URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       True Left
  HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Issues
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 26926--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anti-gentrification
       By: antihellenistic Date: July 3, 2024, 7:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Western Gentrification, Competitive, and Capitalistic societies
       do not end the economic disparity and poverty problem, it
       enhances further to the worst phase. The gentrification society
       prefers and only is achieved and enjoyed by high-skilled
       workers. The low-skilled workers cannot have it, because they
       have few salaries, so, they lack financial money
       
       [quote]As Stiglitz notes, competition is less than perfect,
       creating  distortions in pay and contribution based on
       extraordinary market  transitions, market externalities, tax
       policy, monopoly behavior, and  such extra-market factors as
       exploitation and discrimination. Most appear to have become
       accentuated since the 1970s with the emergence of contemporary
       globalization.
       ...
       With its comparatively greater presence in global cities (r =
       .80,  signif @ .01), and consistent with its role in providing
       competitive  advantage in the global economy, the agglomeration
       of innovation resources bears heavily on the endogenous
       metropolitan culture, economic character, and heterogeneous
       production mix. That is, in addition  to agglomeration nurturing
       innovation and the entrepreneurial desires  of its matrix of
       contributing inventors and professionals, it also has  impact on
       the overall metropolitan area, most particularly on economic
       inequality (Flaherty & Rogowski, 2021). While this may happen
       through  multiple pathways, research brings to the surface two
       avenues of potential occurrence
       In the case of indirect pathway impacts, innovation
       agglomeration  appears to contribute to inequality through its
       polarizing effects on a  global city's employment-structure.
       Specifically, Fig. 1 shows this collateral effect on overall
       metropolitan employment to involve (1) the  seeding of a
       concentration of highly-educated, high-income, skill-based,
       professional upper-middle-class employees (r = .67, signif @
       .01), while  simultaneously (2) deflating demand for
       manufacturing-oriented middle-class workers (r = − .64,
       signif @ .01), and (3) nominally stimulating  employment
       opportunity for low-wage workers (r = .40, signif @.01).  To be
       discussed in the inequality section below, this polarizing
       effect on  MSA employment structure leads to heightened
       inequality, both overall  and for income disparities, even
       though overall metropolitan poverty  levels may remain
       unaffected.
       ...
       In the case of a direct pathway effect of innovation
       agglomeration on  inequality, Fig. 1 indicates this mediating
       variable to be significantly  correlated with overall inequality
       as well as the three disparity ratios (i.  e., for Gini, r =
       .45; for the 90–10 ratio, r = .81; for the 99–50 ratio, r = .66;
       for the 95–20 ratio, r = .43; all significant at the .01 level).
       Throwing light on these direct associations, some researchers
       argue that,  by virtue of an urban economy skewed by
       innovation-sector employment, there may be a greater
       socio-cultural appreciation in global cities  for intellectual
       property and “technology entrepreneurship”, potential  new
       enterprise frontiers, and high-tech worker importance (Liu &
       Parilla, 2019).
       Benner and Feng (2020) argue further that such preferential
       appreciation for innovation resources encourages acceptance of
       an edict to  “move fast and break things,” that willfully
       creates a “pattern of  generating poverty jobs.” Compounding
       this insensitivity or disregard  for socioeconomic consequences
       is a “credentialist prejudice” defined by  Sandel (2020) as a
       “disdain for the less educated” workforce. In short, it  might
       be that many global-city inhabitants (including public
       policymakers) appear more enamored with and supportive of their
       MSA's  creative scenes and innovation ethic than they may be
       sympathetic with  the plights of those peripheralized in
       traditional industrial and service  employment. [/quote]
       Source :
       Boschken, H. L. (2022). Income inequality and the imprint of
       globalization on U.S. metropolitan areas. Cities, 121,
       103503–103503.
  HTML https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2021.103503
       Hitler' solution :
       [quote]It is a characteristic of our materialistic epoch that
       our scientific education shows a growing emphasis on what is
       real and practical: such subjects, for instance, as applied
       mathematics, physics, chemistry, etc. Of course they are
       necessary in an age that is dominated by industrial technology
       and chemistry, and where everyday life shows at least the
       external manifestations of these. But it is a perilous thing to
       base the general culture of a nation on the knowledge of these
       subjects. On the contrary, that general culture ought always to
       be directed towards ideals. - Adolf Hitler[/quote]
       Sumber :
       Adolf Hitler's "Mein Kampf" (Part 2) page 41 - 42
  HTML https://archive.org/details/AdolfHitlersmeinKampfpart2/page/n41/mode/2up
       [quote]“Industrialization has deprived the individual of all
       liberty, placed him in thrall to capital and the machine. The
       state is not the organization for self-rule by free individuals
       who call themselves citizens, but the central organization for
       the mills of labor growing out of industrialization, in which
       any independence or individualism is ground to dust. This is
       most crudely evident in the Bolshevik state, with its state
       capitalism.
       “But if we realize our social economy exactly as we discussed
       more than once, we will come to liberate the individual from the
       domination of capital and all its institutions. To begin with,
       labor will seize possession of capital. But what is ethically
       most significant is the following: when the purchasing power of
       wages increases—when, as you say, it might even double—the
       initial effect will be that production will have to increase,
       since the demand will be greater. But next comes the great era
       of increasing personal gratification, with the result that the
       worker will still earn a sufficiency if, instead of working
       eight hours a day, he puts in only seven or even six.
       “This moment signifies the rebirth of individuality, of the
       possibility of living for oneself outside the hours that serve
       material needs, and of devoting oneself to hobbies, cultural
       interests, art, science, life in general, and the family.
       “To this extent, then, socialism—our socialism—leads back to
       individuality, and with it to the strongest impetus to a
       personal, racially defined, and altogether universal human
       evolution.”
