DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: True Left vs False Left
*****************************************************
#Post#: 25881--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: April 10, 2024, 11:35 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
See also:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/racial-view-of-western-philosopher-from-john-locke-to-karl-marx/msg17367/?topicseen#msg17367
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/racial-view-of-western-philosopher-from-john-locke-to-karl-marx/msg18839/?topicseen#msg18839
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/racial-view-of-western-philosopher-from-john-locke-to-karl-marx/msg24541/#msg24541
#Post#: 27507--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: August 22, 2024, 9:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Communism only cares about the productive workers, of course,
the people whose productivity is better will be good according
to communism, even though they have bad morality and low quality
on understanding integrationist society
--- Quote ---
> In the United States, the class warfare was also racial. There
were riots in East St. Louis, Illinois, in 1917 when white
workers on strike against the Aluminum Ore Company beat and
lynched black strikebreakers. White vigilantes murdered at least
40 blacks and burned their homes.
>
> The worst of some 25 race riots during the “Red Summer of
1919” began after blacks on the south side of Chicago blamed a
white man when a black teenager drowned at a whites-only beach.
About 15 whites and 23 blacks died, and arson left 1,000 black
families homeless.
>
> ...
>
> In South Africa, what is called the Rand Rebellion was a
combination of racial and class grievances. According to one
historian, this 1922 revolt “was a fundamental moment in the
labour history of the country,” and its primary cause “was the
fear that white mineworkers would be replaced by black
employees” [3]. For much of the conflict, “workers’ violence . .
. remained . . . solely between white workers and their
employers.” [4]. However, as the rebellion reached its climax,
white strikers and militants attacked black workers.
>
> The rebellion began in the gold mines of Witwatersrand (“the
Rand”). Shortly before the strike, those mines had enjoyed a
“second industrial revolution,” in which scientific management
and new techniques of gold extraction meant that already-wealthy
mine owners became rulers of mega-corporations [5]. Many were of
English ancestry, whereas the mine workers were mostly
Afrikaners. White workers, whether Afrikaner or Anglo, were a
“labour aristocracy” compared to black workers, who were paid
practically nothing [6].
>
> ...
>
> The South African Communist Party (SACP), then led by English
immigrant William Andrews, called a strike in the Rand. The SACP
and its syndicalist allies had ambitious goals: They wanted
regime change in the Transvaal and ultimately a pro-Bolshevik
government for the Union of South Africa [8]. The SACP under
Andrews openly derided black workers as “kaffirs” who took jobs
from whites. This attitude helped to foster an alliance between
the SACP and Afrikaner nationalists in the National Party, who
saw the rebellion as a fight for the Volk against both rapacious
Anglo capitalists and black “scabs” [9].
>
> ...
--- End Quote ---
Source :
When Communists Fought for White Workers by Sinclair Jenkins,
American Renaissance, April 29, 2020
HTML https://www.amren.com/features/2020/04/when-communists-fought-for-white-workers/
#Post#: 27612--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: August 28, 2024, 1:51 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The Evilness of Karl Marx
"The only thing requiring explanation is the good side of
slavery. I do not mean indirect slavery, the slavery of the
proletariat; I mean direct slavery, the slavery of the Blacks in
Surinam, in Brazil, in the southern regions of North America."
"Direct slavery is as much the pivot upon which our present-day
[size=12pt]industrialism turns as are machinery, credit, etc.
Without slavery there would be no cotton, without cotton there
would be no modern industry. "It is slavery which has given
value to the colonies... Slavery is therefore an economic
category of paramount importance. "Without slavery, North
America, the most progressive nation, would be transformed into
a patriarchal country." "Only wipe North America off the map and
you will get anarchy, the complete decay of trade and modern
civilization. But to do away with slavery would be to wipe
America off the map." - Karl Heinrich Marx[/size]
Source :
1. Karl Marx, quoted from Samuels, "Killing History," p361.
(Alternative translation from: marxist.org, Karl Marx, "The
Poverty of Philosophy," Chapter Two: The Metaphysics of
Political Economy.
