DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
True Left
HTML https://trueleft.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Colonial Era
*****************************************************
#Post#: 27677--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: August 31, 2024, 8:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Famously, Himmler was such a Nordicist that upon discovering the
abundance of blondness among Russians etc. during the invasion,
he actually started doubting that they should be considered
inferior. Hitler of course did not care how blond Russians were.
We should also distinguish between Himmler and Rosenberg.
Rosenberg was a Gnostic Christian:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Rosenberg#Religious_theories
[quote]Rosenberg cryptically applauds the early Christian
heretic Marcion (who rejected the Old Testament as well as the
notion of Christ as the Jewish Messiah) and the
Manichaean-inspired, "Aryo-Iranian" Cathari, as being the more
authentic interpreters of Christianity versus historically
dominant Judaeo-Christianity;[notes 10][/quote]
(See also:
HTML https://ihr.org/journal/v04p335_Whisker.html
)
whereas Himmler disliked Christianity altogether:
HTML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heinrich_Himmler#Anti-church_struggle
[quote]In 1937, Himmler declared:
We live in an era of the ultimate conflict with Christianity. It
is part of the mission of the SS to give the German people in
the next half century the non-Christian ideological foundations
on which to lead and shape their lives. This task does not
consist solely in overcoming an ideological opponent but must be
accompanied at every step by a positive impetus: in this case
that means the reconstruction of the German heritage in the
widest and most comprehensive sense.[96]
In early 1937, Himmler had his personal staff work with
academics to create a framework to replace Christianity within
the Germanic cultural heritage.[/quote]
This also explains why Rosenberg remained loyal to Hitler (also
a Gnostic Christian) to the end whereas Himmler did not.
#Post#: 27679--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: August 31, 2024, 8:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
In Hitler's regime, it was the White Germans with their mob-rule
mentality, which make the racial discrimination toward "blacks".
Hitler's government tried anything they could to against it
[quote]Pieken and Kruse:
Whether [blacks in Germany] would have been willing to
participate, considering the circumstances, we will never know;
this new strategy was largely ignored by the populace in any
case. Rejection of dark-skinned people developed a dynamic of
its own; the short-lived [NS] foreign policy maneuvers could not
change this. The foreign office had already determined in 1934
“that Negroes were often insulted and discriminated against, but
mostly, because of public opinion, no business dared to employ
Negroes. Thus, Negroes are deprived of the possibility to earn a
living even inside of Germany.” Officials feared that an
“anxiety among Negroes” could be the result and this could have
“unsavory repercussions” should “the question of a German
mandate in Africa become reality.”
Almost helpless, officials recorded the numerous cases of
assaults and discrimination. More and more dark-skinned workers
were harassed by their coworkers, or were dismissed because of
threats of boycotts by customers. Some of those affected
received monthly stipends from the foreign office or were hired
by the Berlin Friedrich-Wilhelm University as teachers of
oriental languages. But Germans of African origin were
unprotected against daily assaults or insults.
