routinely indulge in
ourselves: narrating and documenting our own lives, behaving as
if we always have an audience. When research psychologist Jean
Twenge wrote in The Narcissism Epidemic about the epidemic of
misery among post-millenials, she mostly blamed cell phones,
social media, and the “culture of selfies” for the shift.
Fifteen years later, the teens are still drowning in
hopelessness. But calling them narcissists is about as helpful
as calling them obese. What can they do with that diagnosis
except hate themselves even more? One good answer comes from a
long-dead Austrian psychoanalyst who called himself “Mr. Z”:
Take back the word.
In the ’70s and ’80s, a debate over the meaning of narcissist
broke out between two psychoanalysts, Heinz Kohut (Mr. Z) and
Otto Kernberg. Kohut and his family escaped from Nazi-occupied
Austria in the late 1930s. In the U.S., his singular dream was
to be accepted into the Chicago School for Psychoanalysis so he
could spend his life treating patients and debating with
colleagues about Freud. But when he entered classical analysis
himself with someone from the school, Kohut found it a
“burdensome chore” and an “extended failure of understanding,”
according to his biographer, Charles Strozier.
In Freudian theory, narcissist suggests someone who got stuck in
an infantile phase because they didn’t get enough love, then
spent their life in a desperate and futile attempt to regain it.
But in practice, Kohut found this approach formulaic and cold,
crushing of his creative spirit. “Kohut deeply objected to the
idea that narcissism, or any form of self absorption, is
necessarily bad,” Strozier writes. Narcissism, to him, was the
engine of ambition, a creative force that pushed you beyond your
limits to try things you might not be confident you could do.
Kohut’s view eventually became known as “self-psychology,” a
much gentler and more relational form of analysis. He spread the
idea that, in fact, the only way children could thrive is if
their parents worked hard to make them feel special. To him, a
healthy dose of narcissism grounded a child and allowed them to
have empathetic relations with others. (It’s the RuPaul idea:
“If you can’t love yourself …”) The sentiment permeates
parenting today; only the word fell out of favor.
Kohut died suddenly of leukemia at 49, and Kernberg, a rival
scholar of narcissism, took on the word. Kernberg’s darker view
informed Christopher Lasch’s 1979 book The Culture of
Narcissism, which warned of a coming generation obsessed with
fame and celebrity. Lasch’s predictions were alarmingly correct,
but his tone was unnecessarily dire. He predicted that, much
like a borderline patient, all of us staring at a flickering
screen would start to feel our “amorphous existence to be futile
and purposeless.”
In his excellent 2016 book, Rethinking Narcissism, Harvard
Medical School psychologist Craig Malkin translates Kohut’s very
clotted writing to a basic spectrum. On the healthy side of
narcissism is what he describes as the ability to hold “positive
illusions,” a belief that, despite the facts at hand, we can do
great things. At this end of the spectrum, it’s necessary to set
aside critical voices and not let them derail us. Narcissism
becomes disordered, he says, only if we get rigid and prickly
around any small critique and, from there, can slide into a
total lack of empathy and become psychopathic.
Malkin says he fully supports reducing contact with someone in
your life to zero if that person is abusive. But asking if a
partner is a narcissist is a “distraction,” he says. “My first
question is ‘Are you physically and emotionally safe?’” If the
answer is “yes,” then their narcissism might be a trait you can
work with.
Malkin writes beautifully about his mother, the “incandescent”
figure of his childhood and a narcissist. He writes about how
resentful she was when he had to move her into a small apartment
and how she could not rest until she bought herself a pair of
four-inch Manolo Blahniks that made her feel special. He writes
about how he came to think of narcissism not as the whole of her
but as something she used to comfort herself and how, when she
died, he could say good-bye with more love in his heart.
I, too, have a narcissist in my life I try and sometimes fail to
love. After a recent insane argument, during which I fully
regressed, I spent a good two weeks soothing myself on
#narktokadvice. I envied these young amateur shrinks with their
emotional mastery, their foresight to distance themselves from
the danger so as not to ruin their own relationships. I found
wise friends, like this confident queerdo with their sparkles
and cute rainbow shirt: “There’s no bigger inconvenience to a
narcissist than another person’s emotions.” I flirted with some
of the “no contact” gurus, too, but the advice didn’t stick. My
narcissist is getting older now. I still want to try.[/quote]
HTML https://www.thecut.com/2023/03/narcissistic-behavior-trend.html
I have no problem with using psychological warfare against
enemies.
"Do unto others as you would want done unto you!". It is
literally that simple!
I stand by the statement that the behavior as defined by the
contemporary use of the word "narcissism" under my original
response on this thread is in fact just demonic behavior.
#Post#: 18565--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: RuthlessRemovalService Date: March 23, 2023, 1:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I would also like to add to this thread how many of these
Western experts on "narcissism" on Youtube refer to children in
a derogatory manner in their videos. The one instance that
sticks out in my mind is the "narcissism" expert who stated that
"narcissists" draw an inaccurate picture of you in their minds,
but that picture is akin "to a 3 year old with Crayons".
National Socialists have been advocating for taking the Crayons
away from the adults\adulterated and giving them back to the
children that deserve to have them for quite some time now:
HTML https://www.history.com/.image/t_share/MTU3ODc4NjAyOTc3MDYwMTY5/gettyimages-615315844-2.jpg
HTML https://www.purecostumes.com/mm5/graphics/00000001/RA450103_full_1_460x700.jpg
#Post#: 18599--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: guest98 Date: March 25, 2023, 2:40 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote] but I think that I should be filtering what leaves my
mouth to be as genuine and meaningful as possible[/quote]
I remember reading somewhere, and i thought it was very true,
that whatever you say or do, you should do it with your whole
self/personality, instead of doing things in a split way. One
should always be one, instead of many.
#Post#: 18606--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: MissingUranium Date: March 25, 2023, 8:38 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]I remember reading somewhere, and i thought it was very
true, that whatever you say or do, you should do it with your
whole self/personality, instead of doing things in a split way.
One should always be one, instead of many.[/quote]
The only time I could see your statement needing a disclaimer of
it's own is if you find yourself at war with an enemy who has
already initiated deception against you, then retaliatory
deception is warranted, if not a duty.
#Post#: 18614--------------------------------------------------
Re: jewishness
By: guest98 Date: March 26, 2023, 2:30 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The problem is that sometimes it is difficult to tell or notice
if someone is being deceptive with you or not.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page