httos://www.marxists.ora/archive/marx/works/1847/novertv-nhilosonhv/ch02.him/s4
2. The REAL ‘life’ of KARL MARX TIKhistory (Minute 1:07:53)
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnwC8WxKMMc&t=4073s
Karl Marx and Marxism were part of Western Civilization
#Post#: 28015--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: September 26, 2024, 9:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Democracy, Social Democrat and Marxism corrupting Leftism
Universalism
--- Quote ---
> She joined the East German Communist party just before the
Berlin Wall fell, and became an intellectual.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/5-415x600.jpg
>
> Her master’s thesis in 1996 on the Young Karl Marx’s
interpretation of Hegel was so insightful it was published as a
book.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/6-768x302.png
>
> She was, and still is, a Marxist, which is a wrong but serious
view of the world. To use the term to describe nitwits like
Kamala Harris and BLM rowdies is an insult to Marxists.
>
> But Sahra has been consistently Old Left: in favor of workers’
rights and welfare, and suspicious of the United States,
capitalism, and big business. In 2017, she called for the
dissolution of NATO, and for closer ties with Russia, which she
sees as a natural energy supplier. ...
>
> In 2016, Sahra criticized Angela Merkel for letting in so many
Syrians. She believes that “the stronger the welfare state, the
more of a sense of belonging there must be, because if people
have no connection to those who receive social benefits, then at
some point they will refuse to pay for those benefits.”
>
>
HTML hhttp://ttps://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/15-1-768x184.png
>
> What an idea. You can give Syrians German citizenship but that
won’t make them German.
>
> ...
>
> Sahra thinks The Greens are the worst.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/19-768x512.jpg
>
> They started out as pacifists and environmentalists but were
behind the destruction of the German nuclear generation industry
– which Sahra thought was vital for the economy and good for
workers – and the greens are now ferocious warmongers against
Russia. She calls them “the most hypocritical, most aloof, most
mendacious, most incompetent and, measured by the damage they
cause, also the most dangerous party we currently have in the
Bundestag.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20-768x551.png
>
> That was thought to be especially bad because the most
dangerous party is supposed to be the nationalist Alternative
for Germany.
>
> ...
>
> A similar politician is Robert Fico, prime minister of
Slovakia.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/29-zuma-1-768x512.jpg
>
> He was born in 1964 in Communist Czechoslovakia, got a
doctorate in law in 1986, and joined the Communist Party. After
the collapse of the regime in 1989, just like Sahra, he stayed
in the Communist’s successor party, which was called the Party
of the Democratic Left.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/30-768x512.jpg
>
> After Slovakia separated from the Czech Republic, and as open
commies fell out of favor, again like Sahra, he started a new
leftist party known by its initials SMER.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/31-zuma-1-768x512.jpg
>
> He has been consistently Old Left, fighting for workers’
rights, union power, increased severance pay, and generous
leave. And he wants no immigrants, certainly not Muslims. “Islam
has no place in this country,” he says, adding that Slovakia
would not accept “one single Muslim.”
>
> ...
>
> When the EU first talked about forcing member countries to
accept quotas of immigrants, he said, “As long as I am prime
minister, mandatory quotas will not be implemented on Slovak
territory.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/34-768x679.png
>
> ...
>
> The Social Democrat prime minister of Denmark is another lefty
who understands immigration.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/41-zuma-768x512.jpg
>
> Here is The Guardian, worrying about “Mette Frederiksen: the
anti-immigration left leader set to win power in Denmark.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/42.png
>
> She takes the standard Old Left position: “Unregulated
globalisation, mass immigration and the free movement of labour
is paid for by the lower classes.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/44-768x327.png
>
> American lefties used to understand this. “For years, Bernie
Sanders warned that increased immigration would lower the wages
of U.S. workers. Now he barely mentions it.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/45-768x554.png
>
> Some of you remember Pim Fortuyn of the Netherlands.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/46.jpg
>
> He started off as a Marxist – the real kind – and became a
member of the Dutch Labor Party.
>
> ...