The temporary protection changed nothing: contact with Aryans,
or “mixing” with them was to be avoided. In 1935 it appeared
that a solution could be found when the still popular concept of
the “exhibition of peoples” was revived when in the “German
Africa Show” all “aboriginals from the former colonies living in
Germany” were united in a traveling show with the intent to
“give Negroes something to do” and thus be better able to
control “discrimination” against them. It was of no consequence
to the promoters that the “aboriginals” had never set foot on
African soil and were born in Germany. Most of them joined out
of economic concerns.[/quote]
Source :
Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners
in Hitler's Armed Forces page 52 - 53
Democratic mentality, is the obstacle to the ethical government
#Post#: 27680--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: August 31, 2024, 8:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hitler's opinion on the "colored" and "dark-skinned" people
during the war
[quote]Hitler argued that Germany would never have used black
troops as did the French. He wrote:
The former German colonial policy, like everything we did, was
carried out by halves. It neither increased the settlement area
of the German Reich, nor did it undertake any attempt — criminal
though it would have been — to strengthen the Reich by the use
of black blood. The Askaris in German East Africa were a short,
hesitant step in this direction. Actually they served only for
the defense of the colonies themselves. The idea of bringing
black troops into a European battlefield, quite aside from its
practical impossiblity during the war, never existed even as a
design to be realized under more favorable circumstances, while,
on the contrary, it was always regarded and felt by the French
as the basic reason for their colonial activity.19[/quote]
Source :
1. Hitler's Black Victims Clarence Lusane page 71 – 72
2. Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and
Foreigners in Hitler's Armed Forces page 139
#Post#: 27682--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: August 31, 2024, 11:05 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
WEB Dubois, sociologist expert, historian, and civil rights
activist's view on Hitler
[quote]Du Bois did not disagree. He felt that the “British
Empire has caused more human misery than Hitler will cause if he
lives a hundred years. . . . It is idiotic to talk about a
people who brought the slave trade to its greatest development,
who are the chief exploiters of Africa and who hold four hundred
million Indians in subjection, as the great defenders of
democracy.”89[/quote]
Source :
Race War!: White Supremacy and the Japanese Attack on the
British Empire by Gerald Horne page 143
Kuzniar-Clark - Black Nazis II Ethnic Minorities and Foreigners
in Hitler's Armed Forces page 135
#Post#: 27696--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: September 2, 2024, 2:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hitler and National Socialism's pre-western philosophical
foundations
[quote]Gnostics believe that the Christian God made the material
world is actually the devil or demiurge, and that there's a
truth who's above and behind the Christian God. This demiurge
has trapped our souls in this realm; our bodies are our prisons.
And the True God is not material, and thus believers in the True
God (the Gnostics) want to transcend the material realm, which
will free our bodies, and allow our souls to become one with the
True God. The beliefs of Heraclitus sound extremely similar to
that.[/quote]
(Minute 15:11 - 15:50)
Source :
HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4jOKPpWDr0&t=915s
Broek, "Gnosis and Hermeticism from Antiquity to Modern Times,"
p1, p4, p6, p9. Voegelin, "The New Science of Politics," Kindle
p118.
[quote]"Plato constructed an analogy where the life of man on
earth was equivalent to living inside a cave."
"The inhabitants of the interior of the Platonic cave perceived
shadows projected onto the inner wall by outer beings."
"Among these shadows the cavern dwellers built their own idea of
reality."
"In this analogy, the natural world, corresponding to the
interior of the cave, representing transcendent and perennial
ideas, the real essence of those illusory shadows."
"The Ideal emerged in that moment as a new truth, outside of
nature. In this myth, man and the world became only illusory
shadows of something real."
"The father of all things was thought of from that moment on as
a trans-mundane entity, perfect, without error or defeat."
"The essence of beings became an ideal, an eternal and moral
archetype, good and perfect in itself."
"Metaphysical essence was thought immobile, unchangeable,
incapable of fighting, a conservative entity that was largely
unattainable, as well as transcendent, alien and improper to
man."[/quote]
(Minute 16:05 - 17:20)
Source :
From Plato to Hitler: The Ideological Origins of National
Socialism
Videla, "National Socialism: Its Principles and Philosophy,"
p49.
[quote]"Only the struggle, Polemos, allowed individual beings to
be extracted from that undifferentiated chaos, hence the
diversity of the world. This is what the Greeks called Panta or
"the many"."
"According to the pre-western thinkers, struggle was common to
all beings, and it was considered the essence of the universe,
that which modern philosophers call "Being" "
"That is the reason why Heraclitean thought considered a
shapeless existence, Hen, the "One", as having the same
existential essence as Panta, "the many forms"."
"For Heraclitus, a dualism did not exist between the essence of
beings and their appearance, or between gods and nature."