       ...
       “The World War had as one of its consequences that, wherever
       capitalism reigns, America has supremacy. And since America
       suffers from industrial overproduction, it will exploit this
       supremacy to dispose of its overproduction. That concerns
       everyone—Germany as well as France, England as well as South
       America, China, and Japan. Only where capitalism has been
       broken, abolished, replaced by something new does America’s
       power stop.
       “Herein lies our greatest mission and at the same time our best
       chance! Here is the bedrock where we may cast anchor. From there
       an anti-industrial world can be erected.” - Adolf Hitler[/quote]
       Sumber :
       Hitler - Memoirs Of A Confidant by Otto Wagener page 148, 149,
       160
  HTML https://archive.org/details/wagenerhitlermemoirsofaconfidant/page/n177/mode/2up
       [quote]As far as possible, one must avoid ruining landscapes
       with networks of high-tension wires, telpher railways and
       machines of that sort. I'm in favour of roads, when needs
       must—but what's uglier than a funicular? - Adolf Hitler, 9th
       February 1942, midday SPECIAL GUEST: SPEER The farce of
       gas-masks—The economics of the cults— Obersalzberg.[/quote]
       Source :
       Hitler, Adolf – Table Talk page 306
       #Post#: 26927--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anti-gentrification
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: July 3, 2024, 10:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]one must avoid ruining landscapes with networks of
       high-tension wires[/quote]
       Hitler is talking about rural landscapes. In cities (which is
       where gentrification occurs), it is in non-gentrified areas
       where wires are typically above ground:
  HTML https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/messy-electrical-utility-cables-urban-street-buildings-background-street-rocinha-favela-shanty-town-172637483.jpg
       In gentrified neighbourhoods the wires are usually out of sight:
  HTML https://citylimits.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/appin2-771x440.png
       We are supposed to be supporting the non-gentrified aesthetic!
  HTML https://www.atomic-ranch.com/architecture-design/what-is-brutalist-architecture/
       [quote]Brutalism celebrates authenticity. Water tanks, support
       elements and electrical towers are left visible instead of
       concealed behind closed doors.[/quote]
       #Post#: 28147--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anti-gentrification
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: October 6, 2024, 7:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Our enemies raise our morale for us:
  HTML https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2024/10/06/180222/
       [quote]Hello USA and Europe. In case you were wondering what
       awaits all nations once they are finally overrun by the Third
       World...here is a short walk through of Johannesburg, South
       Africa. This is the street next to the Carlton Center,
       previously the most prestigious and wealthy part of the city.
       Video taken September 2024.[/quote]
       Looks good to me! Not one Starbucks* in sight! :)
       (* Actually, there are still 54 Starbucks in South Africa:
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starbucks#Locations
       [quote]South Africa: 54[161][/quote]
       so we still have work to do.)
       #Post#: 31551--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Anti-gentrification
       By: 90sRetroFan Date: December 5, 2025, 2:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       "New China" soon to bulldoze one of the few remaining
       non-gentrified districts:
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo14gDswZeg
       Woke comments:
       [quote]people who moved into highrises along highway corridors
       in the new developments, admit to me they're lonely and
       depressed. I've been in China since 2010 and spoken to them. The
       old men say before they used to play checkers on the street, now
       they sit on the sofa and wait for their son to come
       home.[/quote]
       [quote]Shipai village looks very cozy in all its
       grimyness[/quote]
       [quote]I want to live there :D[/quote]
       [quote]I say that's a nice place for people to live together.
       I'd visit Guangzhou just to go there. the rest of the city is
       like every other city: a place to exist but not to live[/quote]
       [quote]Its a vibrant community why would China demolish it ?
       Makes no sense ! Its Chinese heritage ![/quote]
       Because "New China" is the anti-China. It is all about futurism
       when dealing with local neighbourhoods:
       [img width=1280
       height=960]
  HTML https://www.ahstatic.com/photos/6318_ho_00_p_2048x1536.jpg[/img]
       but all about preservation when dealing with Western colonial
       neighbourhoods, which actually deserve bulldozing but which have
       zero chance of being bulldozed under Eurocentrist Xi:
       [img width=1280
       height=803]
  HTML https://www.christravelblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/yuexiu-park-sacred-heart-cathedral-china-layover-in-guangzhou-what-to-do-in-4-8-hours-IMG_2636.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Heart_Cathedral_(Guangzhou)
       [quote]The site of the cathedral was originally the residence of
       the Viceroy of Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces in the Qing
       dynasty. During the Second Opium War, the residence was
       completely destroyed and Viceroy Ye Mingchen was captured by the
       British.[citation needed]
       Based on the terms of an imperial edict issued by the Daoguang
       Emperor in February 1846, which promised compensation for
       churches destroyed and properties taken from the mission, the
       Société des Missions Étrangères de Paris obtained the site by
       signing an agreement with the Qing government on January 25,
       1861. In his decree of approval, the Xianfeng Emperor wrote
       "from now on, war should be stopped and peace be sincerely kept
       forever".[citation needed]
       With financial support from Napoleon III and donations from
       French Catholics,[3] Bishop Philippe François Zéphirin
       Guillemin, M.E.P. (明稽章), the first vicar
       apostolic of Guangdong, oversaw the construction project. A
       French architect from Nancy, Léon Vautrin,[4] was asked to
       design the cathedral, in collaboration with Charles Hyacinthe
       Humbert, also from Nancy. Humbert and another architect from
       Paris, Antoine Hermitte, who succeeds him at a later time, both
       travelled to China to oversee the construction of the
       cathedral.[5][/quote]
  HTML https://smallimg.pngkey.com/png/small/129-1297667_clip-free-stock-collection-of-free-failing-clipart.png
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page