>
> Fortuyn thought immigration could completely change Dutch
society and said, “’I have no desire to go through the
emancipation of women and homosexuals all over again.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/48-768x132.png
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Allies on the Left - Jared Taylor, American Renaissance,
September 19, 2024
HTML https://www.amren.com/videos/2024/09/allies-on-the-left/
How can the German Green Party's Worldview be closer to Hitler
rather than Marx? If Marx represent "The Old Left", then Hitler
represent "The New Left"
#Post#: 28229--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 10, 2024, 8:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: antihellenistic link ---
>
> Democracy, Social Democrat and Marxism corrupting Leftism
Universalism
>
> [quote]She joined the East German Communist party just before
the Berlin Wall fell, and became an intellectual.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/5-415x600.jpg
>
> Her master’s thesis in 1996 on the Young Karl Marx’s
interpretation of Hegel was so insightful it was published as a
book.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/6-768x302.png
>
> She was, and still is, a Marxist, which is a wrong but serious
view of the world. To use the term to describe nitwits like
Kamala Harris and BLM rowdies is an insult to Marxists.
>
> But Sahra has been consistently Old Left: in favor of workers’
rights and welfare, and suspicious of the United States,
capitalism, and big business. In 2017, she called for the
dissolution of NATO, and for closer ties with Russia, which she
sees as a natural energy supplier. ...
>
> In 2016, Sahra criticized Angela Merkel for letting in so many
Syrians. She believes that “the stronger the welfare state, the
more of a sense of belonging there must be, because if people
have no connection to those who receive social benefits, then at
some point they will refuse to pay for those benefits.”
>
>
HTML hhttp://ttps://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/15-1-768x184.png
>
> What an idea. You can give Syrians German citizenship but that
won’t make them German.
>
> ...
>
> Sahra thinks The Greens are the worst.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/19-768x512.jpg
>
> They started out as pacifists and environmentalists but were
behind the destruction of the German nuclear generation industry
– which Sahra thought was vital for the economy and good for
workers – and the greens are now ferocious warmongers against
Russia. She calls them “the most hypocritical, most aloof, most
mendacious, most incompetent and, measured by the damage they
cause, also the most dangerous party we currently have in the
Bundestag.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/20-768x551.png
>
> That was thought to be especially bad because the most
dangerous party is supposed to be the nationalist Alternative
for Germany.
>
> ...
>
> A similar politician is Robert Fico, prime minister of
Slovakia.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/29-zuma-1-768x512.jpg
>
> He was born in 1964 in Communist Czechoslovakia, got a
doctorate in law in 1986, and joined the Communist Party. After
the collapse of the regime in 1989, just like Sahra, he stayed
in the Communist’s successor party, which was called the Party
of the Democratic Left.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/30-768x512.jpg
>
> After Slovakia separated from the Czech Republic, and as open
commies fell out of favor, again like Sahra, he started a new
leftist party known by its initials SMER.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/31-zuma-1-768x512.jpg
>
> He has been consistently Old Left, fighting for workers’
rights, union power, increased severance pay, and generous
leave. And he wants no immigrants, certainly not Muslims. “Islam
has no place in this country,” he says, adding that Slovakia
would not accept “one single Muslim.”
>
> ...
>
> When the EU first talked about forcing member countries to
accept quotas of immigrants, he said, “As long as I am prime
minister, mandatory quotas will not be implemented on Slovak
territory.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/34-768x679.png
>
> ...
>
> The Social Democrat prime minister of Denmark is another lefty
who understands immigration.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/41-zuma-768x512.jpg
>
> Here is The Guardian, worrying about “Mette Frederiksen: the
anti-immigration left leader set to win power in Denmark.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/42.png
>
> She takes the standard Old Left position: “Unregulated
globalisation, mass immigration and the free movement of labour
is paid for by the lower classes.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/44-768x327.png
>
> American lefties used to understand this. “For years, Bernie
Sanders warned that increased immigration would lower the wages
of U.S. workers. Now he barely mentions it.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/45-768x554.png
>
> Some of you remember Pim Fortuyn of the Netherlands.
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/46.jpg
>
> He started off as a Marxist – the real kind – and became a
member of the Dutch Labor Party.
>
> ...
>
> Fortuyn thought immigration could completely change Dutch
society and said, “’I have no desire to go through the
emancipation of women and homosexuals all over again.”
