DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 28343--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 20, 2024, 10:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/70a6fc5df4f8120dfefc7e847ad8c364/715f0b840315d367-31/s640x960/f044ae7edfd4e39a1f350f83da718fb8209b340a.jpg
Source :
HTML https://t.me/Stalinist_Revisionist_Channel/1169
#Post#: 28344--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 20, 2024, 10:43 am
---------------------------------------------------------
It was Friedrich Engels who are pro-Germanicist, not Hitler
--- Quote ---
> "True, it is a fixed idea with the French that the Rhine is
their property, but to this arrogant demand the only reply
worthy of the German nation is Arndt's: "Give back Alsace and
Lorraine". For I am of the opinion, perhaps in contrast to many
whose standpoint I share in other respects, that the reconquest
of the German-speaking left bank of the Rhine is a matter of
national honour, and that the Germanisation of a disloyal
Holland and of Belgium is a political necessity for us. Shall we
let the German nationality be completely suppressed in these
countries, while the Slavs are rising ever more powerfully in
the East?" - Friedrich Engels
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Engels, F. (2024). Ernst Moritz Arndt by Frederick Engels.
Retrieved October 20, 2024, from Marxists.org website:
HTML https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1841/01/arndt.htm
The difference between Hitler and Engels on agreeing with
expansionist doctrine is, Hitler want to expand to defeat
capitalist and communists, Engels wanted it for Germanic honor,
or ethnic superiority reason
#Post#: 28346--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: October 20, 2024, 4:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
>
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/70a6fc5df4f8120dfefc7e847ad8c364/715f0b840315d367-31/s640x960/f044ae7edfd4e39a1f350f83da718fb8209b340a.jpg
--- End Quote ---
Anti-imperialism is not necessarily anti-progressive. If the
empire is less progressive than the entity opposed to it, then
the latter successfully resisting imperial rule by the former
would be a progressive move.
We are anti-progressive, but we have sided with many historical
empires. One effect of imperialism is to remove the need for
competition between former rival neighbouring states. One reason
why Western weaponry became more powerful than non-Western
weaponry was because Western countries were constantly competing
against one another militarily due to absence of imperial rule,
in contrast to the more successful imperialism in other
civilizations.
#Post#: 28384--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: rp
Date: October 25, 2024, 3:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
A communist sets the record straight:
HTML https://x.com/ahdamnpahpah/status/1849181905775693968?t=28UaHyF79BEtenLGinDIEA&s=19
[quote]
Hitler was a massively Low-T individual who couldn’t even handle
eating meat properly, who constantly shrieked and dribbled like
an emotional wreck, and who “unalived” himself because he
couldn’t hack it. If he were alive today, he would be one of the
‘bluehair, polyamorous, superfluous cane with “low-spoon” and
“neurospicy”’ brigade.
Stalin, on the other-hand. I mean, you can just tell from his
face. No shrieking, no cowardice, no nonsense, no bullshit.
[Img]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Gamcd1vWQAAZym9?format=jpg&name=900x900[/img]
[/Quote]
#Post#: 28857--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: rp
Date: December 4, 2024, 12:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/RickdaBuffalo/status/1856527535003312511
--- Quote ---
>
> Idk how anyone can read this & think Engels, & Lewis Henry
Morgan, who Engels cited, weren't bigots. Which is rooted in
Eurocentric thought.
> These Eurocentrisms are what we are combating within
liberation theory. Marxism isn't without major espitemological
flaws. 1/
> [img width=1280
height=386]
HTML https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GcO18o0agAAhO8C?format=jpg&name=large[/img]
>
--- End Quote ---
Note the misappropriation of the term Aryan. From their
description, it is clear that the Pueblo Indians are the ones
with more Aryan blood! Contrast with Hitler's racial theories
and views toward Amerindians, it's pretty clear Hitler would
have supported #LandBack today if he were alive. #LandBack
activists have more in common with Hitler than they do with
Communists!
#Post#: 28923--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: rp
Date: December 10, 2024, 11:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://x.com/PostScarcityPod/status/1866193391903555617?t=0uQ8Mja0RognAD8aA1B_HA&s=19
[quote]
When I was young and naiive, I took marxists at their word when
they said they cared about liberating colonized peoples. Turns
out they share with liberals a devotion to the "european
civilizing mission," seeing non-eurasians as
"backward/uncivilized needing modernity/progress."
[/Quote]
#Post#: 28957--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: December 14, 2024, 9:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Such sentiments are even older. In his book Homo Americanus,
Croatian writer Tomislav Sunic lists many artists, writers and
philosophers — both European and American — who could accurately
be called “anti-American:” Martin Heidegger, Ezra Pound, Henry
James, H.L. Mencken, and T.S. Eliot. Some, such as Francis
Parker Yockey, would have preferred Soviet control of all of
Europe after the Second World War. Those parts the Soviets did
control are now much whiter than those that were dominated by
the United States. Some Western Europeans are moving to Eastern
Europe to escape the American-style racial diversity that is now
a feature of many formerly white nations. If American thinking
spreads into Eastern Europe, those countries, too, will
gradually be obliterated.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Should Whites Put America First? Peter Bradley, American
Renaissance, March 2022
HTML https://www.amren.com/features/2022/03/should-whites-put-america-first/
#Post#: 29383--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: February 15, 2025, 7:26 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/58139659efa5f3efbdb7365849e4132e/b7d0a7b3c906758f-2b/s1280x1920/63999ac0852318e35b2ab02016a640e81bb50faa.jpg
#Post#: 29386--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: February 15, 2025, 10:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Thus, what was Hitler trying to destroy by invading Russia?