"In that sense, struggle allowed man to exist and also to
preserve his existence. As stated by the ancient Greeks, Polemos
belongs to us, since we ourselves are conflict."[/quote]
(Minute 17:40 - 18:38)
Source :
Videla, "National Socialism: Its Principles and Philosophy,"
p47-49.
[quote]And so, the philosophical origin of Marxism, National
Socialism and Fascism is Hegel, who's getting his ideas from
Kant, who's looking at St Augustine and Plato and Heraclitus,
and probably also Gnosticism as well. These ideologies are
different denominations of the same religion. They hate each
other, not because they're different, but because they're
competing on the same ground.[/quote]
(Minute 24:06 - 24:29)
#Post#: 27697--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: September 2, 2024, 2:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote]"My German Volksgenossen! The fact that the world is so
against us is all the more reason why we must become a unified
whole... [They] will no longer be able to wipe out the cry for
equal rights in our Volk!" - Adolf Hitler[/quote]
Source :
Hitler, 1 May 1933, quoted from "Adolf Hitler - Collection of
Speeches 1922-1945," PDF p130-131.
#Post#: 27704--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: September 2, 2024, 9:48 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Honest White Nationalist Forum
But they incorrectly consider Hitler as part of Zionism
Exposing Hitler as Zionist
Link/URL :
HTML https://t.me/exposinghitler
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/ae8c11729377eb854f62a4bf5f95ead8/1c2e534120740f95-4b/s1280x1920/d899164fe4bc3f5812f775c4b1014f8f4dea4d01.jpg
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/436e29f9ef81c8fea70ce55f6352f0ac/1c2e534120740f95-7b/s1280x1920/a10499f87cec78533890d77794ab0349e3218b3a.jpg
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/fcc3b2b2c808892606f1cc4bd7ca9338/1c2e534120740f95-7f/s640x960/f9983b5e7882565470aef29250143a40a2fe3aa8.jpg
#Post#: 27706--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: 90sRetroFan Date: September 2, 2024, 10:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
They are BS types who use the term "Zionist" to mean
anti-"white". To them, Operation Gaddafi is also "Zionist". They
call it the Kalergi Plan.
Anyway, HAIL HITLER!
#Post#: 27708--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: September 2, 2024, 10:27 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://64.media.tumblr.com/0530f373d1dc576aff0e365c73f36435/5a90c7d5ca771fc4-f4/s640x960/3d12341c31f3d54d0ee6c82e04497a7a94bffaf5.jpg
#Post#: 27712--------------------------------------------------
Re: Hitler: The Face of Anti-Tribalism
By: antihellenistic Date: September 2, 2024, 11:33 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Exposing Hitler as Zionist - Telegram's post
While White European people were starving for food the Nazi
leaders - Göring, and Hitler, encouraged the Wehrmacht soldiers
to exploit them more
[quote]Even in areas where the military situation was hopeless,
officers responsible for troop welfare continued to pander to
what had quickly become the habitual greed of German soldiers.
In April 1943, encircled army divisions in the Kuban region
along the Black Sea ordered one million small-package stamps
with the inscription “one small package/front-homeland.” In the
winter of 1944-45, the commander of 6,000 soldiers trapped by
British troops on the island of Rhodes distributed some 25,000
such stamps. In October 1944, the Wehrmacht High Command
approved a measure allowing Germans entering occupied Italy to
exchange 100 reichsmarks in RKK certificates for lire and to
spend the money there. The Finance Ministry protested that the
practice would further destabilize the currency and endanger the
supply of basic necessities in Italy, and the decision was
reversed six weeks later.
Private purchases in the month of August 1943 in occupied France
totaled 125 million reichsmarks. Even allowing for the
devaluation of the franc, the equivalent would be hundreds of
millions of dollars today. Private purchases drove up inflation,
disrupted occupation authorities’ attempts to control the
market, and undermined all forms of economic stability.