>
>
HTML https://www.amren.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/48-768x132.png
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Allies on the Left - Jared Taylor, American Renaissance,
September 19, 2024
HTML https://www.amren.com/videos/2024/09/allies-on-the-left/
How can the German Green Party's Worldview be closer to Hitler
rather than Marx? If Marx represent "The Old Left", then Hitler
represent "The New Left"
[/quote]
Rightist begin to embrace East Germany's Communism because it's
commitment to preserve "White Homogeneity"
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/4c6b278ab1870a0e6bfcb51e19213bd0/ba0a79c84f3c30f6-4e/s1280x1920/051ca7e0b4b57280331c07419980cb8b3a59ba38.jpg
Source :
HTML https://t.me/Stalinist_Revisionist_Channel/1264
#Post#: 28230--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 10, 2024, 9:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Mao Zedong's Social Darwinist Worldview exposed
--- Quote ---
> Mao Zedong, among many other Chinese Communist leaders, was
influenced by Darwin and many other Darwinist authors such as
Huxley and Hubert Spencer. Mao viewed, “Darwin, as presented by
the German Darwinists, asthe foundation of Chinese scientific
socialism”. The policies advocated by under Mao were reflective
of Darwinist doctrine with his open support for "selection of
the fittest" as a method to achieve world communism. Kenneth
Hsü, a student in China during the 1940s, illustrated that, "we
were victims of a cruel social ideology that assumes that
competition among individuals, classes, nations, or races is the
natural condition of life, and that it is also natural for the
superior to dispossess the inferior." Hsü observed that Mao was
convinced that humans would degenerate without the implication
of natural selection. College students in China also supported
Darwinism.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
The Darwin Effect - Its Influence on Nazism, Eugenics, Racism,
Communism, Capitalism and Sexism Page 304 and 305
HTML https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Darwin_Effect/uiuiBAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
#Post#: 28255--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 11, 2024, 8:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Exposing Marxism's worldview which resulting social
discrimination, aggressivism, and human barbarism
--- Quote ---
> Marx identified “race” as one of the natural “physical
conditions” that influences the productivity of labor. That
productivity, in itself, was critical to social development.57
Somehow or other, it would seem, racial traits influenced the
very fundamentals of human social life. Engels, in his fullest
maturity, in the year before his death, did speak of “economic
conditions” as the factor that ultimately shapes historical
development, to quickly add, “but race is itself an economic
factor.”58
>
> ...
>
> Marx’s comments concerning some of the properties displayed by
workingmen’s castes and guilds as they have arisen, and been
sustained, in history. In various cultures, the members of
castes and guilds display proficiencies of performance that
distinguish them from other members of society. In making
reference to those proficiencies, Marx spoke of “the natural
laws” that “regulate” them. Differential performance is the
result of natural laws. They are the same natural laws that
“regulate the differentiation of plants and animals into species
and varieties.” Marx clearly seemed to identify those laws, that
made caste and guild members what they were, as the same
“natural laws” responsible for hereditary biological variation
and speciation
>
> ...
>
> ...If technological innovation moved history,61 and
genetically determined talents supply innovation, Marxists would
have to try to understand how differential talents arise—in
individuals as well as groups of individuals.62 To explain the
course of history, one would have to explain the course of
technological innovation. To explain the course of innovation,
one would have to explain the rise and prevalence of individual
and collective innovative talent...
>
> ...Darwinian “natural laws,” minimally, conditioned those
social laws Marx and Engels had made the basis of historical
materialism ... technological invention and development, the
foundation of historical materialism, to be the result of human
creativity and talent, differentially distributed among extant
human races
>
> ...
>
> There was more than a suggestion of differential creative
potential among peoples in the writings of Marx and Engels. In a
letter to Engels, dated the second of December 1847, for
example, Marx wrote that “the Spaniards are indeed degenerate.
But a degenerate Spaniard, a Mexican, that is the ideal. All
vices of the Spaniards—boastfulness, grandiloquence, and
quixoticism—are found in the Mexicans raised to the third
power.” Nor did that seem to be the result of a fit of pique,
for Engels expressed some very similar judgments in a communique
on the U.S.-Mexican war he provided for publication.
