DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Questions & Debates
*****************************************************
#Post#: 14544--------------------------------------------------
Curse of Ham Verses
DIR By: guest30
Date: July 6, 2022, 9:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Some people consider "The Curse of Ham" verses is not basis of
the justification of Western colonialism. Which in reality, the
Western colonizers use the Old Testament verses, including it,
as their justification of their actions. Like the history about
Francisco Pizarro, the leader of murderous Spanish colonialism
of "North America" for example, which shown on True Left's main
site. They say to me that I'm out of context. Any solutions?
#Post#: 14546--------------------------------------------------
Re: Curse of Ham Verses
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 6, 2022, 10:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/the-curse-of-ham-or-hamitic-myth/
Actually, the Western colonialists who used the Curse of Ham
were already the (comparatively) less racist ones, since at
least it acknowledges that Ham shares ancestry with Shem and
Japheth. The more racist ones preferred:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Identity#Adamites_and_pre-Adamites
--- Quote ---
> A major tenet of Christian Identity is the pre-Adamite
hypothesis. Christian Identity adherents believe that Adam and
Eve were only the ancestors of white people, because according
to Christian Identity, Adam and Eve were preceded by lesser,
non-Caucasian races which are often (although not always)
identified as "beasts of the field" in Genesis 1:25. For
example, the "beasts" which wore sackcloth and cried unto God in
Jonah 3:8 are identified as black races by Christian Identity
adherents.[citation needed] To support their theory on the
racial identity of Adam, Christian Identity proponents point out
that the Hebrew etymology of the word 'Adam' translates as 'be
ruddy, red, to show blood (in the face)' often quoting from
James Strong's Hebrew Dictionary and from this they conclude
that only Caucasians or people with light white skin can blush
or turn rosy in the face (because hemoglobin is only visible
under pale skin).[25]
> ...
> He claimed the pre-Adamite races such as blacks did not have
souls
--- End Quote ---
#Post#: 14639--------------------------------------------------
The Inferiority of Christianity and Bolshevism
DIR By: guest30
Date: July 12, 2022, 10:22 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
"The heaviest blow that ever struck humanity was the coming of
Christianity. Bolshevism is Christianity's illegitimate child.
Both are inventions of the Jew. The deliberate lie in the matter
of religion was introduced into the world by Christianity.
Bolshevism practises a lie of the same nature, when it claims to
bring liberty to men, whereas in reality it seeks only to
enslave them. In the ancient world, the relations between men
and gods were founded on an instinctive respect. It was a world
enlightened by the idea of tolerance. Christianity was the first
creed in the world to exterminate its adversaries in the name of
love. Its key-note is intolerance." - Adolf Hitler
Source : Adolf Hitler - Table Talk page 9 paragraph 2
My logic is :
The Christians were passive during colonial era. Even many of
them silent, and support the colonialist to oppress the
innocents. And the result of their indifference and ignorance is
the rise of Bolshevism, or Communism, which also resulting
another colonialism in the future if they rule the world.
Is that logic true, what about your thoughts on that?
#Post#: 14641--------------------------------------------------
Re: The Inferiority of Christianity and Bolshevism
DIR By: 90sRetroFan
Date: July 13, 2022, 1:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
"The Christians were passive during colonial era."
The true Christians were wiped out before the colonial era
began:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albigensian_Crusade
The Judeo-"Christians" were not passive at all, but very active:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/colonial-era/canada-residential-schools/
It is meaningless to talk about "Christians" without clarifying
whether we are talking about the former or the latter:
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com/true-left-vs-right/right-left-(judeo-)christian-divergence/
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1