Stability, however, was precisely what was required to ensure
the long-term exploitation of the resources of an occupied
country. The functionaries responsible for running occupied
economies repeatedly tried to restrict the number of packages
sent through the military postal service and to subject German
soldiers to customs and currency checks. But customs officials
described such checks as “truly precarious” situations that
often led to “unfortunate confrontations” and “rebellion and
insults.” The few occasions when customs officials actually did
confiscate goods or currency inevitably “called forth a general
mood of bitterness among the troops.”
As early as October 1940, to maintain troop morale, Göring had
completely abolished the already liberal limits on what soldiers
could purchase, dismissing “worries raised from various quarters
that stores in the occupied territories would soon be stripped
bare” as “negligible.” In the same breath he condemned “the
measures instituted to enforce restrictions on purchases and
shipments” as “psychologically intolerable.” Instead he ordered
that German soldiers in hostile countries be allowed to buy
everything they could afford, with no greater restrictions than
applied to native citizens. Existing “prohibitions on the
purchases of furs, jewelry, carpets, silks, and luxury items”
were to be “immediately” lifted. Also to be abolished were
restrictions on the numbers of packages soldiers were allowed to
send back home through the military postal service. (Limits on
packages in the other direction were retained.)
Göring used the occasion to formulate what became known as the
“Schlep Decree” (Schlepperlass):“The basic restrictions on the
transport of purchased items by soldiers on leave, etc., are to
be lifted. Soldiers should be allowed to take with them whatever
they can carry so long as it is intended for their own personal
use or that of their dependents.” Göring also ordered the free
shipment through the military postal service of packages
weighing up to 1,000 grams (with 200-gram leeway) “in unlimited
numbers.” On July 14, 1942, customs officials quietly lifted the
regulations governing packages whose weight exceeded that limit.
Taking the same view as most of his soldiers, Hitler praised the
Wehrmacht as “the most natural middleman available to a soldier
who wants to send something to his wife or children.” In the
summer of 1942, he admonished Admiral Erich Raeder: “When
soldiers bring something home from the Eastern Front,” it is “a
bonus that benefits the homeland.” On occasions in which
individual officers and customs officials tried to put a stop to
uninhibited plundering, the Führer vented his rage on behalf of
the troops: “To put it bluntly: What can I take with me from the
East? Treasures of art? They don’t exist. All that’s left is
food to stuff your mouth. Nothing better can happen to it than
that it be given to a soldier’s family here at home.” Around the
same time, Hitler remarked that a soldier on home leave “should
be considered the ideal and simplest means of transport and
should be given as much food as he can physically carry.”
The chief of the Wehrmacht High Command, Field Marshal Wilhelm
Keitel, quickly translated these statements into a personal
decree of the Führer’s. The edict read: “Food, intoxicants, and
tobacco brought back from occupied territories to the Reich by
members of the Wehrmacht on home leave or official business,
insofar as they are carried by hand, are to be made immediately
exempt from all forms of control and confiscation.” In early
August 1942, at a high-level meeting devoted to the topic of
food supplies, Göring returned to the issue. According to the
minutes of the meeting, Göring interjected: “Is the finance
minister in attendance?” The deputy minister replied: “Yes, sir!
Reinhardt here!” Göring then continued: “Mr. Reinhardt, desist
with your customs checks. I’m no longer interested in them. . .
. I’d rather have unlimited amounts of goods smuggled in than
have custom duties paid on nothing at all.”
At the same meeting, Göring issued even more drastic statements.
Angered by occupation authorities who were trying to stabilize
France’s currency to facilitate its long-term exploitation,
Göring thundered:
“It has been said that we need to restrict soldiers’ access to
their pay, or it will cause inflation in France. But inflation
is what I want to see more than anything else. . . . The franc
should be worth nothing more than a sheet of a certain type of
paper used for a specific purpose. That will hit France exactly
the way we want to hit France.”[/quote]
Source :
Hitler's Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi
Welfare State by Gotz Aly page 119 - 121
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page