>
> In his account, Engels opined that the American expansion into
the West and Southwest of North America served “the interests of
civilization,” since “the lazy Mexicans . . . did not know what
to do with it.” The “energetic Yankees,” on the other hand,
opened the entire region to trade and industry. Engels was
convinced that more highly developed industrial nations were
destined to bind “tiny, crippled, powerless little nations
together in a great Empire, and thereby [enable] them to take
part in an historical development which, if left to themselves,
would [remain] entirely foreign to them!”65
>
> Both Marx and Engels seemed convinced that there were
“peoples” who “have never had a history of their own” and who
were destined to be “forced into the first stages of
civilization through a foreign yoke, have no vitality, [and]
will never be able to attain any sort of independence.”66 Marx
spoke of the Chinese as being afflicted with “hereditary
stupidity,” while Engels deemed the Slavs of Eastern and
Southeastern Europe to be nothing more than “ethnic trash.”67
>
> Both founders of Marxism conceived of a class of peoples as
“historyless,” as somehow deficient in energy, who entered
history only through the agency of “more vital” agents—to be
“absorbed” into “more energetic stock.”68 Engels regularly spoke
of Slavs as “dying,” “retrograde” peoples, as “phthisical
bodies,” to enter history only through the “mighty Germans,” to
remain forever as “ethnographic monuments” within the German
Empire. 69 He seemed to imagine that only the Germans were
capable of saving civilization, for he argued that when it is a
“question of saving European civilization, what [matters] the
fate of a few nationalities?”
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Marxism, Fascism, and Totalitarianism: Chapters in the
Intellectual History of Radicalism by A. James Gregor Page 76 -
80
Marxism is Part of Western Civilization
#Post#: 28272--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 13, 2024, 7:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Stalinist-Marxist ideology led into enhancement of Western
Civilization and birth of Duginism
Therefore, Marxism is fake socialism
--- Quote ---
> Russian Westernizers, from liberals to social democrats, who
insisted that Russia is part of Western European civilization
and not something original or independent. Therefore, Russia’s
task was to follow the West in all spheres: political, cultural,
scientific, social, economic, and technological. Russian
Westernizers fully embraced the principles of the Enlightenment
and modern science, accepted the theory of linear progress, and
agreed that the Western path of development is universal and
global, as well as that Western values must be adopted by all
peoples and societies. This perspective dismissed Russia’s
uniqueness and, on the contrary, described it as a backward and
peripheral society, subject to modernization and Westernization.
>
> At the same time, in the 19th century, Russian Westernizers
had already split into social democrats and liberals. The former
believed that the future lay with a socialist society, while the
latter saw it in capitalism. However, both groups were united in
their unwavering belief in the universality of the Western
European development path. They viewed Russia’s traditional
values and unique identity as obstacles to progressing along
this Western path.
>
> During the Soviet era, Marxist ideology, inheriting the
social-democratic and communist version of Westernism, dominated
in Russian society.The fierce confrontation with the capitalist
world and the conditions of the “Cold War” after 1947 introduced
a certain element into Soviet ideology that resonated with the
civilizational approach of the Slavophiles and Eurasianists,
although this was never officially acknowledged. The
Eurasianists themselves objectively noted this transformation of
Marxism in Soviet Russia, where gradually — especially during
Stalin’s rule — there was a return to imperial geopolitics and
partially to traditional values. However, from the standpoint of
state ideology, this civilizational factor was not recognized,
and Soviet leaders continued to insist on the international (in
essence, Western-universalist) nature of socialism and
communism, refusing to acknowledge the Russian dimension of
“Soviet civilization.”