#Post#: 29442--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: February 24, 2025, 2:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Democracy and Communism corrupting Socialism
--- Quote ---
> Of course, this background of authoritarian socialism and
slavocratic plantation life had to be concealed for clear
reasons. If the ugly institution of slavery were ever to be
publicly associated with socialism and communism, the modern
left’s house of cards would tumble into the garbage pail of
history. The public would quickly realize that Progressive
political leaders have been crafting legislation and
bureaucratic excesses to compel people to strictly obey the
government, and by doing so, have made the public dependent upon
the largesse of these egalitariansounding slave masters. In the
statist Left’s reactionary crusade against liberal polity, the
peddlers of involuntary servitude have engaged in political
agendas where the state seeks power over people, not power from
people.
>
> This kinship to socialism and slavery dates back to the era of
Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, both of whom regularly twisted
the meaning of liberty, democracy, and equality to pander an
authoritarian socioeconomic agenda. For instance, Marx supported
slavery in America, writing in 1846 that:
>
> Without slavery there would be no cotton, without cotton there
would be no modern industry. It is slavery which has given value
to the colonies. . . Slavery is therefore an economic category
of paramount importance. Without slavery, North America, the
most progressive nation, would be transformed into a patriarchal
country
>
> ...
>
> Engels added another dimension to his beloved socialization of
society. Servitude to the public collective was not optional;
everyone had to forcibly follow his value system (moral
valuism). Everyone had to conform and behave under an ambiguous
schema of democratic dictatorship, effectively hogtying
individuals to each other, as if mere beasts of burden, herded
under heavy guard. To bring about this lifelong “communal
yokism,”[3] an authoritarian, socialist framework had to be
established. Similar to how blacks were treated under a
plantationdominated society, the general populace had to be
ruled and disciplined, and they were obliged to obey the
plantation’s communal overseer. These allegedly enlightened
overseers were empowered to rule everyone, because rights were
seen as social and collective, not individual. To collectivists,
one must be confined by communal values and needs. Here,
individual choice has no role, and individual lives must be
superseded by a compulsory, communal solidarity, on the
communist-servant plantation.
>
> ...
>
> Once this proslavery link to socialism was detected in recent
years, scholars began to piece together the modern-statist
Left’s nefarious past. As it turns out, historically, the roots
of the slavocracy Left are traceable to the forbears of the
Democratic Party, who actively supported enslavement, lynching,
segregation, racism, welfarism, proto-socialism, paternalism,
and white supremacy before and after the American Civil War. In
this sense, the beginning of the Democratic Party in the late
1820s represents the start of an anti-Founders movement
initiated to invalidate the original intent of the creators of
liberal capitalism and selfownership. Nevertheless, most
Democrat Party members are unaware of this slavery-socialist
origin of their own party. Many of these rank-and-file members
are more in tune with the traditional sentiments of tax-cutting,
civil rights, and the soft classical liberalism of President
John F. Kennedy
>
> ...
>
> After the Confederate States of America lost the Civil War in
1865, it was the Democratic Party which took center stage in
opposing any civil rights protections for blacks. They opposed
the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which the Republican Congress
passed, over President Andrew Johnson’s veto. The law was simple
and pertinent; it was “designed to provide blacks with the right
to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as
witnesses in a legal proceeding.”[16]
>
> Worse still, it was the Democratic Party which founded the Ku
Klux Klan in order to keep blacks suppressed and to keep them
from owning guns. According to Eric Foner, professor of history
at Columbia University:
>
> In effect, the Klan was a military force serving the interests
of the Democratic party, the planter class, and all those who
desired the restoration of white supremacy. It aimed to destroy
the Republican party’s infrastructure, undermine the
Reconstruction state, reestablish control of the black labor
force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of
Southern life.[17]
>
> Likewise, Allen W. Trelease, professor emeritus of history at
the University of North Carolina, documented the same offensive
history, writing that during this period, “the Klan became in
effect a terrorist arm of the Democratic party.”[18]
>
> ...
>
> Obviously, collectivism, which has deep roots in racism, was a
determining factor, which eventually drove the statist Left to
take over the anti-gun issue from white supremacists. This
change is most revealing, as it highlights the collectivist
Left’s reactionary mindset, which reflected the racists’ fear of
the inability to control inferiors. This fear led, in turn, to
the idea that everyone in society should be disarmed in order to
secure obedience to state authority.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Killing History: The False Left-Right Political Spectrum and the
Battle between the 'Free Left' and the 'Statist Left' by Mr.
L.K. Samuels Page 480 - 489
*****************************************************
Page 9 of 9
DIR Previous Page