>
> Nevertheless, the USSR developed a scientific system of
critique against bourgeois society, allowing for a certain
distance from the ideological codes of Western civilization in
its liberal form, which dominated the U.S. and Europe after the
defeat of Nazi Germany. However, Russia’s own historical path
was still interpreted exclusively in class terms, which
distorted the presentation of domestic history to the point of
unrecognizability, reducing it to a Western framework that did
not work. Still, Soviet social sciences maintained some distance
from the dominant ideology of Western liberalism, even though
they shared the dogmas of progress, Enlightenment, and the main
assumptions of the modern era. They accepted the historical
necessity of capitalism and the bourgeois system but only as
precursors to proletarian revolutions and the building of
socialism.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Dugin, A. (2024, September 25). Westernology: Towards a
Sovereign Russian Science. Retrieved October 14, 2024, from
Arktosjournal.com website:
HTML https://www.arktosjournal.com/p/westernology
Adolf Hitler warned us about Stalin and Russia
--- Quote ---
> Stalin pretends to have been the herald of the Bolshevik
revolution. In actual fact, he identifies himself with the
Russia of the Tsars, and he has merely resurrected the tradition
of Pan-Slavism. - Adolf Hitler, 5th January 1942
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Hitler's Table Talk 1941-1944: Secret Conversations edited by
Trevor-Roper Page 182
‌
#Post#: 28301--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 15, 2024, 9:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Communist Philosophical Worldview led into Western Darwinian
Discriminative and Oppressive Society
--- Quote ---
> As a sometimes Darwinist, Dietzgen began his revised account
of the science of Marxian ethics with the conviction that human
welfare, the basis of materialist ethics, was shaped by the
natural imperative to survive.46 In The Communist Manifesto,
Marx had, in fact, alluded to the reality that in contemporary
“bourgeois society,” because of the exploitative nature of the
economic system, the proletarians were threatened with
extinction—a circumstance that did, in fact, engage their
instinctive will to survive.47
>
> ...
>
> Thus, from the ultimate and absolute moral principle of
biological development, one could proceed to deal with the
successive stages of societal evolution—which followed
essentially the same developmental processes. Progressive social
evolution took place through the competition of groups that
characterized the history of communal life. Evolving social life
required productive systems that serviced life lived in
collectivities. Meeting those needs thus become moral
responsibilities—and find expression in collective
consciousness. Ethical dictates, moral imperatives, customary
deportment, deferential conduct, and all the familiar patterns
of proper behavior are directly or indirectly the “reflection”
of particular social and productive needs—at particular historic
junctures—within the unfolding mode of production—all as social
reflections on the realities of Darwinian evolution.
>
> Given such an evolutionary perspective, one can argue that
primitive modes of production promote corresponding primitive
modes of conduct—that are at a survival disadvantage when
confronted by more advanced modes. The barbarism of primal
peoples, the savagery and superstition, the oppression and the
exploitation, is a reflection of the primitive mode of material
production— destined to fail in the competitive struggle for
existence. Only the full maturation of the economic base of
society would produce the more advanced, and eminently
survivable, “really human moral order”
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Marxism, Fascism, and Totalitarianism: Chapters in the
Intellectual History of Radicalism by A. James Gregor Page 43,
45, and 46
#Post#: 28329--------------------------------------------------
Re: Communism
DIR By: antihellenistic
Date: October 19, 2024, 1:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Karl Marx Supported British Colonialism in India for the sake of
Expanding Western Progressivism
--- Quote ---
> Karl Marx calls replacement of Hindu Spinner & Weaver’s as
semi-barbarian & semi civilized community. He saw their removal
by British as the only social revolution ever heard in Asia.
(PS: Marx appeared highly racist)
>
>
HTML https://samvadaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/3-1024x576.jpg
>
> Humiliated Hindu beliefs
>
> Then Karl Marx goes on to humiliate Hindu beliefs of
worshiping Hanuman, Cow & nature. He hints that how British were
eradicating these beliefs.
>
> The great philosopher, Marx was so blinded by faith of Man
being supreme, could not understand depth of nature worshiping.
>
>
HTML https://samvadaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/4-1024x576.jpg
>
> Further Marx states, “England, it is true, in causing a social
revolution in Hindostan…” He found it to be an important
revolution to awake Asia & then quotes Goethe to romanticize,
the India’s plight
>
>
HTML https://samvadaworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/5-1024x576.jpg
>
> This will also give u fair amount of idea, how Marxism carries
so much hatred for Hindu Dharma. Any Marxist who in Kerala seems
to be supporting the “Sabrimala”must be asked if so then how he
aligns with Marx?
>
> You can’t be both Marxist & Hindu.
>
> ...
>
> It seems Marx was celebrating the destruction of Hindu Society
by the British. And was delighted with the stupid idea of
“western materialism” was being embedded in India by British.
--- End Quote ---
Source :
Maldahiyar, Aabhas. (2021). How Karl Marx, the father of
Communism, justified Colonial British rule in India. Accessed on
19th October 2024, from
HTML https://samvadaworld.com/national/how-karl-marx-the-father-of-communism-justified-colonial-british-rule-in-india/
*****************************************************
Page 8 of 9
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page